Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: Sarah K Dotters-Katz, Whitney M. Humphrey, Kayli L. Senz, Vanessa R.
Lee, Brian L. Shaffer, Jeffrey A. Kuller & Aaron B. Caughey (2017): Trisomy 13 and the risk of
gestational hypertensive disorders: A population-based study, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal &
Neonatal Medicine, DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1332037
Article views: 3
Download by: [Cornell University Library] Date: 26 May 2017, At: 07:16
Trisomy 13 and the risk of gestational hypertensive disorders: A population-based study
Vanessa R. LEE, MD, MPH4; Brian L. SHAFFER, MD4; Jeffrey A. Kuller, MD5; Aaron B.
D
TE
1
Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill,
North Carolina
EP
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
3
C
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
AC
4
Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon
5
Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
ST
Funding: None
Prior presentation: This paper was presented in part at the 36th annual Society of Maternal Fetal
Sarah Dotters-Katz, MD
D
Abstract word count: 193
TE
Main text word count: 1929 EP
C
AC
ST
JU
Abstract:
Purpose: To describe the rate and severity of gestational hypertensive disorders (GHD) in
Materials and Methods: Retrospective cohort study of singleton deliveries in California from
2005-2008 using vital statistics and ICD-9 data. We were interested in gestational hypertension
(gHTN), preeclampsia with and without severe features (sPREX and PREX), and gestational age
at delivery. Pregnancies and maternal complications affected by prenatally diagnosed T13 were
D
compared to unaffected pregnancies. Regression models were used to compute adjusted odds
TE
ratios for pregnancy outcomes by T13 status.
Results: Of the 2,029,004 deliveries, 142 women had prenatally diagnosed T13. A diagnosis of
EP
GHD occurred in 26.8% of the T13 pregnancies versus 6% of the non-T13
pregnancies(p<0.001). This remained true for gHTN (9.2% vs 3.2%,p=0.001), PREX (12% vs
C
2.2%,p<0.001), and sPREX (8.5% vs 0.9%,p<0.001). After adjusting for confounders, T13
AC
pregnancies were 6.3-times more likely to be affected by GHD, and 12.5-times more likely to
have sPREX. Delivery <37 and <32 weeks in the setting of GHD was 14.1-times and 11.2-times
ST
Conclusion: Women with T13 pregnancies were significantly more likely to have gHTN,
JU
Key words: Trisomy 13, Patau syndrome, Maternal outcomes, gestational hypertension,
preeclampsia
Introduction:
most common trisomy in live born babies and is associated with increasing maternal age. This
growth restriction, rocker bottom feet, and cleft lip and palate; though a variety of other
anomalies have been associated with it.[1, 4, 5, 6] Most commonly, trisomy 13 is due to a de
D
novo nondisjunction of chromosome 13, but it can also be due to an unbalanced translocation
TE
inherited from a parent with a balanced translocation.[7]
Trisomy 13 has been associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia; in small series,
EP
the incidence of preeclampsia in women with a fetus with T13 ranged between 25-40%;
suggesting an increased risk by 2-20 fold.[8, 9, 10, 11, 12] Due to the small size of these series,
C
all with 25 or fewer cases, a detailed understanding of the severity of preeclampsia was
AC
precluded. It was unclear if the preeclampsia associated with trisomy 13 was mostly mild disease
that presented at term or more likely to be severe disease presenting very early in gestation.
Due to this dearth of knowledge, this important aspect of the trisomy 13 is often omitted
ST
or glossed over in maternal counseling, with the main focus of counseling on neonatal survival
and outcomes. However, given the maternal danger that can be associated with gestational
JU
hypertensive disease, a better understanding of this risk is critical. Thus, the objective of this
study was to better describe the rate and severity of hypertensive disorders in pregnancies
complicated by trisomy 13. We also sought to define the risk of maternal complications in this
setting.
Materials and Methods:
After approval from the Institutional Review Boards at Oregon Health & Science
University and the State of California, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using
California Vital Statistics Birth Certificate Data, California Patient Discharge Data, Vital
Statistics Death Certificate, and Vital Statistics Fetal Death File data. These linked datasets
describe maternal and child data from all pregnancies in California from 2005-2008.
Using the Internal Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision code for fetal trisomy 13
D
(758.1), coded during the delivery admission, we identified women with a pregnancy
TE
complicated by a prenatal diagnosis of T13. Women with multiple gestations, other aneuploidies,
other major fetal anomalies not associated with trisomy 13, and those who delivered at <23 or
EP
>43 weeks were excluded. These datasets include no patient identifiers. Therefore, informed
features (PREX), preeclampsia with severe features (sPREX), eclampsia, and gestational
ST
diabetes was collected. Delivery and postpartum information including delivery prior to 37
weeks, delivery prior to 32 weeks, cesarean delivery, abruption, postpartum hemorrhage, red cell
JU
transfusion, platelet transfusion, and maternal length of stay were also obtained.
Women with a T13 fetus were compared to those with an unaffected fetus using bivariate
analysis, including chi-squared and student’s t-tests as appropriate. A planned sub-group analysis
of women with a prenatal diagnosis of T13 to those with an unaffected infant among only
women with a diagnosis of any GHD was also performed. The analyses were performed using
Stata software (version 11; Stata Corporation, College Station, TX). Multivariable logistic
regression was performed to control for potential confounders, including maternal age (≥35 or
<35 years), maternal race/ethnicity, educational level (≥12th grade or <12th grade), less than 5
prenatal visits, parity, diabetes, gestational diabetes, chronic hypertension, and insurance (public
vs private). A p-value of less than 0.01 and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to
determine statistical significance due to the large sample size and to reduce the risk of spurious
associations.
D
Results:
TE
The study population included 2,029,004 singleton pregnancies, including 142 that
carried a prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 13. In this population, the overall prevalence of known
EP
T13 was 0.007% or 7 per 100,000 live births. Women with a prenatal diagnosis of T13 were
Women with fetal T13 were four times more likely to have any GHD (27% vs 6%,
p<0.001). They were significantly more likely to have gHTN, PREX, and sPREX, but not
eclampsia, (Table 2). Preterm delivery less than 37 weeks occurred in 51% of women with fetal
ST
T13 and only 9.9% of those without T13, (p<0.001). Women with a T13 fetus were also more
likely to delivery at less than 32 weeks (14.1% vs 1.4%, p<0.001). Cesarean delivery and
JU
cesarean delivery in a nulliparous woman were also more common among women with fetal T13
(Table 2). However, abruption, postpartum hemorrhage, and product transfusion were not more
common in pregnancies with T13 compared to those without T13, (Table 2).
Thirty-eight of the 142 of women (27%) with T13 developed some GHD, compared to
6% of women without a T13 fetus. When considered only women with a diagnosis of gestational
hypertensive disorder, cesarean delivery occurred in 60.5% of those with T13, but only 46.5% of
those without T13, (p=0.082). Among women with T13 and any GHD, 76% delivered prior to 37
weeks, with 34% delivering less than 32 weeks, compared to 23% and 4% respectively in
women without a T13 fetus, (p<0.001 for both). Rates of postpartum hemorrhage, abruption,
and blood transfusion did not differ between among women with GHD by fetal T13 status (data
not shown). When considering women with preeclampsia with severe features, 83% of those
with a T13 fetus delivered less than 37 weeks, compared to 53% of those without a T13 fetus
(p=0.035); and 50% with a T13 fetus but only 14% of those with a normal fetus delivered less
D
than 32 weeks (p<0.001).
TE
After controlling for maternal age (≥35 or <35 years), maternal race/ethnicity,
EP
educational level (≥12th grade or <12th grade), less than 5 prenatal visits, parity, diabetes,
complicated by fetal T13 were associated with a 6-fold higher odds of developing any gestational
AC
hypertensive disorder (95% CI 4.17, 9.51), a 9-fold higher odds of developing PREX, and 12.5-
fold higher odds of developing preeclampsia with severe features (Table 3). Among women with
T13 and a gestational hypertensive disorder, there was also a significantly increased odds ratio of
ST
delivery at less than 37 and 32 weeks, (aOR 14.1 95% CI 5.77, 34.3 and aOR 11.2 95% CI 5.24,
23.9 respectively). Maternal complications such as abruption and platelet transfusion approached
JU
In this study, a diagnosis of any gestational hypertensive disorder was made in 27% of
women with carrying a fetus with trisomy 13. Among women with T13, 27% developed
preeclampsia, and 9% developed preeclampsia with severe features. Women with a T13 fetus
had a 9-fold higher odds of developing PREX, and 12.5-fold higher odds of developing
preeclampsia with severe features compared to those without a T13 fetus. Among women with
any gestational hypertensive disorder, women with a T13 fetus were 3.4 times and 8.6 times
D
more likely to deliver as less than 37 and 32 weeks respectively, and 2.5 times increased odds of
TE
cesarean delivery.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to specifically examine the relationship between
EP
a diagnosis of fetal trisomy 13 and the spectrum of gestational hypertensive disorders, as well as
the first population based study of this topic. Case control studies looking at risk of preeclampsia
C
in general are limited in size, with the largest having 25 cases.[8, 11, 12] The incidence of
AC
gestational hypertensive disorders in these case-control studies ranged from 25-40%; our cohort
showed a similar incidence.[8, 11, 12] It should also be noted, that though T13 and trisomy 18
ST
are often grouped in studies, there does not appear to be similar increased incidence of
There are many strengths of this study. Because this dataset comprises such a sizable
population, we are able to study rare conditions and outcomes. This present study is the largest
cohort of trisomy 13 neonates, and the only study specifically designed to define the relationship,
timing, and complications of preeclampsia in the setting of trisomy 13. However, there are also
limitations to this study as well. First, we are reliant on coders to correctly identify and code our
primary exposure, fetal T13, as well as our outcomes variables. This does increase the risk of
underreporting. However, most commonly a misclassification bias is generally towards the null.
In other words, if this were the case, it suggests that the findings of this study underestimate
lower the actual relationship between preeclampsia and trisomy 13. As this study was
specifically looking at women who continued their pregnancies, we only included women who
delivered after 23 weeks and 0 days, and thus did not include women who elected termination of
pregnancy or had a spontaneous loss prior to that time. We were also limited by available codes in
the dataset, such as lack of coding for admission to the intensive care unit or maternal death. We
also could not assess if any T13 diagnoses were made during or after delivery for an infant
D
originally in the non-affected group, in the case of a woman with a positive screening test who
TE
did not pursue diagnostic testing. However, it is very unusual for a fetus to have trisomy 13 to
not have major anomalies (and thus not be brought to attention by prenatal ultrasound), and we
EP
did exclude fetuses without a trisomy 13 diagnosis who had major anomalies. Additionally, there
is no way to account for mosaicism within this cohort. Though this cohort only includes those
C
fetuses with a prenatal diagnosis, thus if a family did not pursue diagnostic testing, that fetus
AC
would not have been included. Most mosaic fetuses have more mild phenotype, again biasing the
study toward the null. From a maternal perspective, data regarding maternal history of
ST
pregnancy, was not available. Finally, due to the retrospective nature, we are unable to assess
JU
causation, but can only describe an association of trisomy 13 with gestational hypertensive
disorders and other obstetric outcomes. Future prospective studies could focus on more specifics
In summary, given that 1 in 3 women with a T13 pregnancy will develop some
gestational hypertensive disorder and 1 in 10 will develop severe disease, the clinician must
consider incorporating the risk of gestational hypertensive disorders into counseling for women
and couples with a prenatal diagnosis of Trisomy 13. While future study is needed to better
understand the reasons for this association as well as the maternal outcomes associated with this
range of gestational hypertensive disorders, the provider must be cognizant of the increased risk
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ST
JU
References:
1. Bruns D. Birth history, physical characteristics, and medical conditions in long-term
survivors with full trisomy 13. American journal of medical genetics Part A. 2011;155A:2634-40.
Epub 2011/10/13.
2. Morris JK, Savva GM. The risk of fetal loss following a prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 13 or
trisomy 18. American journal of medical genetics Part A. 2008;146A:827-32. Epub 2008/03/26.
3. Wladimiroff JW, Stewart PA, Reuss A, Sachs ES. Cardiac and extra-cardiac anomalies as
indicators for trisomies 13 and 18: a prenatal ultrasound study. Prenatal diagnosis. 1989;9:515-20.
4. Dotters-Katz SK, Kuller JA, Grace MR, Laifer SA, Strauss RA. Management Considerations for
Ongoing Pregnancies Complicated by Trisomy 13 and 18. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016;71:295-300.
5. Maeda J, Yamagishi H, Furutani Y, Kamisago M, Waragai T, Oana S, Kajino H, Matsuura H,
Mori K, Matsuoka R, Nakanishi T. The impact of cardiac surgery in patients with trisomy 18 and
trisomy 13 in Japan. American journal of medical genetics Part A. 2011;155A:2641-6. Epub
2011/10/13.
6. Nelson KE, Rosella LC, Mahant S, Guttmann A. Survival and Surgical Interventions for
Children With Trisomy 13 and 18. JAMA. 2016;316:420-8.
D
7. Jacobs PA, Hassold TJ, Henry A, Pettay D, Takaesu N. Trisomy 13 ascertained in a survey of
spontaneous abortions. Journal of medical genetics. 1987;24:721-4.
TE
8. Bower C, Stanley F, Walters BN. Pre-eclampsia and trisomy 13. Lancet. 1987;2:1032.
9. Evers J, Seelen J, Blankenborg G. Severe toxemia, hydramnios and trisomy 13-15. Ned
Tijdschr Verloskd Gynaecol. 1967;67:395-7.
10. Silasi M, Rana S, Powe C, Cohen B, Lim KH, Zsengeller ZK, Karumanchi SA, Stillman IE.
EP
Placental expression of angiogenic factors in Trisomy 13. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:546 e1-4.
11. Tuohy JF, James DK. Pre-eclampsia and trisomy 13. British journal of obstetrics and
gynaecology. 1992;99:891-4. Epub 1992/11/01.
12. Boyd PA, Lindenbaum RH, Redman C. Pre-eclampsia and trisomy 13: a possible association.
C
Lancet. 1987;2:425-7.
13. Dotters-Katz S, Kuller J, Heine RP. Parasitic infections in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv.
2011;66:515-25.
AC
ST
JU
Table 1: Maternal Demographics of pregnancies with a prenatal diagnosis of Trisomy 13 vs
the control population
Variable T13 Diagnosis No T13 Diagnosis p-value
% (n=142) % (n=2,028,862)
Maternal age ≥35yrs 37.3 (53) 20.9 (350,333) <0.001
Race 0.087
African American 6.3 (9) 5.1 (103,841)
White 18.3 (26) 26.6 (538,781)
Hispanic 64.8 (92) 54.5 (1,103,587)
D
Asian / Pacific 9.2 (13) 11.9 (241,906)
Islander
TE
Other 1.4 (2) 1.9 (38,412)
Education, grade 0.080
EP
<12 62.9 (83) 55.1 (1,087,040)
≥12 27.1 (49) 44.9 (882,821)
C
Public Insurance 56.6 (81) 48.4 (982,232) 0.044
Nulliparous 25.5 (36) 39.9 (807,319) <0.001
AC
D
hypertensive disorder
TE
Preterm delivery <37wks 50.7 (72) 9.9 (2000,971) <0.001
Preterm delivery <32 wks 14.1 (20) 1.4 (28,795) <0.001
Intrauterine fetal demise 0.70 (1) 0.28 (5,659) 0.327
EP
Any cesarean delivery 53.5 (76) 30.2 (612,736) <0.001
Primary cesarean delivery 61.1 (20) 29.7 (239,661) <0.001
C
in nulliparous patient
AC
D
Gestational hypertensive 14.1 (5.77, 34.3) <0.001
disorder and delivery <37wk
TE
Gestational hypertensive 11.2 (5.24, 23.9) <0.001
disorder and delivery <32wk
EP
Any cesarean delivery 2.50 (1.76, 3.55) <0.001
Postpartum hemorrhage 0.53 (0.13, 2.16) 0.38
Abruption 3.11 (1.15, 8.47) 0.026
C