S.NO.

AUTHOR TITLE YEAR DIMENSION SCALE SUMMERY

1. Xianfeng Yu, Interference effects 2018 100mm x 100mm 1:400

Zhuangning Xie, between two tall in plan
Ming Gu buildings with different 600mm in height,
section sizes corresponding to
on wind-induced full-scale
acceleration dimensions of 40m
x 40m x 240m
based on a length
scale of 1:400
2. Gang Hu , Deep learning-based 2020 70 m breadth, 1:400
Lingbo Liu investigation of wind 70 m depth,
Dacheng Tao , pressures on tall building 280 m height
Jie Song , K.T. under
Tse , K.C.S. interference effects
Kwok
3. Yi Hui , Interference effects 2013 210 mm wide, 1:400
AkihitoYoshida, between two rectangular- 70 mm deep
YukioTamura section high-rise 280 mm high.
buildings on local peak
pressure coefficients
4. Yi Hui, Mutual interference 2012 2.2m wide 1:400
YukioTamura, effects between two 1.8m high.
AkihitoYoshida high-rise building
models with different
shapes on local peak
pressure coefficients
5. Y. Hui, Y.Tamura, Pressure and flow field 2013 2.2 m wide 1:400
A.Yoshida, investigation of 1.8 m high.
H.Kikuchi interference effects on
external pressures
between high-rise
buildings
6. Z.N. Xie , M. Mean interference 2004 20 m long, 1:400 Shielding and channe
Gu(2004) effects among tall 3 m wide were studied based o
buildings 2 m high interference factor of
,tandem and staggere
arrangement of differ
configuration

Height and breadth r

of interfering buildin
discussed in detail.
7. A.C.Khanduri , Modelling wind induced 1997 ANALYSIS Method to solve inte
C.Bedard, interference effects using cases from limited w
T.Stathopoulos backpropagation neural data by applying neu
 networks ANN can be used for
analysis

8. Yuan-Lung Lo, Effects of aerodynamic 2017 18 x1.8 x2.2 m boundary layer 1:400
Yong Chul Kim, modification wind tunnel
Akihito Yoshida mechanisms on square prism model is 0.07 m
interference from in both width (B) and depth
neighboring buildings (D) and 0.56 m in height (H),
which make the aspect ratio
(H/B) 8.
The tapered model is 0.04 m in
width on the roof-top and 0.10
m in width on the bottom.The
height is the same as the
square one and the aspect ratio
is also 8.
The helical tapered model has
the same geometrical
appearance as the tapered
model but has a helical
twisting angle of 180 degrees
from the bottom to the top.
All the three principal models
are manufactured in the same
volume in order to have a basic
comparison level.
9. Suresh K Experimental study of 2020 full-scale buildings of height 1:300
Nagar1a, wind-induced pressures 180 m
Ritu Raj*2 and on tall buildings of plan area-40000mm
Nirendra Dev2b different shapes height of both model-600