Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Khilafah: Islamic Constitutional Law
The Khilafah: Islamic Constitutional Law
1. Should be a Muslim
2. Should be a male
3. Should be an adult
4. Should be sane
5. Should be a citizen of the Islamic State
6. Should be just and God-fearing
7. Should be a freeman
8. Should be a competent and skilled person
1) Should be a Muslim
• The head of Islamic state must be a Muslim and cannot be given to an
unbeliever, nor is it allowed to obey them. This is due to the fact that, in
case of dispute between the rulers and the ruled both have been ordered
to refer the matter to Allah and His Messenger and it is only a Muslim ruler
who can agree to refer the dispute to Allah and His Messenger.
• Authorities:
i. Surah An Nisa 4:59: “O ye who believe! Obey Allah, and obey the
Prophet and (obey) those who are in authority from among you.”
ii. Surah An-Nisa 4:141: “And Allah will never give the unbelievers any way
(of authority) against the believers.”
iii. Hadith: “We will not dispute and fight with our rulers unless we see signs
of (such) open disbelief in their deeds which may provide us with a
justification from Allah (to stand up) against them.”
iv. Hadith when the Companions asked the Prophet’s permission to rise
against bad rulers, he replied: “No (you cannot rebel against them) so
long as they continue to establish Salat among you.”
2) Should be a Male
• It is forbidden for a female to be made a Khilafah, as the authority is only
given to man, not a woman.
• Authorities:
i. Surah An Nisaa 4:34: “Men are in charge of women.”
ii. Hadith: “Verily, that nation would not prosper which hands over the reigns
of its government to a woman.”
• This condition has been questioned and argued that women can also hold
political positions in Islam as there is no Qur’anic verses exist that prevent
women from holding positions of leadership and the Hadith quoted above
has been shown to be extremely unreliable on several counts.
• It is an isolated and uncorroborated one and therefore not binding in
Islamic law, and in addition there is reason to believe it may have been
forged in the context of the battle, which Aishah the Prophet's widow led
against the fourth Khalifah Ali. In view of the examples set by women
rulers in history, it is also clearly untenable and false.
3) Should be an adult
• The jurists in general suggest that the Khalifah is selected by a group of the
best, most Islamically knowledgeable people in the society and not by a
general vote of everyone.
• This group is called majlis al-shura (consultative council). The members of
majlis al-shura are chosen from experts who are learned in Islam, and they
in turn choose the Khalifah.
• However, there is a considerable disagreement among the scholars on the
number of electors necessary for the valid investment of the sovereign.
• Some have argued that he would be invested by no fewer than the
“generality” of the electors throughout the land in order for his election to
be unanimously approved and his authority universally accepted.
• However, this view is refuted by the vote of allegiance to Abu Bakr, given
by those who were present, without waiting for the arrival of those who
were absent.
• Another group has maintained that the minimum number of electors for a
binding election is five, who may unanimously agree on a candidate or
concur in the choice made by one of them.
• They support their argument on two grounds.
1. The appointment of Abu Bakr, was sealed by the consensus of five men
whose lead was followed by the rest of the population.
2. Practice of Umar, who set the number necessary for consultation at six, one
of whom may be invested by agreement of the remaining five.
• This is the view upheld by most jurists of Basra.
• On the other hand, scholars from Kufa have argued, that only three persons
are needed. One of them taking office with the agreement of the other
two, thus constituting one ruler and two witnesses, as in the case of marriage
contract, which is validated by one guardian and two witnesses.
• Still others have asserted that the election of the sovereign would be
binding if undertaken by a single person. This is based on practice al-
Abbas who has said to ‘Ali: “Give me your hand so that I may pledge you
may allegiance and let the people say, ‘The uncle of the Messenger, has
nominated his cousin.’ No two persons would then disagree with you.”
2) Appointment by the predecessor
• Scholars have different opinions regarding the validity of the succession
and the establishment of the leadership without formal appointment or
screening.
• Some Iraqi jurists tend to accept such assumption of power as legitimate
rendering the succession valid and making it obligatory on the Community
to obey the ruler/head, even though no proper choice by the electors has
taken place.
• They contend that the goal of the selection process, which is to recognise the
worthy candidate, has in this case been realised owing to the excellence of
the person concerned.
• It is vital to note that the majority of jurists and theologians are of the view,
however, that establishment in office could only take place as a result of
free choice, but that the electors have to invest him. Once they agree to do
so, they complete the due process, because the office of the Head is an
appointment that is conferred by someone empowered to do that.
• It is equally important here to make reference to the position of Prophet
Muhammad as the first Head of the Islamic State.
• First, he left behind no explicit instructions or nomination for the election or
appointment of his successor. Secondly, it is explicitly stated in the Qur’anic
injunction that all matters affecting the Ummah should be decided by
consultation.
• The Companions rightly inferred that with the passing away of the Prophet,
selection and appointment of Head of the Islamic State had been left to the
elective discretion of the Muslims, which was to be exercised in accordance
with the spirit of the said Qur’anic injunction.
• The first Caliph, Abu Bakr, when his last moment came, although he was
personally convinced that Umar was the fittest person to be the Caliph, he
did not forthwith nominate him as his successor but consulted the most
prominent among the Companions, jointly and severely, and then dictated
his will in favour of Umar.
3) By force