Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Paraphimosis: Continuing Education Activity
Paraphimosis: Continuing Education Activity
Objectives:
Describe the pathophysiology of patients with paraphimosis.
Outline the evaluation in patients with paraphimosis.
Review the conservative and surgical treatment options available for patients with
paraphimosis.
Summarize interprofessional team strategies for enhancing care coordination to facilitate
rapid diagnosis and management of patients with paraphimosis.
Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.
Introduction
Paraphimosis is a true urologic emergency that occurs in uncircumcised males when the
foreskin becomes trapped behind the corona of the glans penis, leading to strangulation of
the glans as well as painful vascular compromise, distal venous engorgement, edema, and
even necrosis. By comparison, phimosis is the condition when the foreskin is unable to be
retracted behind the glans of the penis.[1]
Etiology
Paraphimosis commonly occurs iatrogenically, when the foreskin is retracted for cleaning,
placement of a urinary catheter, a procedure such as a cystoscopy, or for penile
examination.[1] Failure to return the retracted foreskin over the glans promptly after the
initial retraction can lead to paraphimosis. Other, less common causes include penile coital
trauma and self-inflicted injuries.
It is essential that all caregivers who regularly change Foley catheters routinely
replace the foreskin at the end of the procedure to prevent the development of a
paraphimosis.
Epidemiology
In uncircumcised children, four months to 12 years old, with foreskin problems,
paraphimosis (0.2%) is less common than other penile disorders such as balanitis (5.9%),
irritation (3.6%), penile adhesions (1.5%), or phimosis (2.6%).[2]
Pathophysiology
If a constricting band of the foreskin is allowed to remain retracted behind the glans penis
for a prolonged period, it can lead to impairment of distal venous and lymphatic drainage as
well as decreased arterial blood flow to the glans. Arterial blood flow can become affected
over the course of hours to days. This change can ultimately lead to marked ischemia and
potential necrosis of the glans.[3]
Histopathology
At birth, there is normal physiologic phimosis due to natural adhesions between the glans
and the foreskin. During the first 3 to 4 years of life, debris, such as shed skin
cells, accumulates under the foreskin, gradually separating it from the glans. Intermittent
penile erectile activity, such as nocturnal erections, also contributes to the
increased mobility of the foreskin, ultimately allowing it to become completely retractible.
Typical paraphimosis symptoms include erythema, pain, and swelling of foreskin and glans
due to the constricting ring of the phimotic foreskin. It may sometimes be described by
patients as "penile swelling" and may be relatively painless. Clinicians are cautioned to be
suspicious of any telephone description of "penile swelling" as potentially being a
paraphimosis that requires immediate treatment and not to dismiss such descriptions as
harmless without actually visualizing the lesion. Sometimes a photo sent from the patient's
smartphone may be enough to settle the issue.
The history usually makes the diagnosis, but if not, it will be obvious on direct physical
examination. The physical exam should focus on the penis, foreskin, and urethral catheter
(if present). A pink color to the glans indicates reasonably good blood supply, whereas a
dark, dusky, pale, bluish or black color implies possible ischemia or even necrosis.
If a Foley catheter is in place, it's recommended to review the reason why the catheter was
needed and whether any difficulties were encountered in placing it, prior to its removal.
While removing the Foley will almost certainly aid in reducing the paraphimosis, in some
circumstances it may prove to be impossible to replace the catheter and now the caregiver
is faced with a new problem. Most of the time, removal of the Foley is not necessary to
successfully reduce the paraphimosis.[1]
Evaluation
The patient typically presents with acute, distal, penile pain and swelling, but the pain is not
always present. The glans and foreskin typically are markedly enlarged and congested, but
the proximal penile shaft is flaccid and unremarkable. A tight band of constrictive tissue is
present, often preventing the easy manual reduction of the foreskin over the glans.
Diagnosis is made clinically by direct visualization, as well as the inability to easily reduce
the retracted foreskin manually.
Treatment / Management
Mild, uncomplicated paraphimosis may be reduced manually, usually without the need for
sedation or analgesia. More difficult or complicated cases may require local anesthesia with
a dorsal penile block, systemic analgesia, or procedural sedation.
Several methods of reduction are available and can be classified into manual reduction or
surgical repair.
Manual reduction can also be attempted by placing both thumbs over the glans with both
index and long fingers surrounding the trapped foreskin. Then slow, steady pressure is
applied to advance the phimotic portion of the foreskin outwards slowly, back over the
glans. This can be facilitated with a little lubricant. Excessive lubricant should be avoided as
it may make the skin too slippery for reliable grasping.[4]
Another compression technique involves tightly wrapping the swollen portion of the penis
from the glans towards the base with a 1-inch or 2-inch elastic bandage. A gauze pad
should be applied first around the edematous foreskin. The compression bandage can
remain for 10 to 20 minutes to minimize the edema. Then apply one of the manual reduction
methods described above.[5]
Ice packs or surgical gloves filled with ice and applied to edematous areas have been
described as possibly useful in conjunction with other methods to reduce the paraphimotic
swelling. However, since the main issue in paraphimosis is distal penile vascular
compromise from a constricting fibrous band of the phimotic foreskin, many experts
recommend against using ice in these situations as it may further compromise arterial inflow
to the possibly ischemic portion of the penis.
Puncture and aspiration methods are more invasive and should be reserved for cases
refractory to other less-invasive techniques. The puncture technique involves puncturing the
edematous foreskin several times with a hypodermic needle followed by manual expression
of edematous fluid through the puncture holes. Experienced emergency practitioners can
consider penile corporal aspiration of blood.
Differential Diagnosis
Acute angioedema
Allergic contact dermatitis
Anasarca
Balanitis
Balanitis xerotica obliterans
Cellulitis
Foreign body tourniquet
Insect bites
Penile carcinoma
Penile fracture
Penile hematoma
Prognosis
The prognosis with paraphimosis is excellent if diagnosed and treated promptly. There may
be some bleeding during skin retraction, but long-term negative outcomes are rare. The
condition can commonly recur; circumcision can preclude recurrence once the inflammation
has subsided and the patient is a viable candidate for the procedure.[12] An alternative to a
circumcision, especially in an older or sicker patient, would be a dorsal slit. Either is
satisfactory in preventing a recurrence of the paraphimosis.
Complications
Complications that can occur with paraphimosis include pain, infection, and inflammation of
the glans penis. If the condition is not relieved in a sufficiently prompt timeframe, the distal
penis can become ischemic or necrotic. Operative complications include bleeding, infection,
injury to the urethra, and shortened penile skin.
Reducing the paraphimosis successfully is insufficient long-term therapy. All such patients
should be evaluated for further treatment involving a dorsal slit or circumcision procedure to
definitively deal with the tightened foreskin and permanently prevent any recurrences of the
paraphimosis.
After a successful manual reduction, the foreskin should carefully be cleaned. Any
superficial abrasions or tears to the foreskin should be treated with a topical antibiotic
ointment such as bacitracin. Patients should be instructed to avoid retracting the foreskin for
one week and avoid any offending activities contributing to the paraphimosis.
Reducing the paraphimosis successfully is insufficient long-term therapy. All such patients
should be evaluated for further treatment involving a dorsal slit or circumcision procedure to
definitively deal with the tightened foreskin and permanently prevent any recurrences of the
paraphimosis.
Review Questions
Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.
Comment on this article.
References
1.
Choe JM. Paraphimosis: current treatment options. Am Fam Physician. 2000 Dec
15;62(12):2623-6, 2628. [Abstract]
2.
Herzog LW, Alvarez SR. The frequency of foreskin problems in uncircumcised
children. Am J Dis Child. 1986 Mar;140(3):254-6. [Abstract]
3.
Palmisano F, Gadda F, Spinelli MG, Montanari E. Glans penis necrosis following
paraphimosis: A rare case with brief literature review. Urol Case Rep. 2018
Jan;16:57-58. [Abstract]
4.
Manjunath AS, Hofer MD. Urologic Emergencies. Med Clin North Am. 2018
Mar;102(2):373-385. [Abstract]
5.
Pohlman GD, Phillips JM, Wilcox DT. Simple method of paraphimosis reduction
revisited: point of technique and review of the literature. J Pediatr Urol. 2013
Feb;9(1):104-7. [Abstract]
6.
Khan A, Riaz A, Rogawski KM. Reduction of paraphimosis in children: the EMLA®
glove technique. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014 Mar;96(2):168. [Abstract]
7.
Hayashi Y, Kojima Y, Mizuno K, Kohri K. Prepuce: phimosis, paraphimosis, and
circumcision. ScientificWorldJournal. 2011 Feb 03;11:289-301. [Abstract]
8.
Cahill D, Rane A. Reduction of paraphimosis with granulated sugar. BJU Int. 1999
Feb;83(3):362. [Abstract]
9.
Anand A, Kapoor S. Mannitol for paraphimosis reduction. Urol Int. 2013;90(1):106-
8. [Abstract]
10.
Flores S, Herring AA. Ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block for ED
paraphimosis reduction. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;33(6):863.e3-5. [Abstract]