When receiving a referral, MCT considers several factors to determine whether to provide crisis stabilization or crisis intervention services:
1) They aim to fill their .5 slot for crisis stabilization per their performance contract, unless other factors suggest crisis intervention is more appropriate.
2) If the person is at high risk of hospitalization, crisis stabilization is pursued; if at risk in the next couple weeks, crisis intervention may be recommended.
3) Crisis stabilization is pursued if the person wants daily one-hour contact; crisis intervention is recommended if they do not want extensive daily contact.
When receiving a referral, MCT considers several factors to determine whether to provide crisis stabilization or crisis intervention services:
1) They aim to fill their .5 slot for crisis stabilization per their performance contract, unless other factors suggest crisis intervention is more appropriate.
2) If the person is at high risk of hospitalization, crisis stabilization is pursued; if at risk in the next couple weeks, crisis intervention may be recommended.
3) Crisis stabilization is pursued if the person wants daily one-hour contact; crisis intervention is recommended if they do not want extensive daily contact.
When receiving a referral, MCT considers several factors to determine whether to provide crisis stabilization or crisis intervention services:
1) They aim to fill their .5 slot for crisis stabilization per their performance contract, unless other factors suggest crisis intervention is more appropriate.
2) If the person is at high risk of hospitalization, crisis stabilization is pursued; if at risk in the next couple weeks, crisis intervention may be recommended.
3) Crisis stabilization is pursued if the person wants daily one-hour contact; crisis intervention is recommended if they do not want extensive daily contact.
o Performance contract Under the terms of our current performance contract, we aim to fill our .5 slot for crisis stabilization. We consider crisis stabilization to be the “default” service unless one of the additional considerations listed below suggests crisis intervention to be more appropriate in the specific case. o Needed service based on level of risk If the person is referred to MCT as a true diversion from being hospitalized in the moment, we attempt to engage in crisis stabilization, as the more intensive service If the person is at risk of hospitalization in the near future (next couple of weeks) based on their symptoms, but is not necessarily immediately at consideration for hospitalization, crisis intervention is typically recommended o Assessment of clients willingness to engage in the service If the person is requesting daily contact of at least one hour, we pursue crisis stabilization If the person is not willing for or interested in the extensive daily contact recommended with crisis stabilization of at least 1 hr/day, crisis intervention is recommended o Specific service criteria If the person is seen by a doctor, or can be within 72 hours of starting the service, crisis stabilization is appropriate. If the person demonstrates a clinical need for crisis stabilization but cannot see a doctor, we document the barrier and still pursue crisis stabilization. At times, we work with psychiatric services to provide a psychiatric assessment as part of crisis stabilization services. If the person can or will not be seen by a doctor within 72 hours of starting the service and is not able to identify a particular barrier to doing so, crisis intervention is pursued. o Payer source Anthem Healthkeepers has specifically instructed us to provide services under crisis stabilization rather than crisis intervention MCOs will offer reimbursement for services provided in shorter increments under a crisis intervention authorization. Treatment in shorter increments is preferable to some clients, making crisis intervention a more appropriate service.