Topic 4

Topic-4
• Topic-4.1
Polluter Pays Principle
• Topic-4.2
Precautionary Principle
• Topic-4.3
Public Trust Doctrine
Anil K Thakur LLC
• Topic-4.4
Sustainable Development
• Topic-4.5
Cases at National Green Law Tribunal
• Topic-4.6
Powers and functions of NGT
By: Anil K Thakur (Asst. Prof.)

Lloyd Law College, Gr. Noida
Last updated: May, 2022
Topic-4.1
Polluter Pays Principle
Anil K Thakur LLC
Polluter Pays Principle-meaning
• ‘Polluter Pays Principle’(PPP) is also known as

‘Extended Producer Responsibility’ (EPR).
• Polluter Pays Principle has become a popular in
recent times.
• 'If you make a mess, it's your duty to clean it up'-
this is the main basis of this slogan.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• It should be mentioned that in environmental law, it

favors a curative approach which is concerned with
repairing ecological damage.
• It's a principle in international environmental law
where the polluting party pays for the damage done
to the natural environment.
Historical Background
• The Polluter pays principle was first referred to at the
international level explicitly in 1972 in a Council
Recommendation on Guiding Principles Concerning
the International Economic Aspects of Environmental
Policies of the Organisation for Economic Co-
operation and Development (OECD)*.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• The 1972 OECD Council Recommendation added the

polluter pays principle to allocate costs of pollution
prevention and control measures to promote the
prudent use of environmental resources and to
prevent likely falsehood in figures on international
trade and investment.
About Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
• The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and

Development (OECD); is an intergovernmental economic
organisation with 38 member countries, founded in 1961 to
stimulate economic progress and world trade.
• It is a forum of countries describing themselves as committed
to democracy and the market economy, providing a platform to
compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems,
identify good practices and coordinate domestic and
international policies of its members.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• The majority of OECD members are high-income economies with

a very high Human Development Index (HDI) and are regarded
as developed countries.
• As of 2017, the OECD member countries collectively comprised
62.2% of global nominal GDP (US$49.6 trillion) and 42.8% of
global GDP ($54.2 trillion) at purchasing power parity.
• The OECD is an official United Nations observer.
About Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
• The OECD's headquarters are at the Château de

la Muette in Paris, France.
• The OECD is funded by contributions from
member countries at varying rates and had a
total budget of €386 million in 2019.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• The OECD is recognised as a highly influential

publisher of mostly economic data through
publications as well as annual evaluations and
rankings of member countries.
• For more visit: https://www.oecd.org/
• The polluter pays principle was reaffirmed as a
fundamental principle for the Member States
during the 1974 OECD Council Recommendation
on the Implementation of the Polluter-Pays
Principle.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• The OECD initiative was the result of demands on

governments and other institutions to introduce
policies and mechanisms for the protection of the
environment and the public from the threats
posed by pollution in a modern industrialized
society.
• The principle was subsequently endorsed in 1973
when the European Community (EC) adopted a
program of action on the environment.
• Subsequently, an EC Council Recommendation
(1975) provided that Member states should
Anil K Thakur LLC
apply the polluter pays principle.

• It further provided that natural or legal persons
must pay the price of such measures that are
necessary to reduce or remove the pollution to
meet the standards or equivalent measures laid
down by public authorities.
• The polluter pays principle was also adopted in

the Association of Southeast Asian Nations
(ASEAN) Agreement on Conservation on Nature
and Natural Resources adopted in 1985.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• Through the lens of international law, the PPP is

enshrined in Principle 16 of the Rio Declaration,
which states that ‘the polluter should, in
principle, bear the cost of pollution.’
• The United Nations Conference on
Environment and Development, 1992 in
Principle 15 incorporates the polluter pays
principle.
Anil K Thakur LLC
Polluter Pays Principle in Indian Context:
• The Supreme Court of India inexplicitly applied the principle
in the case of M.C. Mehta and Anr. vs Union of India &
Ors. 1987 AIR 1086.
• It was declared by the court that ‘we have to evolve new
principles and lay down new norms, which would
adequately deal with the new problems which arise in a
highly industrialized economy’.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• The significance of this judgment lies in the court’s

formulation of the principle of the measure of liability of
industry engaged in ‘hazardous or inherently dangerous
activities’.
• Such measure must be correlated to the magnitude and
capacity of the enterprise.
Polluter Pays Principle in Indian Context
• Secondly, the court directed the industry either to shift from
the present location or evolve a green belt around it as a
condition precedent to restart the industry.
• Further, the industry was asked to deposit a sum of Rs.
35,00,000/- in a bank and a guarantee of Rs. 15,00,000/-
with the court for compensation to be paid to one who can
Anil K Thakur LLC
prove before the court of law that he suffered because of

the Oleum gas leakage from the Sri Ram Food and Fertiliser
Corporation.
• Thus an innovative remedy was evolved by the Supreme
Court of India in this case which was indirect recognition
and application of the ‘polluter pays principle’.
Indian Judiciary and PPP
• It was for the first time in Indian Council for Enviro-Legal
Action v. Union of India, 1996 SCC (3) 212 that the court
explicitly applied this principle.
• It was declared by the court that redemption of the
damaged environment is a part of the process of sustainable
development and as such polluter is liable to pay the cost of
the individual sufferers as well as the cost of reversing the
Anil K Thakur LLC
damaged ecology.
• Thus, the ‘polluter pays principle’ means the absolute
liability for harm to the environment extends not only to
compensate the victims of pollution but also to the cost of
restoring the environmental degradation.
• Remediation of the damaged environment is part of the
process of sustainable development.
• In this case, five chemical industries were producing
H-acid (1-napthol-8-amino, 6- disciphonic acid).
• An azo dye and untreated toxic sludge were
discharged into the open compound which, in due
course of time, flowed through a canal across the
entire area and the rainwater washed the sludge deep
Anil K Thakur LLC
into the bowels of the earth.

• It caused pollution of river water and underground
water upto 70 feet below the ground within a radius
of seven miles of the village Bicchari is a small village
in Udaipur district of Rajasthan.
• It further left the fields nearby infertile, as a result of
which residents had to migrate out of the village.
• The Court while making a landmark judgment on
this PIL, also kept in mind that any principle
adopted by it must be simple, practical and suited
to the conditions prevailing in the country.
• Looking at the widespread ramification of the
Anil K Thakur LLC
hazardous or inherently dangerous activities,

persons or the institutions would be held ‘liable
absolutely’, though they have taken all reasonable
care while carrying out such activity.
• The liability to compensate is two fold;
• one, to compensate the victims of pollution for
inconvenience and health loss; and
• the other, to restore the environmental
Anil K Thakur LLC
degradation viz., of the soil, underground water

and the vegetation cover of that area. Such
remediation is part of the process of ‘sustainable
development’.
• It is also to be noted that all this does not
absolve a person from criminal liability.
• It was also ordered by the court that the Central
Government must determine the amount required
for carrying out remedial measures and the status
report submitted by the National Environmental &
Engineering Research Institute (NEERI) in the year
Anil K Thakur LLC
1994 be made a basis to compute it.

• NEERI in its report had stated that rupees
4,00,00,000/- would be needed to restore the
power of soil and water contamination.
• The sincerity of the Supreme Court came to the
fore when it was pronounced that the Ministry of
Environment and Forest must recover the money
from the units and the recovered money be used
to repair the damage caused to the land and
Anil K Thakur LLC
water in the area.

• As a result of which plant and factories have been
sold by the State Government.
• The Supreme court in yet another case of Vellore
Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India AIR 1996 SC
1446 reiterated and declared in unequivocal terms
that ‘the precautionary principle and the polluter pays
principle are part of the environmental jurisprudence
of this country.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• These principles have been accepted as a part of the

law of the land as Article 21 of the Constitution of
India guaranteed the protection of life and personal
liberty.
• There is also a constitutional mandate to protect and
improve the environment under articles 48-A and 51-
A (g).
• The Court also observed that this principle has
also been accepted as part of the customary
International Law, therefore, it automatically
becomes a part of the basic jurisprudence of the
land.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• In the same case, the court also ordered for the

creation of ‘Environment Protection Fund’.
• This fund could be utilized for compensating the
affected persons identified by the ‘authority’ and
also for ‘restoring the damaged environment’.
• In M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, on 30 December,
1996 The Supreme Court reiterated the polluter
pays principle and re-emphasized the need to
apply it.
• It was a case of ‘yellowing and decaying of the Taj
Anil K Thakur LLC
Mahal’.
• The court ordered the industries to shift away from
the Taj Trapezium or to switch over to gas as fuel.
• The industries which did not switch over to gas
were ordered to be closed down unconditionally
by December 31, 1997.
• Even the workers of the industries were also
recognized as the victims of the polluting industries
and for the closure of industry, the workers are not to
be thrown out of the industry without any
economic/job security.
• They were also held to be entitled to certain rights
Anil K Thakur LLC
and benefits from the erring industries.

• Therefore, declaration of gratuity, compensation,
additional compensation or shifting allowance by the
Supreme Court, in this case, has given a new
dimension to environmental jurisprudence in India.
Indian Laws
and
Polluter Pays Principle (PPP)
• There are certain statutes too, which directly

Anil K Thakur LLC
or indirectly adhered to the polluter pays

principle.
Indian Laws and PPP
• The Public Liability Insurance Act of 1991 makes it a
mandatory duty of all the industries, which have a
capital value of Rs. 2,00,000 to get insured under the
Act.
• The premium of such insurance shall be collected in
the ‘Environment Relief Fund’ which shall be
Anil K Thakur LLC
available with the collector of the district.

• The collector in case of industrial accident/ disaster
shall pay, by way of relief, immediately to the victims
of the accident/disaster.
• This relief will not be a bar to file a case for
compensation.
Indian Laws and PPP
• Similarly, The National Environmental Tribunal Act,
1995, also provided that tribunal can award
compensation on the ground of any damage to the
environment and such an amount shall be remitted
to the authority specified under section 7-A (3) of
Anil K Thakur LLC
the Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 for being

credited to the Environmental Relief Fund.
• The Act provided that if the owner of the unit/
industry fails to pay or deposit such an amount of
award within the specified period, it shall be
recoverable from the owner as arrears of land.
Courts have always come to the rescue
• The abovementioned pronouncements clear out
the position of the Supreme court, that even
without being any statutory binding of the
principle, the action of the court has been very
effecting and innovative.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• The court has always come to the rescue of

those who have suffered due to pollution.
• Such a firm stand of the court has taken by
surprise all those who used to manipulate the
apathetic environmental agencies.
Please Note
• The coming into force of the National Green Tribunal
Act 2010 implied an automatic repeal of two existing
laws:
• the National Environment Tribunal Act 1995, and
• the National Environment Appellate Authority Act,
1997, and,
Anil K Thakur LLC
• therefore, the closure of the National Environment

Appellate Authority (NEAA)-a quasi-judicial body
empowered to hear appeals against the
environmental approvals granted (or not) to
projects.
• All the cases pending before the NEAA were to be
heard by the NGT.
Topic-4.2
Precautionary Principle
Anil K Thakur LLC
What is Precautionary Principle?
• The Precautionary Principle has been adopted in
many environmental instruments all over the world.
• The principle states that if there is a risk of severe
damage to the environment, absence of any
scientific or conclusive proof is not to be given as a
reason for the inaction.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• The Precautionary Principle shifts the burden of proof

on the shoulders of the person who is arguing that
the activity he is carrying out is not harmful.
• The principle follows the approach of being safe
than being sorry.
• This principle is in contrast to the wait-and-watch
approach which is generally followed in
environmental issues.
What is Precautionary Principle?
• In short Precautionary Principle is a notion which

supports taking protective action before there is
complete scientific proof of a risk,
• that is action should not be delayed simply
Anil K Thakur LLC
because full scientific information is lacking.

When Precautionary Principle is used?
• Many times the scientific evidence do not give

any conclusive information.
• In such a case risk assessment should be done and
a balance should be maintained between
Anil K Thakur LLC
protection of the environment and unnecessary

and extensive restrictions.
• In such a scenario, Precautionary Principle is used.
• While applying the principle, it is very crucial to
understand the consequences of applying it.
Precautionary Principle- Global Perspective
• The Precautionary Principle appeared on the
global stage in the 1980s.
• It was first acknowledged formally in the
Preamble to the Vienna Convention for the
Anil K Thakur LLC
Protection of the Ozone Layer, 1985.

• The parties who were signatory to the
Convention acknowledged the precautionary
measures which have already been taken at the
international and the national levels to protect
the ozone layer.
Montreal Protocol
• Banking on this recognition, the Montreal
Protocol was introduced in 1987 where the
signatories agreed to undertake precautionary
measures to control the emission of substances
which depleted the ozone layer.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• In this Protocol also, measures taken earlier to

reduce the emission of chlorofluorocarbons were
recognized.
London Declaration
• The need to adopt measures which were
precautionary in nature was also recognized in
the Second North Sea Conference Ministerial
Declaration (the London Declaration) in 1987.
Anil K Thakur LLC
Convention on the Protection of
the Marine Environment
• At the Third Sea Conference, the parties came to
a decision that they would continue applying
preventive measures to prevent damage, even
there is no scientific evidence.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• The precautionary principle was also included in

the Convention on the Protection of the Marine
Environment of the North-East Atlantic, which
was introduced in the year 1992.
Helsinki Convention
• In the year 1992, the signatories of the Helsinki
Convention on the Protection and Use of Trans-
boundary Watercourses and International Lakes
was introduced.
• The signatories to this Convention decided to be
Anil K Thakur LLC
guided by the Precautionary Principle.

UN Framework Convention on Climate Change
• The year of 1992 was very important in this

regard.
• There was a convergence of the precautionary
principle and the climate change issue in
Anil K Thakur LLC
International Law.
• The Precautionary Principle was acknowledged on
international level when the UN Framework
Convention on Climate Change was adopted.
Basic Features of Precautionary Principle
It allows for 5 key elements that can prevent

irreversible damage to people and nature-
1. Anticipatory Action
2. Right to know
Anil K Thakur LLC
3. Alternatives Assessment
4. Full cost accounting
5. Participatory Decision Process
1. Anticipatory Action:
• There is a duty to take anticipatory action to
prevent harm.
• Governments, businesses, and community
Anil K Thakur LLC
groups, as well as general public, share their

responsibility.
2. Right to know:
• The community has a right to know complete and
accurate information on potential human health
and environmental impacts associated with the
selection of products, services, operations, or
Anil K Thakur LLC
plans.
• The burden to supply this information lies with the
proponent, not with the general public.
3. Alternatives Assessment:
• An obligation exists to examine a full range of
alternatives and select the alternative with the
least potential impact on human health and the
environment, including the alternative of doing
Anil K Thakur LLC
nothing.
4. Full cost accounting:
• When evaluating potential alternatives, there is a
duty to consider all the reasonably foreseeable
costs, including raw materials, manufacturing,
transportation, use, cleanup, eventual disposal,
Anil K Thakur LLC
and health costs.

• Short and long-term benefits and time
thresholds should be considered when making
decisions.
5. Participatory Decision Process:
• Decisions applying the precautionary principle
must be transparent, participatory, and informed
by the best available scientific and other relevant
information.
Anil K Thakur LLC
Precautionary Principle & Indian Law
• The Indian Judiciary actively supports the

Precautionary Principle.
• A few important
Anil K Thakur LLC
cases are discussed

hereinafter:
SC explained the “precautionary principle”
• SC in Vellore Citizens Welfare forum v. Union of
India (2009) 6 SCC 142 explained the “precautionary
principle” as follows:
• The ‘precautionary principle’ in the context of municipal law
means:
i. Environmental measures by the state government and
statutory authorities- must anticipate, prevent and attack
Anil K Thakur LLC
the cause of environmental degradation.

ii. Where there are threats of serious and irreversible damage,
lack of scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for
postponing measures to prevent environmental
degradation.
iii. The ‘onus of proof ‘is on the actor or the developer
/industrialist to show that his action is environmentally
benign.
M C Mehta v Kamal Nath
(1997) 1 SCC 388.
• In the case of M C Mehta v Kamal Nath, the
Supreme Court reiterated the decision given in
Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum case stating that
Anil K Thakur LLC
the Precautionary Principle is a part of the

environment law in India.
Narmada Bachao Andolan v UOI
AIR 2000 SC 3751
• In the case of Narmada Bachao Andolan v UOI, the
Apex Court very clearly laid down the proposition of
law, and specifically of Precautionary Principle.
• The Court stated that when an issue pertains to
Anil K Thakur LLC
environmental damage, the onus of proof is on the

person who is contending that the activities carried
on by him are not harmful to the environment.
• The party who is giving such contention also has to
satisfy the Court of the same, that there will be no
environmental degradation due to his activities.
AP Control Pollution Board vs. Prof M V Nayadu
AIR 1999 SC 812
• The Precautionary Principle was very
comprehensively reviewed by the Apex Court in the
case of AP Control Pollution Board vs. Prof M V
Nayadu.
• The Court stated that it is better to go wrong in taking
Anil K Thakur LLC
caution and prevent environmental harm rather than

waiting for the issue to materialize into an irreversible
problem.
• The Court opined that the Precautionary Principle was
evolved because of lack of scientific certainty only,
and the principle involves anticipating the harm the
environment may suffer and act on the basis of that.
Anil K Thakur LLC
Topic-4.3
What is Public Trust Doctrine?
• The Public Trust Doctrine is the principle that
certain resources are preserved for public use,
and that the government is required to
maintain them for the reasonable public use.
Anil K Thakur LLC
Basic idea
• The Public Trust Doctrine primarily rests on the
principle that certain resources like air, water, sea
and the forests have such a great importance to
people as a whole that it would be wholly
unjustified to make them a subject of private
ownership.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• It is based on the notion that the public holds

inviolable rights in certain lands and resources,
and that regardless of title ownership, and that
“the state retains certain rights in such lands and
resources in trust for the public.
Issues which Public Trust Doctrine redress are-
• Who owns the Earth and its resources?

• To what extent may the general public claim the
pure water, clean air, rich soil, and the myriad
services Earth provides to sustain human life?
Anil K Thakur LLC
• Across continents and spanning centuries, a

dynamic tension continues between those who
would circumscribe the Earth’s bounty for private
use and those who would carefully allot Earth’s
riches to satisfy human needs.
History of this doctrine
• About 1,500 years ago, the Roman Emperor Justinian
simplified the jumble of laws governing his Empire.
• He commissioned dozens of the era’s leading jurists,
whose wisdom became codified in the Corpus Juris
Civilis.
• In 529, Justinian added these words to one section:
Anil K Thakur LLC
“By the law of nature these things are common to all

mankind, the air, running water, the sea and
consequently the shores of the sea.”
• The Public Trust Doctrine, as this notion came to be
known, suggests that certain resources—usually
water, but now much more—are common, shared
property of all citizens, stewarded in perpetuity by the
State.
Doctrine adopted by English Common Law
• The Doctrine has its origin in Justinian Institute (530

A.D.) of Romans, later on adopted by the English
Common Law.
• The Magna Carta (1215) with its changes introduced
in 1641 and 1647 declared that Public Trust Doctrine
was the part of their established law.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• They declared that the Government has an

affirmative duty to administer, protect, manage and
conserve fish and wildlife.
• The doctrine has also been acknowledges by the
French Civil Code and Spanish Civil Law as a concept
of property.
Public Trust Doctrine imposes
Three types of restrictions on govt.
• Three types of restrictions on governmental
authority are often thought to be imposed by the
Public Trust:
• first, the property subject to the trust must not
only be used for a public purpose, but it must be
Anil K Thakur LLC
held available for use by the general public;

• second, the property may not be sold, even for a
fair cash equivalent; and
• third the property must be maintained for
particular types of uses.
Doctrine of Public Trust & United Nations
• The Stockholm Declaration of United Nations on
Human Environment clearly indicates this
determining proposition:
• The natural resources of the earth, including the
Anil K Thakur LLC
air, water, land, flora and fauna and especially

representative samples of natural system, must
be safeguarded for the benefit of present and
future generations through careful planning or
management, as appropriate
India & Public Trust Doctrine
• Our legal system-based on English Common law- includes
the Public Trust Doctrine as a part of its jurisprudence.
• The State is the trustee of all natural resources which are by
nature meant for public use and enjoyment. Public at large
is the beneficiary of the seashore, running waters, airs,
forests and ecologically fragile lands.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• The State as a trustee is under a legal duty to protect the

natural resources; these resources are meant for public use
and cannot be converted into private ownership.
• The aesthetic use and the pristine glory cannot be
permitted to be eroded for private, commercial or any
other use unless the courts find it necessary in good faith,
for public good and in public interest to encroach upon the
said resource.
India & Public Trust Doctrine
• In India, Judges have taken these substantive and
procedural rights seriously and have strengthened
them by establishing the Public Trust Doctrine to
secure powerful protections for citizens’
Environmental Human Rights.
• The PTD has developed in India through several
Anil K Thakur LLC
landmark cases in the Supreme Court.

• The Supreme Court has deduced this doctrine from
various sources such as the Common Law and Article
21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the
fundamental right to life, and Article 39 in Part IV of
the Constitution which provides for equitable
distribution of material resources.
M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath,
(1997) 1 SCC 388
• The doctrine was first invoked in 1995 by the SC in the famous
M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath (‘Span Motels case’).
• In this PIL, the petitioner challenged a tourist resort namely Span
Motels which proposed to change the course of the river Beas by
dredging, blasting and reconstructing the riverbed.
• The construction of the resort was planned on protected forest
land procured on a ninety-nine year lease from the government.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• The redirection of the course of the river had been approved by

the Ministry of Environment and Forests as well as the local
Gram Panchayat.
• The SC ruled that the lease of forest land for resort construction
as well as the diversion of the river violated the PTD and
therefore were not tenable.
• Importantly, the court declared that the PTD, being part of the
Common Law system, was ‘law of the land’.
K. M. Chinnappa v Union of India
AIR 2003 SC 724
• This was a petition challenging the renewal of
mining lease granted to Kudremukh Iron Ore
Company in the Kudremukh National Park.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• The Supreme Court held that the pristine glory of

the natural resources cannot be allowed to be
eroded or encroached unless the Courts find it
necessary in good faith for public good and in the
public interest.
State of West Bengal v Kesoram Industries Ltd.
(2004) 10 SCC 201
• This Doctrine was once again followed wherein it
was observed that deep underground water
belongs to the State in the sense that the
Doctrine of Public Trust extends thereto.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• Ground water is considered as a part of national

wealth and it belongs to the entire society.
• Water is a nectar sustaining life on earth and thus
the State has a duty to protect ground water
against excessive exploitation.
M.I. Builders (P) Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu,
(1999) 6 SCC 464
• Subsequently, in M.I. Builders (P) Ltd. v. Radhey
Shyam Sahu,(‘M.I. Builders’ case) the Supreme
Court ruled that the builder who had destroyed a
public park during construction of a shopping
Anil K Thakur LLC
complex should restore it as the park was protected

under the PTD derived from the right to life under
Article 21 of the Constitution.
Fomento Resorts & Hotels Ltd. v. Minguel Martins,
(2009) 3 SCC 571.
• Later in the Fomento Resorts & Hotels Ltd. .Minguel
Martins (‘Fomento Resorts Case’) the Supreme Court
reiterated that natural resources are common
properties held by the state as a trustee on behalf of
the people, especially the future generations.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• Therefore, the state cannot transfer public trust

properties to a private party, if such a transfer
interferes with the access rights of the public.
• The public trust doctrine allows the judiciary to
protect the rights of public at large to have access to
light, air and water and also to protect rivers, seas,
tanks, trees, forests and associated natural eco-
systems.
Reliance Natural Resources Ltd. v. Reliance
Industries Ltd., (2010) 7 SCC 1.
• In Reliance Natural Resources Ltd. v. Reliance
Industries Ltd. (‘Reliance Industries Limited’), the
Supreme Court interpreted Article 297 of the
Indian Constitution, to find that the people of
India as a nation are the true owners of the
Anil K Thakur LLC
natural gas.
• The Court also relied on Article 39 included in
Part IV of the Constitution which calls for an
equitable distribution of India’s material
resources to best serve the common good which
includes fairness to future generations.
Earlier v/s recent court interpretations
• While earlier interpretations of the doctrine

saw the obligations imposed on the state as
being negative in nature – a review of actions
that the state may not perform.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• Recent judgments have started to see such

obligations as positive in nature.
Topic-4.4
Sustainable Development
Anil K Thakur LLC
Meaning: 'Sustainable Development
• Right to wholesome environment is a fundamental
right protected under Art. 21 of the Constitution of
India.
• But the question is, can the environment be protected
at present times when almost all the countries in
South-East Asia are still at their developing stages?
Anil K Thakur LLC
• Development comes through industrialization, which

in turn the main factor behind the degradation of
environment.
• To resolve the issue, the experts worldwide have
come up with a doctrine called 'Sustainable
Development', i.e. there must be balance between
development and ecology.
Origin of the doctrine:
• The concept of 'Sustainable Development' is not a
new concept.
• The doctrine had come to be known as early as in
1972 in the Stockholm declaration. It had been stated
in the declaration that:
Anil K Thakur LLC
• “Man has the fundamental right to freedom, equality

and adequate conditions of life, in an environment of
a quality that permits a life of dignity and well being
and he bears a solemn responsibility to protect and
improve the environment for present and future
generation”.
Origin of the doctrine:
• But the concept was given a definite shape in a report by
world commission on environment, which was known as
'our common future'.
• The commission, which was chaired by the then Norway
Prime Minister, Ms. G.H. Brundtland defined 'Sustainable
Anil K Thakur LLC
Development‘ as: Development that meets the needs of

the present without compromising the ability of the future
generations to meet their own needs.
• The report was popularly known as 'Brundtland report' the
concept had been further discussed under agenda 21 of UN
conference on environment and development held in June
1992 at Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Anil K Thakur LLC
Core Elements of Sustainable Development
• Three core elements of sustainable development
are-
1. economic growth ;
2. social inclusion; and
Anil K Thakur LLC
3. environmental protection.
• It is crucial to harmonize them.
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs):
• To bring sustainable development in the

mainstream United Nations (UN) launched the 2030
Agenda for Sustainable Development and SDGs.
• This universal, integrated and transformative
agenda aims to spur actions that will end poverty
and build a more sustainable world over the next 15
Anil K Thakur LLC
years.
• There are 17 goals and 169 targets to be achieved
by 2030.
• Reaching the goals requires action on all fronts-
governments, businesses, civil society and people
everywhere all have a role to play.
Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India
AIR 1996 SC 2715
• In Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India, the
Supreme Court opined, the traditional concept that
development and ecology are opposed to each other, is no
longer acceptable, sustainable development is the answer.
• Sustainable Development means to fulfill the need of
Anil K Thakur LLC
present generation without compromising the needs of

future generation.
• Sustainable development is a balancing concept between
ecology and development.
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQp11Y0v6M0
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJrr-VGIvSQ
Tarun Bhagat Sangh, Alwar vs. Union of India & others
1993 SCR (3) 21
• In a landmark case Tarun Bhagat Sangh, Alwar vs. Union of
India & others, the petitioner through a PIL brought to the
notice of the supreme court that the state government of
Rajasthan though empowered to make rules to protect
environment, failed to do so and in contrary allowed mining
work to continue within the forest area.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• Consequently, the Supreme Court issued directions that no

mining work or operation could be continued within the
protected area.
• But it would be unwise to hold that the courts always favour
environment without giving any significance to the
development aspect when dispute arises between
environment and development.
M. C. Mehta vs. Union of India
(1992) 3 SCC 256.
Stone Crushing Units Closed
• In M.C. Mehta V. Union of India, the SC took note of environmental pollution

due to stone crushing activities in and around Delhi, Faridabad and
Ballabgarh complexes.
• The Court was conscious that environmental changes are the inevitable
consequences of industrial development in our country, but at the same time
the quality of environment cannot be permitted to be damaged by polluting
Anil K Thakur LLC
the air, water and land to such an extent that it becomes a health hazard for
the residents of the area.
• Showing deep concern to the environment, the court reiterated, "Every
citizen has a right to fresh air and to live in pollution free environment."
• Thus, the SC once again treated it as violation of Article 21 of the
Constitution and passed the order in absolute terms under Article 32
directing the stone crushing units to stop their activities in those areas.
• The Court further directed the government to rehabilitate these stone
crushers in "crushing zone" within the period of six months.
Topic-4.5
Cases @ National Green Law Tribunal
Anil K Thakur LLC
NGT bans on RO water filters
Friends through its General Secretary
v.
Ministry of Water Resources,
Anil K Thakur LLC
NGT Principal Bench,

New Delhi
Original Application No. 134/2015
NGT ban on RO water filters
• The NGT vide its order dated May 28, 2019 in
Friends through its General Secretary v. Ministry of
Water Resources, NGT Principal Bench, New Delhi
Original Application No. 134/2015 instructed the
Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate
Anil K Thakur LLC
Change ("MoEF & CC")

• to issue appropriate notification prohibiting the use
of RO systems in areas where the amount of TDS
was less than 500 milligram/litre (mg/l) and creating
of public awareness about ill effects of
demineralized water on public health namely
removal of important minerals as well as undue
wastage of water caused.
Proceedings before the SC
• Aggrieved by the aforesaid order of NGT, the
appellants challenged the impugned order in the
Supreme Court.
• Thus, the Supreme court in Water Quality
Association of India (WQAI) v. Friends and ors on
Anil K Thakur LLC
has now granted the appellants period of ten days

from the date of order to approach the Ministry
with relevant materials for consideration of their
contentions before an appropriate notification is
issued by the Ministry in furtherance to NGT's
order.
Proceedings before the SC
• The NGT through its order has indicated the
requirement of controlling the adverse impact of
demineralization of water for human consumption
and the wastage of unused water.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• The NGT through its order has indicated the

requirement of controlling the adverse impact of
demineralization of water for human consumption
and the wastage of unused water in the era of
depleting natural resources which may be addressed
by the Government in due course of time.
SC Order
• In a recent development, the Hon'ble Supreme
Court of India vide its order dated November 22,
2019 in the case of Water Quality Association of
India (WQAI) v. Friends and ors. has directed the
appellants
• i.e. manufacturers of Reverse Osmosis (RO) water
Anil K Thakur LLC
purifiers to point out to the Ministry the material it

has in possession against the ban imposed by
National Green Tribunal (NGT) on use of reverse
osmosis (RO) systems in areas where the amount
of total dissolved solids (TDS) was less than 500
milligram/litre (mg/l).
NGT Case-Pollution caused by Diaries
Nuggehalli Jayasimha
v.
Government of NCT of Delhi
Anil K Thakur LLC
Original Application No. 46/2018,

NGT order dated 08.07.2019
Pollution caused by Diaries
• The Tribunal dealt in detail with the issue of non-
compliance of environmental norms by dairies
operating in Delhi.
• It was observed that livestock is a major source of
methane emissions causing surface temperatures to
surge up.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• The Tribunal directed Delhi Pollution Control

Committee (DPCC) to ensure that polluting activities
which are without Consent to Operate are stopped by
way of prohibitory order and further DPCC cannot
shift its onus and responsibility to local bodies and to
absolve from its responsibility.
Tribunal’s directions
• Accordingly, the Tribunal directed DPCC to enforce
its statutory obligations by closing polluting
activities, prosecuting the polluters and recovering
compensation in accordance with law and furnish
report to the Tribunal.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• The CPCB was also directed to undertake study

and formulate appropriate guidelines for
managing and monitoring of environmental norms
by dairies throughout the India and furnish its
report to the Tribunal.
Menace of Sand Mining
National Green Tribunal Bar Association

v.
Anil K Thakur LLC
Virender Singh,

• The Tribunal took notice of the remedial action
required against illegal sand mining in violation of the
directions of H’ble Supreme Court in Deepak Kumar v.
State of Haryana &Ors. (2012) 4 SCC 629.
• The Supreme Court had observed that absence of
regulation of sand mining was a threat to biodiversity,
Anil K Thakur LLC
could destroy riverine vegetation, cause erosion,

pollute water sources badly affecting riparian ecology
and damaging ecosystem of rivers, safety of bridges,
weakening of river beds, destruction of natural
habitats of organisms living on the river beds, affect
fish breeding and migration and spell disaster for the
conservation of bird species and increase saline water
in the rivers.
• The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate
Change issued Sustainable Sand-Mining
Management Guidelines 2016, however, it was
noticed that the same were not complied with.
• The Tribunal accordingly considered the issue of
revision of Guidelines in the light of directions of the
Anil K Thakur LLC
Tribunal and preparation of an effective monitoring

mechanism for preventive and remedial measures to
be taken in the states of West Bengal, Rajasthan,
Gujarat, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Punjab, Uttar
Pradesh, Haryana, Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh,
Bihar, Jammu and Kashmir, Goa and Telangana where
sand mining is more prevalent as compared to the
other states.
Conservation of Biological
Diversity
Chandra Bhal Singh
v.
Anil K Thakur LLC
Union of India & Ors.,

Conservation of Biological Diversity
• The issue for consideration before the Tribunal was non-

compliance of provisions of the Biodiversity Act, 2000 and
the Biodiversity Rules, 2004.
• NGT noted that Biodiversity Management Committees have
not been constituted as per Section 41 of the Act and
People's Biodiversity Registers(PBR) have not been
Anil K Thakur LLC
maintained as required under Rule 22 (6).

• PBR helps the State and local community to become aware
of the valuable resources being harvested in the area which
can be utilised for overall social and economic development
of the State.
• Furthermore PBR also help in conservation of traditional
practices and knowledge of local community.
Conservation of Biological Diversity
• In view of serious non compliance for the last 16
years, the Tribunal directed the Chief Secretaries of
all the States to evolve mechanism for monthly
meeting to be attended by the Chairman and
Member Secretary of State Biodiversity Boards,
Secretary of Panchayats Environment and Forest
Anil K Thakur LLC
starting from September 2019.

• States were ordered to be held accountable for
default and were required to deposit a sum of Rupees
10 lakhs per month each from 01.01.2020.
• MoEF&CC was directed to file a compliance report
after collecting necessary data from all the States.
Rejuvenation of River Ganga
M.C.Mehta
v.
Anil K Thakur LLC

• The matter was taken up by the Tribunal for reviewing
the progress and compliance of directions of the
Tribunal on preventing and limiting the pollution of
River Ganga.
• The Tribunal observed that prevention of discharge of
untreated industrial waste and sewage in River Ganga
Anil K Thakur LLC
and its tributaries, installation of Sewage Treatment

Plants (STPs) and Common and Combined Effluent
Treatment Plants(CETPs), installation of continuous
emission monitoring system, uses of treated
wastewater and sludge manure and setting up of bio-
digesters and seepage management and preventing
dumping of waste were the primary issues requiring
immediate attention.
• The Tribunal noted that River Ganga being national river with
distinct significance for the country, all the authorities have to be
stringent and effect zero tolerance to the pollution of River
Ganga.
• Taking a stern approach, the Tribunal ordered that the erring
industrial units would be liable to pay environmental
compensation of Rupees 10 lakhs per month to CPCB for
Anil K Thakur LLC
discharging untreated sewage in any drain connected to River

Ganga.
• With regard to sectors where the STP and separation network
work had not started, the State was held liable to pay
environmental compensation of Rupees 10 lakhs per month
after 31.12.2020.
• The Tribunal also directed that a suitable tourism policy for
permitting hotels and vehicles for such other activities be
evolved which are consistent with the carrying capacity to avoid
pollution of River Ganga.
The problem of E-waste
Shailesh Singh
v.
Anil K Thakur LLC
State of U.P. & Ors.,

Original Application No. 512/2018
The problem of E-waste
• The question for consideration before the Tribunal was
remedial action against scientific disposal of E-waste which
was causing contamination of groundwater and soil
acidification.
• The Tribunal directed for furnishing the report of review on
the performance and working of parameters and
Anil K Thakur LLC
methodology developed for compliance of continuous

activities of action plan for enforcement of E-waste
(Management) Rules 2016.
• The State Pollution Control Boards were directed to furnish
implementation status in respect of checking of informal
trading, dismantling and recycling of e-waste collection and
disposal of e-waste governance framework for monitoring
compliance and capacity building at District, State and CPCB
level for enforcement.
Management of Hazardous Waste
Rajiv Narayan & Anr.

v.
Anil K Thakur LLC

• The matter was taken up by NGT due to alarming
situation created by generation and scientific
dumping of hazardous waste resulting in serious and
irreversible damage to the environment and public
health.
• The Tribunal observed large-scale non-compliance of
Anil K Thakur LLC
Hazardous and Other Waste (Management and

Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 vide its order,
the Tribunal constituted a monitoring committee for
management of hazardous waste and the committee
submitted its recommendations to the Tribunal.
• The Tribunal directed CPCB and all SPCBs, CBIC,
DGFT, Port Authorities, Ministry of Shipping,
Ministry of Labour and Employment and
Department of Labour to comply with the
recommendations of the Expert Committee,
violation of which would attract environmental
Anil K Thakur LLC
compensation to be levied on the defaulting parties.

• It was further directed to ensure that hazardous
waste inventory be updated and verified by way of
checks to ensure that the same is credible, reliable
and robust in terms of content and scope.
• 126 sites which were identified as contaminated were
directed to be cleared of the hazardous waste within 6
months so that the remediation process may be started.
• With regard to 195 probable contaminated sites, the
Tribunal directed that the assessment may be completed
Anil K Thakur LLC
within 6 months and thereafter the waste may be

removed within next 6 months from sites.
• The Tribunal directed that clearance of site by way of
disposal of transfer should be strictly as per the
Hazardous and other Wastes (Management and
Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016.
Stubble Burning and consequent
Air Pollution
Smt. Ganga Lalwani
v.
Anil K Thakur LLC

Stubble Burning and consequent Air Pollution
• Remedial action to prevent crop burning resulting
in air pollution particularly in the NCR region has
been subject matter of consideration before the
NGT for the last more than 6 years.
• The Tribunal noted with dismay that the steps
Anil K Thakur LLC
taken were inadequate and did not provide for

ground checking and vigilance and extinguishing
of illegal fires.
• Preventive remedies of communicating with the
farmers the disadvantages of burning were also
found unsatisfactory and ineffective.
Stubble Burning and consequent Air Pollution
• The Tribunal noted that there was no effective

incentive mechanism.
• Accordingly the Tribunal directed the Central
Government as well as the States to place on the
Anil K Thakur LLC
respective websites the date of fire incidents,

responsible officers for the subject for the entire
area and action taken for failures on a daily basis
to continuously monitor the situation.
On the issue of Noise Pollution
Hardeep Singh &Ors.
v.
SDMC &Ors.,
Anil K Thakur LLC

• The subject matter for consideration before the

Tribunal was the failure of statutory authorities in
Delhi in controlling noise pollution as per the
mandate of Noise Pollution (Regulation and
Anil K Thakur LLC
Control) Rules, 2000.

• The grievance of the applicants was that despite
the orders of the Tribunal, unsatisfactory state of
affairs continued.
• The Tribunal observed with dismay that despite specific
directions, requisite equipments for sound monitoring were
not procured, monitoring stations were not set up, no
satisfactory data about the action taken against by
authorities was prepared by the statutory authorities
entrusted with the enforcement of law.
• Accordingly, taking cognizance of report of CPCB that
Anil K Thakur LLC
compensation be imposed for violation by using

equipments assessed at 10-25% cost of such equipment.
• The Tribunal directed CPCB to lay down stringent
compensation for tampering with sound limiters also in
order to ensure that the same is not resorted to and to
revise the compensation for bursting of crackers for
different classes of defaulters.
• The Tribunal also directed that a dedicated

telephone line with recording facility and a
dedicated online grievance redressal portal for
redressal of noise pollution related grievance
Anil K Thakur LLC
be developed by Delhi Police and public

awareness in this regard be created.
Air Pollution in Non- Attainment Cities
News item published
in
"The Times of India"
authored by Shri Vishwa Mohan titled
Anil K Thakur LLC
"NCAP with multiple timelines to clean air in 102

cities to be released around August 15",
Original Application No. 681/2018;

• NGT dealt with the subject of remedial measures to be
adopted to enforce the Ambient Air Quality Standards with
reference to provisions of the Air Act and Environment
Protection Act in cities classified as non-attainment cities
based on monitoring of ambient air quality.
• The Tribunal observed that the major problem was
Anil K Thakur LLC
remediation of legacy waste dump sites in the country,

releasing emissions in the ambient air and also causing
incidents of fire, further polluting the environment.
• Accordingly, the Tribunal directed bio-remediation of such
dump sites. The Tribunal also directed development of
Emergency Response System to be placed in public domain.
• The Tribunal directed for installation of Ambient

Air Quality Monitoring Stations within one year
which would monitor the air quality on all 12
notified parameters under the Air Act.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• On default it was directed that the State Pollution

Control Boards would be liable to pay
compensation at Rupees 5 lakhs per month
starting from 01.01.2021.
Coastal Water Pollution
Lt. Col. Sarvadaman Singh Oberoi
v.
Union of India &Ors.,
Anil K Thakur LLC

• The Tribunal dealt with the issue of formulating
an Action Plan to restore coastal water quality
along the Indian coastal areas. Reliance was
placed on report of CPCB "Classification of Indian
Coastal and Conflicts" referring to marine
Anil K Thakur LLC
pollution by sewage and other discharge in

violation of environmental laws.
• It was observed that coastal areas are critically
polluted on account of dumping of sewage and
waste. Over 80% of marine pollution is from land-
based sources- industrial, agricultural and urban.
• The Tribunal noted that report of CPCB is incomplete about
the status of compliance with regard to norms of pollution
laws in all the coastal areas, particularly with regard to
discharge of untreated industrial and Municipal effluents
and solid waste.
• Accordingly, the Tribunal directed CPCB to submit a
comprehensive Status Report with regard to coastal
Anil K Thakur LLC
pollution by way of classification of coastal areas into

priorities I- V.
• In view of lack of accurate and scientific data, the Tribunal
directed all the State Pollution Control Boards of coastal
States/UTs to provide relevant information to CPCB when
then 1 month failing which they would be liable to pay
Rupees 10 lakhs per month till compliance.
Compliance of Solid Waste Management Rules
at Railway Stations
Saloni Singh & Anr.

v.
Anil K Thakur LLC

at Railway Stations
• The Tribunal considered the issue of non-compliance
of Plastics Waste and Solid Waste Management
Rules, preventing discharge of effluents,
management of water at Railway Stations,
compartments and tracks and removal of
encroachments causing environment degradation.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• The Tribunal had earlier directed preparation of

remedial Action Plan by 30.11.2018 to be notified on
website for comments of general public and be
finalized before 31.03.2019.
• The CAG was directed to conduct Performance Audit
on or before 30.06.2019 on the issue of solid waste,
plastic waste and open defecation along railway
tracks.
at Railway Stations
• The Tribunal while reviewing the compliance of
the orders directed the CPCB to take into account
the process of implementation of Action Plans of
Railways for all major stations and evaluate the
Anil K Thakur LLC
same and file compliance report with regard to

compliance of Section 25 of the Water Act and
Section 21 of the Air Act of such railway stations
before 31.03.2020.
Remedial action for 351 polluted
river stretches in India
News item published
in
"The Hindu"authored by Shri Jacob Koshy titled
Anil K Thakur LLC
"More River Stretches are now critically

polluted :CPCB“
Remedial action for 351 polluted river stretches
in India
• The proceedings for cleaning of 351 polluted river
stretches were initiated on the basis of a news item in
'The Hindu' under the heading "More river stretches
are now critically polluted" authored by Jacob Koshy
Anil K Thakur LLC
which stated that 351 polluted river stretches have

been identified by the Central Pollution Control Board
as being critically polluted.
• The Tribunal had earlier passed directions for
preparation for Action Plans for restoration and
rejuvenation of the polluted river stretches.
Remedial action for 351 polluted river stretches
in India
• The Tribunal while reviewing the progress directed
that all steps proposed in the Action Plans including
completion of setting up of STPs and their
commissioning be done till 31.03.2021, in default of
which compensation assessed at Rs. 10 lakhs per
Anil K Thakur LLC
month per Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) would be

payable.
• The Tribunal further directed that monitoring may be
done by the Chief Secretaries of all States/UTs at the
State Level and by Secretary, Ministry of Jal Shakti
with the assistance of National Mission for Clean
Ganga(NMCG) and CPCB.
Plastic Waste Management
Central Pollution Control Board
v.
State of Andaman & Nicobar &Ors.,
Anil K Thakur LLC
Execution Application No. 13/2019,

• The Tribunal vide its order considered the issue of
implementation of Plastic Waste Management Rules
2016 and directions issued by CPCB to implement the
thickness norms for carry bags, constitution of squads
for vigilance, preventing littering of plastic waste in
public places, submission of Annual Reports and
Anil K Thakur LLC
Action Plan for management and quantification and

characterization and every city and town of all states.
• The Tribunal ordered that national framework for
Extended Producers Liability be finalized and enforced
within 3 months and report be furnished by the
MoEF&CC to the Tribunal.
• CPCB was also directed to give its report for compensation
regime.
• The Tribunal additionally directed for preparation of an
institutional mechanism to ensure that no unregistered
plastic manufacturing recycling unit is in operation and no
plastic bag of less than 50 microns thickness be
manufactured, stocked and sold and used in the cities,
Anil K Thakur LLC
special environment squads be set up to oversee that no

littering of plastic waste takes place at historical religious
and public places and no burning of plastic waste takes
place in the open.
• The States have been directed to submit their compliance
report filling which compensation of Rupees 10 Lakhs per
quarter shall be levied by the CPCB.
Pollution in Lakes
Court on its own Motion

v.
Anil K Thakur LLC
State of Karnataka,
Original Application No. 125/2017;
Pollution in Lakes
• The NGT considered the issue of contamination

of Bellandur, Agara and Varthur lakes at
Bengaluru on account of discharge of untreated
sewage and other effluents from
Anil K Thakur LLC
residential/commercial/industrial buildings in
violation of statutory provisions of the Water Act,
1974, particularly Section 25.
Pollution in Lakes
• The NGT noticed that the current situation was
that sewage continued to be discharged into the
lake with no plan of even immediate interim
preventive measures.
• There was large scale breach of public duties by
Anil K Thakur LLC
concerned Authorities dealing with the subject.

Illegality may not continue on account of default
or negligence of the Authorities.
• Accordingly, a Monitoring Committee was set up
to review the progress as per the order and
directions of the Tribunal till 31.03.2020.
Enforcement of environmental norms
in
running restaurants/ hotels/ motels/ banquets
etc.
Westend Green Farms Society
v.
Anil K Thakur LLC
Union of India &Ors,

Enforcement of environmental norms in running
restaurants/ hotels/ motels/ banquets etc.
• The Tribunal noted the violation of law on the
subjects of solid waste management, discharge of
effluents, illegal ground water extraction, ground
water contamination, emission by illegally operating
diesel generators, absence of statutory consents
under the Air and Water Act and violation of
Anil K Thakur LLC
conditions of consent wherever such consent had

been granted, by the
restaurants/hotels/motels/banquets in Mahipalpur
and Rajori areas in Delhi.
• The Tribunal also considered the issue of absence of
Rain Water Harvesting System, excess noise pollution,
illegal parking and encroachments.
• The Tribunal in view of Guidelines prepared by CPCB
covering requirement of monitoring mechanism,
• Action Plan suggested by Urban Development Department
for compiling data of functions held on installation of CCTV
cameras,
• GPS system in garbage collection vans,
Anil K Thakur LLC
• regulating sides of gatherings as per the capacity of areas,

• fire safety devices steps,
• control traffic congestion
• inter alia directed that enforcing the requirement of
consent to establish should be the starting point for
commission of the project rather than last in the
governance chain.
• The project proponent at such areas must file their Annual
Environment Statement in terms of Rule 14 of the EP
Rules.
• The Tribunal for the director that stringent norms be
worked out for controlling and regulating parking of
vehicles used by organisations and guests in functions as
Anil K Thakur LLC
well as parking of vehicles generally on roads and public

spaces at into air pollution.
• It was further held that use of DG systems must be fitted
with noise limiters and data loggers and be operated
within soundproof halls within prescribed noise limit
without its effect be felt outside.
• The Tribunal clarified that the owner of the property will
be liable for any default.
Topic-4.6
Powers & Functions of NGT
Anil K Thakur LLC
About NGT
• The National Green Tribunal has been established
on 18.10.2010 under the National Green Tribunal
Act 2010 for effective disposal of cases relating to
environmental protection and conservation of
forests and other natural resources and giving
compensation for damages to affected persons.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• It is a specialized body equipped with the

necessary expertise to handle environmental
disputes.
• It has replaced the National Environment
Appellate Authority.
Functions of NGT
• The Tribunal's dedicated jurisdiction in environmental
matters and help reduce the burden of litigation in
the higher courts.
• The Tribunal is mandated to endeavour for disposal
of applications or appeals finally within 6 months of
filing of the same.
Anil K Thakur LLC
• Initially, the NGT was proposed to be set up at five

places of sittings and would follow circuit procedure
for making itself more accessible.
• New Delhi is the Principal Place of sitting of the
Tribunal and Bhopal, Pune, Kolkata & Chennai are
other four place of sitting of the Tribunal.
Structure of NGT
• Principal Bench of the NGT-New Delhi
• Pune (Western Zone Bench)
• Bhopal (Central Zone Bench)
• Chennai (Southern Bench) and
• Kolkata (Eastern Bench).
Anil K Thakur LLC
• Each Bench has a specified geographical jurisdiction

covering several States in a region.
• There is also a mechanism for circuit benches.
• For example, the Southern Zone bench, which is
based in Chennai, can decide to have sittings in
other places like Bangalore or Hyderabad.
Structure of NGT
• The Chairperson of the NGT is a sitting/retired Judge

of the Supreme Court, Head Quartered in Delhi.
• Other Judicial members are sitting/retired Judges of
High Courts.
• Each bench of the NGT will comprise of at least one
Anil K Thakur LLC
Judicial Member(Sitting/Rtd. Judge of the High Court)

and one Expert Member.
• Expert members should have a professional
qualification and a minimum of 15 years experience
in the field of environment/forest conservation and
related subjects.
What is the Tribunal’s composition?
• The Tribunal has a presence in five zones- North,
Central, East, South and West.
• The Principal Bench is situated in the North Zone,
headquartered in Delhi.
• The Central zone bench is situated in Bhopal, East
Anil K Thakur LLC
zone in Kolkata, South zone in Chennai and West zone

in Pune.
• The Tribunal is headed by the Chairperson who sits in
the Principal Bench and has at least ten but not more
than twenty judicial members and at least ten but not
more than twenty expert members.
Powers of NGT: What sort of cases are heard in NGT?
• Any person seeking relief and compensation for environmental damage
involving subjects in the legislations mentioned in Schedule-I of the
National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 may approach the Tribunal.
The statutes in Schedule I are:
• The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974;
• The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Act, 1977;
• The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980;
Anil K Thakur LLC
• The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981;

• The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986;
• The Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991;
• The Biological Diversity Act, 2002.
• The Tribunal has jurisdiction over all civil cases involving a substantial
question relating to environment.
• Additionally, any person aggrieved by an order/direction of any of the
Appellate Authorities under the legislations mentioned above can also
challenge them before the NGT.
Are decisions of the Tribunal final?
• The Tribunal has powers to review its own
decisions.
• If this fails, the decision can be challenged before

Anil K Thakur LLC
the Supreme Court within ninety days.

• This means that any violations pertaining only to above
stated laws, or any order / decision taken by the
Government under these laws can be challenged before the
NGT.
• Importantly, the NGT has not been vested with powers to
hear any matter relating to the Wildlife (Protection) Act,
1972, the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and various laws enacted
Anil K Thakur LLC
by States relating to forest preservation etc.

• Therefore, specific and substantial issues related to these
laws cannot be raised before the NGT.
• You will have to approach the State High Court or the
Supreme Court through a Writ Petition (PIL) or file an
Original Suit before an appropriate Civil Judge where the
project that you intend to challenge is located.
Speedy disposal and increased access to justice:
• Expeditious decision making is beneficial not only to
litigants but also enables prevention of potential
environmental damage instead of compensating for
damage already caused.
• By serving the orders and seeking responses by
Anil K Thakur LLC
email only saves time and enables the Tribunal to take

decisions in a time bound manner.
• In the absence of full strength of judicial and expert
members in regional benches of the Tribunal situated
in Chennai, Pune, Bhopal and Kolkata, the Principal
Bench in New Delhi is hearing applications from
other jurisdictions remotely by video conferencing to
meet the needs of the litigants.
FEW LANDMARK JUDGEMENTS
• Ms. Betty C. Alvares v. The State of Goa and Ors.

Misc Application No. 32/2014(WZ)
• Even a Foreign National Can Approach the NGT.
Anil K Thakur LLC
Almitra H. Patel & Ors. vs. Union of India and Ors. JT
1999 (10) SC 332
• A complete prohibition on open burning of
waste on lands.
• Absolute segregation has been made
Anil K Thakur LLC
mandatory in waste to energy plants and

landfills should be used for depositing inert
waste only and are subject to bio-stabilization
within 6 months.
Srinagar Bandh Aapda Sangharsh Samiti & Anr.
v.
Alaknanda Hydro Power Co. Ltd. & Ors.
MANU/GT/0101/2016
• NGT has directly relied on the principle of

‘polluter pays’ and made a private entity liable
Anil K Thakur LLC
to pay compensation, making them subject to

a code of environmental jurisprudence.
Samit Mehta vs. Union of India and Ors.
1999 (3) SCALE 166
• This case was held to involve questions of public
importance and significance of environmental
jurisprudence and ‘Polluter Pays’ principle was
invoked.
Anil K Thakur LLC
Save Mon Region Federation and Ors. vs. Union
of India and Ors. MANU/GT/0150/2016
• The Tribunal very proactively suspended the
Environmental Clearance granted to the Project
and Directed the EAC to make a fresh appraisal of
the proposal for environmental clearance grant
Anil K Thakur LLC
and asked the Ministry of Environment and

Forest to make a separate study on the
protection of the said bird.
Protect pdf from copying with Online-PDF-No-Copy.com

Topic 4

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Topic 4

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Topic-4

By: Anil K Thakur (Asst. Prof.)

• ‘Polluter Pays Principle’(PPP) is also known as

• It should be mentioned that in environmental law, it

• The 1972 OECD Council Recommendation added the

• The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and

• The majority of OECD members are high-income economies with

• The OECD's headquarters are at the Château de

• The OECD is recognised as a highly influential

• The OECD initiative was the result of demands on

apply the polluter pays principle.

• The polluter pays principle was also adopted in

• Through the lens of international law, the PPP is

• The significance of this judgment lies in the court’s

prove before the court of law that he suffered because of

into the bowels of the earth.

hazardous or inherently dangerous activities,

degradation viz., of the soil, underground water

1994 be made a basis to compute it.

water in the area.

• These principles have been accepted as a part of the

• In the same case, the court also ordered for the

and benefits from the erring industries.

• There are certain statutes too, which directly

or indirectly adhered to the polluter pays

available with the collector of the district.

the Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 for being

• The court has always come to the rescue of

• therefore, the closure of the National Environment

• The Precautionary Principle shifts the burden of proof

• In short Precautionary Principle is a notion which

because full scientific information is lacking.

• Many times the scientific evidence do not give

protection of the environment and unnecessary

Protection of the Ozone Layer, 1985.

• In this Protocol also, measures taken earlier to

• The precautionary principle was also included in

guided by the Precautionary Principle.

• The year of 1992 was very important in this

It allows for 5 key elements that can prevent

groups, as well as general public, share their

and health costs.

• The Indian Judiciary actively supports the

cases are discussed

the cause of environmental degradation.

the Precautionary Principle is a part of the

environmental damage, the onus of proof is on the

caution and prevent environmental harm rather than

• It is based on the notion that the public holds

• Who owns the Earth and its resources?

• Across continents and spanning centuries, a

“By the law of nature these things are common to all

• The Doctrine has its origin in Justinian Institute (530

• They declared that the Government has an

held available for use by the general public;

air, water, land, flora and fauna and especially

• The State as a trustee is under a legal duty to protect the

landmark cases in the Supreme Court.

• The redirection of the course of the river had been approved by

• The Supreme Court held that the pristine glory of

• Ground water is considered as a part of national

complex should restore it as the park was protected