Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Other theories for the origin of black diamonds include: Formation under high
pressure inside the Earth (as with other diamonds); metamorphism induced by
Uncut Black Diamond
meteorite impact; and formation caused by fission of uranium and thorium. Black
diamonds also do not contain traces of “mantle minerals” that are commonly Photo by Rob Lavinsky, iRocks.com –
Although many sources state that the only locations in which black diamonds have been found are Brazil and the Central African
Republic, the uncut stone in the image (below right) is clearly stated by its photographer Rob Lavinsky, a noted authority on minerals, to
have originated in Sierra Leone, a country in the far west of Africa. Other sources state that black diamonds are “almost exclusively”
found in Brazil and Africa but that they are exclusively found in alluvial deposits – placers created by running water – which indicates
they may once have been at the earth’s surface. [5] Black diamonds are not associated with kimberlites or lamproites, which indicates
that a different process led to their formation, [2] however some have been found in placers in which transparent diamonds also
occurred.
Recently, black diamonds were discovered in Yakutia, Siberia. A Gems & Gemology article from 2003 reports on scientific analysis on
these stones, which were found to have a different chemical composition to the African / Brazilian material. [6] Owing to the mineral
differences in the polycrystalline diamonds from Yakutia, the name yakutite has been suggested for these stones; however they are still
considered carbonados, with minor differences to the African / Brazilian kind – and their origin is still described as a “conundrum”. [7]
Overall, black carbonado diamonds exhibit several qualities which are incompatible with formation deep inside the Earth, and this has
led geology professor Stephen E. Haggerty, publishing in the Astrophysical Journal, to the next logical conclusion: That the black
diamond is of extraterrestrial origin. [4] Research using infrared rays (2007) has shown black diamonds to have a chemical spectrum
which includes hydrogen, in an amount which suggests that they may have originated inside a star. [8]
Nonetheless, the black diamond’s origin is still a matter of debate – and other scientists have criticized Haggerty’s theory; posing the
question that if the black diamonds fell as a meteorite, why are most of them so small in size, and why are there no large pieces?
Haggerty has stated that “No satisfactory explanation exists for their origins. They may reveal a new geological source for diamond
For this reason, and because of their lack of sparkle, their chief use in past times was in drilling and cutting; while clear “gem” diamonds
were considered more precious and saved for jewelry. Although claims of slightly superior mechanical characteristics of natural black
diamonds (unless severely flawed) over natural diamonds are widespread and generally accepted [7], much of the modern scientific
research on superhard materials has focused on synthetic materials; and synthetic polycrystalline diamonds have been created with
greater hardness / toughness than natural diamonds of any variety.
The general theory as to black diamonds’ superior mechanical characteristics is that they are made of diamond with ostensibly the same
hardness as clear diamond, but as they are formed from a mass of tiny crystals, they do not have the “cleavage planes” which allow
clear, monocrystalline diamonds to be split. In gemology, hardness and toughness are different measures – regular clear diamond is
extremely hard (can scratch other objects) but is not that tough (can be shattered due to cleavage planes).
Another theory suggests that black diamonds have the same hardness as other diamonds, but that due to their polycrystalline nature,
they have more “cutting edges” and are therefore more effective in cutting other material. [2]
Faceted black diamonds are said to have a unique luster owing to the fact that light is almost completely absorbed by them. Black
diamonds are opaque, and so the cut parameters that are so important to creating the brilliance and fire of clear diamonds, are of no
consequence. However, black diamonds still have the “adamantine” luster of transparent diamonds – and color is still a factor: Some
black diamonds are “pure” black, while others are greyish or may have colorless or grey areas. [11]
The most noted cutter of black diamonds in the world is undoubtedly Fawaz Gruosi. He has been called the “King of black diamonds”
and is reported to have created over 4,000 pieces of black diamond jewelry. [12] Gruosi started the de Grisogono brand in 1993 in
Geneva, and is accredited with single-handedly creating the modern popularity for black diamond jewelry. Prior to his work, the black
diamond, very rare and difficult to cut, had fallen from popularity and had been disregarded since its previous heyday in the 1930’s. [13]
Despite its rarity, black diamond is generally less expensive than “regular” clear diamond. Perhaps this is because it lacks the sparkle
and fire of the clear diamond, and is less infinitely gradable: It cannot be measured by the standard “four C’s” of brilliant diamonds –
Clarity, Color, Cut, Carat. However, since the 1990’s and the work of Gruosi, the price of the black diamond has risen dramatically.
Other famous black diamonds include: The Black Star of Africa, weighing 202 carats; the emerald cut Table of Islam, which weighs 160.18
carats; the Gruosi, a 115.34 heart-cut black diamond and the largest heart-cut diamond in the world; the Korloff Noir, an 88 carat stone
cut from a 421 carat rough; the cushion-cut Black Orlov, also known as the Eye of Brahma, said to have been once owned by Russian
Princess Nadia Vyegin-Orlov in the 18th century, weighing 67.50 carats and reported to have been re-cut from a stone once weighing 195
carats; and the 33.74 carat pear-cut Amsterdam. [15] [16] [17]
There are reports of gigantic black diamonds from days gone by: The Pharmaceutical Journal of September 28th, 1895 reported a 3,073
carat black diamond which had recently been shown to the Paris Academy of Sciences by a Mr. Moissan [presumably Henri Moissan
(September 28, 1852, Paris – February 20, 1907) after whom Moissanite was named]. The black diamond was said to have a hardness
greater than that of the brilliant and to be without flaws. The article also stated that this stone was larger than the three largest black
diamonds discovered up to that time; 620, 810 and 1,700 carats – presumably these weights were for uncut stones. [18]
The article from the Pharmaceutical Journal is reproduced below; but what became of these four stones? Yet another mystery surrounds
the black diamond!
A little more information on Moissan’s giant black diamond is available from other publications of the day: the “Proceedings of the
American Pharmaceutical Association, Volume 44” of 1896 states that the stone was found “between the Rio a Rancador and the Brook
das Bicas, Brazil”, also that the stone was porous and had lost 19 grams (presumably evaporating moisture) since being removed from
the earth. [19] The 1895-1896 “Annual report of the United States Geological Survey to the Secretary of the Interior” stated that the
Brazilian Government had made a strong effort to obtain the stone for the national museum at Rio de Janeiro. [20] Elsewhere, the stone
was described as having a rough surface, and under magnification appeared as though gas had escaped from it while it was still pasty. It
does seem from all these articles that this stone
actually existed – but where is it now? And where
are the other stones mentioned in the
Pharmaceutical Journal of 1895?
Searching for the phrase “stone of reconciliation” in older texts, we find that everything
prior to the 19th century states that it was not the black diamond that is the stone of
reconciliation, but the “regular”, sparkling brilliant diamond! Turning to G.F. Kunz,
noted expert on the history and lore of gems, we find that this quality of diamond traces
back to Rueus, who stated it in his 1566 work De Gemmis. [22] It appears that the tale is
older still: Several sources mention that Dioscorides, the Greek Physician of 40-90AD,
called diamond “a Precious stone of reconciliation and of love.” This undoubtedly
comes from his famous De Materia Medica, a five volume medicinal treatise.
Not a single one of the old texts or sources I found mentions black diamond in this
regard: All refer to the brilliant diamond – leading one to reflect that not a single one of
the modern internet articles checked their sources; and on the statement of Winston
Churchill, never more true than in the internet age, that “A lie gets halfway round the
world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on”.
Black diamond was little mentioned in old literature. It is scarce even now and seems to
have been extremely scarce, if known at all, prior to the 19th century. Most modern
scientific sources state that it was first found around 1845 in Brazil [7] , however this is
highly controversial in the light of some earlier writings – as will be seen below.
The first mention of the phrase “black diamond” I have found is from the 1609
“Harangues et actions publiques des plus rares esprits de nostre temps” (“Speeches and
public actions of the rarest spirits of our time.”) This instance does not describe the Illustration from Punch, 1851 – dry wit on the
stone itself, but the phrase is used metaphorically in describing the eyes of a person. subject of the preciousness of black diamond…
However, one is tempted to suggest that the black diamond must have been known at
least by fable to the author; how would one have been able to draw a visual parallel to a stone that was not known to exist?
The earliest actual description of black diamond I have found so far is from Joannon de Saint-Laurent’s 1746 “Description Abregée du
Fameux Cabinet de M. le Chevalier de Baillou, Pour Servir a L’Histoire Naturelle des Pierres Precieuses, Metaux, Mineraux et Autres
Fossiles.” (“Brief Description of the Famous Cabinet of the Chevalier Baillou, with Regard to the Natural History of Precious Stones,
Metals, Minerals and Other Fossils.”) This work lists numerous precious stones, and then states “Finally here we have the black
Diamond, the hardest of all.” [23] No further descriptive detail appears – and although it appears from the preceding text that the
cabinet contained many faceted stones, it is unclear whether the stone in question was faceted.
The next description of black diamond I can find is from the 1763 “Commercium Philosophico-Technicum” of William Lewis, who wrote:
“I have been favoured with a sight of this stone, and am assured that it is a true diamond. At a distance, it looks uniformly black; but on
closer examination, it appears in some parts transparent, and in others charged with foulness, on which the black hue depends.” [24] He
also states on p.321 “I have been informed by a skilful jeweller that he had seen a black diamond, cut and set in a ring; though perhaps the
examination made of it was not so rigorous as could be wished for determining its being truly of the diamond kind.”
Of course, we must bear in mind that we do not have the benefit of scientific examination of these stones in order to verify that they
were indeed black diamonds; however, further literary mentions all but assure us absolutely that the black diamond had been
discovered by this time: Jean Claude de La Metherie, a mineralogist and geologist of note, writes in his 1795 “Théorie de la terre”
(“Theory of the Earth”), “Le diamant noir est plus dur que le diamant blanc.” – “The black diamond is harder than the white diamond”.[25]
The Encyclopaedia Britannica of 1797 mentions a Mr. Dutens, who related that he had seen a black diamond in Vienna in the collection of
the prince de Lichtenstein. [26] This was Louis Dutens (1730-1812), a French writer whose Des Pierres Précieuses et des Pierres Fines
(Precious Stones and Fine Stones) appeared in 1776; however turning to his work we are enlightened no further, as he simply states “J’en
ai vu un noir dans la collection du Prince de Lichtenstein à Vienne” – “I saw a black one [diamond] in the collection of the Prince of
Liechtenstein in Vienna.” [27] G.F. Kunz, writing in 1917 in “Rings for the finger: from the earliest known times, to the present” describes
in the collection of the famous Imperial Kunstgewerbe Museum (Museum of Arts and Crafts), Vienna, a sun-dial ring made in the 17th
century, with a lid “studded with black diamond lozenges”. Perhaps this is a coincidence, perhaps not: The faceting of one larger stone
often creates several usable smaller pieces and, given the rarity of black diamond, it is not an impossible stretch to venture that these
jewels may all have originated in the same stone. If it were a lesser writer describing the sun-dial ring, it would be easy to dismiss the
lozenges as probably being made from another mineral altogether; however Kunz was a celebrated gemologist (who even had a
gemstone – kunzite – named after him), rendering this possibility less likely.
It’s another oft-repeated “internet myth” that the Duke of Wellington was an aficionado of black diamonds, and once owned one
weighing 12.25 carats. [28] Which Duke of Wellington is not stated – but although most unqualified references to “The Duke of
Wellington” refer to the first and most famous, Arthur Wellesley, it seems somewhat unlikely to have been him as he lived from 1769 to
1852.
There is, however, more: “The Lady’s realm, Volume 12” of September 1902, describes the “most famous collection of jewels of modern
times”, that of the Duke of Richmond, to contain a black diamond that “…did duty for centuries as the eye of an Indian idol.” [29] This
diamond sounds suspiciously like the Black Orlov previously mentioned, a stone once nicknamed the ‘Eye of Brahma’ and said to have
been prised from the statue of an Indian Deity. The Orlov, like many other diamonds, has controversial origins lost in the mists of time.
From all this it seems abundantly clear that a handful of black diamonds must have been known before the first recognized “official”
discovery in 1845. It’s possible that a handful were found many centuries before, and found their way from the treasuries of the Orient
and Africa, through to the jewel collections of 18th century Europe. But the first chapter in the history of the black diamond is evidently
entirely missing, save for a few scant inscriptions.
All things considered, it seems that after all this research, we can only say one thing about the black diamond for certain: That it exists.
In every other regard, it seems, curiously, to resist study as fiercely as it resists the blade. The more we examine it, the less we seem to
know – as every statement made about it seems to contradict another. Even after all this time, the black diamond still remains as
perhaps the most mysterious gemstone on earth and one of the true enigmas of our time.
[1] http://www.physorg.com/news87577799.html
[2] http://rockhoundblog.com/regular-postings/black-diamonds-carbonados-“presolar”-meteorites/
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbonado
[4] http://www2.fiu.edu/~jgara002/research%20statement/carbonado/carbonado-infrared.htm
[5] http://www.blackdiamondjewelry.org/black-diamonds-faq.htm
[6] “An Investigation into the Cause of Color in Natural Black Diamonds from Siberia” – Gems & Gemology, Fall 2003
[7] http://chuma.cas.usf.edu/~juster/GLY4921/carbonado%20diamond%20paper.pdf
[8] http://www.aip.org/dbis/APS/stories/17061.html
[9] http://www.umass.edu/synergy/diamond.html
[10] http://books.google.com/books?id=13POAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA160
[11] http://www.diamondsourceva.com/Education/ColoredDiamonds/colored-diamonds-black.asp
[12] http://www.perfect-knowledge.com/links.html
[13] http://www.worldtempus.com/en/brands/partner-brands/de-grisogono/fawaz-gruosi/
[14] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spirit_of_de_Grisogono_Diamond
[15] http://www.lebanonwire.com/0311/03112905DS.asp
[16] http://fine-jewelry-store.blogspot.com/2010/04/black-diamonds.html
[17] http://www.greendale-diamonds.co.za/famous-diamonds.asp
[18] http://books.google.com/books?id=0TDOAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA278
[19] http://books.google.com/books?id=W3ECAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA700
[20] http://books.google.com/books?id=Cw0MAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA903
[21] http://books.google.com/books?id=0-IDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA984
[23] http://books.google.com/books?id=8qpAAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA146
[24] http://books.google.com/books?id=TW7iNF_ZP6YC&pg=PA637
[25] http://books.google.com/books?id=EWcFAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA328
[26] http://books.google.com/books?id=CXpMAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA1
[27] http://books.google.com/books?id=al8GAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA30
[28] http://www.scribd.com/doc/24764869/Black-Diamonds
[29] http://books.google.com/books?id=SG8-AAAAYAAJ&pg=PA682
No Comments
No comments yet.
Leave a comment
*Name
*Email (not published)
Website
Search
Recent Posts
Terms of Use & Disclaimer (updated May 15th 2021) | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | GDPR | Homepage | Blog