Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rule 106-109
Group 9
Members:
Tee, Mark
Urot, Dave
Villacastin, Franklin
Villoga, Kyle
Yntig, Krista
Rule 106
CONSTITUTION OF FAMILY
HOME
THIS RULE IS DEEMED REPEALED BY THE FAMILY CODE.
What is a Family Home?
• Zion Pearl was born in Canada on June 27, 2015 to a Filipino mother, Roice,
and Canadian father. A Record of Birth was submitted to the Philippine
Statistics Authority (PSA) in Manila. PSA, unfortunately, erroneously
recorded Zion’s year of birth as “2016” instead of “2015.” Roice filed before
the RTC of Davao City, where she was a resident, a Petition for correction of
Zion’s Record of Birth under Rule 108 of the Rules of Court, impleading (a)
the PSA, and (b) Office of the Solicitor General (OSG).
Issue:
• WON the RTC was correct in motu proprio dismissing the petition for
correction of entry on the ground of lack of jurisdiction.
Ruling:
• YES.
• First, the RTC of Davao City is not the proper venue of the instant Petition.
The fact of birth of Zion was recorded directly before the PSA in Manila and
not to any local civil registrar. Consequently, the Petition should have been
filed before the RTC in Manila pursuant to Section 1 of Rule 108 of the Rules
of Court. Given that Rule 108 pertains to a special proceeding, the specific
provisions stated thereunder, particularly on venue, must be observed in
order to vest the court with jurisdiction.
• Second, the Petition failed to implead the civil registrar. The local civil
registrar is an indispensable party for which no final determination of the
case can be reached. The consequence of such failure to implead is that the
RTC will not acquire jurisdiction over the case or, if proceedings were
conducted, to render the same null and void.
Who may file petition for the cancellation or
correction of entries in the civil registry
• Any person interested in any act, event, order or decree concerning the civil
status of persons which has been recorded in the civil register, may file a
verified petition for the cancellation or correction of any entry relating
thereto, with the Court of First Instance of the province where the
corresponding civil registry is located.
The parties that must be impleaded in the
proceeding and the parties that may oppose
• Parties that must be impleaded
• Civil Registrar
• All persons who have or claim any interest which would be affected thereby
• Parties that may oppose
• Civil Registrar
• Any person having or claiming any interest under the entry whose cancellation or
correction is sought
How may correction be effected
• This is a Petition for Review on Certiorari... a special proceeding for correction of entry in the civil registry
under Rule 108 of the Revised Rules of Court filed by herein petitioner.
• In his Amended Petition, petitioner alleged that he was born on November 13, 1965 at St. Paul Hospital in
the City of Manila; that his birth was duly registered in the civil registry of Manila; that he had been using his
real name "Ramon Corpuz Tan" during his lifetime; that when he later secured a copy of his Certificate of
Live Birth, he discovered that his name was entered as "Ramon Corpus Tan Ko" instead of his true and
correct name which is "Ramon Corpuz Tan"; that the aforesaid material errors and mistakes in the entries of
his Certificate of Live Birth were due to inadvertence and error of the hospital personnel who prepared the
subject certificate; that "Ko," which was the first name of his father, was inadvertently included in his last
name; and that the mistake was not immediately rectified because he only discovered the same, after
having his own children.
ISSUE:
Notice and publication. — Upon the filing of the petition, the court shall, by an order, fix the time and
place for the hearing of the same, and cause reasonable notice thereof to be given to the persons named
in the petition. The court shall also cause the order to be published once a week for three (3) consecutive
weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the province.
RULE 108 SECTION 5.
Opposition. — The civil registrar and any person having or claiming any interest under the entry whose
cancellation or correction is sought may, within fifteen (15) days from notice of the petition, or from the last
date of publication of such notice, file his opposition thereto.
REPUBLIC V. LUGSANAY-UY, G.R. NO. 198010 (2013)
A reading of Sections 4 and 5 shows that the Rules mandate two sets of notices to different potential
oppositors, one given to the persons named in the petition and another given to other persons who
are not named in the petition but nonetheless may be considered interested or affected parties (i.e.
creditors).
Summons must, therefore, be served not for the purpose of vesting the courts with jurisdiction but to
comply with the requirements of fair play and due process to afford the person concerned the opportunity to
protect his interest if he so chooses
PERIOD TO FILE THE OPPOSITION
Within 15 days from notice of petition, or from last date of publication of notice [Sec. 5, Rule 108]
EFFECT OF FAILURE TO IMPLEAD AND NOTIFY THE
AFFECTED OR INTERESTED PARTIES
A petition which seeks the correction of entries in the birth certificate pertaining to first name, surname and
citizenship is not merely clerical. When the corrections will result in changes in the status from “legitimate”
to “illegitimate” and the citizenship from “Chinese” to “Filipino”, the petitioner should have impleaded not
only the local civil registrar but also her parents and siblings as they are affected by the changes or
corrections. It is clear therefore that when the petition for cancellation or correction of an entry in the civil
register involves substantial and controversial alterations, including those on citizenship, legitimacy or
paternity or filiation, or legitimacy of marriage, a strict compliance with the requirements of Rule 108 is
mandated, failing in which the petition must be dismissed. (Republic v. Lagunsay Uy, G.R. No.
198010)
SUCH FAILURE, HOWEVER, MAY BE CURED
While there may be cases where the Court held that the failure to implead and notify the affected or
interested parties may be cured by the publication of the notice of hearing, earnest efforts were made by
petitioners in bringing to court all possible interested parties. Such failure was likewise excused where the
interested parties themselves initiated the corrections proceedings; when there is no actual or presumptive
awareness of the existence of the interested parties; or when a party is inadvertently left out. (Republic v.
Lagunsay Uy, G.R. No. 198010)
RULE 108
Section 6. Expediting proceedings. — The court in which the proceeding is brought may make orders
expediting the proceedings, and may also grant preliminary injunction for the preservation of the rights of
the parties pending such proceedings.
Section 7. Order. — After hearing, the court may either dismiss the petition or issue an order granting
the cancellation or correction prayed for. In either case, a certified copy of the judgment shall be
served upon the civil registrar concerned who shall annotated the same in his record.
SILVERIO V. REPUBLIC, G.R. NO. 174689
RA 9048 now governs the change of first name. It vests the power and authority to entertain petitions for
change of first name to the city or municipal civil registrar or consul general concerned. Under the law,
therefore, jurisdiction over applications for change of first name is now primarily lodged with the
aforementioned administrative officers. The intent and effect of the law is to exclude the change of first
name from the coverage of Rules 103 (Change of Name) and 108 (Cancellation or Correction of Entries in
the Civil Registry) of the Rules of Court, until and unless an administrative petition for change of name is
first filed and subsequently denied
It means that the local civil registrar has primary, not exclusive, jurisdiction over such petitions for correction
of clerical errors and change of first name or nickname
DIFFERENCES AND SIMILARITIES BETWEEN RULE 103 AND 108
1) Under Rule 103, full name may be changed while in Rule 108 only clerical and substantial errors may
be corrected;
2) Under Rule 103, the petition must be filed with the Regional Trial Court where the petitioner resides
while under Rule 108, the verified petition must be filed with the Regional Trial Court where the
corresponding civil registry is located;
3) Under Rule 103, the Solicitor General must be notified by service of a copy of the petition while in
Rule 108, the Civil Registrar concerned is made a party in the petition as a respondent. The Solicitor
General must likewise be notified by service of a copy of the petition;
DIFFERENCE AND SIMILARITIES BETWEEN RULE 103 AND 108
4) Under Rule 103, the petitioner is the person who desires to change his name while in Rule 108, the
petitioner may be any person who has interest in any act, event, order or decree;
5) In both cases, publication of the order for hearing once a week for three (3) consecutive weeks is
necessary. However, in Rule 108, it is further required that the court shall cause reasonable notice to
persons named in the petition;
6) In both cases, service of judgment shall be made upon the civil registry concerned
Rule 109
Appeals in Special
Proceedings
WHO MAY APPEAL?
The right to appeal is a mere statutory privilege, and should be exercise only in
the manner prescribed by law. The statutory nature of the right to appeal
requires the one who avails himself of it to strictly comply with the other
statures or rules that are considered indispensable interdictions against
needless delays and for an orderly discharge of judicial business.
Advance distribution in special proceedings Sec.2