1

DISASTER RESPONSE, PLANNING, AND RECOVERY

Student’s name

Institutional affiliation

Lecturer’s name

Date
 2

Introduction

Disasters are natural disasters or human-caused events that cause a major change in the

environment in a short amount of time. A few instances include diseases, crop loss,

displacement, and death. Other disasters include the reduction of natural and social capitals, the

destruction of physical infrastructure, and the overall interruption of economic and social

opportunities. Volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, droughts, floods, storms, and fires have all

caused substantial deaths and loss of property, as well as damage to social and economic

infrastructure and environmental degradation. Natural Crises such as floods, hurricanes, and

earthquakes may wreak havoc on cities, infrastructure and kill so people. The tsunami that struck

Japan in 2011 is an example of a natural disaster that resulted in massive loss of life and

property.

Identification of Risk and analysis

According to Farber D. (2018), it's vital to determine the scale and likelihood of natural disasters

and their vulnerability to assess the risk of natural disasters on an individual, regional, or national

level. The interplay of humans and the environment create circumstances that make people

vulnerable to natural disasters. Vulnerability is also the effect of individual and societal actions

before a disaster, which become apparent after the disaster. People determine the chance of risk

occurrence, the results of disaster analysis and vulnerability assessments are combined.

Estimating possible hazardous losses and identifying the number of people affected by the risk

are parts of a full-scope review. The following vulnerability assessment and risk management

strategies should be created with two main components: prevention and reduction efforts to limit

potential personal, societal, or economic losses and insurance coverage for risks that can't be

avoided.
 3

Planning and Response to Disasters

Lin L. (2018) suggests that responding to disasters encompasses a wide variety of actions geared

at protecting persons and property while addressing the economic and social interference that

crisis cause. Catastrophe response approaches include population protection actions and rapid

mitigation attempts. A rapid mitigation approach would be to clear debris from flood-prone

areas' channels. It also requires putting out earthquake-caused fires and managing hazardous

material spills before they cause more harm. Factors such as warnings, evacuation orders, search

and rescue, emergency medical care, and refuge are all examples of population protection

operations—communication and coordination during a crisis and scenario analysis and response

management. Individuals, houses, businesses, and communities should all be assessed regarding

disaster preparedness and management initiatives.

Evacuation, Protective Actions and Warning Response

Botzen, W. W et al. (2018) describes the concept of directive response as a type of overall

behavior directed by emerging norms that raises many concerns. One is that, rather than being

automatic or dictated by official orders, activity in reaction to warnings results from discussion

and reflection among members of impacted groups—activities that are often followed by a quest

for additional confirmation. Some Conditions hinder the contemplation process, such as

contradictory warning information obtained by groups and individuals, challenges in

communicating with others whose opinions are important for the decision-making process, or

differences of opinion among group members about any element of the decision-making process.

The realization that communities may generally characterize an immediate crisis in ways that are

different from legal perspectives is yet another consequence of the emerging norm strategy to
 4

preventive action decision making. What happens during the shadow evacuation phenomena is

which has been observed in several emergency scenarios.

The present study on decision-making under risk settings indicates that a broad range of

personal, group, situational, and resource-related elements that enable and impede self-protective

behavior must be considered. The intricacy of self-protective choices is demonstrated through

subjectively based decision-tree models. As the work on storm evacuation has shown, various

factors play a role in deciding whether or not to leave. These reasons vary from risk perceptions

and physical security in the face of a potential threat to the level of knowledge about particular

areas at risk, as well as challenging to implement such as the existence of pets in the home that

requires attention, an absence of a suitable place to go, counterarguments from other family

members, fears of looting, and fears that the evacuation process may be more dangerous than

staying home and weathering the storm.

Families cannot be forced to evacuate or stay put, much less to prepare for a threat, unless they

are in dire circumstances. Even under dire circumstances, most families must be individually

approached and helped or persuaded to assist, according to Doorn, N. (2017). Official demands

and instructions may be disregarded, ignored, or dismissed by some members of the public. Due

to a lack of resources or capability, some may be unable to obey. The trustworthiness of the

message collected from various sources, the sort of information communicated, and the

household's ability to recognize the risk, make decisions, and respond properly will all play a

part.
 5

Confusion can be exacerbated by disagreements, competitiveness, and a lack of teamwork

among local, state, and federal government agencies, as well as between those agencies and

privately owned media. The uncertainty and disobedience may be exacerbated if government and

corporate organizations refuse to release their staff and cease routine operations. Even when

pressed, people prefer to "standardize" odd situations and revert to their regular habits. People

will not act on threat information until they believe it would do them significant harm, as

previously indicated. Recognizing that there is a problem is inadequate to elicit self-defense if

the threat is perceived to be immediate.

Recovery Process

In the best-case scenario, actions are taken to reduce negative disaster effects, restore social

units to which was before levels of capability, reduce the vulnerability, and achieve other goals

like significantly reducing crisis losses and improving the built environment, standard of living,

and lengthy sustainable development. Finances are intended to enable families and businesses

with replacing lost goods and reconstruction; providing various forms of cooperation and support

to influenced public entities; developing and trying to implement disaster recovery and

rehabilitation proposals; and other activities designed to assist households and businesses.

Resilience and Household Recovery

Whatever happens to dwellings or after crises is described by the term’s susceptibility and resiliency.

According to Wenger C. (2017), the degree of hazard occurrences on residences is linked to social

location in terms of susceptibility. Poverty forces humans to survive in substandard or vulnerable

housing, such as manufactured housing, increasing their risk of death, injury, or homelessness. Money,

education, and wealth all influence a family's ability to prevent and prepare for disasters. Culture
 6

influences a family's ability to accumulate assets to attain better levels of safety, as well as their

recovery options and access to resources after a calamity.

Conclusion

It's vital to emphasize that disaster resilience is a great plan which should be incorporated at all

levels of socioeconomic planning and resource mobilization. Crises are more than "barriers to

overcome" or "stumbling obstacles" on the path to progress; they are the cause of it. As a result,

by changing our strategic planning and integrating crisis threat assessment into the making plans

of all housing developments, we can ensure future natural disasters are met by residents who are

prepared to withstand their effects, and thus treated as emergencies rather than crises.

References

Farber, D. (2018). Response and recovery after María: lessons for disaster law and policy. Rev.

Jur. UPR, 87, 743. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?

hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_ylo=2017&q=disaster+response+and+recovery&oq=disaster+respon

se+and+#:~:text=Farber%2C%20D.%20(2018).%20Response%20and%20recovery%20after

%20Mar%C3%ADa%3A%20lessons%20for%20disaster%20law%20and%20policy.%20Rev.

%20Jur.%20UPR%2C%2087%2C%20743.
 7

Lin, L. (2018). Integrating a national risk assessment into a disaster risk management system:

Process and practice. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 27, 625-631.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?

hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_ylo=2017&q=disaster+risk+assessment&oq=disaster+risk+#:~:text=

Lin%2C%20L.%20(2018).%20Integrating%20a%20national%20risk%20assessment%20into

%20a%20disaster%20risk%20management%20system%3A%20Process%20and%20practice.

%20International%20journal%20of%20disaster%20risk%20reduction%2C%2027%2C

%20625%2D631.

Botzen, W. W., Brouwer, L. M., Scussolini, P., Kuik, O., Haasnoot, M., Lawrence, J., & Aerts, J.

C. J. H. (2018). Integrated disaster risk management and adaptation.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?

hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_ylo=2017&q=disaster+risk+assessment&oq=disaster+risk+#:~:text=

Botzen%2C%20W.%20W.%2C%20Brouwer%2C%20L.%20M.%2C%20Scussolini%2C%20P.

%2C%20Kuik%2C%20O.%2C%20Haasnoot%2C%20M.%2C%20Lawrence%2C%20J.%2C

%20%26%20Aerts%2C%20J.%20C.%20J.%20H.%20(2018).%20Integrated%20disaster

%20risk%20management%20and%20adaptation.

Doorn, N. (2017). Resilience indicators: Opportunities for including distributive justice concerns

in disaster management. Journal of Risk Research, 20(6), 711-731.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?

hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_ylo=2017&q=resilience+as+a+factor+disaster+management&btnG=

#:~:text=Doorn%2C%20N.%20(2017).%20Resilience%20indicators%3A%20Opportunities

%20for%20including%20distributive%20justice%20concerns%20in%20disaster

%20management.%20Journal%20of%20Risk%20Research%2C%2020(6)%2C%20711%2D731.
 8

Wenger, C. (2017). The oak or the reed: How resilience theories are translated into disaster

management policies. Ecology and Society, 22(3). https://scholar.google.com/scholar?

hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_ylo=2017&q=risk+analysis+and+resilience+in+disaster+managemen

t&oq=risk+analysis+and+resilience+in+disaster+m#:~:text=Wenger%2C%20C.%20(2017).

%20The%20oak%20or%20the%20reed%3A%20How%20resilience%20theories%20are

%20translated%20into%20disaster%20management%20policies.%20Ecology%20and

%20Society%2C%2022(3).