CONTENTS—

Chap 1 — Illiteracy of the two.

Chap 2 — Chattopadhyay and eroticism.

Chap 3 — The rejection.

Chap 4 — Not Gods but Mortals.

Chap 5 — Murgi mission: Criminal

background.
 Gurave Gāurachandraya Radhikāya
tadālaye Krsnāya Krsna-bhaktāya tad
bhaktāya namo namah

"I offer my humble pranams unto my

Gurudeva, unto Sri Gaurachandra, unto
Sri Radha Krşņa and unto the devotees of
devotees of Sri Krishna"
 गु गौर जयतु। जयतु वै णवधमः। इदं सव
कृ णापणम्।

“May victory be unto Guru and

Gauranga. May the doctrine of
Vaishnavism be triumphant. All this is
thus offered to Krishna, the Supreme
Personality of Godhead.”
 Introduction.
The book is titled as "Overrated", because Vivekananda and his Guru, Ramakrishna
paramahamsa, do not deserve acknowledgement in the quantity they receive from the ignorant
common mass of Hindus. What did the Ramakrishna mission benefit people? Nothing.
Vivekananda himself, so was Ramakrishna, hardcore Non Vegetarians. It doesn't require much
pondering upon them, verily they are inauthentic, their mission is with no grounds, they claim
their founders as God's incarnation, yet have no scriptural proof. RKM may live happily in their
Disney land fantasy world of Biographies, but in reality, RKM is a Joke. The common masses of
the Hindu population consider RKM as the Godfather of Hinduism, it's funny how a 19th century
originated cult is addressed as Hinduism's Godfather. From traditional Advaitins, to Shaktas,
From Vaishnavas to Shaivas, all reject RKM more or less.

In the book we'll be seeing on their philosophical bloopers, RamaKrishna Paramahamsa being
fraudulent, and the like.

Notes.
 "KA" refers to Kathamrita, A five-volume book, written in Bengali by Ramakrishna's direct
disciple Mahendranath Gupta. The Kathamrita was later translated by Swami
Nikhilananda into English under the title "The Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna", Also by Jeffrey
J. Kripal under the title "Kali's child".

 "Sil" Refers to Sil, Narasingha Prosad (1997), Swami Vivekananda: A Reassessment , ...
English translation of Vivekananda's biography.

 Gadadhar Chattopadhyay refers to RamaKrishna paramahamsa, thats his original name.

 Footballananda refers to Vivekananda.

CHAP 1— ILLITERACY OF THE TWO.

According to Scriptures Meat eating is certainly sinful. Even if consumed in restrictions as

prescribed for those in the lower modes of material nature, it's still in the category of being an
obstacle in the path of spirituality by Scriptures.

According to Ayurveda it's unnecessary.

As per Biologists and Anthropologists who study our anatomy and our history, humans are
herbivores who are not well suited to eating meat. Humans lack both the physical
characteristics of carnivores and the instinct that drives them to kill animals.

But to Footballananda (Vivekananda) and his Guru Ramakrishna Paramahamsa (Gadhadhar

Chattopadhyay), Meat eating is considerable. Vivekananda and his master, both shamelessly
were loving beef consumption.

Hilarious justification for meat consumption.

Meat in any way should not be consumed, according to the Scriptures. Vivekananda
(Footballananda) gives excuse of chemistry and biology like Zakir Naik. Both are illiterates in the
field of science, in this there's no tinge of doubt. We shall have a look at their excuses to
consume meat.

Ramakrishna says about Vivekananda—

“He (Vivekananda) has eighteen extraordinary powers one or two of which are sufficient to
make a man famous in the world”, or “He is a burning, roaring fire consuming all impurities to
ashes”, and added, “Even should Naren live on beef and pork, it could not harm in the least the
great power of spirituality within him!”

http://www.ramakrishnavivekananda.info/swamieastwest/2_files/1-10.html

"If one can keep one’s mind steadfast upon God after partaking of beef or of pork, these things
are as good as Havishyanna. But vegetables eaten by a man engrossed in worldliness are no
better than -pork or beef. That you have taken forbidden food does not make any difference to
me. But if any of these (pointing to the other devotees) had done so, I could not even bear to
have them touch me."
 http://www.ramakrishnavivekananda.info/swamieastwest/2_files/1-7.html

Vivekananda says, Complete Works, 4.486-7—

"The taking of life is undoubtedly sinful; but so long as vegetable food is not made suitable to
the human system through progress in chemistry, there is no other alternative but meat-eating.
So long as man shall have to live a Rajasika (active) life under circumstances like the present,
there is no other way except through meat-eating. It is true that the Emperor Asoka saved the
lives of millions of animals, by the threat of the sword; but is not the slavery of a thousand years
more dreadful than that? Taking the life of a few goats as against the inability to protect the
honour of one’s own wife and daughter, and to save the morsels for one’s children from robbing
hands - which of these is more sinful? Rather let those belonging to the upper ten, who do not
earn their livelihood by manual labour, not take meat; but the forcing of vegetarianism upon
those who have to earn their bread by labouring day and night is one of the causes of the loss of
our national freedom. Japan is an example of what good and nourishing food can do."

When asked for scriptural proofs, RKM is dead silent, its only based on speculation as per
likings.

Objection— Ramakrishna comsumed meat only when offered to him, or he offering to Kali.

Refutation— Doesn't matter, it's all excuses.

Skanda Purana, Vaishnava Khanda, 7.9: Vasudev Mahatmya, 6.19-20 States:

"In Your case, who are created out of sattvaguna, the true meaning of the vedas should be
accepted, otherwise, that kind of performance (involving violence) Is not at all proper. to you
who are sattvikas the God is directly Vishnu, the consort of rama. For his gratification one is
authorized to perform a yajna which does not involve any violence. The performance of a
sacrifice by killing a beast, is contrary to dharma in your case, O excellent Suras."

Why call Vivekananda as "Footballananda." ?

Lord Krishna repeatedly says in the Bhagavad Gita, only by devotion, one can understand
Bhagavad Gita, i.e Him. Yet some heretics prefer Gyan Yoga above Bhakti.

Our Vivekananda prefers Body building to understand Bhagavad Gita.

 Vivekananda said—

'First of all, our young men must be strong. Religion will come afterwards. Be strong, my young
friends; that is my advice to you. You will be nearer to Heaven through football than through the
study of the Gita. These are bold words; but I have to say them, for I love you. I know where the
shoe pinches. I have gained a little experience. You will understand the Gita better with your
biceps, your muscles, a little stronger. You will understand the mighty genius and the mighty
strength of Krishna better with a little of strong blood in you. You will understand the
Upanishads better and the glory of the Atman when your body stands firm upon your feet, and
you feel yourselves as men. Thus we have to apply these to our needs."

https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Complete_Works_of_Swami_Vivekananda/Volume_3/Lec
tures_from_Colombo_to_Almora/Vedanta_in_its_Application_to_Indian_Life

Footballananda's uncontrolled senses.

Vivekananda's identity in their respective biographies is that of an incarnation of Lord Jesus,

Shiva, and all one can think of.

Vivekananda's biography, translation by Sil Narasingha prosad (Sil) —

"Vivekananda is seen not just as a patriot-prophet of resurgent India but much more—an
incarnation of Shiva, Buddha and Jesus."

Nikhilananda's translation of Ramakrishna's biography, 1996—

"Perfect from his birth, [Vivekananda] did not need spiritual disciplines for his own liberation.
Whatever disciplines he practiced were for the purpose of removing the veil that concealed, for
the time being, his true divine nature and mission in the world. Even before his birth, the Lord
had chosen him as His instrument to help Him in the spiritual redemption of humanity. "

Yet, in his life he didn't seem as a perfect personality. Once grief-stricken by his father’s death
who was very dear to footballananda, he was dragged by his friends to a brothel. And the Avatar
consumed alcohol.
 Vivekananda's biography, translation by Sil Narasingha prosad (Sil)—

"He (Vivekanada) visited brothels and consumed alcoholic beverages in the company of his
friends"

Later he came back to senses, That's an obvious result of learning football instead of practicing
devotion. Note, its the same footballananda which is claimed to be perfect by birth.

Footballananda's love for Max Muller.

The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda; Volume 6; Conversations and Dialogues; Part IX,
Pages 495-496—

“While our study had proceeded thus for a while, Swamiji (Vivekananda) raised the topic about
Max Müller and continued thus: Well, do you know, my impression is that it is Sayana who is
born again as Max Müller to revive his own commentary on the Vedas? I have had this notion for
long. It became confirmed in my mind, it seems, after I had seen Max Müller. Even here in this
country, you don’t find a scholar so persevering, and so firmly grounded in the Vedas and the
Vedanta. Over and above this, what a deep, unfathomable respect for Shri Ramakrishna! Do you
know, he believes in his Divine Incarnation! And what great hospitality towards me when I was
his guest! Seeing the old man and his lady, it seemed to me that they were living their home-life
like another Vasishtha and Arundhati! At the time of parting with me, tears came into the eyes of
the old man. But what are Varnâshrama and caste divisions to one who is the commentator of
the Vedas, the shining embodiment of knowledge? To him they are wholly meaningless, and he
can assume human birth wherever he likes for doing good to mankind. Specially, if he did not
choose to be born in a land which excelled both in learning and wealth, where would he secure
the large expenses for publishing such stupendous volumes? Didn’t you hear that the East India
Company paid nine lakhs of rupees in cash to have the Rig-Veda published?” Even this money
was not enough. Hundreds of Vedic Pundits had to be employed in this country on monthly
stipends. Has anybody seen in this age, here in this country, such profound yearning for
knowledge, such prodigious investment of money for the sake of light and learning? Max Müller
himself has written it in his preface, that for twenty-five years he prepared only the manuscripts.
CHAP 2 — CHATTOPADHYAY AND EROTICISM.

During Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura’s time, Gaudiya Vaishnava meant Asampradayas

(Unauthorized Sects) such as Baul, Aula, Sakhi-Beki, Jati Gosai, etc. who were all degraded. The
Vaishnavas got no respect. At this time the shaktas became strong from Rama-Krishna-
Vivekananda, and this put further obstructions for the establishment of pure Vaishnava dharma
in Bengal. Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakur preached against all nonsense.

Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakur and Bhaktivinoda Thakur were like the Lions Roaring &
Roaming all over, resulting other beasts frightened. So was the condition with Ramakrishna and
Vivekananda. They used to pay utmost respect to Bhaktivinoda Thakur and Bhaktisiddhanta
Saraswati Thakur, cause they knew their power would be ended by the Dad-Son combo. Both
the parties were resident of bengal and of same time, due to which, Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati
Thakur knew the concealed secrets of Ramakrishna of his time.

Scholars of that time in bengal knew all history of Ramakrishna. He became impotent. He was
woman-hunter and therefore uneducated. In the village he was simply hunting after this low-
class woman. Therefore his brother got him married. When he was married he was impotent. So
therefore he planned, "Oh, I see everyone mother. You are my mother." And people said, "Oh,
he's so realized that even his wife is his mother."

Where is that another person in the Vedic culture, Vyāsadeva and the like, they are also married,
who has called his wife "mother"? one should not call a wife a mother? Is that very great
advancement? But this rascal was impotent, he had no other alternative, so he manufactured
some idea. And people thought, "Oh, he's so devotee of goddess of Kālī that he sees even his
wife as mother."

This is evident that Ramakrishna was impotent not only by scholars of that time, but even by his
photographs that 21st century residents can detect from. RamaKrishna's pics shows he had
breasts in growth, one side was well grown. The growing breast of Ramakrishna Paramahamsa
is caused by hormone imbalance.
It's a fact that such symptoms of breast growth in male can also be due to Gynecomastia.
According to studies, Patients with gynecomastia more frequently reported sexual complaints,
such as severe erectile dysfunction, lower sexual desire and intercourse frequency. Inshort,
Impotence.

Ramakrishna's homosexuality.

Jeffrey John Kripal had translated the "Kathamrita" a five-volume book which is the biography of
Ramakrishna, written in Bengali by Ramakrishna's direct disciple Mahendranath Gupta. The
Kathamrita was later translated by Swami Nikhilananda into English under the title "The Gospel
of Sri Ramakrishna" However, few controversial passages were completely removed by
Nikhilananda. But when Kripal gave his translations to Kathamrita (KA), RK missionaries were
bewildered. RK missionaries tried to put a ban on Kripals book, questioning the translations,
Kripal then improved his translations after apologizing and came up with the 2nd edition of the
same, although many passages of the 1st edition was perfect, many defected.

RK missionaries With their leading agent in this task, Swami Tyagananda & Pravrajika
Vrajaprana tried their best to somehow ban the book. Two attempts have been made to have
the book banned in India itself, the homeland, in 1996 and 2001, but did not pass in the
Parliament because of the authenticity Kripal's translation had. On the contrary, Kripals book
won the American Academy of Religion's History of Religions Prize for the Best First Book of
1995. Kripals translations were supported by the Bengal scholar Brian Hatcher.

According to Kathamrita 4.271 & 4.232, Authentic translation by Kripal, Ramakrishna

paramahamsa describes his Tantrik Sadhana of his days, Ramakrishna himself tells to his
disciple that he used to worship the boy's penis, and used to apply sandolwood paste on them.

Ramakrishna said, KA 4.231—

“A naked person used to stay around—I would play with his little penis with my hand. Then I
would laugh a lot. This naked form used to come out of me. It was in the form of a
paramahamsa—like a boy”

Ramakrishna said, KA 4.232—

“In that state I couldn’t help but worship the little penises of boys with sandal-paste and
flowers”
The bengali term used for penis here is "Dhan", Which is a playful word for penis. But Dhan
literally means wealth or treasure also. However, Penis is the only suitable translation. Wealth
simply doesn't makes sense. This was more or less, but indirectly admitted by Swami
Tyagananda himself. RamaKrishna was from Tantrik background although didn't follow it
properly, is a well known fact. Kripal quotes a ritual from the Yoni-Tantra and proves that
Ramakrishna was performing the same ritual regarding "Dhan". Swami Tyagananda and the like
tried to refute it in their works, but couldn't. They left it saying, it's mental speculation.

KA 4.75—

For Vaishnavacharan, such a faith certainly carried homoerotic dimensions. Ramakrishna, for
example, points out that Vaishnavacharan liked to look at pictures of men (manusha), for they
aroused in him (Ramakrishna) feelings of “tenderness” (komala) and “love” (prema).

Objection— The text has the word "Manusha", Which primarily means Human beings not men,
although men is also a correct translation but is secondary to human being.

 Refutation—

That's difference in interpretation. Both translations as Men or Human beings, are correct. But,
even if we agree that its Human beings, it means he had sexual attraction to both the genders,
which doesn't make any difference. In any case, the argument is defeated.

Chattopadhyay was insane.

Chattopadhyay's insanity can be proven when he used to worship his own parts.

RamaKrishna said, KA 4.106—

“The paramahamsa’s state of madness also used to come [upon me]. I would become mad and
worship my own penis with the awareness that it was Shiva’s penis. This is called the worship
of the living lingam [jivanta linga puja]. And it became adorned with a little pearl! Now I’m not
able to do that”
Objection— Linga doesn't mean the male organ. And It’s customary in India to decorate the
Shivalinga with garlands and ornaments such as necklaces. It's talking of RamaKrishna's Shiva
Linga, How can one interpret "Pearl" On the organ?

 Refutation—

That's partially correct.

However, What can be understood is, its undeniable that linga is a symbolic representation of
the Union of Shiva-Parvati, depicted through organs. Yes, Not literal organ. Many misunderstood
Linga as the organ is a well known fact, Hence the first half of the objection is baseless because
Chattopadhyay can also be one among them. The "Pearl" Here doesn't mean the literal Pearl.
Scholar Narasingha Sil said that in this connection, "Pearl" Is a metaphor used for a ball/drop of
semen. In the section RamaKrishna's sexual comments on deities, it will be proven how
Ramakrishna used Linga for the male organ, because he uses Yoni for female organ very clealy
elsewhere also.

Here's the bengali text of the Verse—

"ekta abar mukta parano hoto"

Mukta means Pearl. But whats significant is, just a single Pearl is not put on Shiva Linga, but
ornaments, a complete set. As "Ekta" Here refers Singular, and Mukta means pearl.

"Paramahamser abar unmader avastha hoy Jokhon unmad holo, shiva-linga

bodhe nijer linga puja kortam"
Here "Unmad" Means madness, this is agreed by Swami Tyagananda too. Hence, on what basis
of logic does a person worships Shiva linga out of madness? Obviously it means penis worship
only, otherwise whats the use of the term "Madness"?

Objection— The translation given by Tyagananda says "Divine Madness", not just madness.

 Refutation—

The bengali text doesn't have any term for "Divine". This entry of "divine" word is based on
personal ambition, just to showcase Chattopadhyay was Saint. But in no way the word unmad is
even remotely close to be used in context with divinity. But cherry on the top, even if we accept
the term "Divine madness", it doesn't prove anything, as Kripal quotes from yoni tantra. Many of
the errors Tyagananda points out are not errors at all but differences of opinion regarding the
interpretation of texts, which, like all texts, can always be interpreted in any number of legitimate
and mutually enlightening ways. Moreover, many of the “translations” he criticizes are not in
fact translations at all but interpretive glosses on particular passages that were never presented
as translations (the “play in Vrindavana” material is a good example of this).

Cheap Mantra

The Gaudiyas chant Hare Krishna Mahamantra, Sri Vaishnavas chant the 1000 names of Vishnu
and Om Namo bhagavate Vasudevaye, and the like. Shaivas chant Om Namah Shivaye. The two
illiterates chanted "Cunt" Means Vagina.

Ramakrishna says, Sil, 1998—

"The moment I utter the word “cunt” I behold the cosmic vagina ... and I sink into it "

Sil, 1998—

"[Ramakrishna] considered swear words [to be] as meaningful as the Vedas and the Puranas
and was particularly fond of performing japa (Chanting) by muttering the word “cunt”.

RamaKrishna's sexual comments on deities.

Ramakrishna always sees " Vagina", "Penis" In everything. So much so that he didn't even have a
pure vision for our deities which are not related to Shakta Tantras much, like Sita.

RamaKrishna says, KA 4.36—

“I had a vision of Sita’s image. I saw that her whole mind dwelt only on Rama. She paid no
attention to her vagina, hands, feet, dress, or ornaments. It was as if her life was filled with
Rama—if Rama were not, if she could not have Rama, she would die!”

Objection— Kripal translates the Bengali word yoni as “vagina.” This is no doubt one meaning of
the word among several others, such as "source"and "birth" or "family lineage." When a Bengali
reads the word yoni in the above passage, he or she is not thinking of Sita’s vagina, that can be
assured. “Family lineage” is the correct meaning for the given context. Ramakrishna is
describing how Sita’s entire mind was centered on Rama: she was completely oblivious of her
own family lineage, her body, her clothes and her ornaments.

 Refutation—

According to the context, it's Vagina. Because RamaKrishna mentions several body parts and
decorations of the body parts like from ornaments. Suddenly adding family lineage out of
nowhere doesn't make sense. "Yoni" Is very well known for Vagina, if Ramakrishna's intention
was pure, he should have used some other word if referring family lineage.
CHAP 3 — THE REJECTION.
Vivekananda is not rejected by Vaishnavas alone. But even Shaktas reject them. Till this extent
that Vivekananda and Ramakrishna from their own Lineage, are rejected.

Here's what an Initiated Shakta from their own Lineage (Indirectly the same Lineage) informs—

"I'm from Tirthanath Sampraday, and we reject the ideology of RK Mission. Their Guru, Sri
Ramakrishnan Paramahanmsa was Shishya of our Paratpar Guru Sri Jagan Mohan Tarkalankar
Mahashay's brother in-law Sri Kenaram Bhattacharya, and yet they're allergic to Purnatantrachar.
They deliberately hide the fact that Thakur and Sri Maa were Kaulas, and pass them as
incarnations of Shiva-Shakti whereas they in reality were Jivanmukta Siddhas. Thakur's Guru's
sister was Shakti of our Paratpar Guru, which is why He's related to our Guru Parampara the way
your cousin will be related to you. But his disciples who rejected His ideology and spread fake
stories about Him are not the folks we'd love to agree with. Tirthanath, Anandanath, Ardhakali,
Sarvananda, Bharti, Giri, Saraswati, and even majority members of Puri Sampradaya (to which
Swami Vivekananda belongs) of Kalikula rejects his Neo-Advaita and anti-Vamachar
philosophy."

One of the Mayawadi leader of this time, Shankaracarya Nischalananda Saraswati from
Govardhan Math, Puri, rejected Vivekananda openly in one of his speeches which was uploaded
by Govardhan Math's official channel. Here's the Video — https://youtu.be/wlGg2haKsQg

In minute 4:00, Shankaracarya N.S says—

"He (Vivekananda) didn't possess any knowledge or science miracle as it is made out to be;
though he had knowledge, that he is talked about in every home, famous in the whole world; it is
his utter disbelief in Sanatana Varnashrama system which ensured his fame."

Which is quite obvious, because Adi Shankaracarya used to firmly believe the Varnashrama, but
Vivekananda rejected it totally. Smarthas, Shaivas, Vaishnavas, Shaktas, the main four famous
Sects differ from Vivekananda. Traditional Advaitins, Tantrikas, differ from Vivekananda.
Vivekananda openly rejected many Tantrik parts of Tantras as quoted in the beginning of this
chapter, the Tantrik Shakta of his lineage's quotation says. That's evident from RK's Biography
also.
CHAP 4 — NOT GODS BUT MORTALS.

Claim: Ramakrishna was an incarnation of God. So was Vivekananda.

 Refutation: There's no Scriptural proof. Biographies are not held authoritative.

Objection: In the Scriptures, Existing verses regarding Chaitanya Mahaprabhu is predicting him
without name, addressing him as an hidden incarnation, the same can be applied to
RamaKrishna also.

 Refutation:

Prediction related verses in the Scriptures talk of one Avatara not two. The argument is utterly
destroyed here itself, still let's continue. Chaitanya Mahaprabhu is by name mentioned in
Satvata Tantra.

Satvata Tantra 5.43—

tasmin yajanti shri-krishnam

chaitanyakhyam jagad-gurum

pita-varnam tantra-mantrair

namnam shodashabhih samam

"With sixteen holy names of the Lord and with mantras from the Tantras the people in that age
will worship the Lord of the universes, whose complexion is fair and who is named Shri Krishna
Chaitanya."

Satvata Tantra is one of the top 3 oldest Tantras. It is mentioned in Garuda Purana 1.1.16.
Quoted many times by Gaudiya Purv Acaryas. It is also quoted by non-Gaudiya Purv Acaryas like
Vallabhacarya in Srimad Bhagawatam 1.3.1. What more is needed to prove its authenticity?
Satvata Tantra is said to be best and among top 3 Samhitas by Isvara Samhita 1.64. (Here
Samhitas means Tantras only)

According to Srimad Bhagwatam 11.5.32, Mahaprabhu or the hidden incarnation of Krishna

would blast the world with Sankirtan of Hari Naam. Ramakrishna's role is nowhere in Sankirtan.
This is agreed by Ramakrishna himself endlessly in his biography. In the exact near verses,
Bhagvatam describes the complete life of Chaitanya Mahaprabhu (which was explained in
details by Jiva Goswami in his Tattva Sandharbha), exactly but without naming.

But there's one interesting claim the opponent made, why would a RK Follower consider only the
existing verses? As Mahaprabhu was Krishna, his associates are all beyond Prkriti says
Bhagavtam, 11.5.32. Actually every single Incarnation of the Lord descends with divine
companions. Hence, Mahaprabhu's companions wrote the Chaitanya Caritamrita, Chaitanya
Bhagavata, Sandharbhas, Laghu bhagavatamrita, Bhakti Rasamrita Sindhu etc. On that matter,
RKM cannot reject those verse which are not available in the scriptures to this day because they
quoted those Verses.

Objection: Okay, let's change the argument. The argument is Mahaprabhu reincarnated as
Ramakrishna. Mahaprabhu says in Chaitanya Bhagavat that he will again come to the world.
That can be said Ramakrishna.

 Refutation:

First of all, Mahaprabhu didn't say anything such, Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakur destroyed
such claims in his bhasya on Chaitanya Bhagavat. Even if we agree that he did say so for the
sake of argument, Mahaprabhu's teachings are absolutely opposite to Ramakrishna.
Mahaprabhu totally rejected Advaita. Ramakrishna was an Advaitin. Mahaprabhu himself said in
Chaitanya Charitamrita, that one should not accept anyone as an incarnation of Krishna unless
he is mentioned in the Scriptures. Which again contradicts Ramakrishna. There can be infinite
contradictions mentioned, the book will have more 100's of chapters but the list of
contradictions won't end. Why does the teachings of Ramakrishna horribly contradict Krishna's
teachings? Why would Krishna worship Kali when Scriptures say Kali, Durga and all goddesses
are croreth part of Srimati Radha Rani? Srila Prabhupada was predicted by Mahaprabhu as his
senapati Bhakta, but his Senapati Bhakta doesn't accept Ramakrishna as an incarnation of
Krishna.

On this, Srila Prabhupada, the one predicted by Mahaprabhu in Chaitanya Bhagavat as well as
Chaitanya Caritamrita, himself says—
 Srila Prabhupada's Room Conversation -- July 18, 1971, Detroit—

Prabhupāda: Ramakrishna Mission, if I say it frankly, they distorted the Bhagavad-gītā to the
greatest extent. Because they presented somebody, Ramakrishna, as God. Ramakrishna said
that "I am the same Kṛṣṇa, I am the same Rāma," and they accepted it. But one thing is, anybody
can say that "I am the same Rāma, I am the same Kṛṣṇa." First of all we have to see the proof.
So many, there are many ways of to understand. So Ramakrishna Mission is pushing on this
wrong idea. And another thing is that, supposing this Ramakrishna is the same Kṛṣṇa, then the
philosophy is different. Ramakrishna's philosophy and Bhagavad-gītā's philosophy is different,
because Ramakrishna says that you can accept any method, every method is all right. But Kṛṣṇa
says only unto Him, sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇam (BG 18.66). "Give up
everything, simply surrender unto Me." Now Kṛṣṇa says one: "Simply surrender unto Me," and
Ramakrishna says that we can accept anywhere. So which one we shall accept? Kṛṣṇa's or
Ramakrishna's? What is your opinion? If something is spoken by Kṛṣṇa and something is
spoken by Ramakrishna, so which one we shall prefer to accept?

God with Throat cancer.

It's well known regarding the death of Ramakrishna. He suffered from Throat cancer, leading
him to death. That's some modern God.

God who is ugly.

Krishna's incarnations especially in human like forms, always are described as unimaginably
beautiful. I don't think I should prove Ramakrishna was not supremely beautiful, on the contrary,
extremely ugly. This didn't intend to tease or mock him for the material body's appearance. It is
based on philosophy, not personal attacks.
CHAP 5 — MURGI MISSION: CRIMINAL
BACKGROUND.
This chapter was not necessary, because criminals exist in all sects. But it was forced to be
added because of RKM's mockery of ISKCON regarding criminal cases (Most of them are false
though).

Does RKM Itself have a sound criminal background? Decide yourselves, here only 3 cases would
be provided.

Case I
Police had arrested a maharaj of Bankura Ramakrishna Math and Mission on charges of raping
a class IX girl student on the Mission campus at Ashrampara in Bankura town. The accused,
Snehasish maharaj, was arrested by police from Memari in Burdwan last night after he fled
there to escape the wrath of the family members and neighbours of the victim girl. In the FIR
lodged at Bankura Sadar police station, the girl’s father had complained that Snehasish maharaj,
who has been the in-charge of the library at Bankura Ramakrishna Mission, raped his daughter
when she used to go there to attend coaching class and access the library.

It has been alleged in the complaint that maharaj raped the class IX girl repeatedly for one
month and captured her nude photo and video on his mobile phone. He also threatened the girl
not to tell about their physical relationship to anyone, else he would disseminate the video and
photographs. Fearing this, the 15-year-old kept mum and did not reveal anything even to her
mother. But recently her mother somehow sensed that there was something wrong with her
daughter and began to quiz her leading to the revelation of what she could not even imagined in
her nightmare. Subsequently, her father informed about this to his relatives and neighbours who
went to the Bankura Ramakrishna in groups yesterday. But by then, the accused maharaj had
fled. The father then lodged the FIR and police arrested him on 20 October 2016, from Memari
in Burdwan.

The accused was produced before the Bankura district court today and the judge sent him to
judicial custody until 02 November. The victim girl has been referred to a medical examination.

Case II
A lady who had been raped, a deekshita at the Ramakrishna Mission, and had been initiated by
the guru maharaj of the Ramakrishna math.
Case III
Sarthak Majumdar, a first-year student of electronics and telecommunications engineering at
Ramakrishna Mission Shilpamandira, had been found dead (Murdered) in a pond on campus.
 गु गौर जयतु। जयतु वै णवधमः। इदं सव
कृ णापणम्।
“MAY VICTORY BE UNTO GURU AND
GAURANGA. MAY THE DOCTRINE OF
VAISHNAVISM BE TRIUMPHANT. ALL THIS IS
THUS OFFERED TO KRISHNA, THE SUPREME
PERSONALITY OF GODHEAD.”