Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bradley J Ostendorf
06/08/2022
CLINICAL FIELD EXPERIENCE D: BEGINNING TEACHER OBSERVATION AND
FEEDBACK
2
Summary of Pre-Conference, Observation, and Post-Conference
Pre-Conference
For this field experience, my principal mentor and I observed a first-year science teacher.
I had already established a professional relationship with this teacher prior to this experience. I
helped in recruiting this teacher and served as a mentor for them throughout the year. As a
mentor, I was able to assist in their professional growth with individualized support. This
allowed the teacher to “… implement teaching practices as part of an experienced team, rather
than isolation.” (Martin, Buelow, & Hoffman, 2015) The mentorship was very helpful, but the
The pre-conference was a short meeting lasting about only ten minutes. During this time
all parties established a class period in which it would work best to observe. My mentor stated
that it is helpful to select a period where the teacher is comfortable so that they don’t feel they
are being unfairly evaluated. After a date was established, we reviewed the lesson plan the
teacher would be using to gain a better understanding of what we would be observing and how
they intend for the lesson to go. The part of our pre-conference, that I had not reviewed during
this course, was the time spent discussing the growth areas of the previous observation. It had
been established that this teacher needed to improve upon student engagement and minimizing
unstructured time. We spent several minutes discussing how their current lesson was adapted to
assist with this. As a coaching staff, we recommended that the teacher work on having the
students participating in constructive activity throughout the entire class period. The goal is to
During the observation, it was noted that the teacher spent the first half of class
presenting on different muscle groups. Students were provided with guided note sheets as the
teacher presented their materials on the Promethean board at the front of the class. This use of
technology and scaffolded note taking helped keep every student engaged with the lesson. There
were also several opportunities for the students to ask questions and clarify their thinking.
For the second half of class, students participated in a lab which required them to explore
the muscle groups they previously took notes on. Students selected their own groups and spread
out across the room to complete their lab packet. During this time, it was observed that the
teacher floated to a few groups to check on their progress. Several groups were not spoken to and
many students were distracted or off task. No technology was used during this lab experience.
Post-Conference
During the post conference, we opened the conversations by discussing the positives of
the lesson. I stated that in comparison to the previous observations, the first half of class had
practically no unstructured time for the students. All students were engaged with the lesson and
technology was positively used. We also noted that the use of guided notes helped bridge the
We then spent time discussing growth areas. It was noted that during the second half of
class, there was a significant portion of students that were distracted and not completing work.
Prior to providing feedback on this observation, we asked the teacher why they thought this was.
The teacher stated that the lab was not engaging enough to keep the students interested. This led
to a conversation regarding how the teacher could have used technology and created a more
CLINICAL FIELD EXPERIENCE D: BEGINNING TEACHER OBSERVATION AND
FEEDBACK
4
interactive lab that the students would have been more engaged with. By allowing the teacher to
elaborate on their own lesson, they were able identify where they felt the lesson went wrong and
what adjustments they would make next time in a similar situation. Getting this out of a new
teacher is a very positive aspect of the post-conference experience. (Mitchell & Bolt, 2015)
To end the pre-conference, my mentor and I stated that the largest positive from this
experience was the notable changes made by the teacher based on previous feedback they had
received. Although the entire lesson was not perfect, it was far better for the students and their
learning. If this teacher continues to receive feedback and adjust as they have, their future is
bright.
to use technology to engage students more during their lab activities. This teacher has access to a
Chromebook cart which allows all students to have access to their own laptop during class.
Instead of completing a paper packet, students could participate in a virtual lab, allowing them to
better visualize what they had learned at the start of class. Simply making this recommendation
caused a domino effect of the teacher looking into virtual labs which may lead to the district
This coaching cycle created a significant amount of collaboration. My mentor and I spent
a significant amount of time outside of the observation process discussing this new teacher, their
strengths, and areas of improvement. These discussions lead to us sharing our past experiences as
teachers to come up with strategy recommendations for this teacher. Without this collaboration, I
CLINICAL FIELD EXPERIENCE D: BEGINNING TEACHER OBSERVATION AND
FEEDBACK
5
would be limited to my own perspective. Collaboration with the teacher was also prominent
during this process. Once the growth areas were acknowledged, we quickly shifted our
conversation, as a team, towards how improvements can be made. The teacher coming to an
understanding that our goal as coaches was not to criticize, rather assist in growth, trust was
quickly established. They were more willing to open up about their concerns with their teaching
Although this trust came quickly, it will be important for administration to continue to
build on this relationship. Trusted leaders act with consistency. Teachers must come to
understand that they can count on their administrators to act consistently in pursuing the school’s
mission. (Danielson, 2016) This includes coaching new teachers to reach their full potential as
educators.
Vulnerability and transparency helped get me through this coaching process more than
anything. Being a peer to this individual, prior to the coaching process, made it difficult to
interact with them as their “boss”. At first it was an uncomfortable feeling, but after I helped
them understand that I had been in their shoes before and was very clear that my goal was to help
them get better, the discomfort was alleviated. Essentially, I tried my best to make sure this
teacher knew that I am not perfect and being overly critical is not my goal. I wanted this teacher
to see me and think “If he is observing me and providing me with feedback, it is because he
genuinely has my, and the kids, best interest in mind. I will gladly accept any feedback from this
individual because he believes in and is willing to build into me.” As a future administrator, I
important, one must be careful to not let these prevent necessary feedback from being delivered.
In the case of this field experience, there were several concerning aspects of this teacher’s
performance that needed to be addressed. If I hold onto a fear of upsetting my teachers, I may
miss on giving them the feedback they need to develop professionally. “Effective leaders place
children at the center of education and accept responsibility for each student’s academic success
and well-being” (Professional standards for educational leaders, 2015) It will be my ethical
responsibility as a principal to honestly help my teachers grow so that students are receiving the
Danielson, C. (2016). Talk about teaching! Leading professional conversations. Thousand Oaks:
Corwin.
Martin, K. L., Buelow, S. M., & Hoffman, J. T. (2015). New teacher induction: Support that
Mitchell, M., & Bolt, T. (2015). Preparing student teachers and beginning teachers for the post-
teaching conference. The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 86(2),
10-13.
Professional standards for educational leaders. (2015). Retrieved from National Policy Board
https://www.npbea.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Professional-Standards-for-
Educational-Leaders_2015.pdf