Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go
ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.
A who’s who of political conservatives – former federal judges, U.S. senators and GOP
election lawyers – have issued a report that is the most extensive rebuttal yet of
Donald Trump’s stolen election claims in six of 2020’s battleground states.
The report, “Lost, Not Stolen: The Conservative Case that Trump Lost and Biden
Won the 2020 Presidential Election,” refutes the 187 claims made in Trump’s 64
post-election lawsuits as well as erroneous conclusions in several post-election
post election lawsuits, as well as erroneous conclusions in several post election
reviews that pro-Trump state legislators outsourced to pro-Trump contractors.
(Trump lost every lawsuit except one that involved a non-election issue.)
But the report’s most intriguing aspect may be the short summaries where it
described how sufficient numbers of otherwise loyal Republican voters in six states
turned away from Trump in 2020 compared to 2016, causing his loss.
“Our conclusion is unequivocal: Joe Biden was the choice of a majority of the
Electors, who themselves were the choice of the majority of voters in their states,”
the report’s introduction said. “Biden’s victory is easily explained by a political
landscape that was much different in 2020 than it was when President Trump
narrowly won the presidency in 2016.”
Lost Not Stolen was co-authored by former U.S. Sens. John Danforth (Missouri) and
Gordon Smith (Oregon), former federal judges J. Michael Luttig, Thomas B. Griffith,
and Michael W. McConnell, former U.S. Solicitor General Theodore Olson,
Republican election lawyer Benjamin Ginsberg and David Hoppe, former chief of
staff to ex-House Speaker Paul Ryan.
READ: Leaked Bannon clip confirms Trump's false victory claim on election night
was planned
Here are excerpts summarizing the ticket-splitting in the six battleground states.
Arizona
“Biden outperformed [Hillary] Clinton’s 2016 results, and Trump performed worse
than he had in 2016,” the report said, before parsing Biden’s 10,457-vote margin.
“Disaffection for Trump among Republican voters led to ticket-splitting that hurt
Trump and helped Biden,” it said. “Nearly 60,000 voters did not vote for Trump even
though they voted Republican down-ballot; of these, 39,000 voted for
Biden. Considering only the two most populous counties in the state, more than
74,000 disaffected Republicans did not vote for Trump in 2020; 65% of these (48,577
votes) voted for Biden; those 48,577 votes alone represent 4.6 times Biden’s margin
of victory over Trump.”
Georgia
Biden beat Trump by 11,779 votes, making Biden the first Democrat to win the state
since Bill Clinton in 1992.
Michigan
In 2016, Trump won by 10,700 votes. In 2020, Biden won by 154,188 votes.
Nevada
Though not widely covered nationally, Trump’s allies filed 10 suits that claimed that
“thousands and thousands” of people voted illegally
thousands and thousands of people voted illegally.
“President Biden carried Nevada by a margin of 33,596 votes over Trump, out of
nearly 1.4 million votes cast,” it said. “Biden’s win in Nevada, like Clinton’s, is
attributable to a reliable base of Democrats in southern Nevada [greater Las Vegas].
He performed far better with Latina women than Latino men and outperformed
Trump with independents.”
Pennsylvania
In 2016, Trump won by 44,292 votes, compared to 2020 where Biden won by 80,555
votes out of 6.9 million votes cast.
“While Biden’s largest vote margins came from dense population centers with large
Black populations, including Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, he made gains in
Republican counties and outperformed Clinton in counties she won in 2016,” it said.
“Democrats saw increased support in suburban Philadelphia counties (as compared
to 2016), while Republican gains in suburban Pittsburgh were not as great.”
Wisconsin
In 2016, Trump won by 22,748 votes. In 2020, Biden won by 20,682 votes.
The Lost Not Stolen report said that Trump’s repeated stolen election claims were
baseless and harmed public confidence in American democracy and elections. It
quoted numerous court decisions were judges were extremely critical of Trump, such
as this excerpt from a federal court ruling in Michigan:
“This lawsuit represents a historic and profound abuse of the judicial process. It is
one thing to take on the charge of vindicating rights associated with an allegedly
fraudulent election. It is another to take on the charge of deceiving a federal court
and the American people into believing that rights were infringed, without regard to
h h l i h i f i l d hi i h h dh
whether any laws or rights were in fact violated. This is what happened here.”
“We urge our fellow conservatives to cease obsessing over the results of the 2020
election, and to focus instead on presenting candidates and ideas that offer a
positive vision for overcoming our current difficulties and bringing greater peace,
prosperity, and liberty to our nation,” it concluded.