Is Cold War bipolarism the best tool to explain global history

after 1945?

There is no doubt that when it comes to describing the global history after the Second World
War, many people immediately think about the Cold War and the bipolarism that it brought
to the whole world spectrum. Therefore, there is a question of whether describing the global
history after 1945 through the perspective of Cold War bipolarism is the best option.
Personally, I agree with this statement. I think that it is a reasonably suitable tool for
expressing the past after World War II.

As we know from history, both the USA and the USSR were known as dominant and the
most powerful countries back then. However, they strongly believed that, on the battlefield,
there should be only one winner. Therefore, the Cold War between them was inevitable.
Every one of the states wanted to turn into the main state. This careful longing assumed a
huge part on the worldwide scale. I would even say that it chose the progression of additional
worldwide history since we as a whole realize that the division of the earth began another
section in history and impacted the remainder of the world. The global consequences such as
building atomic bombs, collecting allies, creating international organizations, starting
economic collaborations and projects all had one reason - the global race for becoming the
best state between the USA and the USSR. In particular, most of the significant events
followed by the year 1945 are explained from the point of Cold war bipolarism. For example,
in 1948, the USA created the Marshall plan to help Western states financially. To answer, the
USSR created the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (CMEA) in 1949. While, in
1949, the Federal Republic of Germany was established by western countries, on the other
hand, the USSR established the German Democratic Republic. After, Western states created
an intergovernmental military alliance (NATO) in 1949, and in 1955, the USSR opened the
Warsaw Treaty Organization. Finally, with the beginning of 'who has more powers', the
actual race took a considerable turn when countries started working on atomic bombs.
Between the years 1944 and 1981, states created several types of atomic bombs. Not only this
fact itself, but the way states tested their weapons were so important that they will remain
forever in global history.

In conclusion, I would say that not exclusively is Cold War bipolarism the best tool to depict
worldwide history later 1945, yet it is the main reasonable instrument. To be precise, the Cold
War was a notably significant event that took almost half of the decade. These specific years
were perplexing and sufficiently confounded. In the event that not considering bipolarism,
which assumed a significant position back, it would be feasible to comprehend the entire
plan. Worldwide history later the Cold War was tied in with setting new principles, and that
is the thing that the USA with the USSR did. In this way, I emphatically trust that clarifying
that period from a recorded point of view using this particular tool was a great decision.
 What does China’s economic ascendancy over the past 40 years
tell us about the co-existence of plan and market?

To begin with, nowadays, it is widely known that China became extremely famous thanks to
its financial breakthrough. For sure, there is no doubt that the current economic situation in
the country took one of the most unexpected and powerful turns. In the last 40 years, China
has broken the record in terms of a growth rate of total GDP. Also, during these years, the
most considerable poverty relief happened within the state. Therefore, many people got
interested in the method that China used to achieve such progress. To be exact, what does this
excellent performance of the state educate us regarding the coexistence of the plan and the
market?

As a significant aspect, 2018 observed 40 years since the beginning of China's reform and
opening-up policy. In 1978, the “Great Cultural Revolution” was completed in the PRC, and
the CPC Central Committee decided to focus its work on the economic construction of the
state. For example, during the implementation of the new policy, a family contracting system
began to be introduced in the village, in the city, the government gradually transferred
management functions to state-owned enterprises and gave up part of the profits in their
favor, economic zones arose in the coastal regions. The historical process of reform and
opening-up in China began, and they carried reforms within the framework of a planned
economy. It should be noted that personalization of reforms of China's government also
played a crucial role in boosting their economy, thanks to which they won international
recognition. They came up with the idea of a socialist market economy in China. It was an
organic combination of the advantages of socialism as a social regime and a market economy
as a mechanism for the allocation of resources. China decided to move from a planned
economy to a market economy in 1992, after reforms for 14 years. Unlike other countries,
China underwent a unique market economic transformation. Defending the socialist path
under the leadership of the CCP, which is the only ruling party, China began to build a
socialist market economy. With the help of the mechanisms of a market economy, China has
achieved great success and advanced in modernization. A special form of government in
China is called the "Chinese model". The current development conditions in China are proof
that this model has great promise and strong potential.

In conclusion, as we already know, in the late 1980s and the early 1990s, most of the
countries that used to have planned economies have moved to market economies, including
the former Soviet Union, Eastern European countries, and China. Unlike other countries,
China underwent a unique market economic transformation. Thus, in my opinion, the great
economic breakthrough of China tells us that the right and balanced coexistence of both the
plan and the market within the state can actually lead to significant changes.