Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FELICITY MADERA,
Petitioner.
-versus-
NICHOLAS CAPILI,
Respondent.
x---------------------------------------------------------------x
PETITION
4. When asked for the basis of the said illegal search and seizure,
respondent claimed that it is for the purpose of preserving
evidence for the pending rebellion case involving petitioner’s
husband;
5. The unlawful act of respondent mentioned unjustifiably violated
the petitioner’s constitutional right against illegal search and
seizure;
PRAYER
c. Other reliefs just and equitable under the premises are likewise
prayed for
Doc. No. 90
Page No. 345
Book No. III
Series of 2022