Professional Documents
Culture Documents
place over a period of years as exhibited by temperature, wind, velocity and precipitation.”
4. Enduring Quality:
Organisational climate built up over a period of time. It represents a relatively enduring quality
of the internal environment that is experienced by the organisational members.
5. Multi-Dimensional Concept:
Organisational climate is a multi- dimensional concept. The various dimensions of the
organisational climate are individual autonomy, authority structure, leadership style, pattern of
communication, degree of conflicts and cooperation etc.
Litwin and Stringer have included six factors which affect organisational climate. These
factors are:
(i) Organisational Structure: Perceptions of the extent of organisational constraints, rules,
regulations, red tape,
(iii) Rewards: Feelings related to being confident of adequate and appropriate rewards,
(iv) Risk and Risk Taking: Perceptions of the degree of challenge and risk in the work situation,
(v) Warmth and Support: Feeling of general good fellowship and helpfulness prevailing in the
work setting.
(vi) Tolerance and Conflict: Degree of confidence that the climate can tolerate, differing
opinions.
Schneider AND Barlett give a broader and systematic study of climate dimensions.
Taguiri has identified five factors influencing the organizational climate on the basis of
information provided by managers.
These are:
(i) Practices relating to providing a sense of direction or purpose to their jobs-setting of
objectives, planning and feedback,
(v) Being with a profit oriented and sales oriented company. KATZ et. al. have identified five
factors which affect individual performance in organisation;
(iv) Universalism,
Lawrence James and Allan Jones have classified the following factors that influence
organisational climate:
(i) Organisational Context: Mission, goals and objectives, function etc.
(iii) Leadership Process: Leadership styles, communication, decision making and related
processes.
(iv) Physical Environment: Employee safety, environmental stresses and physical space
characteristics.
(v) Organisational Values and Norms: Conformity, loyalty, impersonality and reciprocity.
Richard M. Hodgetts has classified organisational climate into two major categories. He has
given an analogy with an iceberg where there is a part of the iceberg that can be seen from the
surface and another part that is under the water and cannot be seen. The factors in the visible part
that can be observed and measured are called OVERT factors and the factors that are not visible
and quantifiable are called covert factors.
Both these factors are shown in the following figure in the form of an iceberg:
The results of the above studies show that it is very difficult to generalise the basic contents of
organisational climate, based on these studies. However, some broad generalisations can be
drawn and it can be concluded that four basic factors are somewhat common to the findings of
most studies.
The organisational climate can affect the human behaviour in the organisation through an impact
on their performance, satisfaction and attitudes. There are four mechanisms by which climate
affects the behaviour of the employees.
1. Constraint System:
Organisational climate can operate as a constraint system in both the positive and negative sense.
This can be done by providing information to the employees about what kind of behaviour will
be rewarded, punished or ignored. Thus, behaviour can be influenced by varying degrees of
rewards and punishments. Such a constraint system would influence the behaviour of those
people who are most interested in those specific values which are assigned to different
behavioural outcomes.
The factors indicated in the figure represent major determinants of climate in an organisation and
as such represent important areas of management concern. If employees satisfaction and job
performance are to be improved, the management must modify these factors so that the
employees view climate as favourable to them. Various research studies also confirm the positive
relationship between organisational climate and employee performance.
Frederiksen on the basis of laboratory studies involving 260 middle level managers concludes
that different organisational climate has different impact on human performance. He summarizes
his findings in the following statement.
“It appears that the amount of administrative work in the stimulated job is more predictable in a
climate that encourages innovation .than in one that encourages standard procedures and that in
an innovative climate, greater productivity can be expected of people with skills and attitudes
that are associated with independence of thought and action and the ability to be productive in
free unstructured situations.”
This study suggests that the performance was more predictable for subjects who worked in a
consistent climate than those who had to work in an inconsistent environmental climate.
Inconsistent climate was having indirect impact on productivity. Another laboratory study shows
that significant differences were found in performance and satisfaction of people in varying
organisational climates.
For example, in this study, three types of organisational climates were created:
(i) Authoritarian structured.
It was found that the achieving organisation produced the most in terms of money volumes,
numbers of new products and cost saving innovations. People in democratic friendly
environment expressed maximum satisfaction with their jobs. However, people in the
authoritarian structured organisation produced goods of highest quality because of right
specifications put by government orders. Other studies have shown the similar results.
2. Inter-Personal Relationships:
The interpersonal relationships in the organisations are reflected in the way informal groups are
formed and operated. The informal groups may benefit the organisation also, but in some cases it
may displace the goals of the organisation.
3. Conflict Management:
In the organisation, there can always be inter-group as well as intra group conflicts. The
organisational climate will depend upon how effectively these conflicts are managed. If they are
managed effectively, there will be an atmosphere of cooperation in the organisation. If they are
not managed properly there will be an atmosphere of distrust and non-cooperation.
4. Individual Autonomy:
If the individual employees are given sufficient freedom to work and exercises authority, it will
result in efficiency in operations. The autonomy will lighten the burden of higher level
executives.
5. Organisational Control System:
The control system of the organisation can be either rigid or flexible. Rigid control will lead to
impersonal or bureaucratic atmosphere in the organisation. There will be minimum scope for self
regulation.
6. Organisational Structure:
The organisational structure serves the basis of inter personal relations between superiors and
subordinates. It clarifies as to who is responsible to whom and who is to direct whom. If there is
centralisation of authority, the participation in decision making by the subordinates will be very
less. On the other hand, if there is decentralisation of authority, there will be an atmosphere of
participative decision making.
If the managers are relations oriented, the climate will be considerate and supportive. There will
be team spirit in the organisation because the needs and aspirations of the workers will be given
due importance.
9. Communication:
The communication system of the organisation will also affect the organisational climate. The
flow of information, its direction, its dispersement and its type are all important determinants.
Proper communication system means that the subordinates are in a position to express their
ideas, suggestions and reactions, otherwise they will feel frustrated.
The following techniques are generally helpful in improving the climate of the
organisation:
1. Effective Communication System:
There should be a two way communication in the organisation so that the employees know what
is going on and react to it. The manager can modify his decision on the basis of feedback
received.
5. Technological Changes:
Generally, the workers and employees resist any innovative changes. But where technological
changes improve the working conditions of the employees, the change will be easily accepted.
Better climate will be there if the management adopts innovative changes in consultation with
the employees.
But all the above factors are contingent upon the assumptions of the nature of people in general.
For example, the ECONOMIC MAN is basically motivated by money and economic security
and hence, economic factors may be used to attract and motivate him. For a SOCIAL MAN
positive social relations and interactions are a must. Thus, the creation of a climate where happy
family atmosphere prevails is appropriate for him. The self actuating man seeks achievement,
accomplishment and meaning in what he does. The organisational climate with a certain degree
of freedom is appropriate for him.
Thus, in order to build up a sound organisational climate, management must understand the
people in the organisation. The importance must be given to what motivates people’s
performance in general and building an overall climate conducive to motivation, a keen insight
into the individual in particular and tailoring a personal approach to leadership and job design to
which the man will respond with commitment. The different types of people suggest that there
cannot be any all purpose organisational climate.
Bennis has given some basic features of democracy as applied to organisational life. According
to him, democracy is basically a system of values.
(ii) A reliance on consensus rather than on the more customary forms of coercion or compromise
to manage conflict.
(iii) The idea that influence is based on technical competence and knowledge than on the
vagaries of personal whims or prerogative of power.
(iv) An atmosphere that permits and even encourages emotional expression as well as task
oriented acts.
(v) A basically human bias, one which accepts the inevitability of conflict between the
organisation and the individual but which is willing to cope with and mediate in this conflict on
rational grounds.
To summarise, we can say that there are three important ideas in this concept of
participation:
1. Mental and Emotional Involvement:
The basic feature of participative system is that there should be mental and emotional
involvement of the employees in the administration of the organisation. This involvement is
psychological rather than physical. A person who participates is ego involved rather than merely
task involved. If there is no psychological involvement of the employees, the participation is no
participation but just a manipulation. In such a situation, the manager tries to make people think
that they are participating and having an influence, while in reality they are not.
2. Acceptance of Responsibility:
A second important characteristic of participation is that people are encouraged to accept
responsibility. Since people are mentally and emotionally involved in decision making, they have
to undertake responsibilities also. Thus, they become both decision makers and executors.
This is a social process by which people become involved in an organisation and want it to work
successfully. When people want to do something, they will find a way. Under participative
conditions people perceive managers as supportive contributors to the team. Employees are
ready to work actively with managers, rather reactively against them.
3. Motivation to Contribute:
Participation motivates people to contribute to the situation. They are given opportunities to use
their initiative and creativity towards the objectives of the organisation. Participation uses the
creativity of all persons, thereby all of them contribute something in decision making.
Contribution is different from consent because in consent the person only confirms what has
already been decided. A consent or does not contribute to decision making rather he merely
approves what has been decided by others.