Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10
October 2013
October 2013
Editorial Board
T.S. Vijayan
R. K. Nair
S.V. Mony
V. Manickam
R. Chandrasekaran
Dr. T. Narasimha Rao
Ashvin Parekh
Editor
U. Jawaharlal
A
s has been said time and again, the role of the It has generally been a practice among several business
regulators and supervisors – especially in the houses that there are internal standards and
domain of financial services – is protection of boundaries within which the conduct of the entity is
customers’ interests, although they are also endowed sought to be ensured. As long as these internal
with the responsibilities of ensuring that the industry standards operate within the overall domain of
registers consistent growth that is so vital for the regulatory stipulations, compliance with the norms
progress of an economy. Considering the fact that the would be an easy task. However, where the regulatory
Indian insurance industry is still at a developing stage, and supervisory directives undergo frequent changes,
there is an additional emphasis on the need for conforming to the requirements might get
ensuring that the policyholders’ interests are given the complicated; and it could lead to a dilution of the
highest priority. In upholding this function of purpose for which they are intended. Supervisors have
policyholder protection, it is equally important that a to consider these delicate aspects while envisaging
level-playing field for the players is always ensured that changes, and ensure that a healthy balance between
presupposes a fair competition among them. consumer protection and the need for regulatory
stipulations is maintained.
It would be redundant to mention that a constant
follow-up by the supervisors with the regulated entities ‘Regulatory Compliance in Insurance’ is once again the
with regard to their internal business practices is hard focus of this issue of the Journal. Finance experts always
to fathom; and in order that the players do not overstep harp upon the importance of striking a balance
the regulations, it is the practice for the players to report between ‘risk and return’; and in order that this balance
from time to time various aspects of their business as is achieved, it is vital for insurers to have in place a
envisaged. For this to be achieved, it is necessary that all healthy asset-liability match. ‘Asset Liability
the employees are thoroughly conversant with the Management for Insurers’ will be the focus of the next
need for compliance and fulfilment thereof, in order to issue of the Journal.
ensure complete acquiescence. In the case of such
officers/employees who have been specially trained to
handle compliance matters, it would make good sense
to always provide for a second line so that an exigency
does not lead to total disarray. T.S. Vijayan
inside
issue focus
Towards Customer Centricity
18 Amarnath Ananthnarayanan
24 Regulations
Abhijit Gulanikar
[7
17
Vantage Point
end-user
U. Jawaharlal
[7
41
~r_m g_mdoeZ
Independent Directors
28 R Sankaranarayanan
nr`yf AJ«dmb
thinking cap [7
45
~r_m _| {hÝXr Š`m| Oéar
S>m°. AO`Hw$_ma {_lm
Insurance ePlacement
[7
48
Statistics - Non-Life Insurance
31 Karthik Sn
[7
49
Statistical Supplement (Monthly)
34 Cancer Insurance
Seema Arora
from the editor
-i
------------------------ -
T
here is a delicate balance associated the players has its own method and style insurance industry, considering its capital
with the fulfilment of the of arriving at the business retention intensive nature. Mr. Abhijit Gulanikar
compliance function; and while ratios? discusses threadbare the regulations
business priorities take the cake, insurers pertaining to investments and the
To ensure that this very crucial function of
should ensure that this delicate balance is nuances of striking a balance between
compliance is duly fulfilled, it is important
never upset. For the policymakers, it is profitable investment and regulatory
for the players to have a full-fledged
equally vital that a great deal of thinking compliance in the area of investments.
workforce who are sufficiently trained in
goes into the process of contemplating
this domain. There is also need for In the aftermath of several corporate
large scale changes in compliance so that
ensuring that the skill sets are updated to debacles, the topic of fixing
the purpose for which they are intended is
be in tune with the requirements of the responsibilities has been gaining a lot of
always accomplished. In a domain where
regulators/supervisors. While it may lead ground. In the next article, Mr. R.
there could be duplicity of regulatory
to additional costs for the players, it Sankaranarayanan gives a detailed
supervision, it should be ensured that
should be appreciated that the account of the operation of the ‘Directors
while ensuring to comply with the
investments made are akin to those in & Officers’ Liability Cover in the ‘end-user’
requirements of one regulator, players do
Research and Development – with due section. In the ‘thinking cap’ section that
not overstep the stipulations of another.
returns in the long run. Failure to ensure follows, Mr. Karthik Sn describes the
There has to be in place a system of
compliance, and in time, would no doubt importance of a technology based broker
prioritizing the needs so that the more
attract penal action from the supervisors; exchange, especially for large commercial
essential functions like complying with
besides, a continued observation of non- risks. In the end, we give the second and
KYC norms are always given the highest
compliance is certainly detrimental to the concluding part of a very well thought-out
importance.
reputation of the players. write-up by Ms. Seema Arora on the
In order to ensure an equitable disease of cancer as also the importance
‘Regulatory Compliance in Insurance’ is
distribution of insurance business all over of the operation of Cancer insurance, if the
the focus of this issue of the Journal once
the country and also to improve upon the society were to tackle this malady
again. The opening article in this issue is
poor spread of business among the rural successfully.
by Dr. Amarnath Anantanarayanan in
masses, the rural and social sector
which he exhorts the importance of That the success of insurers is greatly
obligations were put in place. To achieve
adopting a ‘customer centric approach’ dependent on profitable investments is
the targets on paper ‘somehow’ would
which he says is bound to go a long way in no secret; and to enable this, the insurers
certainly defeat the purpose of such an
establishing a strong reputation for the need to have a reasonably fair assessment
important regulation. Players should
players. In the next article, Dr. Som of the timing of their assets and liabilities.
assign due importance to these targets so
Majumdar talks about the importance of ‘Asset Liability Management for Insurers’
that insurance spreads its wings to the
having in place a comprehensive system will be the focus of the next issue of the
farthest corners and to the deprived
of risk management which would act as Journal.
sections of the country. Similarly, to keep a
the perfect foil for all aspects of regulatory
track of the business retention in the
compliance; and this, he says, would be
industry, the lapsation figures of life
applicable in any domain. Investments
insurers are monitored over a period of
are a very vital area of operation for the
time. Would it serve the cause if each of U. Jawaharlal
in the air
Circular
Ref: IRDA/LIFE/ADVT/CIR/182/09/2013 Date: 10.09.2013.
■4
i
~----------------ii.ta
CEO's of all Non-Life Insurance Companies
Ref: IRDA/DIST/GDL/MISC/183/09/2013 Date.: 11-09-2013
All Concerned
Ref: Date: 18.09.2013.
INVITATION FOR OPENING NEW ON-LINE Different application forms are prescribed their application for new ATI accreditation.
AND OFF-LINE ATI for establishing on-line and off-line
An application complete in all respects
training institutes. Hence applicants are
Applications are invited from all eligible along with required information and
advised to apply in relevant format only. In
organizations and institutions to establish documents should be submitted to the
case an applicant desires to apply for both
On-line and Off-line ATIs for conducting Authority. The Authority will scrutinize
irda journal October 2013
■5
in the air
The following is the Exposure draft on generates which can potentially affect the following potential problems while
usage of Trade Logos by Insurance the informed choice to insuring public. using the trade logo of promoting
Companies released for comments of partners.
While, the Authority has put in place
the public and all the stakeholders. The
comprehensive regulations, guidelines 1. Having no written agreements, may
views ,if any, may be sent to
and circulars on Insurance be a matter of concern especially in
dvsramesh@irda.gov.in by 30th
Advertisements, there is no mention on the event of any reputational
September 2013.
the 'trade logos', though, trade logos are loss, as shareholders of
Exposure Draft on usage of Trade Logo predominantly used in all the publicity respective promoter companies may
by Insurance Companies material I insurance advertisements. prefer to have their own stand on the
However, while reviewing the practices quantum of compensation to be
It is common that companies have in adopted by various life insurers that are sought, thereby, possibly jeopardizing
place a distinct trade logo /emblem I using the trade logo of promoters I the interests of the policyholders.
icon(referred as trade logo hereafter)so as foreign promoters, the following varying
to build the brand image I draw the 2. Absence of specific consideration
practices are noticed.
attention of their respective loyal amount may result in fleecing
customers. Insurance Companies being i. Some companies are using only one of Insurers' expenses in the case of
in the business of promoting its promoting partners'trade logo, any unforeseen contingencies, if
insuranceservicesmay have in place their despite the fact that the other determination of compensation is
own identity through a distinct trade logo promoters are having significant based on future discretions with no
so as to seamlessly reach the minds of share in the Insurance Company. pre-defined parameters.
insuring public. While it is the business
ii. In respect of some companies no 3. With no ceiling to the absolute
prerogative of insurance companies to
written agreements are in place, but amount payable, when consideration
adopt I promote the trade logo, be it by
trade logos of the promoting partners amount is determined I decided as
having a distinct trade logo or use the
are used. a percentage of premium income,
existing trade logo of the promoters
this may lead to disproportionate
with the objective of leveraging their iii. Some agreements did not have ny
out-go year on year based on
respective strengths, it is desired that the specific time lines for usage of trade
insurance business prospects.
insurance companies that use the trade logo.
logo of the business partners I promoters 4. In the event of exit of the promoting
also keep in place certain risk iv. Some agreements did not have any
partner, the costs of building the
management practices so as to ensure reference to the consideration
unique logo may be
that the interests of thepolicyholdersare amount while some have a mere
prohibitive.Otherwise the exited
appropriately protected against possible reference to the consideration
partner may charge the Insurer
concomitant reputational risks amount with no specificities.
exorbitantly.
associated. The need for safeguarding the v. S o m e a g r e e m e n t s have
business interests of the Insurers is more In the light of above concerns, the
consideration clause as a percentage
pertinent, in cases where the trade logo of Authority considers that there is a need for
of the premium, with no upper
promoting I foreign partners is used, as a putting in place the prudent risk
ceilings.
trade logowhich is reared and sustained management measuresby all the
insurance companies. Towards this
irda journal October 2013
■6
i
-----------------------ii.ta
as 'a name or a mark, such as symbol, b) Where an Insurer adopts the trade g) The agreement may be for a specific
monogram or logowhich is used in logo of any of its partner, there shall be period of time with a provision to
relation to using the name of Insurance in place a written agreement setting renew in the agreed periodicity.
Company as an acronym or the Insurance forth the underlying terms and
h) Any pay outs towards compensation
Services offered for the purpose of conditions.
made, on account of alleged
promoting, canvassing and publicizing
c) The parties to the agreement shall damagesowing tousage of trade logo.
the company or the services and products
specify the consideration amount, if of the promoting partner shall be
offered'.
any, leaving no scope for any arbitrary remitted from the Shareholders'
Keeping in view the risks associated with payments. Where the consideration Account.
trade logo and the long terminterests of amount is not mentioned as an
All Insurance Companies that are using
policyholders, all Insurers shall consider absolute amount, but referred as a
trade logo of their promoter partners shall
developing a distinct trade logo of their percentage of premium income,
file the agreements with the Authority.
own so as to minimize not only possible specified ceiling as an absolute
Any changes I modifications to the
confusion in the minds of insuring public amount shall be mentioned leaving
terms and conditions shall also be filed,
but also the costs, be it the consideration no scope for any disproportionate
soon after effecting the changes.
amount or the compensation, associated windfall gains to the other party.
with the trade logo of the promoting All the Insurance Companies are hereby
d) The consideration amount shall be
partners. d i re c t e d t o co m p l y w i t h t h e s e
reasonable.
guidelines.The guidelines come into force
a) Where an Insurer adopts the trade
e) There shall be a specific mention immediately.
logo of any of its partners, there shall
in unambiguous terms if there is
be a prominent declaration as to the CHAIRMAN
no consideration amount involved.
fact of Insurer being a separate entity
giving the names of all joint venture f) The terms and conditions of the
partners. Further it should state agreement shall also have specific
clearly that mere adoption of logo caveats on settlement of
of promoter does not convey any compensation, if any to be made to
inheritance of financial strength and one of the parties owing to the
quality of promoter in products and damages caused.
services of the Insurer.
■7
in the air
GUIDELINES ON COMMON SERVICE 2.2. "Authority" means the 2.7. "Rural Authorized Persons"
CENTRES - 2013 Insurance Regulatory and (RAP) is an individual
Development Authority Village Level Entrepreneur
The Department of Electronics and
established under the (VLE) Registered and
Information Technology (DeiTY),
Government of India has implemented provisions of Section 3 of the Authorised by CSC I CSC-SPV to
the Common Services Centers (CSCs) on a Insurance Regulatory and o p e ra t e a n d m a n a g e a
Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model as Development Authority Act, Common Service Centre, and
a part of National a-Governance Plan 1999 (41 of 1999) approved by the Authority
(NeGP). CSCs are the front-end delivery upon successful completion of
2.3. "CSC" means the "Common
points for government, private and social training and examination, as
Service Centre" established
sector services to citizens of India. M/s CSC specified by the Authority, to
under National a Governance
a-Governance Services India Limited, a carry out functions as RAP as
Plan by Mls CSC a-Governance
Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) has been specified under para 11.
Services India Limited
formed to enable delivery of services
2.8. "State Designated Agency"
through the CSC Network. 2.4. "CSC-SPV" means Mls CSC a-
(SDA) is the nodal agency at
Governance Services India
These Guidelines are issued to permit state level involved for the
Limited, the Special Purpose
both Life and Non Life Insurers in India to monitoring and supervision of
Ve h i c l e i n co r p o ra t e d t o
Market certain categories of Retail the esc project progress at the
facilitate delivery of
Insurance Policies and Services through state level.
M/s CSC e-Governance Services India government, private and social
Limited (CSC-SPV) and its Common Service sector services to citizens of 2.9. "Service Centre Agency" (SCA) is
Centers Network. India through the Common the implementing Agency
Services Centers (CSCs) network, responsible for covering a
The prime objective of these Guidelines is and approved by the Authority group of districts in a state;
to facilitate the Insurers in India to reach under these Guidelines, who providing the required
out to the rural India utilising the network
for remuneration arranges investment budget and the
of CSC-SPV
insurance contracts (under functional specifications of the
These Guidelines are issued by the specific products approved by esc.
Authority in exercise of the powers the authority from time to time)
2.10. "Solicitation" for the purpose
conferred upon the Authority under with insurance companies on
of these guidelines is defined
Section 14(1) of the IRDA Act 1999, to behalf of its clients through CSC
as the approach of prospect by
protect the interests of the policyholder Network.
a RAP with a view to inducing
and to regulate, promote, and ensure the
orderly growth of the insurance industry. 2.5. "NIELIT": National Institute of the prospect to purchase an
Electronics and Information insurance policy, and includes
1. Scope and applicability of these Technology is an autonomous providing assistance in case the
guidelines: scientific society of Department prospect decides to purchase
These Guidelines cover insurance of Electronics and Information an insurance policy.
soliciting and servicing activities of the Technology, Government of
2.11. "Village Level Entrepreneur'' is
CSC SPV, and its functionaries including India.
an individual Registered and
irda journal October 2013
■8
i
-----------------------ii.ta
2.12. Words and expressions used Form-A to the Authority for 8.3. Rural Authorized Person
and not defined in these renewal of licence along with should possesses the
Guidelines but defined in the the payment of application minimum qualification of :
Insurance Act, 1938 (4 of 1938), processing fee of Rs.1000
8.3.1. Pass in 10th Class or
the Insurance Regulatory and (Rupees One Thousand only) for
equivalent examination
Development Authority Act, renewal of license.
from a recognized
1999 or in any of the
Provided, however, that if the Board/Institution.
Regulations I Guidelines made
a p p l i c a t i o n re a c h e s t h e
there under shall have the 8.3.2. Minimum knowledge of
Authority later than the period
meanings respectively Computer applications I
mentioned above, but before
assigned to them in those Acts operations.
the actual date of expiry of the
or Regulations I Guidelines. 8.3.3. Should have completed at
current licence, an additional
3. Compliance : CSC-SPV and RAPs shall, fee of rupees five hundred least 20 hours of theoretical
in addition to these guidelines, only shall be payable by the training from an institution
comply with all the applicable applicant to the Authority. recognized by the Authority.
provisions of the Insurance Act, 1938, 8.3.4. Should pass an
Provided further that the
the IRDA Act, 1999, and the rules, examination, at the end of
Authority may for sufficient
regulations, circulars or guidelines, as the period of training
reasons offered in writing by
applicable, to be issued from time to mentioned above
the applicant for a delay not
time. conducted by the NIELIT or
covered by the previous
4. Application for grant of licence: An proviso, accept an application any other examining body
application by CSC-SPV for grant of a for renewal after the date of the recognized by the Authority.
licence to act as an Insurance expiry of the licence on 8.3.5. The syllabus for the above
Intermediary shall be made to the payment of an additional fee of training shall cover
Authority in Form-A along with an one thousand rupees only by Principles and Practice of
application processing fee of the applicant. Insurance, Legal aspects of
Rs.5000/- (Rupees Five thousand Insurance; AMUPML & KYC,
7.2. The Authority may call for
only). General lnsuranc_e and Life
any additional information /
5. Procedure for licensing: The Authority documents as deemed fit for Insurance, as specified by
on being satisfied that the applicant processing the renewal the Authority from time to
fulfils all the conditions specified for application, from the applicant. time.
the grant of licence, shall grant a 9. Tr a i n i n g , E x a m i n a t i o n a n d
7.3. The Authority, on being
licence in Form-S and send intimation Certification of RAP:
satisfied that the applicant
thereof to the applicant. The licence
fulfils all the conditions 9.1. Training:
shall be issued subject to the CSC-SPV
specified for renewal of the
adhering to the conditions and the 9.1.1. The RAP shall undergo 20
licence, shall renew the licence
code of conduct as specified by the hours Training covering the
in Form-B for a period of three
Authority from time to time. topics stated in the Syllabus.
years and send intimation to
6. Validity of licence: A licence once that effect to the applicant. 9.1.2. The training material and
issued shall be valid for a period of self assessment content
8. Persons engaged for solicitation:
three years from the date of its issue, shall be in digital
unless the same is suspended or 8.1. For the purpose of downloadable format and
c a n ce l l e d p u r s u a n t t o t h e s e solicitation of insurance shall be hosted under a
irda journal October 2013
■9
in the air
9.1.3. The self-assessment tests be decided by the longer valid as soon as the
shall be in multiple-choice Authority i n services of RAP are
models. consultation with terminated or suspended by
respective examination CSC-SPV or its authorised
9.2. Training Methodology
conducting institute, SDA I SCA.
9.2.1. The RAP shall register on the depending on the
9.3.12. On line examination:
Learning Management requirements.
System website and 9.3.12.1. Online examination will be
9.3.4. The examination questions
complete the training. conducted by authorised
shall be displayed with
institutes and the results
9.2.2. The RAP shall download the multiple choices of answers.
will be published on the CSC-
digital training content to
9.3.5. The number of questions for SPV's Website and copy sent
his PC /laptop and complete
the online examination to the Authority.
the self-learning modules.
shall be 40 and with a
9.3.12.2. RAP who are declared 'pass'
9.2.3. At the end of each module duration of 60 minutes.
in the examination will be
the RAP shall complete the
9.3.6. Each question shall carry 2.5 issued a Certificate to solicit
self-assessment test. The
marks and the examination insurance business and
Learning Management
is for 100 marks. The shall be referred to as
System shall not allow the
examinee has to score "Certified for procuring
RAP to complete more than
minimum 35 marks to pass Insurance Business".
two self-assessment test
the examination.
per day. 9.3.12.3. I n s u ra n c e c o m p a n i e s
9.3.7. There will not be any should register New
9.2.4. On completion of the self-
negative marks for wrong Business of only such RAPs
assessment test for each of
answers. who are listed in the CSC-
the module, the candidate
SPV's Portal as "Certified for
shall earn one-hour training 9.3.8. There shall be no limit for
procuring Insurance
credit. the number of attempts for
Business". Insurance
appearing the examination
9.2.5. The RAP shall complete all companies should under no
by RAP.
the 20 self-learning circumstance register New
modules and s e l f- 9.3.9. The RAP has to pay the Business from a RAP who is
assessment tests online to appropriate fee as approved 'NOT CERTIFIED" by the
earn the credit for 20 hours by the Authority for training examining institute to carry
training. and examination to the out Insurance business.
concerned institute.
9.3. Examination and 9.3.12.4. All the existing RAPs shall
Certification 9.3.10. On passing the have to pass the exam for
examination, the examining soliciting the Insurance
9.3.1. The online examination of
institute shall issue a business.
RAP shall be conducted by
certificate validating the
NIELIT or any other institute 9.3.13. Enabling Registration of
completion of training and
as approved by the New Insurance Business by
passing of the examination
Authority from time to time RAP:
by RAP.
in their centres spread
9.3.13.1. The CSC-SPV's Portal shall
across India. 9.3.11. The Certification of the
enable the RAP to register
completion of training
9.3.2. The RAP on completion of
irda journal October 2013
■
10
i
-----------------------ii.ta
period of the license are the prescribed code of address, change in
updated in the CSC-SPV's conduct, in the agreement nomination, sale of
Portal. entered into with the RAP. vehicle etc. for updation
and arrange to get
9.3.13.2. In case there is a change in 10.6. CSP-SPV shall ensure
necessary endorsement in
the RAP; the new RAP can continuous monitoring of
the policy documents if
carry out insurance servicing the activities of the RAP and
required.
from the date of be responsible for the
a p p o i n t m e n t a s R A P. compliance of these 11.7. Assist and facilitate claims
However, the RAP can guidelines and the code of settlement process by
register New Business only conduct by RAPs. helping insured in filling
form the date he qualifies in claim form, collect copy of
11. Functions of RAP
the examination. documents like death
The insurance related functions of a certificate, nomination,
10. Functions of CSC-SPV
RAP shall include any one or more of assignment, and such other
10.1. CSC-SPV, on obtaining the the following: documents required for
license from the Authority settlement of claims by
11.1. Assisting the prospects to
to act as an insurance insurers.
select the policy based on
intermediary, may enter into
the need of Insurance. 11.8. Inform clients about
agreements with Insurance
11.2. Obtaining detailed payment of renewal
companies as specified in
information relating to premium and send policy
para 14 of these guidelines.
proposers I persons I risks to renewal notices to clients on
10.2. CSC-SPV shall assist the RAPs behalf of insurers, if the
be insured and protection
to undergo the prescribed insurer outsources the
needs and render advice on
training and certification. services.
appropriate insurance
10.3 CSC-SPV may obtain the cover. 11.9. Comply with the AML I KYC
support of the SDAISCA in guidelines issued by the
11.3. Providing the insurer with
training the RAP, providing Authority from time to time.
underwriting information
operational and marketing
like age, income, family 11.10. All other customer centric
support and guidance in
medical history, any illness services as may be required
field operations of the RAP as
suffered and such other for smooth and effective
deemed fit. The agreement
information as required in policy servicing.
entered with the insurers
assessing the risk.
shall specify the detials of 12. Remuneration :
the support enlisted. 11.4. Acting promptly on
12.1. The remuneration payable
instructions from a client
10.4. On successful completion of to CSC-SPV by the Insurer,
and providing him written
training and passing the for the solicitation of
acknowledgements and
prescribed examination and policies by the Authorised
information on proposal
based on the certificate RAPs shall not exceed the
acceptance and status of
issued by examining remuneration as specified
claims settlement.
institute, CSC-SPV shall enter by the Authority from time
into an agreement with the 11.5. Assisting clients in paying to time under Sec. 42-E of
RAP authorising him to premium, in compliance the Act.
solicit the approved with section 64VB of the Act.
irda journal October 2013
■
11
in the air
12.3. CSC-SPV, on receipt of any Understanding shall be entered proposers' data to the
remuneration from the between the insurers and CSC-SPV and Insurer should be detailed
insurer, shall distribute not the agreement amongst various in the agreement.
less than 80% of the same aspects should include the following:
14.7. The procedure for sending
to the respective RAPs. The
14.1. Procedure for enabling or the soft files and documents
remuneration to entities
disabling the RAP for the relating to claims of the
such as SDA/SCA shall be as
delivery of the approved i n s u re d t o I n s u ra n ce
per the agreement with
insurance products; Company should be
the insurer after retaining
procedure for tracking and explained in detail in the
an amount of not exceeding
monitoring the transactions agreement.
8 % t o wa rd s fe e s fo r
and activities of the RAP;
recruitment, p r o v i d i n g 14.8. The procedure to send the
procedure for incorporating
and enabling the hard copy of the claims
the Unique code allotted by
software and guiding related documents to
CSC-SPV; procedure for
and monitoring the RAP in insurers as per the Service
incorporating the Aadhaar
day to day functions. level Agreements with the
number of the customer
insurer should be explained
12.4. CSC-SPV shall enter into an and the nominee and the
in detail in the agreement.
agreement with the PAN number of RAP may be
insurers and mention used by all insurers to 14.9. The procedure for
clearly in the agreement the maintain the uniformity. maintenance of data in a
percentages and method of The tracking code may be secure mode by the Insurer
distribution of the agreed mutually by insurers should be outlined in detail
remuneration to various and CSC-SPV. in the agreement.
entities in the esc scheme. 14.10. The procedure for updation
14.2. List of Products to be
12.5. The settlement of accounts marketed through the and transmission of data in
by insurers in respect of CSC-SPV should be a secure mode by the
remuneration of CSC SPV incorporated in the Insurer should be outlined
shall be done on a monthly agreement. in detail in the agreement.
basis and it must be 14.11. The CSC-SPV and the
14.3. A robust grievance redressal
ensured that there is no Insurers shall develop
system should be set in at
cross settlement of suitable system to ensure
both the CSC SPV level and
outstanding balances. continuity in the services
the insurer level. The
13. Products al l o w ed u n d er CS C: insurers should submit a rendered by RAP to
Insurance companies shall develop Complaint Redressal policyholders, even after the
insurance products to be marketed Analysis report to the termination of agreement
exclusively through the esc model Authority every quarter. with licensed insurance
and file such products exclusively RAP, and this should be
14.4. The procedure for sending
designed for CSC model with the recorded in detail in the
the soft copy of the proposal
Authority for approval. The products agreement.
data / claims data etc by the
developed for CSC Model should not 14.12. The method of distribution
RAP to the Insurer should be
have the Sum Assured (per life or risk) of the remuneration by the
detailed in the agreement.
exceeding Rs. TWO LAKHS except for Insurer to the CSC and to the
motor insurance. Products approved 14.5. The procedure for sending
other entities as mentioned
irda journal October 2013
by the authority for the CSC Model can the soft copy of the
in para 12 should be
be marketed through the CSC Model. completed policy data I
detailed in the agreement.
claims data etc by the
14. Agreement between CSC-SPV and the 14.13. The agreement to specify
Insurer to the RAP should be
Insurance Company the roles and obligations
detailed in the agreement.
An Agreement - Service Level of the parties, including
14.6. The procedure for sending
Agreement - Memorandum of the SCA and SDA, to the
the hard copy of the
■
12
i
-----------------------ii.ta
agreement should be the authority from time to 16.4. Develop suitable systems to
detailed in the agreement. time in this regard redress customer
grievances/complaints.
14.14. The agreement shall 15.3.2. RAP is barred from soliciting
include relevant clauses insurance and offering any 16.5. Develop simple insurance
defining the role and other insurance business products, which are easy to
responsibilities of CSC-SPV, related services in their understand by the RAPs
the role and responsibilities individual capacity, in any and rural customers and
of the RAP including the mode, on behalf of any file the same with the
code of conduct I market individual, organization, or Authority for approval.
conduct of the RAP; and role insurance company, other
than the esc scheme model. 16.6. The insurer should submit a
and responsibilities of the quarterly statement in
SCA and the entity 15.3.3. RAP shall maintain the Form-e giving details of all
responsible for acts of records and the reports of products marketed by CSC-
commission and omission the activities related to SPV.
of the RAP deployed. Insurance, in the manner
specified in the 16.7. Develop suitable feedback
15. Obligations of RAP: mechanisms to bring in
appointment agreement
15.1. RAP shall be appointed by with CSC-SPV. i m p ro v e m e n t s i n t h e
CSC-SPV after passing the services rendered, effect
15.3.4. RAP shall not accept any
examination. changes, if any, required in
payment from Insurers
the policy terms and
15.2. The agreement between other than the
conditions.
the CSC-SPV and the RAP remuneration as specified
shall include: in the agreement between 16.8. Develop suitable system to
the Insurer and the CSC-SPV. ensure continued insurance
15.2.1. Code of Conduct for RAPs.
16. Obligations of Insurance Company: protection and servicing to
15.2.2. Adherence to regulatory rural customers.
provisions, compliances, 16.1. Insurance Company shall
not pay any fee or 16.9. The Insurer shall
disclosures, ethical conduct
remuneration, by whatever communicate the details of
of business and specific
name called, other than the lapses, if any, committed by
instructions that are issued
remuneration as specified the RAPs to the
by the authority from time
in para-12 of these Authorities such as SDA,
to time.
Guidelines. SCA and CSC-SPV for
15.2.3. Adherence to the provisions necessary action.
16.2. Product training process
of the IRDA Act, 1999.
should be set in place by the 17. Code of Conduct:
15.3. Subject to reference to para Insurer for the training of
17.1. Every Rural Authorized
8.2 above, RAP will also be the RAPs, and the data on
Person shall:
held responsible for any act the training imparted
of omission or commission during the quarter should 17.1.1. Conduct his dealings with
in the insurance business be maintained by the clients with utmost good
transactions undertaken by Insurer to be submitted faith and integrity at all
him. to the Authority as and times;
when called for.
15.3.1. In the process of soliciting 17.1.2. Act with due care and
insurance business and 16.3. Insurance Company shall diligence;
irda journal October 2013
■
13
in the air
■
14
i
-----------------------ii.ta
18. Reports to be submitted to the business or in the policy A u t h o r i t y h a s
Authority: holders' interest. communicated the reasons
for the cancellation in
The Insurance Company and the CSC- 20. Cancellation or suspension of
writing.
SPV shall submit periodical reports to licence with notice:
the Authority as specified hereunder. 22. Cancellation or suspension of
The licence of CSC-SPV may be
licence of RAP with notice:
18.1. The CSC-SPV shall furnish to cancelled or suspended after due
the Authority Quarterly notice and after giving it a reasonable The licence of RAP may be cancelled or
report in Form-D, Form-E opportunity of being heard, if it suspended after due notice and after
and any other return, as giving him a reasonable opportunity
20.1. violates the provisions of
may be, required by the of being heard if the RAP is found
the Act, Insurance
Authority on Insurance guilty of misconduct or his conduct
Regulatory And
activities. is not in accordance with the code
Development Authority Act,
of conduct specified in para-17 of
18.2. The Insurance Company 1999 or Rules or
these guidelines, or fails to carry out
shall furnish to the Authority Regulations made there
his obligations specified under para-
half yearly report in Form-F under;
15 of these guidelines.
and any other return, as
20.2. fails to furnish any
may be, required by the 23. Cancellation or suspension of
information relating to its
Authority on business licence of RAP without notice:
activities as a CSC-SPV as
procured through RAPs.
required by the Authority; The licence of RAP may be cancelled or
19. Power of Authority to inspect: suspended without notice if he is
20.3. furnishes wrong or false
found guilty of fraud, or is convicted of
19.1. The Authority may appoint information; or conceals
a criminal offence; or commits such
one or more of its officers as or fails to disclose material
defaults which require immediate
an inspecting authority to facts in the application
action in the opinion of the Authority,
undertake inspection of the submitted for obtaining a
provided that the Authority has
premises of the CSC-SPV/ licence;
communicated the reasons for the
CSCs to ascertain and see
20.4. indulges in rebates or cancellation in writing.
how activities are carried
inducements in cash or kind
on, and also to inspect the 24. Power of the Authority to issue
to a client or any of the
books of accounts, records clarifications:
client's directors or other
and documents of the CSC-
employees or any person In order to remove any difficulties in
SPV/RAP for any of the
acting as an introducer; respect of the application or
purposes specified in these
interpretation of any of the provisions
guidelines; and 20.5. fails to carry out its
of these Guidelines, the Authority may
obligations as specified in
19.1.1. to ensure the compliance issue appropriate clarifications from
the Guidelines.
of provisions of the Act, time to time.
Rules and Regulations; 21. Cancellation or suspension of
(T.S.Vijayan)
licence without notice:
19.1.2. to investigate the Chairman
complaints received from The licence of a CSC-SPV may be
any insured, any insurer, or cancelled or suspended without
any other person on any notice, if it
matter having a bearing on 21.1. is found guilty of fraud, or is
irda journal October 2013
■
15
in the air
Press Release
Ref: Date: 29.08.2013.
IRDA's Comments on the Detailed underlying drivers vary. India is a clear early warning system. Given the high
Assessment Report outperformer in terms of expected life level of solvency at 150 per cent required
insurance penetration, and is broadly in to be maintained by insurers at all times,
The insurance sector in India was
line with expectations in the non-life the Authority does not envisage the
assessed by the World Bank and
sector. While the preconditions of need for a ladder approach to the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) on
effective supervision are broadly met, it intervention levels. However, with a view
adherence to the Insurance Core
has been further commended that the to facilitating a risk based oversight, IRDA
Principles (ICPs) of IAIS in 2011. This
IRDA is taking steps to address the various is looking at having in place the early
was the first such exercise carried out
issues raised in the assessment report. warning signals (EWS) for the systemically
by independent assessors. Prior to this,
important insurance groups, and is
the insurance sector in India was The report has commented on certain
working closely with other regulators in
subjected to self-assessment in the year inadequacies with regard to incomplete
the financial sector. As regards moving
2007, under the aegis of the Ministry of oversight of the Life Insurance
towards the risk based capital approach to
Finance jointly with the Reserve Bank of Corporation of India (LIC), lack of adequate
solvency, IRDA is presently examining
India. The assessment carried out by the enforcement powers with respect to
various issues related to the same and
IMF/World Bank Team reflects monetary sanctions, lack of adequacy of
would take a view on adopting a
improved level of compliance with the reserves under the Indian Motor Third
s t a n d a rd i z e d f ra m e w o r k a f t e r
ICPs and significant progress made in Party Pool of commercial vehicles, and de
deliberations with all stakeholders. As a
the compliance post the self-assessment jure independence of the regulator. IRDA
first step an exposure draft has been
in 2009. would like to assert that there is complete
released laying down the framework to
oversight on the LIC with regard to both
The Detailed Assessment Report (DAR) has assign risk weights to financial assets
market conduct and prudential
commended the relatively well supporting insurance liabilities. While
regulations and that the Indian Third
developed insurance regulation and acknowledging that Fraud is a challenge
Party Motor Pool has been dismantled
supervisory architecture in India to be met squarely, IRDA has laid down
in the year 2012. Simultaneously, the
particularly in the areas of licensing, the regulatory framework on detection,
concerns on valuation of non-life
consumer protection, market oversight classification, monitoring, reporting and
liabilities are being addressed by
and transparency. The report also mitigation of frauds.
strengthening the stipulations for
mentions that IRDA's on-going
provisioning for Incurred but not The Insurance Regulatory and
supervision of insurance companies and
reported (IBNR) and Incurred but not Development Authority (IRDA) welcomes
market is tight and displayed a strong
Enough Reported (IBNER) liabilities. the assessment carried out by the IMF-
level of control and that the insurance
With regard to the de jure independence, World Bank team. Assessed against the
industry in India has relatively large
IRDA would like to assert that there is international experience, the observance
footprint compared to other forms of
complete autonomy with regard to standard was fairly satisfactory.
financial intermediation given India's
supervision and regulation of insurance
income levels, in comparison with (T.S.Vijayan)
sector in general and insurance
analogous developing countries. This is
companies and intermediaries in Chairman
irda journal October 2013
■
16
vantage point i
ii.ta
‘While the surplus funds need to be invested profitably, insurers have to be doubly careful about the
liabilities coming up; as they cannot afford to default on the payment of claims coming up from time
to time’ emphasizes U. Jawaharlal.
R
isk is inherent in any business; and claim payments from time to time, the (although in the current scenario where
when the business is all about actuaries are entrusted with the business retention is itself a big question,
taking over the risks of others, there responsibilities of also profitably even the inflow of premiums at regular
is even greater emphasis on the risk managing their investments – intervals is not something that can be
component. It is exactly in this respect that considering the fact that there are huge taken for granted).
the acumen of insurers with regard to the surplus funds which are generated
Being essentially long-term contracts, the
risk profile in future times comes into play. regularly with the premium income being
surplus funds generated from time to
Historically, insurers world over have been spread over the entire year. With the
time beg to be invested profitably, as any
successful in assuming the risks of others, regulatory boundaries on one hand and
finance expert would vouch. Particularly,
with the occasional ones falling by the the rapidly changing global economic
in the non-life domain of the Indian
wayside more on account of ambitious environment on the other, it is truly a
insurance industry, it is these investments
business trends rather than a genuine challenging assignment.
which have stood insurers in good stead
failure of risk assumption. The challenges
It has always been the avowed objective historically. They have more than
associated with risk profiling are
of corporate entities to maintain a good compensated for the operational losses
increasing by the day, with the dynamics
match between their assets and liabilities that have become a regular feature, which
undergoing a tremendous
so that business goes on in an is not a very good sign of efficient risk
metamorphosis regularly.
uninterrupted manner, and generating a management. At a time when the global
The actuarial acumen of the insurers is an profit in the process, at that. For this to economic scenario presents highly
accepted lifeline for the success of their happen, the insurers need to have at their volatile trends, and when the global
regular business. With a constantly disposal the information pertaining to the ecological balance is itself throwing new
changing risk profile, this acumen is being timing of the revenues and pay-outs. As challenges; it would not be very wise to
challenged constantly; and it goes to the discussed earlier, this is where the depend totally on investment income
credit of the actuarial resources that challenge arises. While there can be a rather than generating operating profits
insurance industry continues to thrive. reasonable estimate of the assets side – by sensible risk management.
Apart from being instrumental in the inflow of premiums in particular, it is
‘Asset Liability Management for Insurers’
developing mortality/morbidity statistics the liabilities which can come up without
will be the focus of the next issue of the
and the various other trends leading to notice that throw the real challenge
Journal.
irda journal October 2013
■
17
issue focus
Amarnath Ananthnarayanan insists that the best way to gain the confidence of the customer is to
show abundantly that we do care for their interests, and further adds that adopting the path of
compliance in its true spirit would be the ideal way to achieve that.
T
he general insurance industry sells honour his wife’s hospitalization claim. insurance organization. In addition, in an
an intangible product, a ‘Promise’ to He, just like many others in India, started underserved and under-informed market
help people when they need it the feeling that they should not have like India where the insurance industry is
most, making ‘Trust’ the critical success unnecessarily spent money on their growing so very rapidly, both in terms of
factor. Trust is built on the foundation of Health insurance policy. Getting to the variety of products as well as geographic
transparency. The best path to build bottom of this, we realize that the insurer spread, the customers need to be
transparency in our products and services had issued a policy where there was a educated a lot more on the range of
delivery is to have a strong compliance condition that the pre-existing diseases products and services which are available
framework which ensures that we deliver will be covered only after renewing the and suitable for them.
what we promise. The compliance policy for three years. In Nitin’s case, his
For a start, the documentation required at
framework ensures that the promise that wife was hospitalized in the 2nd year
every stage of the lifecycle of a customer
is made is abundantly lucid and itself. This fact of the three year waiting
from policy issuance to claims settlements
transparent. Compliance to me is nothing period was not adequately
should be clear and simple. A strong
more than the extension of what every communicated to Nitin during the sales
compliant process for ensuring the right
insurance company should be doing, process.
delivery mechanism is thus very essential.
which is being ‘Ready and Happy to Help’.
This is a classic case of agony to the When we talk of compliance, it is all about
The checks and balances envisaged in a
customer and also reputation damage to how we create transparency for our
compliance framework enable the people
the insurance company. And this is where I partners and customers, about our
we interact with to experience this
feel a strong compliance culture in the products and services, be it policy issuance
attitude of being ready and happy to help.
organization helps a lot in building a time or claims settlement criteria. It all
Therefore, a compliance oriented mindset
customer centric approach in an starts with creating the right product,
in the DNA of the employees and the
training our sales people in explaining the
partners lays the foundation stone for the
product feature lucidly; and last but not
right delivery mechanism and success of
The checks and balances the least, the exclusions as well as the
any organization.
claims process. Be it our employees or our
Just to elucidate what I said, let me give envisaged in a compliance intermediaries, they should clearly
you the example of Nitin who could be just framework enable the people demonstrate clarity on what is covered
and more essentially, what is not covered
irda journal October 2013
■
18
-i
ii.t a
claims ensures compliance on all aspects It is not only about putting the right suggesting the corrective steps with
and definitely helps improve the processes and procedures in place, but timelines and ownership for delivery of
company’s customer centricity. also constantly checking as to whether the same.
these are working properly, monitoring
The question that emerges now is how to and reviewing them, and implementing Instead of viewing compliance as a
check the health of our systems and improvements. It is applicable to all the policing mechanism, we should create an
processes from the eyes of the customer. processes in the organization, be it sales, environment where the compliance
Picking up a few customers who have underwriting, claims settlement, finance function is viewed as a partner for growth.
purchased their covers in the last few or information technology. A ‘surprise To excel even in this aspect we should
months and randomly calling them to checks’ mechanism built in by the institute monthly, quarterly and annual
check with them as to whether they were compliance team, at the branch and awards for people to come up with
taken through the product features in functional level periodically will definitely innovative thoughts on improving the
detail, their experience of buying a help in testing the robustness of the compliance processes and standards. We
product from us, their views on our pricing system. can also create compliance champions in
and product coverage etc, will definitely each branch or each function of our
help us in ensuring compliance and good Yet another tool is mystery shopping. This business who could be role models and
customer service. Applying Six Sigma can be done by either engaging an help in creating the brand image of the
techniques and identifying the root cause external agency or by our own team on a organization. The senior management
for the variances will help us in improving periodic basis. At regular pre-defined team can do a lot in this respect by even
our processes and plugging the loop holes intervals, a compliance dash board can be rewarding people impromptu in the
in the system. A prudent practice is to prepared for the management team various locations for exemplary behavior.
maintain the voice recording of these based on this mystery shopping on
customer calls and review them deficiencies noticed in the delivery of The organization that wins not just the
periodically, to see how things have products and services as well as minds but even the hearts of people
moved over time. through a good compliance culture is
undoubtedly going to reach greater
heights of success. Let us build a culture
where we always do the ‘right things’ all
the time to ensure our place in the hearts
of our customers. To me, what defines a
J.l'nftlW
Ill t nN C right thing is NOT DOING anything that we
are not comfortable with or having even a
second thought about it. So, more than
just following a set of rules, it is in having
the right spirit.
.In
....___.,.,
j;I
Iii'
m
l•JM:"'
■
19
issue focus
Dr Som Majumdar observes that it is essential for a corporate entity to ensure that risk management
initiatives are perfectly in place which should act as the first step towards regulatory compliance.
R
egulatory compliance is sine qua exposure before the event takes place and numerous criteria of defining a risk. Some
non for effective operation of an to take position to confront and mitigate define risk as the compound estimate of
insurance or reinsurance company. the consequence within the available the probable frequency, severity and
In the insurance industry, the regulatory resources. Within that context, an attempt public perception of harm, whereas one
emphasis is primarily on protecting is made hereon to discuss the salient school of thought defines risk as the
policyholders' interest which entails features of risk management practices possibility of loss or exposure to loss
promulgation of various legislative that could instil financial discipline in line arising from a hazard or condition which
guidelines. There is thus great need for an with the regulatory perspective. increases the likely frequency or severity
insurance entity to conform to those of loss. Therefore, in a sense, the risk
guidelines to ensure that at every stage of RISK DEFINED seems to have connotations of the overall
contractual relationship, total and combination of both probability of failure
Under the principles of ISO/IEC Guide 73, and consequence of failure.
efficient service is rendered to
the risk can be defined as the combination
policyholders. By default, the insurance
of the probability of an event and its In order to appreciate the value of risk
company assumes risk relative to its risk
consequences. There have been management practices, the Risk
capital and thus they are saddled with the
Management Society of Canada remarked
fiduciary responsibility of living up to
that in 2009, ISO-31000 emphasised the
people’s trust. Because the insurance
shift from event to the effect on risk and
industry is capital intensive, it is necessary
risk management has an organisation’s
for the supervisory authorities to ensure
By default, the insurance objectives. It further said that trying to
capital adequacy after the event happens
company assumes risk predict the events can be difficult and
as well as to judge the degree of risk
challenging. Objectives on the other hand,
tolerance of the insurance entity before relative to its risk capital typically are clearer and more precisely
the risk is exposed to insured perils. With
the onerous task of maintaining financial and thus they are articulated. It therefore stresses to put the
emphasis squarely on risk management
discipline in the insurance industry, the saddled with the
as a strategic discipline for making risk-
irda journal October 2013
■
20
i
-----------------------ii.ta
RISK AND PROBABILITY from the occurrence of the subjective
event. Chance of loss measured by an
By default, risk is defined as the variation objective probability, rather than by a
Pure risks are usually
in the outcomes that could occur over a judgement is an objective risk where
specified period in a given situation. Risk is insurable and are the chance of loss which is predictable under
related to probability in terms of its relatively stable circumstances; for
primary concerns of
efficiency. Probability is a neutral example, fire and natural perils (wind
mathematical term used quantitatively risk management storm or flood) produce losses which, in
which is measured from “Zero” to “One”.
practitioners to entail the aggregate over time, can be
Zero represents absolute impossibility, accurately predicted despite short-term
whereas “one” is absolute certainty like optimum profitability fluctuations. By contrast, subjective risks
“Death”. Thus, if there is only one
within the are those where chance of loss is
outcome, there is no variation hence the measured by subjective probability or
risk is Zero. If, however, many outcomes organization. judgement rather than statistics which
are possible, the risk is not Zero. The influence subjective probability.
greater the variation, the greater is the risk
factor. The probability associated with COST OF RISK
is usually governed by the law of large
certain outcome is the relative likelihood
numbers that is to say, the greater the
that a particular outcome will occur. Expenditures which an organization
number of instances considered, the more
Probability varies between Zero and One. requires to make for its financial
likely is the result obtained to be repeated
If the probability is zero, that outcome will exposures to pure risk are taken on board
in future instances. For this reason, the
not occur. The closer the probability is to to work out the cost outlay. Cost of risks
keeping and study of statistics as a tool of
one, the more likely it will occur. Risk is can be computed as the sum of retained
measuring mathematical value of risk is
therefore, a property of the entire losses, plus insurance premium, plus
vital to the insurers.
probability distribution, whereas there is a expenditures for risk control, plus the
separate probability for each outcome. administrative cost of operating a risk
PURE RISK
Thus, the probability of throwing a coin management department (indirect
leading to “Head” is one in two, so the Although the risk, per se, may involve cost/staff etc.) plus the cost of external
probability or “P” is 0.5. exposure to financial loss arising from consultants like surveyors, brokers and
various conditions or circumstance, the training fees; plus the opportunity costs
In terms of assessing a risk in life current analysis will aim at restricting the on the capital expended on risk
insurance, it is absolute certainty but the viewpoints from the insurance angle only management. This is an important means
timing is the only factor that is a matter of and not from other perspective such as of monitoring the effectiveness of a risk
assessment. By contrast, property or market risk, investment risk, technical risk management programme. Cost of risk
liability is a matter of absolute uncertainty or trading risk etc. In doing so, “Pure Risk” should then be compared to some base
which may happen or may not happen in is more of a factor that will be subjected to, unit of measurement such as turnover.
a given period of time. Therefore, the a risk which results only in loss, damage, Within the overall of cost measuring the
probability of a loss to occur for an disruption or injury with no potential for risk, the risk factors are also taken into
estimated magnitude is measured in gain, profit or other advantage. Pure risks account which is the level of risk
terms of severity of the loss to calculate are usually insurable and are the primary mathematically calculated as a function of
irda journal October 2013
the value of risk; such as the property loss concerns of risk management probability of failure and consequence of
of over $100 million following a Bush Fire practitioners to entail optimum failure together with the individual
is 5%, a risk of flood loss in a particular profitability within the organization. Pure components which comprise and
low-lying area is above 20% etc. which risk can be subjective or objective and influence the likelihood of a certain event
are usually based on the past experience. accordingly is assessed to quantify the occurring.
The probability of an insured peril to occur possible maximum loss that may arise
■
21
issue focus
RISK MANAGEMENT ESSENTIALS a best opportunity cost available. The strategic management with a major aim
basic principle of risk management is to of increasing the probability of success
In order to appreciate the significance of optimise the return in carrying out the and reducing both the probability of
risk management process, an attempt is operations by incurring a cost of failure and the uncertainty of achieving
made hereon to refer two cases of Fire improvements in the risk that reduces the the organization’s overall objectives.
incidence at different period in two potential loss by a sum greater than the
different regions that produced a heavy potential cost. Obviously, it is an activity Keeping in line with Fayol's principles,
loss in terms of property and loss of process that consists of some basic Arthur Williams Jr. in his magnum opus,
human lives. functions in accepting a risk relative to the “Principles of Risk Management and
capital employed within the organization Insurance” remarked that risk
In the given circumstances of Fire management involves the identification,
aiming at maximisation of return to the
incidence at AMRI hospital in Calcutta that measurement and the treatment of the
risk capital.
took place in Dec 2011 causing loss of lives loss exposures of an insurance business.
of 92 patients ( Source: the Times of India, Henry Fayol (1841-1925), the French Risk identification emanates from the
4 March 2012) and a devastating fire to a industrialist who is often regarded as the process of risk assessment through the
garment factory in Dhaka in Bangladesh father of management theories, analysis of risk profile that typically
taking place in May 2013 causing a death accurately analysed the activities which identifies the most vulnerable risks
toll of more than 1000 workers (Source: are required in industrial undertakings by exposed to a specified peril. Once
Business Week Bloomberg, 10 May 2013), p o i n t i n g o u t t h e i r co m p a ra t i v e identified, risk evaluation sets out to
an attempt will be made to identify the importance at different levels of the measure the exposure of individual risk or
areas of difference between “objective organization. The managerial activity was portfolio of risks together with the
probabilities” and its counterpart which is thus broken down into functions of m e a s u re m e n t o f p ro b a b i l i t y o f
the “subjective probability” estimates. One “Planning, Organizing, Direction and occurrences. The next process outlines the
way to estimate the underlying objective Control” primarily to generate a process risk treatment that explains how the risk is
probability is to observe the return period whereby the organizations methodically currently managed in the company's
of the event assuming no change in address the risk attaching to their books. In this process of activity, the firm
underlying conditions. By contrast, the activities with the goal of achieving determines the level of optimum
subjective probability is the factor of sustained benefit within each activity and retention relative to its capital employed
individual judgement depending on the across the portfolio of all activities. Hence and type of spread it needs through
information available and the ability of it becomes a central part of organization’s various forms of risk transfer mechanism.
the individuals to analyse the information
and the degree of bias etc. The risk treatment stage is the most
important functional area of company's
The nature of response to a risk by a operations where the regulatory
prudent business owner in running a
The risk treatment
compliance is the centre point of
successful operation of his business is stage is the most attention. In this specific stage, the
determined by the decision he takes to solvency margin is routinely met in
optimise his profit from the operations by
important functional
compliance with the directives of the
effectively managing the risk to a area of company's regulators. Since risk transfer mechanism
tolerance level so that cost of managing provides 'off balance sheet capital' to the
operations where the
irda journal October 2013
the risk must not outweigh the benefits entity's capital account that involves
available to him. Therefore, three courses regulatory compliance spread of risk, sometimes across the
of action are available to him: to accept national boundaries, the regulators
the risk and retain it to himself in full, to
is the centre point of
maintain a constant vigil on the adequacy
minimise the risk by adopting risk attention. and the efficacy of the mechanism
mitigation measures, to spread the risk at process. For instance, the Australian
■
22
i
-----------------------ii.ta
Prudential Standards through its became insolvent allegedly due
framework of APRA (Australian Regulatory destructive competition; many insurers
Prudential Authority) aims at maintaining The insurance earned excess profits etc. besides giving
a specific reinsurance arrangement business is usually i n a d e q u a t e p ro d u c t s d i s c l o s u re
framework to manage the risks arising statement, causing pricing irregularities
operated in a market
from the regulated institution's and so on. The purpose of enforcing
reinsurance arrangements. The ultimate characterised by regulatory compliance is therefore to
responsibility for the reinsurance ensure fairness and equity and in the ideal
imperfect
arrangement framework of a general world, that should be a continuous
insurer rests with its Board of Directors competition, though process.
and in the case of foreign insurers groups sometimes a subtle
(i.e. Level 2 Insurance Group as per APRA
framework) the responsibility shifts to the
element of
Board of directors of its parent company. competition in price is
23
issue focus
Abhijit Gulanikar opines that while working within the confines of investment regulations, a better
management of the portfolios could result in more profitable investment for insurers.
T
he objective of this article is not to Asset Allocation Maximum exposures per industry, per
reiterate the investment group and per issuer are specified in the
regulations laid down by IRDA but The regulations lay down asset allocation regulations. These exposure norms have
to understand how to practically guidelines for portfolios in which to be met for unit linked fund at each
implement investment process and investment risk is taken by the insurance segregated fund level and for traditional
systems to ensure compliance of the company i.e. traditional funds of Life funds individually for the ‘Life Fund' and
regulations. The article would also insurance companies and all the funds of 'Pension Group and Annuity Fund'.
suggest some changes in the regulations General insurance companies. The
regulations do not specify any asset It must be noted that the investment
in the future for betterment of the
allocation guidelines for unit linked funds regulations specified by IRDA have to be
insurance industry.
where the investment risk is taken by the met at all points in time and not at some
Background policyholder. The asset allocation for reporting frequency like ‘at the end of’ (or
linked funds is as communicated to the on average) for a fortnight or month or
Investment regulations for an insurance policyholder in the policy bond. quarter.
company are governed by Sections 27 to
28 of The Insurance Act, the investment Segregation of Duty and Outsourcing
regulations notified in February 2013 and
Investment regulations have clearly laid
various circulars that have been issued by
down norms for segregation of duty
IRDA. There are several other regulations The regulations do
between various functions of investment
that affect investments besides IRDA like
not specify any asset department. The norms clearly specify the
SEBI, FIMMDA, RBI, and Companies Act.
‘investment dealing’ function headed by
Investments have to be done within the allocation guidelines
Chief Investment Officer to be clearly
framework specified by companies’
for unit linked funds segregated from ‘investment controlling
investment policy. Practically since
and reporting’ function to be headed by
concurrent audit is compulsory for where the
irda journal October 2013
■
24
i
-----------------------ii.ta
Other Regulators are especially useful when violations
can take place passively i.e. without
Some of the investment regulations are any explicit trade e.g. a steep price
A breach of the
not mandated by IRDA but by capital movement may end up breaching
market regulators or self-regulatory internal limits shall certain exposure limits. These will be
bodies. e.g. Reporting to SEBI for any known only at the day end after
holding beyond 5% in equity capital of
set off warnings in
valuation and no corrective action can
the investee company – the daily price the system which be taken. If IMS does not specify
limit for trading of government security stricter internal limits, company
linked to previous day’s price for that would alert relevant
would violate the regulatory limits
security. persons to take during such day with unusual market
price movement.
Implementation timely corrective
b) Process should create master only for
Investment regulations require that action.
investible instruments, so that any
investment function front, mid and back
investment in instruments other than
office define and document the 'Standard
this list can be avoided. Internal
Operating Procedure' (SOP) for the entire
The following is a typical work flow: process of companies may require
investment function i.e. the front office,
investment committee approval to
the mid office and the back office. To
Fund manager enters all transaction define a list of approved issuers. The
ensure compliance it is necessary that the
mandates in IMS. IMS checks for limits and investible universe can also be used to
SOP are properly designed and
throws alert limit breaches before the ensure compliance with this list of
documented through a joint effort of the
order is sent to the dealer. Then the approved issuers.
investment front, mid and back office
mandate flows to dealer for execution.
team. A regular review of SOP is required c) Quarterly IRDA returns need to be
Limits checked by the system at the time
to keep pace with changes in internal automatically generated by the IMS.
of placing of order by the dealer. The
company procedures, changes in markets
dealer confirms execution of order before
and changes in the regulations. In some cases the IMS alone cannot
the order flows to back office for
ensure compliance and a robust SOP
settlement. Limits checked by the system
The adherence to these complex and that is strictly followed is needed.
at the time of dealer confirmation. Back
varied specifications of regulations and Some of the examples where such
office confirms and settles the trade after
investment policy guidelines is possible robust process is required are given
receiving confirmations from
only through implementation of a robust below.
brokers/counter-parties. Limits checked
investment management system (IMS).
at the time of settlement of the trade. At
IMS has to record all transactions, carry out i) Any changes: Regulation changes
the end of the day valuation and
valuation, do accounting and monitor should be discussed in detail by
accounting are carried out. The limits are
compliance with regulations and Mid Office and Front Office and
checked during the day end process.
investment policy specifications. The IMS their impact should be analyzed
and procedures should be robust enough portfolio by portfolio. A quick
Some of the precautions that need to be
to ensure 6 PM deadline for closing the action plan to implement the
taken to ensure compliance with the
dealing. Investment Management System changes should be initiated
regulations are:
(IMS) should be flexible enough to quickly immediately with the vendor of
irda journal October 2013
implement changes in the regulations a) Setting internal limits that are stricter IMS.
and investment policy. IMS should have than the regulatory limits. A breach of
clear work flow built in for the front office, ii) It is relatively easier to meet
the internal limits shall set off
mid office and back office. Adherence to regulations for transactions that
warnings in the system which would
limits needs to be checked at each step in are undertaken regularly as the
alert relevant persons to take timely
the work flow. system is well set and everybody is
corrective action. These internal limits
aware about the process to be
■
25
issue focus
followed. But in case of Dealing System (NDS) does that work distribution of business to amongst
infrequently conducted for Government securities; brokers and linked to performance of
transactions extra care needs to be B l o o m b e rg ' s O rd e r E xe c u t i o n the broker.
taken e.g. For OFS whether Management System (EMSX) does it
company is applying on 100% for equity. For corporate bonds, CDs e) Specify personal dealing policy for the
margin or 25% margin. etc, no such system currently exists. investment personnel. And ensure
The best practice would be to adherence to these policies through
iii) Portfolio specific restrictions also seamlessly integrate these order monitoring mechanism like
tend to get overlooked at times. In management/dealing systems with telephone recording, mobile usage
'Pension, Group and Annuity Fund' the IMS. Current IMSs used in India do etc.
instruments falling under 'Other not provide this functionality.
Investment Category.' are not f) Setting up of stop loss/compulsory
permitted. So even if these c) The valuation of portfolios is currently review of investment policy. These
instruments are part of the master done at the end of the day and online policies would force the investment
(being permitted in Life or Linked update on limits due to change in the team to revisit assumptions made at
fund) they cannot be traded for intra-day value of securities is not the time of investing in a particular
this portfolio. Similarly certain available. Companies maintain instrument if the market value of that
linked funds like say 'Top200' portfolios in excel format with live instrument has fallen significantly
require that investments be made prices linked to closely monitor the compared to cost or there has been a
only in Top 200 companies by impact of price changes on portfolios. credit downgrade of the issuer.
market capitalization. What-if analysis of portfolios (i.e.
Suggestions for changes in Investment
impact of various potential trades) is
Best Practices beyond regulations Regulations:
also carried out on these excel sheets.
We need IMS that can incorporate live Short term
Companies that are proactive should look
data feed for market systems like
beyond the current regulations and
Bloomberg, Reuters etc. and carry out a) IRDA has referred NIC Code for industry
implement some of the best practices.
what-if analyses. classification of the companies for its
a) Specifying objectives for each fund. regulations. Practical inconsistencies
d) Specify per broker business limits for were found regarding classification of
These objectives are primarily based
proper risk management. These industry by data providers in the
on product/fund features filed with
should be internal limits on market. An independent body or self
regulator. The liability profile would be
determined by the product features regulatory body like Life council
and ALM committee would determine should be given responsibility of
the risk limits. The asset allocation appropriately classifying various
limits, duration limits, credit risk limits issuers as per NIC code and regularly
Companies maintain updating this classification.
shall flow from ALM analysis and
determine the objective of the fund. portfolios in excel
b) For unit linked funds the customers
An appropriate benchmark for
format with live are interested in fund performance
evaluation of fund performance shall
versus the benchmark. Benchmarks
be determined based on the objective prices linked to such as Nifty, BSE100 are widely
of the fund.
closely monitor the accepted in the market to represent
irda journal October 2013
■
26
i
-----------------------ii.ta
industry in India and its weight keeps c) Equity derivatives
on increasing the benchmark
artificially capping the industry Investment in equity derivatives is
A separate tracking
weightage to 15% of the portfolio essential to a) offer innovative
may result in severe under- mechanism may be products to policyholders b) take
performance of the fund and lead to tactical calls on equity markets. The
used to track liquidity of futures and options market
unhappy policyholder. What matters
in such circumstances is not the downgraded is significantly higher than cash
absolute risk but risk relative to market. Insurance companies hold
instruments but large positions in the equity market
benchmark and regulations should be
amended to reflect this reality. downgrade should relative to the liquidity available in the
cash segment of the market.
c) On downgrade of credit rating of an not result in violation Insurance companies thus cannot
instrument, the instrument may execute their views due to lack of
of regulations.
become ineligible for investment for liquidity in the cash segment even
not meeting the minimum credit though at the same time sufficient
rating requirement e.g. Securities liquidity may be available in the
rated AA- in Pension, Group and Government bonds needs to be derivatives segment to execute that
Annuity Fund. Given the lack of reconsidered. Over the last 25 years view. They also cannot hedge
liquidity in the Indian markets these the SLR requirements for banks have company specific (say results of a law
instruments cannot be disposed off come down from 40% to 23% but suit) or market wide event risk (say
(at least not immediately). Selling there has been no change for election results) that could
these instruments under distress insurance companies. The returns of significantly affect their portfolio. This
results in severe losses to policyholders are affected by such to a large extent can be avoided by
policyholders. The price at which the large pre-emption of investments in hedging in Equity derivatives.
instrument trade is below the fair government securities.
value of the instrument (fair value at Conclusion:
b) Credit Rating of Corporate Bonds
the reduced credit rating) as counter-
Investment regulations specified by IRDA
party is aware of the insurance Insurance companies have capacity to are comprehensive. A robust investment
company desperation to sell the hold instruments for long term and management system together with
instrument. The regulatory generally do not face any redemption strong Standard Operating Procedure is
compliance should look at the pressures, under such circumstances a needed to ensure compliance with the
instruments credit rating at the time well diversified portfolio of corporate guidelines.
of investment. A separate tracking bonds that is rated A (single A) or
mechanism may be used to track better can give better risk adjusted
downgraded instruments but return than the current portfolios. A
downgrade should not result in diversification criteria linked to credit
violation of regulations. rating of the issuer is needed to
e n s u re s a fe t y o f m o n e y fo r
Long term
policyholders. Graded exposure limits
a) Allocation to Government Bonds like say a maximum of 5% per issuer
irda journal October 2013
27
end-user
Independent Directors
- D&O Cover
R Sankaranarayanan avers that although the D&O Liability insurance policy affords a great deal of
protection to the directors and officers, their integrity is still the prime deciding factor in case of a
dispute.
Advent of Independent Directorship in otherwise get their voice heard. The relevant experience and expertise”. The
India: recommendation that independent Bill requires the non-executive director to
directors should be in the board of exercise his duties with due and
G
enesis of independent directors companies having significant public reasonable care, skill and diligence. He is
began in 1970 as a reform of interest has now been incorporated in the required to chair the audit (cl.177 of the
Corporate Governance on a present Bill - Company Amendment Bill, Bill) and remuneration committee (cl.178)
monitoring role world over. It had 2011 - notwithstanding the fact that still and also should be the chairman of the
witnessed sea changes following the raging controversy persists in the stakeholder committee (cl.178). The
corporate collapse and culminated in the appointment of independent director by repealed Act had codified in Schedule IV
prescription of independent directors to the Board not being codified in the new greater responsibilities to the
protect the prosperity of various stake Bill to make them truly independent. independent directors. They are also liable
holders. The status of independent for financial penalties and cannot be
directors had progressively increased with Role & Responsibilities of an relinquished from their responsibilities.
Cadbury Committee in 1992, Hampel Independent Director: Higgs pointed out that the non-executive
Committee (UK), Blue Ribben Committee directors are “the custodians of Corporate
in 1997, followed by SOX legislation in US, The Bill defines an independent director Governance”. They are expected to be
Derek Higgs Recommendations in UK as a “non-executive director who in the sound in judgement, should have an
(2003) and finally with Irani Committee opinion of the Board is a person of inquiring mind, question intelligently,
report in India in May 2005. integrity and experience and possesses debate constructively, challenge
rigorously and decide dispassionately.
While the Board of the company is the
effective decision making body, the Earlier there were views that nominee
importance of independent directors was
Irani Committee strongly
directors appointed by banks / financial
not felt in India until the Enron debacle advocated that institutions are to be deemed as
when Naresh Chandra Committee gave independent directors. Based on the Irani
independence of the non-
some thought to it. Only recently, Committee report, the new bill had amply
following the extensive executive directors is not to clarified that nominee directors are not
recommendations of Dr Jamshed J Irani, independent directors (Cl -149(5)).
be viewed from the promoter
the concept of independent directors has
irda journal October 2013
first entered the statute book. Irani interest but from the point of Liability of an Independent Director:
Committee strongly advocated that
vulnerable stake holders who After the Satyam fiasco, there is serious
independence of the non-executive
cannot otherwise get their rethinking to be an independent director,
directors is not to be viewed from the
despite the present enormous increase in
promoter interest but from the point of voice heard. the role of the independent directors and
vulnerable stake holders who cannot
the demand for honesty, due diligence,
■
28
i
-----------------------ii.ta
care and caution. Howsoever a wrongful deductible or caps on liability. With many and subsidiary directors with or without
act has been committed; the onus is now financial scandals directors are getting worldwide jurisdiction. This is a typical
upon the director to prove before a trial embroiled in, moral issues daunt mandatory cover which the company
that the said act was done with due companies being allowed to indemnify takes; but it is imperative that the non-
diligence, care and caution. Be that as it the liabilities of the directors. The only executive directors need to be careful to
may, the rewards of serving as an succour in the current day situation seems ensure that they are protected
independent director may outweigh the to be covering non-executive directors adequately. These general cover limits
risk of continuance. No doubt the non- under a D&O policy of insurance. always pose the following issues:
executive directors have to look at the
protection available to them under the What is a Director & Officers’ Liability 1. When multiple suits are launched
corporate bye-law of the company, the Insurance? against the company, the company
contractual indemnity agreed upon, may become financially unable to
Traditionally the D&O has three insuring provide indemnification agreed with
speak to the auditors of the company to
agreements. the non-executive directors.
know the financial risk of the company
and such other allied risk factors affecting Multiplicity of suit may be derivative,
Side A : For the benefit of individual
their position qua director including the employee related, fiduciary liability
Directors/Officers. It covers the liability of
coverage available to them under the D&O etc.
the individuals for the wrongful act when
policy taken by the company. Especially the company cannot reimburse them. A 2. Since defence cost is generally inbuilt
with the introduction of the statute typical example is the derivative suits. in the limit selected in the traditional
making a mandatory thrust for
covers, any major suit might deplete
independent directors on board, the D&O Side B: It is a risk transfer mechanism to
the available indemnity limit.
insurance policy assumes significance. It reimburse the company for meeting its
would work as an alleviating measure of obligation of the directors and officers. 3. Many times during the bankruptcy of
the potential financial risk of these For the defence expenses or other the company, creditors bring the suit
directors as they are highly exposed today settlements incurred by the director to claim the proceeds of the D&O
for personal liability and their personal which are permitted by the statute to be covers. Thus the limit will be lost to
assets are prone to attachment in any reimbursed by the company will be a the non-executive directors.
court proceedings. good case for this cover (Ref cl.197 (13) of
the bill). 4. Any material misrepresentation, non-
Non-executive directors will not be in disclosure of facts and basic elements
charge of the daily management and are Side C: Entity Cover – Coverage for claims o f t h e c o n t ra c t d e l i b e ra t e l y
unlikely to have any responsibility for the made against the company itself. suppressed might render the D&O
company’s employees. They are policy itself void with little protection
appointed for their skills, knowledge and These covers are purchased by the
available to the non-executive
prestige that they may bring to the company with certain limits for both
directors.
company. With the introduction of the executive and non-executive directors
recent Bill, they are not any more What is expected of an independent
monitoring executives but have to be director for taking a D&O Policy?
actively involved in the strategic
With the introduction of the A prospective non-executive director
development of the company and the
governance process. Hence their liability recent Bill, they are not any might have to exercise the following due
to any third party has been relegated to diligence before embarking on his
the same extent of an Executive Director.
more monitoring executives directorship.
Considering the magnitude of liability but have to be actively a. Whether the company could provide a
Higgs Report, in fact has gone to the
irda journal October 2013
extent of suggesting the company should involved in the strategic separate D&O cover with adequate
limit to cover his liability
provide D&O cover to the non-executive development of the independently of the coverage the
directors before they are appointed and
company and the company already has?
company should be allowed to indemnify
the non-executive directors against any
governance process. b. Whether the cap of liability under the
uninsured liability for the insurance policy is sufficient considering the
■
29
end-user
■
30
thinking cap
Insurance ePlacement
- Broker Exchange for Large Commercial Risks
Karthik Sn harps on the advantages of technology for various stakeholders which include cost
curtailment, enhancing efficiency and speed of processing.
-
negotiation
companies
The strain on profit margins setting up the product for defining the
- Process of ePlacement of risk to product structure. This would in turn
of brokers has been very generate a risk based questionnaire
choose following underwriters in
case of subscription after a lead high. proposal form which is used to
underwriter is selected is complex capture all the risk information.
Templates could be used to capture
■
31
thinking cap
Insured/Broker Insured/Broker
Product config
t
MRC/ Slip Preparation
Risk
Questionnaire
• A
Choose
Lead UW
Create MRC Create MRC
Template Document Quote for Accept
Choose FUW Quotes
FUW
Acord standards RLC Integration Components MRC Doc Approve Reject/ Reassign
/ Quotes Quotes
Reports
MRC Doc /
Quotes/T&C
Cover Note /Policy Preparation C
Tidy Prepare Debit/Credit
ODS/ Quote Document Notes
Repository Create Cover Create Recon/Settle Cover
Note Policy ment
Note/Policy Doc
Insurance
Co/Bureau
the information in a pre-determined - Invite insurance companies / Lead C. Preparation of Cover Note and
format. With most insurance Underwriters/ Following Underwriters Policy Document: This is the last step
companies adopting standards for to bid in the ePlacement process. On
information exchange, it becomes all successful completion of the trading
- Negotiate/ counter bid/ renegotiate/
the more important that the Slip/MRC negotiations and once Lead and
accept/ reject/ reassign bids
document adheres to standards like following UWs are identified, the
ACORD, RLC/GRLC standards or any - The entire risk captured should be in process to create cover notes and
other standards. If the underlying XML format and can be passed on to policy documents starts.
product structure is based on XML the insurance company policy
standards, it would be easy to convert admin/rating engine to auto rate a. On confirmation of trading closure
it into any of the industry standards. wherever possible (like the case of issue debit notes/payment notice
personal lines)
The SLIP could be then placed on to b. Interface with 3rd party payment
the trading portal to choose the Lead - Attach documents, terms and systems to accept payments
and Following underwriters. conditions, snapshots of the risk and
any additional documentation etc. c. Interface with insurance companies to
B. Broker Trading Platform: The main get cover notes and policy documents
irda journal October 2013
■
32
- Risk data entry done once - eliminate and information on the entire business
-
i
!lHl!!Zll!l
keying of risk information across flow could be used for further analysis and
multiple systems With the possibility of improvement.
■
33
thinking cap
Cancer Insurance
- Problems and Prospects
Seema Arora laments that the disease of cancer is not being tackled sufficiently well presently; and
the lack of awareness – both about cancer as well as Cancer insurance - adds to this malady. She
further writes that there is a job on hand for all the stakeholders to put in their best efforts in
tackling this deadly disease.
What is Cancer Insurance? has branched off into multiple new • Lump sum cash payment as a certain
■
34
i
.....
!l!!ll!!m!l
pre-existing cancer from the portfolio. Care and Cancer Insurance Schemes borrow money, if any of their family
members suffers from the disease.
Waiting Period - Most of these policies • Cancer treatment available in the
cover the risk after an initial waiting government health care delivery • Most of the insurance schemes have
period ranging from 30 days to 1 year system is mostly subsidized. Under been initiated by NGOs like Indian
from the date of cover. Rashtriya Arogya Nidhi, funds are Cancer Society, Cancer Patients Aid
given to states illness assistance Associations, Kidwai Cancer
■
35
thinking cap
Foundation Trust etc. in collaboration • Lack of understanding and educate the people about the disease and
with the public sector insurers. These knowledge about the disease and importance of Cancer insurance.
schemes are being run on non-profit treatment Insurance companies do
Strengthening the Primary Health
basis for the noble cause of cancer not understand the importance of
Centres and Community Health Centres.
care. Although quite cheap and low innovative treatments and their
priced, lack of intermediaries, lack of benefits to the patient. Often, the sales If additional fund is provided by the
awareness about the disease and the force does not recognize the benefit of government in establishing
cost of treatment have resulted into cancer policies and are reluctant to sell infrastructure, screening and diagnostic
the low popularity of these schemes. these products. The insurers are often facilities at the primary and community
not aware of the best care and health centres, the disease could be
• Most of the Cancer insurance policies
treatment centres and providers. diagnosed at an early stage; and long
offered by the private sector
waiting period at the tertiary care centre
companies are financially unattractive Possible Solutions and Control
could be reduced.
for those who are actually suffering measures:
from costly medical conditions, as the Innovative Schemes and Products:
Creating awareness about the disease, the
premiums are too high and the
cost of treatment and benefits of Health More attention should be paid to the
benefits are limited and do not cope
insurance: innovative indigenous Health insurance
well with the high medical inflation
rate. Poor, unorganised and middle schemes that will help address the
Knowledge amongst Indians about the
income households are unable to weakness in health care financing and
cost of modern medical treatment is
afford these policies and the minimal provision. The government should take
abysmally low. The insurance coverage
amount of Health insurance cover steps to provide insurance cover in
that most of the middle class Indians
which they have, is meaningless for a collaboration with the various NGOs
have, range from ~1 lakh to ~5 lakhs. They
costly disease like cancer. engaged in cancer care and prevention, as
are not aware that even an insurance
a part of social security programme. There
Challenges faced by the Insurance coverage of ~5 lakhs is not sufficient to
are only a few Cancer insurance schemes
Industry. meet the cost of cancer treatment. Most of
available in the Indian market. Indian
the middle class Indians have the financial
insurers need to come with the newer
• Lack of data capacity to subscribe for higher insurance
products, priced reasonably, as a top-up
premium but they don't go for higher
The data regarding the prevalence is product with the base policy or as a
insurance coverage because they simply
collected through population based standalone cancer product. Developed
have no idea about the cost of potential
cancer registries and hospital based countries have taken a further stride with
cancer treatment. Insurers, IRDA,
cancer registries of National Council of a large number of insurers providing
pharmaceutical companies and speciality
Cancer Registry. There are currently 27 cancer specific policy for a particular type
hospitals and centres should thus come
population based registries in India of cancer like a policy for breast cancer or
forward with awareness campaigns and
and 9 hospital based cancer registries. for prostate cancer. For insurance is a
A population based cancer registry business of pooling homogenous risks
records all the cancer cases diagnosed and pooling disease specific risks, it will
A population based cancer
by health services while the hospital- not only help in combating moral hazard
based registries take the data from registry records all the cancer but will also help in proper pricing of the
patients coming to a particular health product. Cancer insurance can be added as
institution. Thus if adequate
cases diagnosed by health a top-up plan under large Group
diagnostic facilities are not there, the services while the hospital- insurance schemes.
case will not be recorded and the
irda journal October 2013
■
36
i
.....
!l!!ll!!m!l
Swiss reinsurer has partnered with Roche 80D and could serve the purpose of
Holding (a pharmaceutical company and social security by the government.
the world's biggest maker of cancer Such collaboration between
• The insurance companies can be
drugs) and several Chinese insurers, to the insurer, provider and/or forged by the regulator to allocate or
devise and offer the new Cancer insurance
pharmaceutical company reserve funds for subsidized premium
product. It is a measure to bring down the
funding for poor cancer patients.
cost of cancer treatment in China, which is could be worked out in
unaffordable by most of the Chinese • Standards could be set by the
citizens. Roche has started to work more Indian environment to bring regulator for the insurance companies
closely with insurance companies there to to complete a certain portion of their
down the cost of treatment.
help them establish insurance policies. In business under the banner of Cancer
2012, 10 million policies covering cancer insurance.
treatment costs were sold in China. The
Cancer insurance as a part of corporate
product is sold by Chinese insurers that
Swiss Re generally already has a insurer but also the provider and the social responsibility:
relationship with. The Swiss company pharmaceutical company.
A substantial proportion of the country's
then reinsures this portfolio. Changes in the legal provision and tax burden of cancer could be prevented
The challenges being faced by the Indian laws: through cancer awareness about existing
insurance companies could be very well cancer control knowledge and by
Changes to healthcare laws have made it
implementing programs for tobacco
addressed if collaboration with the possible in us for those with pre-existing
provider and/or pharmaceutical company control, vaccination (for liver and cervical
medical conditions to obtain insurance
is arranged, as they may assist the insurer cancers), early detection and treatment,
coverage. The Affordable Care Act has
in the following ways: as well as public health campaigns
presented these changes. As per this act
promoting physical activity and a
• Gathering and sharing data: Data the Health insurance companies are
healthier dietary panern.
related to the prevalence of cancer required to offer coverage to those
patients and cost of treatment could suffering from conditions such as cancer. There are about 325 radiotherapy units in
be analysed by the providers and In our country also, Social Health India and current prevalence load of 30
pharmaceutical companies and insurance schemes like Rashtriya lakh patients. In order to meet this
sharing of such information could Swasthya Bima Vojna covers pre-existing situation, India requires more new
help the insurers in pricing their diseases but the private Health insurance speciality centres in both public and
cancer insurance products. companies are reluctant to take on high- private sector, more specialised centres for
risk cases which is counter to the principle cancer diagnosis and treatment in smaller
• Educating and guiding the insurers of insurance. In Indian context legal towns. According to the estimates, the
and public: Providers and provisions could be made to: cost of a single bed per speciality hospital
pharmaceutical companies can in India is about ~50 lakhs, which means
educate the field force of insurance • Require big employers to cover their
that a 100 bed hospital require an
companies and roll out cancer employees by Cancer Health insurance
investment of ~50 crore. This huge
awareness campaign for the insurers or pay penalties, with exceptions for
problem related to the awareness, care
and public. Besides this, they can small employers.
and treatment delivery, could not be
share information related to what • Provide tax rebates to certain small addressed effectively unless all the
constitute proper cancer treatment. businesses that cover specified costs stakeholders come forward on a common
Such collaboration between the insurer, of Cancer Health insurance for their platform. Implementation of such
irda journal October 2013
■
37
Insurance companies should take a lead • Manual for Health Professionals
as social entrepreneur or corporate social Insurance companies can Directorate General of Health Services,
entrepreneur by forging alliances with Ministry of Health and Family Welfare,
align with major charitable
NGOs and other groups who are working Government oflndia, November 2005
for cancer care and try to promote cancer and philanthropic
• Cancer registration in India by Kishore
insurance products in collaboration with
organizations and start Chaudhry & Usha K. Luthra, 50 Years of
them. This model will help in securing
rolling out products at Cancer Control in India, NCCP
broad based affiliation and reduce the risk
of adverse selection since the insurance subsidized rates. • Http://www.ncsl.org/ health reform
companies can make use of the
information available with them. Besides, • http : //www . roche . com/
Islamia (Central University), New Delhi, valueofinnovation
insurance companies can align with
Cancer Therapy Vol 8, 56-70, 2011.
major charitable and philanthropic • http://in.insurance.yahoo.com/
organizations and start rolling out • Estimating the Economic Burden of policies/special/ashadeep.html
products at subsidized rates. Cancer at a Tertiary Public Hospital: A
• http : //cpaaindia . org/
Study at the All India Institute of
Not only this, regulations could be made activities/insurance.htm
Medical Sciences - Bidhu Kalyan
more stringent for the insurers and it
Mohanti, Abhiroop Mukhopadhyay, • http ://www.indiancancer
could be made a part of their obligation
Sanghamitra Das, Kuldeep Sharma, societydelhi.in/ Cancer%20
towards the society by the regulator and
Soumitra Dash, Health Administrator Insurance.htm;
standards could be set for them to
Vol:XVII, Number 1: 143-147pg.
complete certain minimum business from • http://forbesindia.com/ blog/health/
this area. Besides, as a part of corporate • Improving Cancer Care in India: the-complex-economics -of-cancer-
social responsibility all big business Prospects and Challenges - Sanjoy care
houses could be made to contribute a part Kumar Pal, Bal raj Mittal
of their profit towards cancer care fund. • http ://www.icicilombard.com/
• A Critical Assessment of the Existing app/ilomen/PersonalProducts/Health
Many state governments and the central Health Insurance Models in India, 31st /criticalcare.aspx
government roll out insurance schemes January 2011 Sponsored under the
with major government subsidy like Scheme of Socio-Economic Research, • http://www.indianexpress.com/
Yashaswini and Rajiv Arogya Shree The Planning Commission of India, news/cancer-insurance-fails-to-find-
schemes. Similarly, as part of CSR, the New Delhi takers.
insurance companies also allocate or • www.cancer.org / /cancer/cancer
reserve funds for subsidized premium • Working paper no. 90, Health
insurance for the informal sector: basics/
funding for poor cancer patients. By
funding and aligning with schemes that Problems and Prospects Anil Gumber, • http : //www . cancer . gov/
are nearer to its core operational November 2002, Indian Council for cancertopics/cancerlibrary
processes, the companies can build their Research on International Economic
Relations, New Delhi. • http://www.cancer.net/a 11-a bout-
brand image and gain customer loyalty.
cancer/newly-diagnosed/tests-and
References: • Role of private sector in healthcare in procedures
India with special role in cancer - B.
• Projections of Number of Cancer Cases Sanyal.
in India (2010-2020) by Cancer
Groups - Ramnath Takiar*, Deenu • Cancer Economics by M Neelam
irda journal October 2013
■
38
~ fcn~-~ ~ ~ %. fciR.!.ll-1.:icf>(lf~ m 1lfcRf cnf ~ fcn<TT ~ "illfcn cf)'llf ~ f.!.l lq ~.!.lch
~~~- ~~~fcnwlW;Jf3TT~ ~~m~1!°@= ~~m~1
~if - 1Jlm~fu°ffi~~~~l ~~
cflt o'.llq-EJlfllch !.lfa!Sdl-TI if -Elll-11.::ll(l: 7::ffi~m%
7 : : 1 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ fs5=p.il,;1 .() '4l"m,w%fcn~
fcn~ ~j(jfo:fi J:fRcp m ~ ICl8l-lH ~~
'§,zjll(l ~ ~ "cR ~ fcR:TT 'llT ~ ~
~~~ o'.1961{ cfil~~~ ~ % I
PlIB~ffi ~f.!.llq~.!.lch ~I ~~cir ~ i f
~ ~ fcn ~ ~ ~ ~ !Clchl-El~TIM
~ ~ ~ ~ i (1Rcfi J:fRcf) fclR .!.l Il-lch m ~~
~if 9R-cJ1fe1(l t. ~(lCf> l-lHc;il cpf~~
~if%. 7::ffi~~~~~lq~.!.lcfi(ll ~ ~fflmTTf 1~ . '5-f6TICIR.!.lll-lchm~
~faRct(1 ~ ~ ~ %fcn ~ ~ fu"ffi ~ i f cill{cill{ qR_qJ.:i ~~t cf6T ~3TT
c i r ~ ~ <;T ~ I ~~ cnf ~j91M.:i ~m~%; ~~cfiRUTcffi
~ ~ ~ f f l c i r ~ i f 7::ffim~~ ~m~m~i~ffi~~~
l-16fcl crof %fcn f~sM IV$ "-TI ~ ffi ~ m 3fcRR tI ~ cir qR_q<:f~ cnf fcr9R~ ~ B
cflffi~~~~fcn<TT~~~~ ~~3lfcnr~~mTTT. m?::ffi~~
~~ !.ifa<!llrl(ll<:N~~ml ~mTTTfcn~~ m ICIR.!.lll-lch m
~~lq~.!.lcfi(ll~~~~ 4gM'"1~-ns.TT
7::16 ~ ~ 3Jlq~.!.lcfi(ll
-;m %fcn ~ 1rm ~I
!CIR .!.lPrn ~3TT~W2l~ ~ &.I lq-EJ lfllch
~3TT~~if~ ~~~ ~#RT •~if ICIR.!.lll-lch ~j91M.:i' F= ~~~~
cnfcR%; ~1 fs©Ml$l fciR.!.l'-li cnr ~fa~J-1 □ 1 ~c:R. ™
~ ,3fq:)cf>1 4,...s:_f&/s ~ 1 fcl:flt:t~ «GT •-mfs©l-1
~ f f i 9Rchf0-l(l ~if 3l1R o'.jq-EJl.!.l ~fc!M;:;, m !.lfaMl"-1' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~3TT~~~-~~q~~ ~~'5-fR~t; m~ 4gM'"1 cR~~
fs©MIV$"-TI ~ffi% I ~ -EllhM(ll llR~ffi?::ffi 6tl l-l lcf>(lf~ ~ ffi 7::16 ~ 311 q ~ .!.lch %fcn ~
~lq~.!.lch ~fcn~l cf>J..\\:11.() ~1!_0@: ¼lchl4(ll l f f i = r ~ ~ qR_zjqfu-~~~ml
~~~~ffi~ ~j91M'"1 m~~ '61ll-llcf>(lfdTT~ffi qR_zjqfu-~~· ~~
~lq~.!.lcfi(ll ~ ~ ~
~ 1 cf>J.h11R.s.n ~llfl-fB if.
~ffl~~ffi~~~~
qR_RJ(l
m
3lj91M.:i
if I ~ 3TTJ#r ,3fq:)cnr~mTTT I
---
Z1_Q(__...,u;-_.t..::-:-=-\~'fdj~t.f\~~~cs1rl
fcn<TT ~ %. ~ '§,4l I(1 m1lT fcn ~ ~ fuITT -el°.~. ~ulll-i
3iu:fll:f
II
~ '5flf@qj m
~ ~tjfq~ '5f!PsP-I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cf>G ~ ~
~ $ ! q~@ (cf)cf) ~ 3 W t ~ i t ~ - ; f t f u - ~ mfflOOctr :/;-!till a I cRm%<Fllfcn
~~cplHTTRfcrcm:rmm% I
sil'~,ijfqq~_ft;rqi
~ . ~anli$"-l 4ll-IT~~ ( ~ ~ ) ; ('f2:fl chl4%:-F'h Re.!!lcfi, ~an1i$"-l-;ftfu,
~ %:S{<.1 '-hl~-ff~lll<.1 ~q{ql~-:i.1.fl ~ I
~~c'l'ch"~~~~~3WITT"~chf¥~3TTJT"@~~~~cf>G~~~
100-..:i-~1:;cfl~~, ~ ~ • cpl~%, ~~fcr58R:r%fcfl~ a.Jqtl { ~
~~%fcfl~3lm.16'1-f :/;-ll-1$1 fl ~fcfl~ m «.flli lcficif3TT~ o!.l lq:/;-l lfllcfi ~~: 3IBTT-3IBTT
~;~~ci<;j:/;-ll{~ffl&TI~fi:-l<hl □TI~~~~%1
~,llf~<H ~
~ . g%Rlll<.1 ~2<1!/H ~~ cfi14'91<.1ch ~ Re.!!lcfi, ~ 3lfcn $ 1 4i □:s I
irda journal October 2013
~;imwat1 ~~ ~ - q ~ H$B© ~ma BZ Ombr ~r_m ànÌm| "cf,Jl" "i:f>m %<IT 'cf>'rolT 7;11 ~ ~ "cf>l"
mil>~%~~ m~c.ITT;-1 ~ 1cblf.lcf> $dlffilf$d ~% I
~-q~~~~~"cf>l"~ lfll@"~"q3lffl%~~~~
~~~~%1
~~~cfititm% I ~"ffi9-q~
ll&:T ~ 'cf>'rolT ~ mlll't.lR ~ "cf>T Wffif
;J~~~~~~~~ ~7T<IT%1
5. ('-jl9<cllQI it-~14l.flcf><OI cf;torfusr~
~~~<1'N~~m~~~
-;,i-r;:rr I
■
41
_moQ>a dmhZ ~r_m
~ ~ ~ cfiT ~ ~ ~ ~ 'ffi
ol ~ q;J\cfi{OI ~ ~ 8lITTIT3TI<fiT~ - ~~~f.:mfur
fi@-4 a41 (ft;nm~qffiUJt 1
~~~~'cfil" W~il i:fiw.glt,a ~I ~ q i ) ~ ~
irda journal October 2013
■
42
·-IJJ ■
43
irda journal October 2013
,It';~ j ~-'J
~%,i.!.:J,,.j i iJ ~
rµ- 16'~1wt
1~t~<W
~ ~
!t1a? tel if i I;
~i t;,l w ~ ~ ~-w -w~t i ti
oc ~""
~i!.J~ ~
t~i,~i i-
t~';i~ ~,
11!li1:,1 ;a, '!fr
'li iiW.~~
i~~is:cs: <Wf~ I t 1fr cs: i ~ '1w I - I
·l t '1w
1
~ t ,w
{1J i~i!i
,w
1;ItJ
I ! t ~ J ~ -~ <!fr
ill t!-tii'W ;tfrµ-i
i t ! ~ s:J~il;
ii1fmm~ ,w ;
~ i I ~
-w
;il1!llii11itii!
:wii~ lit~ii
ii~iii
miii
iJii
:i i!)lJ_
ii~!ll~f
Ii~
i cs= ~-j
i·~i~i
l
'1w
~~<il~~~aj~qif mWT ~ 4('il<"'lc:R.1 ~ ~ ~ , : f t
~<f>Wm{~~~~ m-~%1~~1 qf):,,m.1.:i om~
gaH$ma Ho$ hñVjon go
lf.ft~ cfiT WR~ 1lf.ft~ cfiT WR~ wan er f.rP-rur ~~~mm mTT
~qif~~~qif~~ nw{bg Ho$ {bE `h 3TI"{ ~ cfiT ~~~qi)~
~mTJTl<nft~~l:TIB~~ '<fiPHT~~,:fi~mTJT I
A{Zdm`© H$amZm hmoJm {H$
<iif~mTJT, ~~fcfi~fflmmlf~
mcfil -$il<H<!lcfictl ~ ~ ~ <iT ~ H$moB© ^r XwK©Q>ZmJ«ñV ~ 3TI"{ ~~I m<fiR ~ ffl~ ~
~%1 lfITT'c:[<iif~~-qll'Gq~ I
Mm{hEŸ&
r
~~<iif~mlfRT~~t I ~
~ ~ -q "41l@f ~ cfiT -$ilcl~<!lcfictl -q%1 ctt'4~'ic.ll<l._~~~3m~ boIH$ EH$ d[að> ~r_m noeoda h¡ Am¡a dV©_mZ
mrftl~ffl"ID~<iif~cf'ffilfom <fii:q%l~a ~ q i ) ~ I cfITT ~ ~ _| Q>mQ>m EAmB©Or OZab B§í`moa|g H§$nZr
~~~i1~~~~qif
~wrr~~m~~lfTUJlll
-q ~~~~qi'tfficRcft
~ . ~~~'3Bcfitmlr<R~ I
{b{_Q>oS> _| {Z`wº$ h¡Ÿ&
J
------------------
Moving... IBJ
IRDA Journal.
From 'Library' o 'lnterne '
can el
irda journal October 2013
■
44
i
.....
!l!!ll!!m!l
s. "4 ~cfifm~if<fifwB~
&1c.11-E1,wcfiWIB~~cfil~m~~
qf.fi~~6~~~~ cfiT
f~<rPT~ ~ ~ ~ cfiT $rm~ m~ CbnãY l_ Ed§
3N-IT~~fcf;q)~~*
~ &jqfllWcfi $r~~fcf; ~
g§gmYZm| H$m Cn`moJ ~~~~~~ I
1R W<!l"a.l ~ ~a.l ~ ~ ~ ~ i I
~w:r~~cfif~~acfi AmO VH$ Zht hmo nm 6. ~~~~m 3ll;t~w.rr~
~'ITT1llrITTi 3lR ~,:ft~~~~ ~ ~ cfiT ~ ~ ~
~*~~i I ~~ifiarn ~acfi ahm h¡ Am¡a AmO ^r h_ ~~I
irda journal October 2013
~~1R~~~ m~f<f.~
{dH${gV Xoe H$s loUr 7. ~*~~~~¥.~
~~if,~~~"5RlRifi~ I "ITT
~~~~m~m~m4
~~~~~~~~ _o I‹S>o hþ`o h¡Ÿ&
'lmlmr~ifi1llfl~~Wll<fli I
~ cfiT ~ ~ wit i I~~
■
45
8. ~~~~-q~~~cf;t 11. ~~ ~-qcf.a
mm~~ -~-;:i:p~ mrr i ~ 12. ~~qil~lll<R"q~
~~~~ll
©IM41"11 '3Wf~qil"3o"RT~i I
13. ~~~~ffi~~
~ 3-1Ac114 cTI
9. ~ ~ctt~~m 3lllf~~
cfilf.'n:rrur
qi) ~~~~3ll-;r@~cfi@ 3TR w:rr~toT 14. ~~~~~~~~
~3llil ~<fll1Wll<l13TR<flll~~q;)
~ ~ cfiT G"1°f '5ITTf mTT<TT I 3lT"1 ~
11. ~~fcf;m~~~~~
~ tf tR -q ~ ~ c€t (l'W W ~ i I
~ ~ -q ~ ~ <filfi ~ %-:;;ir~ ~
~ ~ ~ i fcf; ~ ~ ~ -q ~ 3lT"1 ~ ~ ~ WT -q m -:;;ft;r 3rR
~~~m.~m<l'T
~~W:rlsi!RT~~~ ~~ ~ll'ffillii(:'11 ~~~cf;t~
~3R~~ I
~ffl~~~m~WIBr~~ cfil~~~i 3TR~ ~mlITTl~
12. ~ffi~~,wrq;t ~~ ~~~ m1 ~~m~cfil ~ ~~w-nr#rfu;r~~zj~~i 1~
~~ctt~-qm~mi ~~m~~~ctt~ ~cfil~~m~~~~
~I ©IM41~1 ~~-qitm:qfffi q;),:ft~3m:rr-ft~~~~ql~ ~~i"3<R 3TI1l 3TR~~~
qil"3o'RT~Wi I ~~m~wr 1~m~~~ ~-q<l'Tmffl-;r@ 3TR~mcxl'fu;~
-q~ ~~ lft-:;;ft;r, ~ rcf;(l'W~
31~~~-q;) 3TWT~~~~m
c€t~lR 3l!lm:min I~~~ ~-q~
~ I ~lll<R"q~cfil~~ ~
~-qffrc~~m 10~~~ ~ ~ w:rr ~ i m~ ~ ~~mm~i I ~ ~~(:'I qRG~fal
rcf;~ff5ITTIITTT<f;~ 18 8. 68 ~~ ~ ~ 3Tilf ~ cfiT fu°'i.ffif ~: ~ -q
~~~~i:r~-qmif1~-q~
a<fii~~~cf;t~fut 38.76
~~m~~~i~~
w min 3TR ~ ~ ~ oR"R q@
~~a<fitf i I ~ ~Jl<f~lf.l<fi ~ ~~fcf; ~cfil~~~~-q~
f.li:.i@f©ai I
rcf; offif rcf; ~ cit W, 3lTGf1cft -q ~ 134 q lk'l~4i lft~ I ~UWTIH~\;tTIT~cfil
~t!U~i:rR=rtt.m. ·m~i (crrt 1. l@o~lRflq; 3TR ~ tf ~ ~ -l l<fiRl<:-1-i<fi ~qi)~
2. ~~~"q~"q"5fq]"{>R111: ~ ~ ~ uwm: ~ 3lcmU cfiT ~
mr wm 2010 ~ ~ ) ~ ~ 10
3. ~~~-q 3m:rr-ft min 3TR~~~~~~q;)m
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i:rR1" i 3TR 64
~cf;t~~~-q~ tf~~TTI~~, ~ ~ ~ f f i
~ ~~-q~qJB~~i:rR=ri I 4.
Gfcll "q<filfi ctt~cfil mw-r 3lllf~~ffi~q;l
~ ~ rcf; ~ 43 ~ ~ i:rR=f ~3ll 5.
~ I ~~~cfil~~~~
~~ctt~-i:mr 11 ~ ~ ( ! q i 6. ~cfil~
i I~ ~ l f t ~ : tf"5JlITTURf~~i~ ~cfil~
~~cfil~~
irda journal October 2013
7.
rcf; (:'Il<fiBl4d I ~ ~ i I
8. ~Wllm:~ 3TcmU-qcf.a
~~-ij~3l'f.rcn;_f~~? 9. ~~~~~-q~~
~-qcf.a boIH$ ghmam BpÝS>`m bmB©\$ B§í`moaoÝg H§$. {b.
~~-rm~,~ 3TR 3R~"q 1o. ~ifuR-qcf.a 1icrdirn~Rc€t bIZC, Ho$ EH$ d[að> H$m`©H$mar
~ wt ~~3'.rt qi)~~~ 3m:rr-ft ~
■
46
round-up
Seen in the photograph is Mr. T.S. Vijayan, Chairman, Mr. Rajiv Takru, Secretary (Financial Services), Ministry of Finance who
IRDA, delivering the Inaugural Keynote address. was a guest of honour, speaking at the conference.
■
47
statistics non-life insurance
70000
69,081
65000
60000
55000
50000
Premium (M In Crores)
45000
40000
35000
32,308 32,308
30000
irda journal October 2013
27,823
25,894
25000
22,074
19,515
20000
16,520
15000
11,334 13,552
10000
6,467 7,890
5000
0
April May June July August Total
Month 2012-13
* Compiled on the basis of data submitted by the Insurance companies
The total bar in the above chart represents the business figures of the entire financial year 2013-14
■
48
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
Statistical Supplement
(Monthly - July, 2013) irda journal October 2013
49
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Credit Guarantee 177.65 343.93 21.00 46.00 151.59 243.14 136826.00 1457715.00
Previous year 26.06 100.80 7.00 26.00 -86.04 -293.72 858047.00 1490432.00
All Other Miscellaneous 1494.95 6044.71 47605.00 200818.00 -68.28 2.01 1077985.00 18327733.00
Previous year 1563.23 6042.70 57720.00 203677.00 36.61 142.63 2522731.00 8931688.00
Grand Total 42007.81 150636.18 595834 2281300 8050.47 23734.46 38008870.00 464836534.00
Previous year (Total) 33957.35 126901.73 577435 2160639 5453.40 19674.00 101966942.00 398452543.00
■
*Wherever applicable
50
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
255.66 965.92 2732.00 10197.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
199.21 824.41 2601.00 10364.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
27.90 163.96 850.00 3241.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
27.72 145.28 781.00 3088.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
27.90 163.96 850 3241 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
27.72 145.28 781 3088 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
55.60 277.35 153.00 810.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
80.36 341.68 137.00 843.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1172.00 4413.45 538.00 2013.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1078.79 4082.30 900.00 4511.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
618.16 2309.88 34641.00 131536.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
541.56 1945.90 31630.00 117971.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1790.16 6723.33 34641 131536 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
1620.35 6028.20 31630 117971 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
39.95 157.10 298.00 1162.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
27.40 134.09 230.00 1008.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
94.42 262.64 26.00 118.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
21.97 191.60 17.00 90.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
134.37 419.74 324 1280 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
49.37 325.69 247 1098 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
31.10 157.50 4286.00 15276.00 12.81 33.72 29831.00 98171.00
48.82 207.70 4690.00 16380.00 6.86 31.56 16007.00 77284.00
260.02 1000.05 3442.00 11532.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 144033.00 494781.00
577.75 1018.33 2589.00 8839.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 160715.00 483407.00
77.37 312.77 2683.00 10935.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
54.52 243.11 2035.00 9472.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
337.39 1312.83 6125 22467 0.00 0.00 0 0 144033 494781
632.28 1261.44 4624 18311 0.00 0.00 0 0 160715 483407
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
95.65 413.87 3282.00 15688.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
101.20 426.88 4192.00 16608.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2727.83 10434.50 52393 200495 12.81 33.72 29831 98171 144033 494781
irda journal October 2013
2759.29 9561.28 48902 184663 6.86 31.56 16007 77284 160715 483407
51
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year
Credit Guarantee 0 24 0 0.00 24.05 0 0
Previous year
All Other Miscellaneous 116.93 575.69 916.00 4088.00 116.93 458.76 132851.00 785803.94
Previous year 116.61 458.50 1474.00 5098.00 116.61 341.89 102421.30 573491.84
Grand Total 10125.59 50313.68 129663 513855 10125.59 40188.09 6684504.25 32957830.41
Previous year (Total) 9744.84 40122.64 79833 289159 9744.84 30377.80 2284582.37 13754410.95
■
*Wherever applicable
52
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
14.61 77.06 469.00 2127.00
25.29 76.76 1193.00 4214.00
66.73 67.90 3.00 23.00
0.09 1.78 2.00 12.00
66.73 67.90 3 23 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.09 1.78 2 12 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
9.16 57.83 46.00 165.00
3.40 15.09 15.00 35.00
297.31 1402.95 6205.00 27692.00
293.87 1286.36 6184.00 22705.00
173.95 770.93 0.00
141.30 431.10 0.00 0.00
471.26 2173.88 6205 27692 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
435.16 1717.47 6184 22705 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
4.69 17.06 15.00 42.00
0.80 3 2.00 7.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00 1.24 0.00 2.00
3.60 3.60 1.00 1
4.69 18.29 15 44 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
4.40 6.21 3 8 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
19.54 87.04 59.00 282.00
27.79 173.45 75.00 280.00 0.93 0.93 0 0
7.71 29.61 27.00 81.00
52.36 173.52 27.00 127.00
7.71 29.61 27 81 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
52.36 173.52 27 127 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0 0 0.00 0.00
9.50 74.41 452.00 2103.00
10.19 66.63 1027.00 3732.00
603.21 2586.03 7276 32517 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
irda journal October 2013
558.69 2230.91 8526 31113 0.93 0.93 0 0 0 0
53
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year - - - - - - - -
Credit Guarantee - - - - - - - -
Previous year - - - - - - - -
All Other Miscellaneous 112.4 432.9 3,618 15,283 21.9 21.3 371,154 1,469,138
Previous year 90.6 411.6 4,032 16,320 11.0 (283.7) 435,460 1,895,770
Grand Total 14,798.0 62,813.0 110,888 422,214 1,392.8 9,386.6 6,653,962 27,766,907
Previous year (Total) 13,405.2 53,426.3 93,322 358,231 754.0 8,645.9 12,814,681 37,164,647
■
*Wherever applicable
54
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
0.3 3.3 9 45 - - - -
1.1 2.6 19 38 - - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
4.5 5.1 4 9 - - - -
0.1 3.7 2 12 - - - -
686.1 2,814.3 14,492 58,090 - - - -
486.0 1,839.3 10,871 40,645 - - - -
426.6 1,670.7 14,545 58,242 - - - -
257.2 953.6 10,934 40,900 - - - -
1,112.7 4,485.0 14,545 58,242 - - - -
743.3 2,792.85 10,934 40,900 - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
251.9 6,245.1 5 186 - - 98,840 3,904,971
915.8 6,691.3 9 21 - - 439,986 3,181,932
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
251.9 6,245.1 5 186 - - 98,840 3,904,971
915.8 6,691.3 9 21 - - 439,986 3,181,932
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
37.8 167.0 1,346 5,934 - - - -
35.4 159.6 1,605 6,698 - - - -
1,407.2 10,905.5 15,909 64,416 - - 98,840 3,904,971 - -
irda journal October 2013
1,695.6 9,650.0 12,569 47,669 - - 439,986 3,181,932 - -
55
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
■
*Wherever applicable
56
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
79.63 523.79 286 999
83.85 387.66 292 1048
49.71 149.63 64 297
76.14 354.07 58 313
49.71 149.63 64 297
76.14 354.07 58 313 0.00 0.00 0 0
7.96 79.10 27 215
18.45 65.22 52 218
295.92 1,182.80 3975 16091
286.36 1,096.70 4284 16597
156.49 601.06
183.39 680.66 -
452.41 1,783.86 3975 16091 0.00 0.00 0 0
469.75 1,777.36 4284 16597 0.00 0.00 0 0
22.89 44.19 54 173
5.28 50.92 30 165
2.17 26.31 9 54
8.41 17.42 12 18
25.06 70.50 63 227 0.00 0.00 0 0
13.69 68.34 42 183 0.00 0.00 0 0
17.18 37.04 587 1927 1.05 37.54 9995 70617
23.80 48.39 1143 3017
5.81 72.91 102 430 28148 115293
2.33 44.91 81 380
4.97 24.79 235 1300
4.80 22.23 180 1237
10.79 97.69 337 1730 0.00 0.00 0 0 28148 115293
7.13 67.14 261 1617 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
53.41 199.16 638 2494
171.30 587.37 2856 9740
696.14 2,940.78 5977 23980 1.05 37.54 9995 70617 28148 115293
irda journal October 2013
864.10 3,355.55 8988 32733 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
57
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
■
*Wherever applicable
58
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
342.73 847.28 498 1,628 - - - -
268.90 548.10 350 1,140 - - - -
14.81 468.29 28 128 - - - -
1.44 90.81 28 118 - - - -
0.88 45.81 1 2 - - - -
1.04 7.82 1 8 - - - -
15.69 514.11 29 130 - - - - - -
2.47 98.64 29 126 - - - - - -
16.00 16.00 6 6 - - - -
- - - - - - - -
18.21 154.18 61 239 - - - -
49.99 166.19 70 211 - - - -
534.74 1,913.02 8,208 28,614 - - - -
382.05 1,210.99 6,124 18,645 - - - -
495.92 1,746.31 22,144 81,423 - - - -
348.23 1,120.00 15,704 55,475 - - - -
1,030.65 3,659.33 22,144 81,423 - - - - - -
730.28 2,330.99 15,704 55,475 - - - - - -
5.98 38.02 9 29 - - - -
3.93 18.53 4 15 - - - -
- 0.17 - 1 - - - -
- 0.13 - 1 - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
9.98 55.71 4 20 - - - -
7.50 66.51 5 19 - - - -
15.96 93.90 13 50 - - - - - -
11.43 85.17 9 35 - - - - - -
153.52 603.89 10,796 43,194 11.88 11.88 13,352 13,352
138.53 549.71 9,109 36,746 33.52 33.52 37,255 37,255
269.79 901.61 1,904 8,190 - - - - 137,218 1,440,595
419.23 1,297.43 2,674 8,857 - - - - 316,072 1,180,932
1.52 4.64 57 176 - - - - 123,084 486,710
0.48 2.52 18 92 - - - - 101,713 301,405
271.31 906.25 1,961 8,366 - - - - 260,302 1,927,305
419.71 1,299.95 2,692 8,949 - - - - 417,785 1,482,337
- 166.90 - - - - - -
- 5.18 - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
77.73 1,777.80 18 72 - - - -
4.81 33.01 54 133 - - - -
1,941.82 8,739.65 35,526 135,108 11.88 11.88 13,352 13,352 260,302 1,927,305
irda journal October 2013
1,626.13 5,116.95 28,017 102,815 33.52 33.52 37,255 37,255 417,785 1,482,337
59
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
■
*Wherever applicable
60
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
- 0.00 - - - 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0.00 - -
- 0.00 - - - 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0.00 - -
- 0.00 - - - 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
- 0.00 - - - 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 - - - 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0.00 - -
780.32 3,258.81 - - - 0.00 - -
900.33 4,078.44 - - 0.00 0.00 - -
921.19 3,429.91 31,165 139,101 - 0.00 - -
675.30 2,866.39 27,645 113,865 0.00 0.00 - -
1701.52 6688.71 31165 139101 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
1575.63 6944.83 27645 113865 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 - - - 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0.00 - -
- 0.00 - - - 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0.00 - -
- 0.00 - - - 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0.00 - -
- 0.00 - - - 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 - - - 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0.00 - -
599.25 3,124.35 126 569 107.30 200.66 43,627 63,138 526,848 3,574,162
1,878.58 8,343.11 272 1,083 0.00 104.79 - 47,574 1,409,330 6,283,990
0.94 1.68 11 51 - 0.00 - - 75,695 324,290
11.47 58.03 269 1,265 0.00 0.00 - - 66,967 307,569
600.19 3126.03 137 620 107.30 200.66 43627 63138 602543 3898452
1890.05 8401.14 541 2348 0.00 104.79 0 47574 1476297 6591559
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
6,239 8,713 39 265 - - - -
4,777 5,021 46 202 - - - -
8540.94 18528.14 31341 139986 107.30 200.66 43627 63138 602543 3898452
irda journal October 2013
8243.11 20367.00 28232 116415 0.00 104.79 0 47574 1476297 6591559
61
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year
Credit Guarantee
Previous year
All Other Miscellaneous 1910.96 6352.77 21003.00 93962.00 948.83 1910.96 1273976.51 4976348.69
Previous year 2511.33 7998.34 26365 106343 846.33 2511.33 1972618.85 6280478.62
Grand Total 21587.00 98929.62 317030 1444759 -1797.73 21587.00 11648393.08 49179126.99
Previous year (Total) 18436.54 77035.93 350250 1404609 1012.65 18436.54 7685004.01 40380678.15
■
*Wherever applicable
62
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
28.17 86.73 557 2066.00
22.67 80.81 661 1820.00
0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.76 5.89 15.00 51.00
7.59 9.75 8.00 22.00
655.24 2734.22 24512.00 135010.00
443.21 2149.54 28641.00 135964.00
703.10 2751.42 0.00 0.00
384.09 1806.06 0.00 0.00
1358.34 5485.64 24512 135010 0.00 0.00 0 0
827.30 3955.60 28641 135964 0.00 0.00 0 0
2 11 22 209
5 10 39 135
0 1 0 2
0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 1 28 74
1 2 35 115
2.77 13.31 50 285 0.00 0.00 0 0
5.18 12.22 74 251 0.00 0.00 0 0
97.62 267.01 1317 7833 5.49 12.37 109684 247430
171.75 361.63 729 2967 7.22 24.19 144466 378221
604.89 2765.48 164 602 599.59 2729.46 0 306750
542.85 2361.45 75 264 539.56 2346.04 290452 1394294
604.89 2765.48 164 602 599.59 2729.46 0 306750 0 0
542.85 2361.45 75 264 539.56 2346.04 290452 1394294 0 0
81.01 1330.91 3041 11146.00 0.53 873.47 1140 52550
137.52 1411.09 4051 15166.00 0.66 625.91 458 52953
2173.56 9954.97 29656 156993 605.61 3615.30 110824 606730 0 0
irda journal October 2013
1714.86 8192.55 34239 156454 547.44 2996.14 435376 1825468 0 0
63
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year - - - - - - - -
Credit Guarantee - - - - - - - -
Previous year - - - - - - - -
All Other Miscellaneous (3.34) 78.17 152 635 (13.47) (52.80) 31,321 322,573
Previous year 10.13 130.91 99 430 (96.84) (248.28) 49,610 327,164
Grand Total 1,537 8,074 13,914 47,963 480 2,235 1,455,490 7,697,792
Previous year (Total) 1,056 5,822 7,181 28,498 (92) 1,941 656,252 7,865,551
■
*Wherever applicable
64
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
2.12 41.45 20 102 - - - - - -
4.22 39.17 11 49 - - - - - -
3.36 13.91 37 143 - - - - - -
4.16 6.10 43 92 - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
3.36 13.91 37 143 - - - - - -
4.16 6.10 43 92 - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
10.70 21.14 46 108 - - - - - -
9.04 24.87 28 85 - - - - - -
85.05 327.34 1,156 4,385 - - - - - -
62.64 271.54 737 3,263 - - - - - -
44.29 163.59 - - - - - - - -
34.91 144.48 - - - - - - - -
129.34 490.93 1,156 4,385 - - - - - -
97.54 416.01 737 3,263 - - - - - -
6.20 9.66 27 57 - - - - - -
0.80 4.59 9 54 - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- 1.45 - 33 - - - - - -
6.20 9.66 27 57 - - - - - -
0.80 6.04 9 87 - - - - - -
0.11 0.33 41 126 0.06 0.28 132 1,108 - -
- 0.21 7 55 0.19 0.34 425 752 - -
- - - - 1.64 5.41 363 858 4,354 794,130
- - - - 1.28 2.39 359 713 - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - 1.64 5.41 363 858 4,354 794,130
- - - - 1.28 2.39 359 713 - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
0.46 1.97 7 29 - - - - - -
1.59 3.01 4 16 - - - - - -
152 579 1,334 4,950 2 6 495 1,966 4,354 794,130
irda journal October 2013
117 495 839 3,647 1 3 784 1,465 0 0
65
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Credit Guarantee 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Previous year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
All Other Miscellaneous 10.57 52.40 85.00 285.00 0.00 0.00 45583.92 270884.42
Previous year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grand Total 822.32 2220.11 3604 10034 0.00 0.00 459317.02 1509966.23
Previous year (Total) 0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
■
*Wherever applicable
66
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
0.99 0.99 11.00 11.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.46 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.10 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.56 0 4 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.04 0.04 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.04 0.04 1 1 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.30 0.30 6.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.32 1.88 18 22 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
irda journal October 2013
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
67
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Credit Guarantee 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Previous year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
All Other Miscellaneous 0.52 4.48 23.00 115.00 0.52 4.48 5197.00 17632.25
Previous year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grand Total 3230.81 10339.56 22546 73657 3242.12 10495.69 858716.54 1621964.47
Previous year (Total) 0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
■
*Wherever applicable
68
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
982.91 3272.68 12161.00 41840.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
879.24 2930.57 12307.00 42323.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1862.15 6203.25 12307 42323 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1862.15 6203.25 12307 42323 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
irda journal October 2013
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
69
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year
Credit Guarantee
Previous year 0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
All Other Miscellaneous 3931.98 15869.17 71110 270642 -1494.66 -2084.23 168921689 234259388
Previous year 5426.64 17953.40 73732 294101 1172.31 1900.67 7729456 55281218
Grand Total 77614.00 324253.00 996794 3856984 7294.00 29771.00 1443439719 2036336798
Previous year (Total) 70320.00 294482.00 956517 3901711 8359.73 35744.13 74539460 485256384
■
*Wherever applicable
70
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
400.98 2242.68 6298 24738 346.60 2508.64 0 0 0 0
281.17 1923.73 5954 24031 314.26 2581.50 0 0 0 0
22.61 292.28 493 2092 119.99 445.02 0 0 0 0
47.42 308.31 319 1358 173.74 570.15 0 0 0 0
15.78 49.38 70 220 12.09 90.71 0 0 0 0
17.09 64.80 81 259 15.84 93.34 0 0 0 0
38.40 341.66 563 2312 132.08 535.73 0 0 0 0
64.51 373.11 400 1617 189.58 663.49 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
13.87 747.25 313 1495 199.24 1505.54 0 0 0 0
43.81 937.94 247 1204 229.22 1700.34 0 0 0 0
1431.83 5678.62 86207 342549 833.57 3313.71 0 0 0 0
1198.63 4817.08 73585 291541 692.76 2909.04 0 0 0 0
2392.27 9329.54 126630 505838 1232.83 4716.23 0 0 0 0
1881.56 7373.06 110552 474045 956.93 3798.90 0 0 0 0
3824.10 15008.16 126630 505838 2066.40 8029.95 0 0 0 0
3080.19 12190.14 110552 474045 1649.69 6707.94 0 0 0 0
54.36 273.13 761 3133 49.70 238.28 0 0 0 0
56.86 261.72 719 2956 58.73 260.53 0 0 0 0
1.47 1.92 4 16 1.09 1.96 0 0 0 0
0.11 1.20 2 22 0.09 1.61 0 0 0 0
0.00 11.81 0 4 0.00 2.88 0 0 0 0
0.11 5.93 1 2 0.00 12.92 0 0 0 0
1.65 8.49 72 290 10.13 55.72 0 0 0 0
1.01 8.15 11 110 20.71 93.11 0 0 0 0
57.49 295.35 837 3443 60.93 298.83 0 0 0 0
58.09 276.99 733 3090 79.53 368.17 0 0 0 0
41.86 163.06 4638 16196 59.63 285.17 20495 100924 184638 744505
52.22 193.80 4743 15383 135.06 419.81 24170 83018 223711 792924
550.71 3435.98 10843 35457 896.54 5926.66 821415 1773898 1166093 2627602
523.56 1559.13 10251 34050 1021.13 8390.56 576313 1509220 904563 2424538
1.09 6.31 46 164 4.40 26.16 85 580 1473 8103
1.26 5.83 37 196 3.68 23.83 113 815 1797 9119
551.80 3442.30 10889 35621 900.94 5952.82 821500 1774478 1167566 2635705
524.82 1564.97 10288 34246 1024.80 8414.39 576426 1510035 906360 2433657
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
450.49 1663.88 16904 60795 248.17 1215.72 15914 80623 38902 192085
403.35 1634.85 16850 66942 225.87 916.70 15886 24597 45606 205210
5378.99 23904.34 167072 650438 4013.99 20332.40 857909 1956025 1391106 3572295
irda journal October 2013
4508.16 19095.53 149767 620558 3848.01 21772.34 616482 1617650 1175677 3431791
71
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
■
*Wherever applicable
72
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
10.88 17.73 4.00 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
10.60 11.92 4.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.20 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.20 0 1 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.05 10.51 5.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.48 3.16 5.00 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.25 14.39 14.00 59.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.25 14.39 14 59 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
30.17 30.17 3.00 3.00 0 0 0 0
18.00 18.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
30.17 30.17 3 3 0.00 0.00 0 0
18.00 18.11 1 3 0.10 0.10 2 2
0.09 2.45 0 3 0.02 2.79 20.00 15869.00
0.95 0.95 24 24 0.78 0.78 789 789
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.11 0.64 3 3 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.09 2.92 2 5 0.00 0.00 0 0
45.55 75.88 29 81 0.02 2.79 20 15869
irda journal October 2013
31.12 37.26 36 47 0.88 0.88 791 791
73
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Public Liability 14.20 86.44 38.00 251.00 5.65 25.17 10815.48 64240.23
Previous year 0.00 21.88 0.00 4.00 0.00 17.96 0.00 3975.00
Product Liability 0.00 3.91 0.00 5.00 -0.35 -2.64 0.00 1680.00
Previous year 462.81 1907.10 868.00 2768.00 270.36 -305.01 84611.98 627041.98
Other Liability Covers 192.45 2212.11 771.00 2498.00 178.48 1392.32 20967.69 624954.78
Previous year 576.39 2302.00 1188 4082 287.52 -292.03 122477.15 764672.85
Liability (Total) 288.87 2594.04 1061 3723 241.08 1485.56 47442.68 744150.19
Previous year (Total) 104.61 857.93 5233.00 13239.00 7.73 -237.46 267250.26 1663861.96
Personal Accident 96.87 1095.39 1392.00 5242.00 -11.22 -45.43 195035.72 2034032.33
Previous year 4933.35 20829.88 23033.00 113786.00 3131.43 12045.89 6413644.66 30572970.84
Medical Insurance 1801.92 8783.98 5511.00 29994.00 279.16 396.92 77934.75 518755.69
Previous year 309.29 1336.96 62113.00 262954.00 -11.27 -46.42 1914513.04 8912207.47
Overseas Medical Insurance 320.56 1383.38 62842.00 261651.00 10.52 34.25 1954569.63 10138583.49
Previous year 5242.64 22166.84 85146 376740 3120.16 11999.48 8328157.70 39485178.31
Health (Total) 2122.48 10167.36 68353 291645 289.68 431.17 2032504.38 10657339.18
Previous year (Total) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 -5.60 -3.78 0.00 0.00
Crop Insurance 5.60 3.78 4.00 3.00 5.60 3.78 85.28 65.68
irda journal October 2013
Previous year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Credit Guarantee 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Previous year 641.12 2687.87 4478.00 17422.00 203.81 605.80 624501.81 2953399.30
All Other Miscellaneous 437.31 2082.07 4466.00 18203.00 117.47 321.10 553626.75 1960712.36
Previous year 20359.51 90250.51 274723 1196759 3892.22 17778.14 13690820.64 73105234.34
Grand Total 16467.29 72472.37 222882 882163 2909.15 6429.96 5672226.64 41660592.69
■
*Wherever applicable
74
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.14 73.47 33.00 122.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
15.88 119.85 15.00 113.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
542.19 2587.63 13952.00 63727.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
476.26 2287.95 10433.00 47643.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
583.51 2413.71 4157.00 15969.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
434.34 1903.55 666.00 1958.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1125.71 5001.34 13952 63727 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
910.60 4191.50 10433 47643 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
4.61 26.61 13.00 77.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.12 17.52 8.00 72.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-0.32 1.28 1.00 14.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 3.70 1.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.99 8.63 36.00 158.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.24 25.45 27.00 121.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.28 36.52 50 249 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
5.36 46.67 36 228 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
15.60 105.70 956.00 1982.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.76 76.50 102.00 440.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
473.69 1534.64 174.00 947.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 444219 2410684
430.57 1718.44 212.00 969.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 176995 2386426
18.30 57.91 6594.00 21001.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3132 16764
21.09 108.61 2957.00 15956.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9447 38946
491.99 1592.55 6768 21948 0.00 0.00 0 0 447351 2427448
451.66 1827.06 3169 16925 0.00 0.00 0 0 186442 2425372
0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.60 3.78 4.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
19.33 76.93 697.00 2545.00 18.38 67.87 6739.00 13513.00
12.43 63.52 395.00 2580.00 11.98 45.62 916.00 2853.00
1659.05 6886.51 22457 90574 18.38 67.87 6739 13513 447351 2427448
1405.29 6328.88 14154 67932 11.98 45.62 916 2853 186442 2425372
irda journal October 2013
75
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year
Credit Guarantee
Previous year
All Other Miscellaneous 84.71 527.76 1191.00 6154.00 -106.64 -220.76 238078.42 839089.60
Previous year 191.35 748.53 755.00 3767.00 -25.41 -650.33 268534.39 608271.91
Grand Total 11600.84 51219.22 123413 489126 -1637.67 -1429.85 9167601.86 25483207.24
Previous year (Total) 13238.51 52649.08 139723 479400 1605.67 5243.39 5345214.32 21110823.87
■
*Wherever applicable
76
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
4.73 24.99 179.00 884.00
1.96 12.03 217.00 585.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.48 0.00 3.00
1604.52 3523.85 13167.00 28037.00
545.75 1922.51 4588.00 18714.00
1604.52 3523.85 13167 28037 0.00 0.00 0 0
545.75 1922.51 4588 18714 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
18.80 77.97 2166.00 10956.00 1.35 1.65 1665.00 2072.00
26.15 96.10 3233.00 15403.00 0.01 0.08 30.00 236.00
315.11 2810.73 2217.00 12327.00 246.26 2472.34 178959.00 1125456.00 150029.00 311415.00
145.46 758.83 4194.00 15649.00 0.01 311.14 7.00 257226.00 354827.00 1396230.00
315.11 2810.73 2217 12327 246.26 2472.34 178959 1125456 150029 311415
145.46 758.83 4194 15649 0.01 311.14 7 257226 354827 1396230
266.20 1199.38 3389.00 16209.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
539.49 1745.27 7362.00 23981.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2209.35 7636.92 21118 68413 247.61 2474.00 180624 1127528 150029 311415
irda journal October 2013
1258.82 4535.22 19594 74335 0.02 311.22 37 257462 354827 1396230
77
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Credit Guarantee 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Previous year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
All Other Miscellaneous 258.88 1387.95 26179.00 101500.00 100.37 354.15 808321.93 18209424.18
Previous year 158.51 1033.80 8669.00 27551.00 121.97 824.28 10307.27 13622765.32
Grand Total 9744.41 36833.91 89549 328631 3721.78 18186.12 10447846.58 58451629.78
Previous year (Total) 6022.63 18647.79 45605 161281 3806.49 12828.47 4064198.45 26789902.57
■
*Wherever applicable
78
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
1336.58 4021.74 26964.00 57697.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
459.33 2209.11 7574.00 32591.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
39.87 163.68 105.00 384.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.60 99.81 44.00 154.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
791.09 2841.33 15656.00 51577.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
166.25 766.36 3008.00 15112.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
722.14 2520.54 44.00 161.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
75.14 539.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1513.23 5361.87 15656 51577 0.00 0.00 0 0
241.39 1306.21 3008 15112 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 6.73 0.00 24.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.08 7.44 3.00 11.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.59 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.13 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.66 1.52 4.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.74 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.66 8.84 4 33 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.08 8.31 3 14 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 1.94 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
15.97 28.17 165.00 488.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9617.00 18378.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1176.00 3184.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
15.97 28.17 165 488 0.00 0.00 0 0 9617 18378
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 1176 3184
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
90.42 166.67 12559.00 14701.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
74.99 162.12 2209.00 9657.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2996.73 9752.91 55453 124881 0.00 0.00 0 0 9617 18378
irda journal October 2013
778.39 3785.56 12838 57528 0.00 0.00 0 0 1176 3184
79
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
■
*Wherever applicable
80
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
277.00 1129.67 7470 30103 0.00 0.00
252.90 1050.39 8680 34680 0.00 0.00 0 0
466.30 1923.46 7727 30766 0.00 0.00
336.02 1386.11 8765 34857 0.00 0.00 0 0
743.30 3053.12 7727 30766 0.00 0.00 0 0
588.91 2436.50 8765 34857 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.36 1.06 2566 7588
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
743.30 3053.12 7727 30766 0.36 1.06 2566 7588 0 0
irda journal October 2013
588.91 2436.50 8765 34857 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
81
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year - - - - - - - -
Credit Guarantee - - - - - - -
Previous year - - - - - - - -
All Other Miscellaneous 366 1,130 3,001 12,824 - 75,685 794,946
Previous year 331 1,797 2,826 23,275 - - 14,480 102,071
Grand Total 20,861 89,372 194,611 814,529 - - 42,702,141 189,151,358
Previous year (Total) 18,148 74,467 196,369 802,409 - - 37,769,479 160,307,881
■
*Wherever applicable
82
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
173 1,461 1,380 5,840 - -
90 1,084 514 2,233 - - - - - -
115 1,128 139 508 - -
121 1,140 177 667 - - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
115 1,128 139 508 - - - - - -
121 1,140 177 667 - - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
10 55 15 55 - -
9 32 7 21 - - - - - -
1,657 6,811 26,657 116,141 - -
1,241 4,617 33,268 128,766 - - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
1,657 6,811 26,657 116,141 - - - - - -
1,241 4,617 33,268 128,766 - - - - - -
13 45 5 27 - -
13 34 4 14 - - - - - -
139 461 136 431 - -
87 398 94 325 - - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
152 506 141 458 - - - - - -
100 432 98 339 - - - - - -
170 487 5,848 17,737 193 4,420 128,898 2,221,840
92 299 225 1,103 511 2,301 371,670 1,706,073 - -
233 4,556 2,954 11,191 - -
514 2,311 56 175 - - - - - -
62 253 479 1,989 - -
45 185 1,946 7,824 - - - - - -
295 4,810 3,433 13,180 - - - - - -
559 2,496 2,002 7,999 - - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
55 181 940 6,903 - -
134 568 2,390 17,671 - - - - - -
2,627 15,438 38,553 160,822 193 4,420 128,898 2,221,840 - -
irda journal October 2013
2,345 10,668 38,681 158,799 511 2,301 371,670 1,706,073 - -
83
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
■
*Wherever applicable
84
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
934.04 4825.11 6330.00 24308.00 100.68 1142.08 0.00
1163.63 5448.26 9104.00 30701.00 348.49 1295.96 0.00 0.00
245.63 1067.21 1556.00 5764.00 71.39 288.78 0.00
330.84 1520.15 2433.00 6696.00 426.29 580.89 0.00 0.00
25.00 122.20 40.00 119.00 1.26 13.45 0.00
25.32 76.89 42.00 126.00 2.75 5.31 0.00 0.00
270.63 1189.41 1596.00 5883.00 72.65 302.23 0.00 0.00
356.16 1597.04 2475.00 6822.00 429.04 586.20 0.00 0.00
-17.08 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 10.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
317.69 1180.35 552.00 2982.00 93.66 401.02 0.00 0.00
-4636.58 1277.94 666.00 2692.00 -447.37 558.18 0.00 0.00
5068.08 16663.44 65276.00 217123.00 620.18 2599.65 39386.00 149998.00
3930.99 13723.35 61684.00 218609.00 1463.31 2931.05 7534.00 29536.00
6742.73 20894.11 92420.00 249713.00 831.25 3125.32 55631.00 203422.00
4683.10 15762.58 59297.00 221089.00 1568.66 3366.58 5329.00 24271.00
11810.81 37557.55 92420.00 249713.00 1451.43 5724.97 95017.00 353420.00
8614.09 29485.93 61684 221089 3031.97 6297.63 12863 53807
223 556 418 1861 136 209 4751 8099
94 429 656 6296 73 159 -1950 3904
1 1 1 1 -1 0 0 0
0 2 -2 11 0 0 0 0
-4 2 0 11 0 0 0 0
-29 7 1 8 0 1 0 0
228 927 1623 6673 9 247 -1622 1183
263 998 1707 6035 300 472 3637 8324
447.31 1484.78 2042 8546 144.60 456.36 3129 9282
327.81 1435.56 2362 12350 373.15 631.95 1687 12228
176.26 500.34 5375.00 18476 60.16 330.52 34379.00 247719
190.37 655.10 6859.00 18575 -257.21 403.77 35912.00 253057
4937.37 11050.42 7051.00 28432 2666.60 5023.36 2218627.00 13745917 2438445 17058189
3696.05 8271.26 6719.00 24455 815.66 3665.20 702484.00 3334611 929989 5647331
9.69 23.76 27.00 250 12.96 18.85 359.00 1121 2831 12456
9.39 20.68 139.00 375 10.91 16.10 -38.00 523 695 6201
4947.06 11074.18 7078 28682 2679.56 5042.21 2218986 13747038 2441276 17070645
3705.44 8291.94 6858 24830 826.57 3681.30 702446 3335134 930684 5653532
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
1707.54 4522.19 17713.00 71877 286.37 1057.80 253727.00 3324550
1680.81 4984.70 20470.00 81578 543.62 1350.54 40593.00 3001262
20594.26 62335.02 133106 410467 4889.11 14457.19 2605238 17682009
irda journal October 2013
11401.73 53187.40 110478 398637 4848.26 14805.53 793501 6655488
85
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
■
*Wherever applicable
86
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
488.96 2986.07 8953 36388 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
338.61 2313.30 8624 34514 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
86.52 375.89 902 3082 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
81.84 345.27 731 2988 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
10.12 49.90 98 628 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
12.32 51.53 63 629 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
96.64 425.79 1000 3710 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
94.16 396.80 794 3617 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
148.03 498.06 472 2416 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
87.47 387.44 615 2176 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
1860.80 7307.68 97498 374451 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
1655.37 6740.16 91102 354240 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
2924.09 10817.03 138279 528436 0.00 0.00 87 26826 749 161189
2296.96 8990.48 127708 490192 0.00 0.00 140256 164943 142593 304754
4784.89 18124.71 138279 528436 0.00 0.00 87 26826 749 161189
3952.33 15730.64 127708 490192 0.00 0.00 140256 164943 142593 304754
118.37 474.16 1124 4223 206.28 772.44 0 0 0 0
101.49 394.61 1067 3867 153.16 649.74 0 0 0 0
0.42 0.96 4 9 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.06 2.04 5 11 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 1.56 0 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
23.04 113.57 255 1135 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
22.90 113.15 240 1208 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
141.83 590.25 1383 5368 206.28 772.44 0 0 0 0
124.45 509.80 1312 5086 153.16 649.74 0 0 0 0
113.41 308.17 14395 49220 594.05 1408.68 774 1216 2135 7675
118.03 393.69 15071 57827 536.46 1406.28 491 866 5141 10853
508.27 1516.81 8114 24577 2248.51 9161.40 42 137 159 529
418.17 1464.68 7096 21005 2278.91 8098.16 42 141 157 531
3.21 12.58 101 324 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
3.82 14.24 86 360 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
511.48 1529.39 8215 24901 2248.51 9161.40 42 137 159 529
421.99 1478.92 7182 21365 2278.91 8098.16 42 141 157 531
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
1186.95 4670.47 23767 90299 1403.03 7444.39 149 2355 466 3505
778.78 3382.64 22446 90950 1105.09 6065.79 4554 22706 4414 22416
7472.19 29132.91 196464 740738 4451.87 18786.91 1052 30534 3509 172898
irda journal October 2013
5915.82 24593.23 183752 705727 4073.62 16219.97 145343 188656 152305 338554
87
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
■
*Wherever applicable
88
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
2008.00 4567.52 40861 92734 0.00 0.00 0 0
572.33 2705.26 14489 59596 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
99.99 429.03 2434 7918 0.00 0.00 0 0
64.69 317.80 1702 6598 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
10.55 40.19 321 796 0.00 0.00 0 0
6.97 29.77 287 711 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
110.54 469.22 2755 8714 0.00 0.00 0 0
71.66 347.57 1989 7309 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 -0.96 0.00 0 0 0 0
283.41 798.88 635 5364 0.00 0.00 0 0
205.93 639.10 1092 4470 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
4811.78 13447.12 113936 388447 0.00 0.00 0 0
1964.71 9960.83 100526 323706 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
3571.86 14223.95 263609 700101 0.00 0.00 0 0
2466.93 10543.67 157676 518593 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
8383.64 27671.07 263609 700101 0.00 0.00 0 0
4431.64 20504.50 157676 518593 0.00 0.00 0 0
57.49 301.91 1042 5859 23.44 134.49 103 316
42.59 223.64 814 4577 19.37 111.15 56 261 0 0
2.22 25.46 41 470 0.00 0.00 0 0
1.93 22.14 33 420 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 -1.90 0.00 0 0 0 0
5.07 61.37 90 1158 0.00 0.00 0 0
4.19 50.72 71 905 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
64.78 388.74 1173 7487 23.44 134.49 103 316
48.71 296.50 918 5902 17.47 111.15 56 261
518.44 2142.81 3825 20450 344.44 1260.31 74845 956744
405.03 1674.07 3114 16626 456.13 1310.35 179604 994728 0 0
4923.56 9321.62 83582 164534 18233.30 30129.36 1389631 14281927 1411278 16079521
1573.70 4264.38 26744 83363 17651.59 28957.35 3525214 13927448 4155687 15165738
10.64 127.75 1886 2275 0.00 0.00 0 0 289 1406
8.87 106.46 58 955 0.00 0.00 0 0 2941 5625
4934.20 9449.37 85468 166809 18233.30 30129.36 1389631 14281927 1411567 16080927
1582.57 4370.84 26802 84318 17651.59 28957.35 3525214 13927448 4158628 15171363
0.12 3.05 2 4 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
911.23 7932.29 50074 193770 680.85 5420.58 16182 42155
792.37 6897.64 47007 173009 749.91 4713.55 11987 31226 0 0
17214 53423 448402 1195433 19282 36945 1480761 15281142 1411567 16080927
irda journal October 2013
8110 37435 253088 869824 18874 35092 3716861 14953663 4158628 15171363
89
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Credit Guarantee 1.84 10.80 1.00 5.00 1.84 10.80 13400.00 13400.00
Previous year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
All Other Miscellaneous 521.30 2261.43 18251.00 58372.00 54.00 136.67 301463.86 1483212.38
Previous year 467.30 2124.77 16326.00 55611.00 82.70 735.94 257554.47 1200384.86
Grand Total 3888.14 19347.49 71941 252796 260.98 2686.69 3555759.14 24743047.01
Previous year (Total) 3627.16 16660.80 70453 245733 1106.69 5871.56 4841573.99 17275515.49
■
*Wherever applicable
90
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.52 30.79 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.38 3.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 2.38 3.41 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
243.83 745.78 7584.00 22507.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
209.31 749.13 6770.00 22434.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
243.83 745.78 7584 22507 13.90 34.20 0 0 0 0
irda journal October 2013
209.31 749.13 6770 22434 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
91
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year 12270.31 29277.47 21268 99260 -2161.54 395.43 460027.76 1093336.87
Credit Guarantee
Previous year
All Other Miscellaneous
Previous year
Grand Total 18541.85 53980.07 118283 189280 6271.54 24702.60 427180.99 1449430.14
Previous year (Total) 12270.31 29277.47 21268 99260 -2161.54 395.43 460027.76 1093336.87
■
*Wherever applicable
92
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
18541.85 53980.07 118283 189280 NA NA NA NA 1176058 3238817
12270.31 29277.47 21268 99260 NA NA NA NA 1803672 4341892
18541.85 53980.07 118283 189280 NA NA NA NA 1176058 3238817
irda journal October 2013
12270.31 29277.47 21268 99260 NA NA NA NA 1803672 4341892
93
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year
Credit Guarantee
Previous year
All Other Miscellaneous 124.22 409.40 0 0 124.22 409.40 545150.00 1474790.00
Previous year 58.46 291.62 0 2.00 58.46 291.62 299255.00 1473555.00
Grand Total 3940.34 14974.96 35429 122142 3940.34 14974.96 1279487.41 4897785.19
Previous year (Total) 4259.26 14426.35 26915 94606 4259.26 14426.35 1008454.34 3365014.14
■
*Wherever applicable
94
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
2.60 4.36 86 183 0 0.00 0 0
0.00 3.91 0 1051 0 0.00 0 0
162.04 556.13 8624 42884 25 190.00 5154 38956 107934 419104
206.36 1261.46 51462 169881 0 340.00 0 77508 178334 539393
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4399 19822
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3658 14600
162.04 556.13 8624 42884 25.13 190.00 5154 38956 112333 438926
206.36 1261.46 51462 169881 0.00 340.00 0 77508 181992 553993
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
164.65 560.49 8710 43067 25.13 190.00 5154 38956 112333 438926
irda journal October 2013
206.36 1265.38 51462 170932 0.00 340.00 0 77508 181992 553993
95
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year
Credit Guarantee 10501 39498 794 2970 771 4658 297068 1311232
Previous year 9730 34840 946 3066 1918 3905 1125284 2129280
All Other Miscellaneous
Previous year
Grand Total 10500.62 39497.67 794 2970 770.74 4657.72 297067.74 1311232.21
Previous year (Total) 9729.88 34839.95 946 3066 1918.44 3904.90 1125283.59 2129280.36
■
*Wherever applicable
96
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
irda journal October 2013
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
97
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year
Credit Guarantee
Previous year
All Other Miscellaneous
Previous year
Grand Total 2395.29 8371.59 17257 59285 2395.29 8371.59 173723.96 586020.25
Previous year (Total) 1346.19 4984.89 13392 42922 1346.19 4984.89 48875.15 137432.80
■
*Wherever applicable
98
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.07 0.07 7 7 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.09 0.09 11.00 11.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
13.883682 37.557716 156 408 0.94474 0.94474 42 42 61576 194352
16.80 49.74 172 462 0.29 11.53 6 32 25345 126170
13.88 37.56 156 408 0.94 0.94 42 42 61576 194352
16.80 49.74 172 462 0.29 11.53 6 32 25345 126170
13.96 37.63 163 415 0.94 0.94 42 42 61576 194352
irda journal October 2013
16.89 49.83 183 473 0.29 11.53 6 32 25345 126170
99
■
non-life insurance
Name of the Insurer: Star Health and Allied Insurance Company Limited
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year
Credit Guarantee
Previous year
All Other Miscellaneous 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Previous year 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 -39.98 -157.06 0 0.00
Grand Total 9625.49 28471.04 123542 450463 3002.29 3864.58 1364363.12 4714444.17
Previous year (Total) 6623.20 24606.46 119392 402728 -3596.33 -26599.25 999597.99 4355035.76
■
*Wherever applicable
100
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
33.27 86.35 2196 7953.00 41.56 126.08 6558 24004.00
77.29 237.46 4913 24398.00 11.16 45.66 1888 13395.00
846.39 2997.22 14964 55486.00 3484.47 7908.23 2114646 2190404.00 2210733 2506017.00
1991.47 9939.40 35488 118010.00 2058.98 6354.27 491634 932586.00 586902 1255871.00
10.00 57.17 260 1597.00 21.66 153.81 741 4976.00 3385 20222.00
30.24 140.92 757 3695.00 39.82 179.70 1406 6813.00 4227 19744.00
856.39 3054.39 15224 57083 3506.13 8062.04 2115387 2195380 2214118 2526239
2021.71 10080.32 36245 121705 2098.80 6533.97 493040 939399 591129 1275615
0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0
889.66 3140.74 17420 65036 3547.69 8188.12 2121945 2219384 2214118 2526239
irda journal October 2013
2099.00 10317.78 41158 146103 2109.96 6579.63 494928 952794 591129 1275615
101
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year
Credit Guarantee
Previous year
All Other Miscellaneous
Previous year
Grand Total 1048.67 6184.82 3232 10537 312.54 5448.69 109248.71 657846.87
Previous year (Total) 736.13 736.13 74 74 736.13 736.13 14721.00 14721.00
■
*Wherever applicable
102
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF JULY, 2013
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2490.00 14009.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.52 28.10 59.00 401.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33322 376073.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21103.00 21103.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.52 28.10 59.00 401.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33322.00 376073.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 21103 21103
4.52 28.10 59 401 0.00 0.00 0 0 35812 390082
irda journal October 2013
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 21103 21103
103
■
GET READY
FOR A MARATHON!
A Unit Linked Insurance Policy (ULIP) is a long term
instrument for Risk Protection with a lock-in period of 5 years.
• Do you know that if you do not pay your premiums on time, your policy stands
discontinued? You must keep your policy alive by paying premium on time.
• Do you know that if your policy is discontinued you have an option of reviving it or
completely withdrawing from it ? If you don't exercise the option within 30 days, it
would be deemed that you are withdrawing from the policy.
• Do you know what you wi 11 getwhen you discontinue your pol icy? If you discontinue
your policy, the proceeds of the discontinued policy will be given to you on
completion of five policy years and you earn an interest rate of 3.50% p.a on the
fund from the date of discontinuance.
• H ave you ascertained the charges levied for discontinuance of your policy? Ask for
details of the Discontinuance Charges.
Remember that if you don't pay premium every year for 5 years, there will be a Discontinuance
Charge. Discontinuance Charge will not apply to Single Premium policies.
You may contact IRDA CaU Centre at 155255 if your grievance bas not been attended to by the insurance company or
You may approach the Insurance Ombudsman, If applicable. For further informatlou, vlsll www.gbic.co.ln or wwwJrda.govJn
events
view point
II
By focusing today on the risks and issues related to emerging longevity risk transfer markets,
the Joint Forum is helping global policymakers and supervisors remain ahead of the curve as
these markets continue to grow.
Mr Thomas Schmitz-Lippert
Chairman of the Joint Forum of IAIS; and Executive Director,
International Policy, the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority.
We continue to believe that traditional insurance activities do not pose a systemic threat to the
financial system; and encourage FSOC to focus on highly leveraged, thinly capitalized, or
unregulated activities of non-banks as it exercises its authority.
Senator Ben Nelson
NAIC CEO.
There is no global capital standard for the insurance industry. This is a lacuna that needs to be
plugged. But the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) has taken the lead to
formulate standards for a risk-based solvency regime for insurers.
Mr. Ravi Menon
Managing Director, Monetary Authority of Singapore
APRA wants each insurer to challenge itself about its governance and management of
catastrophe reinsurance arrangements and to adopt very good practice.
Mr. Ian Laughlin
Deputy Chairman, Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.
Co-operation between the insurance supervisors across jurisdictions is critical for effective
supervision of the insurers operating in any jurisdiction.
Mr. T.S. Vijayan
Chairman, Insurance Regulatory & Development Authority, India.
II
If undelivered please return to:
IRDA, Parishram Bhavan, 3rd Floor, Basheer Bagh, Hyderabad - 500 004. Ph: +91-40-23381100