Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lama Imam
Sir Marco
What is Modernity? S7
Answer to Question 1
In Sven Lindquist’s, “Exterminate All the Brutes”, he Sven Lindqvist outlines the birth
of racism during the nineteenth century. At the beginning of the nineteenth century
During the nineteenth century European expansion, this attitude whose central crux
In 1838, a great anthropologist, J.C Pritchard claimed that the savage races could not be
saved. This rising threat of extermination provided motivation to anthropologists for research
which in return allowed the exterminators an excuse to exterminate, namely that it was
inevitable. In that same year Herman Merivale refuted Pritchard’s theory that “the white is
destined to extirpate the savage” (Lindquist,123) by stating that human life is lost numerously
but its because of natural reasons. He further says that the history of European colonies in
America, Africa and Australia have in common the sweeping destruction of their native
Prejudice against the others (those not a part of the west) had always existed but it was
justified using science as an anchor only during the 19 th century. This idea was first
engineered by Robert Knox. His book, the Races of man(1850) makes an abhorrent leap from
Knox’s own prejudices to his claims being backed by science. Knox had studied comparative
Lama 2
anatomy and from his very limited experience of having performed an autopsy on only one
colored person he justified historical instances of the darker races being slaves to the lighter
ones by saying that darker skinned people were psychologically inferior due to the more
fiborous texture of their brain. He went on to make similar ignorant claims lacking an
empirical basis on the inferiority and unavoidable spoliation of the darker races. He lost all
credibility when he was accused of using assassins to attain corpses for his studies.
Darwin’s “origin of species” gave life to Knox’s ideas again, Darwin neither confirmed
of denied knox’s theories but it was still a justification for the racists “After Darwin race
became the wholly decisive explanation and was accepted and became a central part of british
Anthropological society of London where Richard Lee in his speech reminded the listeners of
the fate of nations similar to genocide in Tasmania. “Through its moral and intellectual
superiority, the Anglo-Saxon race is sweeping away the earlier inhabitants, said Richard Lee”
(Lindquist,132). T.Bendshye opposed Lee’s views by saying that “The natives die out only
when their land is taken from them. Although some Indian tribes of America had been almost
natural selection homologous to extermination, “Contact with Europeans leads the lower,
extermination by relating the almost extermination of a New Zealander rat by an European rat
Darwin understood the struggle for life but believe it developed man. He also pointed out
how extermination of races was not really due to natural selection since “The intellectually
and morally deficient, succeeded best in life and reproduced themselves most rapidly”
(Lindquist,133) William Greg justified this by saying that this struggle between races could
prevent racial decay. Darwin’s cousin, Francis Galton justifies this contradiction further by
saying that to avoid going extinct we must work towards improving hereditary factors to
better survive in a civilised world. Galton further says that reproduction rate of the middle
class was higher because civilised sexes had just lost interest in each other after civilisation.
Sven goes on to say that “During the 19 th century Europeans had encroached on vast
territories… And the dying nations were dying just because their lands were taken from
them”. (141) He then claims that even though we want genocide to have started and ended
with Nazism, it had already existed and Adolf Hitler knew it already since “The air he and all
other western people in his childhood had breathed was soaked in conviction that imperialism
is a biologically necessary process and leads to the inevitable destruction of the lower races”
(Lindquist,141.)
In the mid-nineteenth century the Germans had still not exterminated any nation and
looked more critically on this concept than other Europeans. Georg Gerland a pupil of a
German Anthropologist did extensive research on causes of extermination and concluded that
it was due to the bloodthirstiness and cruelty of a seemingly intellectual people, the
Europeans and that “It is no law of nature that primitive people must die.” (Lindquist,143) In
1891 Friedrich Ratzel, a German anthropologist writes “The theory that dying lout is
predestined by the inner weakness of an individual race is faulty. It is the Europeans that
cause destruction; as the “superior race” is a minority.” (Lindquist,144) Ratzel well full circle
on his views by saying that looking deeply, t the decline of the lower races can be blamed on
Lama 4
their inner weaknesses and not just on advancement by higher people, at the beginning of
1890s as colonial ambitions had begun to rise in Germany also. He became a founding
member of the Pan-German league an organization had creation of a German colonial empire
highest on their agenda. In 1894, the Pan-German League stated in their paper that “the
conditions of life for the German race could be assured only through elbow room where
lower races would lose their existence, anyhow worthless to civilization. (Lindquist,148)
extermination of the Herero people. They drove them out of their lands and when they
resisted they were ordered to be exterminated. The cause of extermination was termed
rebellion and the cause of rebellion as the Hereros warlike nature when in reality their leader
had signed multiple treaties to avoid war with German over 2 decades ago “But just as
Americans did not feel the need to feel themselves bound by their treaties with Indians,
Germans didn’t think they had to abide by any treaties made with the natives”.
(Lindquist,150)
The previously mentioned elbow-room that the Germans wanted to acquire was
“given wings” when Ratzel coined it as Lebensraum (Living space). In this concept he
explained that since the time life first came into existence there has always been a lack of
space and “life has been fighting life for space”. (Lindquist,153) And that a much larger
Lebensraum needed to be conquered to have sufficient land to earn a livelihood and others
have to be displaced for this to happen. Germany’s approach, unlike that of previous
colonizers, was not to conquer the largest amount of land but to develop technology and
education and its economy utilizing the land best thus its economy grew the quickest at the
end of 1800s and Germany built the second largest colonial empire [… I’m afraid that
Lundqvist’s reading explains the link between land-grabbing and technological progress in
Lama 5
In the shorterm Hitler wanted to conquer the agricultural lands of the Soviet Union to supply
food to wartime Germany and in this way killed millions of soviets which would serve as a
long term advantage of incorporation of these lands by Hitler into the German Lebensraum.
The first to be gassed in Aushwitz were the Russian prisoners of war. These were war
killings while the Jews were murdered. Of all the non Jewish Russians a lot were granted
reprieve from death to work as slaves whereas all Jews were to be exterminated. “In that, the
Holocaust was unique-in Europe. But in the history of Western expansion in other parts of the
world many examples of total extermination of whole people can be seen”. (Lidquist,158)
The intention behind this conquest was not to murder Jews but to acquire more
Lebensraum for Germany. Jews were just considered landless [… but then… if they were
landless, how could the Germans acquire more land by killing them?], aimless, scattered
people deemed to belong to an ever lower race than Russians, who could not claim the right
to live and were to be exterminated if they resisted. “Auswhitz was the modern industrial
application of a policy of extermination on which European world domination had long since
rested”. (Lindquist,160)
Grade: 19/20
Lama 6
Work Cited: