Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ECG564
OPEN-ENDED LAB
SEMESTER 2021/2022
MARKS COMMENTS
INTRODUCTION
BASIC CONCEPTS
METHODOLOGY 1 2 3 4 5
RESULTS&ANALYSIS 1 2 3 4 5
DISCUSSION 1 2 3 4 5
CONCLUSION 1 2 3 4 5
TOTAL MARKS
INTRODUCTION
The traffic accident crisis in Malaysia is one of the most serious problems in the
country. Accidents in Malaysia are common, especially in rural areas with a high
concentration of road users. The government has used various ways and alternatives
to reduce the accident rate in Malaysia. Most accidents that occur in Malaysia are
related to road conditions, the environment, driver behavior, and other factors. Road
users should be aware and vigilant of the number of people involved in a road accident
of leads to an increase in road fatalities.
The Road Safety Audit (RSA) is a technical methodology aimed at identifying
potential safety hazards or operational precautions that may adversely affect the safety
of all road users during the planning, design, and construction of road projects. RSA can
detect potential security risks before they become accident sites. The implementation
faces many problems, including poor management of RSA, common mistakes made by
designers, and inconsistent application and implementation of RSA.
The Road Safety Audit becomes proof of the problem that occurs on the road. In
the road safety inspection report, the government committed to two major initiatives
to identify potential road safety risks, such as accident prevention, which focuses more
on detecting and eliminating accidents involving danger zones and accident
prevention, and which focuses more on building safer roads and better traffic control
for all road users.
OBJECTIVE
BASIC CONCEPT
➢Interchanges
➢Traffic signal
➢Traffic signs
➢Pavement marking and delineation
➢Landscaping
PROBLEM STATEMENT
It is not uncommon to find that safety and operational problems become evident
shortly after many new road projects become operational. In most cases, these
problems could have been anticipated, or at least their effects could have been
mitigated, at little extra cost if they had been identified at the appropriate stage in the
development of the project.
PROCEDURE
1. The Road Safety Audit was carried out in accordance with the Guideline for the
States Audit of Roads and Road Projects in Malaysia prepared by JKR.
2. The appropriate study location was selected to conduct a Road Safety Audit
which consists of an existing road stretch, length, and radius, not more than
2km.
3. The area of study was being observed, by examining the several elements
including junction geometrical layout, roadside features, landscaping, road
signage, and road markings.
4. The problems of the road which developed from traffic operations regarding the
safety of the drivers were identified.
5. The hazards were also identified due to the way the landscaping has matured
such as trees and foliage obstructing signs or sight distance impaired.
6. The visual inspection was carried out on the inventories of the junction’s
physical and geometrical properties on the site.
7. Each direction of the road was driven on and the key area of safety concern was
identified.
8. Digital photos of each of the elements were taken representing the problems by
the road and its surrounding area.
9. All the data collected, and the photos captured were analyzed in detail and are
presented in the report.
RESULTS & ANALYSIS
There were a few things that needed to be examined because the road safety audit is for
Stage 5, which is the audit of existing roads. Alignment of the horizontal and vertical axes is
checked first. Three things need to be examined. First, the overall alignment standard needs
to be examined for consistency along the entire route, and any places where it abruptly
changes and deviates from what the drivers would expect need to be documented. Second,
"sub-standard" curves-defined as any curve with a speed value greater than 10 km/hr below
the 85th percentile approach speed-need to be recognized. It is also necessary to record any
indications of vehicles veering off the road.
Other than that, it is important to make note of any places along the route when the cross-
section standard abruptly alters or deviates from what the driver would normally anticipate.
Any area where the roadway's capacity is constrained is indicated, as is any place where
there is frequently backed-up traffic. The absence of "turning vehicle" protections at
intersections and any places with insufficient shoulder width are then noted. Any area where
speeds exceed 50 km/h and a "barrier kerb" has been deployed is documented, and the
correct sort of kerb that has been utilised is verified. It is important to verify that the cross
section suitably accommodates "Vulnerable Road Users." As for the cross section for
bicyclist, it should have segregated areas (paved shoulders), where numbers are significant.
The cross section for motorcyclist should have segregated lanes (paved shoulders) and
separate roadways, where warranted by demand. Any location where the cross section does
not allow the development of appropriate access control needs to be identified.
When it comes to intersections, the approach (stopping) sight distance, entering sight
distance, and safe intersection sight distance requirements that depend on the traffic speed
attained need to be examined. It is also necessary to check the intersection's general layout
features. For instance, it's important to confirm that the intersection's basic design
accommodates all road users (pedestrians, cyclists, and motorcycles) securely. The layout is
also examined for consistency with different traffic patterns. It's also important to look for
any missing auxiliary (turning) lanes and any gaps in the "through" traffic lanes.
Additionally, effective and equitable control of traffic flow along and across arterial roads as
well as for the safe crossing of pedestrians must be examined. Traffic signals are given only
where warranted for sale. It's also important to make sure that the availability, placement,
and spacing of traffic lights along the route support a practical traffic management approach.
It is necessary to verify that every implanted signal is operating successfully and efficiently.
Then, it is necessary to verify any area where the signal hardware, such as signal faces, is
insufficient to safely govern the various traffic movements.
In addition, the street lighting provided on arterial roads and highways in cities, towns, and
other "built-up" regions needs to be monitored, particularly when there are pedestrians and
parking along the road. It's also important to verify the installed illumination to ensure that it
meets the location's, the needs of pedestrians, and other elements' requirements. The
locations of roadway lighting poles that present a driving danger, such as small islands, the
noses of medians, or the outside of acute curves, are noted. There may be instances where
sharing traffic signal pedestals and electric power poles could remove the need for street
lighting poles.
Regarding traffic signage, it is necessary to look for instances of unlicensed traffic signs and
the usage of unusual signs. Check the placement and separation of the signs, and make note
of any areas with an excessive number of signs or signs that are placed too closely together.
All traffic signs must be prominently posted and easily seen by the intended road users. The
amount of information displayed on traffic signs as well as the speed of moving cars need to
be taken into consideration in any situations when the legibility of the information is subpar.
It is necessary to look for any instances where signs contain too much information to be
readable by drivers moving at a regular operating speed.
In terms of regulatory and warning signs, it is important to verify that the proper regulatory
signs have been presented when necessary and that warning signals have only been utilised
when they are necessary. Regarding guide and direction signs, they should be checked on a
systematic route or regional strategy to ensure that they are rational and fulfil the demands
of uninitiated drivers. The presence of advance direction signs, intersection direction signs,
and reassurance (distance) signs should be checked at all crucial intersections. To ensure that
the targeted drivers can take the necessary action, it is important to double-check that these
signs are positioned correctly. It is important to look for cases where the destination names
on successive signs, such as "advance direction signs" followed by "intersection direction
signs" and "reassurance direction signs," differ.
Not least of all, it is important to check for general traffic management issues. In accordance
with any adopted warrants, guides, and procedures, any special provisions that have been
provided for motorcyclists should be verified and commented on the necessity for such
upgrades as "paved shoulders," "segregated motorcycle lanes," or "separated motorcycle
roadways." The level of safety provided to pedestrians, especially schoolchildren, needs to
be reviewed next, and any situations where special accommodations are required should be
noted. Existing speed limits should be evaluated for appropriateness and credibility, and if
necessary, remarked upon if, in the opinion of the majority of drivers, they are impractical
given the traffic conditions, the type of nearby development, or other factors. In order to
increase safety during the "Festive Season" and Holiday Periods, when traffic demands are
high and the majority of drivers are relatively inexperienced on the road, it is necessary to
check for any unique difficulties and requirements that may be necessary.
Location
The location that had been selected for this study is at UITM Shah Alam. The Road Safety
Audit had was carried out along the road started along the Jalan Ilmu 1/1. Both direction of
the existing road has been considered in this study.
Road Safety Audit Findings
The state of the pavement, footpath, drainage, lighting system, traffic signs, and many other
issues were examined during the Road Safety Audit.
Stage 5: RSA of an Existing Road is the focus of the road safety audit that was
conducted for this project. An audit at this point reveals dangers caused by how the
landscaping has evolved as well as safety issues that arise from the natural wear and
tear of traffic operations. The observation shows that there are a number of possible
dangerous features at the place under investigation. The venue is in Universiti
Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, and is just in front of the engineering faculty on Jalan
Ilmu 1/1. The research area has a length and radius of little more than 2 km, and it
took 800m to observe the road. It is measured along Engine Square's main
thoroughfare.
For each inspection, as shown in the table above, a number of suggestions have also
been made. Along with the photographic documentation of the observations in the
previous section, the following characteristics of safe roads were also noted:
1) Proper and consistent demarcation of the road and the path ahead, as well as
advance notification of width and alignment changes that might not be visible to
a motorcylist.
2) Define merge and diverge regions, auxiliary lane arrangements, shoulders and
parking controls, pavement sections not meant for driving, danger zones, lane
dips, and road narrowing using the proper line marking pattern.
3) Ensure that there is enough space between signs for a driver to see and
understand each one under typical traffic circumstances, as well as proper sight
distance to the sign.
4) Effective overall traffic management that takes into account the demands of all
motorists.
5) Ensure that road medians are broad enough for plants to provide an effective
barrier and that landscaping impacts do not restrict sight distance at crucial
spots.
The research evaluated the in-situ test and looked at the area using Google Maps and
Google Street View. Time and the existing location limited the methodological options.
CONCLUSION
In general, this report aims to add to the corpus of information on traffic safety.
It has been shown that the Road Safety Audit was conducted in compliance with the
Malaysian Public Works Department's Guidelines for the Safety Audit of Roads and
Road Projects (JKR). The Stage 5 Audit: RSA on Existing Road study was carried out,
and the 800 m-long Jalan Ilmu 1/1 in front of the Faculty of Engineering in Shah Alam
was chosen as the existing road to be audited. There are a number of issues with this
current road that could jeopardize the safety of any user, such as the confusing zebra
crossing for pedestrians and the uneven road surface caused by poor maintenance.
However, before the current road becomes an accident-prone area, the issues
should be resolved or the prospective risks should be mitigated. Mitigation measures
should then be built, such as providing the necessary regulation signs or specific
crossing facilities for the road users. Conducting a road safety audit has several
advantages, especially for the people who use the roads. It can be used as a preventive
tool to prevent accidents by implementing the recommendations in its reports for
mitigating the hazards. Above all, a road safety audit can lower the likelihood that
accidents will occur on the current route while simultaneously enhancing that road's
safety.