Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Topics Covered
Abstract
Keywords
Introduction
Experimental
Results and Discussion
Effects of Organic Additives on Chemical Composition of BAS
Effects of Organic Additives on Crystallinity and Chemical Structure of BAS
Effects of Organic Additives on Agglomeration Grade of BAS
Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References
Contact Details
Abstract
Keywords
Introduction
Aluminas have been in use for many years as catalyst, adsorbents, desiccants, abrasives,
plastic fillers as well as fire retardants for many chemical process industries. Aluminas for
water adsorption, which are traditionally known as desiccants, were first introduced in 1932
[1]. Since long time ago, synthetic aluminas have been used in the chromatographic
purification of biological compounds. Recently aluminas have found widespread usage in
applications as diverse as municipal wastes treatment as well as in polymer and
pharmaceutical industries [2].
Alumina chemicals have been applied to treat industrial and municipal waters [3]. On the
other hand, aluminum sulfate is useful as a coagulant for removal of various metals, particles
and undesirable organic compounds from industrial waste water. Alumina trihydroxide
(gibbsite) and monohydrate (pseudoboehmites) also have been accepted as flocculants in
drinking-water. Transition forms of aluminas have been used as adsorbents for removal of
undesirable contaminants in both municipal and industrial waters.
As a result of more stringent conservation requirements large alumina adsorption processes
have been developed for water treatment. Successful new environmental applications of
alumina adsorbents include the removal of phosphate, mercaptan, arsenic, fluoride and
colloidal silica compounds in ground and drinking water [4].
The most important source of aluminum hydroxides is the Bauxite refining plant. More than
94% world alumina production is accounted for by the Bayer process for Bauxite refining. The
alumina product from the Bayer process is usually 99.5% pure with soda (Na2O) as the mayor
impurity [5]. Therefore, when a pure alumina product is required, it must be obtained by
another chemical process that uses pure aluminum salts as a raw material.
The interest to find alternative routes for the preparation of ceramic powders that avoid the
inconveniences of the traditional techniques has been growing. For this reason, the
development of new synthetic routes is required that allow to obtain ceramic powders with
specific properties, such as small particle size, spherical in shape, narrow particle size
distribution, absence of agglomerates and high chemical purity.
One of the most interesting recent developments in the preparation of aluminum hydroxide
and alumina has been the introduction of BAS as monosized alumina precursors with uniform
and controllable morphology. Matijevic [6] originally produced particles that contained an
appreciable amount of sulfate but this contaminant could be exchanged for hydroxide species,
in much the same manner as the one described by Gordon et al. [7], converting the BAS to
hydrous aluminum oxide.
Other researchers have also used basic aluminum salts as high purity alumina precursors.
Cornilsen and Reed studied amorphous basic aluminum succinate and BAS as potential
precursors [8]. Whereas Sacks et al. [9] and Blendell et al. [10] used spherical BAS as the
specific starting material for conversion to alumina.
The BAS studied by the above mentioned researchers, were obtained by homogeneous
precipitation of BAS in aqueous medium. In this case, agglomeration problems of the BAS
particles generally arise, especially when the precipitation process is performed at high
concentrations of aluminum salt. Therefore, under this condition it is difficult to obtain
monosized and non-agglomerated particles.
The use of low aluminum concentration solutions in the precipitation process allows the
preparation of non-agglomerated BAS particles. However, at these low alumina concentrations
the amount of product obtained is too low, from a practical point of view.
In one alternative process to prevent agglomeration, organic compounds are added to the
precipitation medium. Generally, the preparation of mono-dispersed alumina hydroxide by sol-
gel process was achieved, using high alumina concentration and hydroxyl-propylcellulose as a
steric agent to prevent agglomeration.
In this work, the effects of cationic, anionic and neutral organic additives on the physical and
Experimental
The organic additives used in this study were reagent-grade products obtained from Sigma-
Aldrich. The BAS was obtained by the following procedure. The aluminum bisulfite solution
was prepared by dissolving previously precipitated basic aluminum sulfate with sulfur dioxide
in aqueous media. The organic polymers described above were added to the aluminum
bisulfite solution. This solution is added drop by drop to previously heated water with vigorous
agitation. After the total quantity of the solution was added, the solution was stirred for 15
minutes in order to complete the precipitation. The obtained BAS precipitates were separated
by filtration, washed with hot water and dried at 75°C for 24 hours. The solids were
characterized by X-ray diffractometry (XRD) (Model D-500, Siemens, Germany) using Ni-
filtered CuKα radiation. Infrared analysis was performed using KBr pellets and the samples
were run on a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer (Model 1600 series FTIR, Perkin
Elmer, Norwalk, Connecticut, USA). Differential thermal analysis (DTA) and thermal
gravimetric analysis (TGA) of the samples were obtained by heating 20 mg of sample up to
1300°C, at a rate of 10°C/min, in air (Model SDT 2960, TA instruments, New Castle,
Delaware). The morphology of the particles was determined by scanning electron microscopy
(SEM) (Model jsm-35C Jeol, Tokyo, Japan).
It should be notice that the additives were not detected in any BAS samples by FTIR
spectroscopy. This is probably due to the small amount of additive adsorbed on the BAS
surface. Non-ionic macromolecules such as polyethylene oxide and polyvinyl alcohol are
linear, flexible molecules with no charge, which adsorb non-specifically on the surface of
oxides. Because the interaction with the surface takes place through hydrogen bonds between
polar functional groups of the polymer chain and the hydroxylated and protonated groups on
the surface, the adsorption density decreases with increasing pH, irrespective of the nature of
the oxide. Furthermore, the affinity of the polymer for the surface will be weaker when the
surface sites are more prone to salvation [16]. In this case, low adsorption of non-ionic
polymers on BAS surface is expected owing to the high solvation energy of aluminum ion
(4700 kJmol-1, 25°C) [17].
Table 1: Results of thermal analysis (TG and DTA) of typical BAS with additive.
attached to the surface of the particle through electrostatic interaction between the polymer
charged head and opposite charged sites on the solid surface. In this case, the adsorption
density depends on the sign and number of surface charges [16]. Because BAS is positively
charged (+9.0 mV, Z-potential) at precipitation pH, it is expected that the negatively charged
additive DLS will adsorb more strongly on the positively charged BAS than the positively
charged additives DEA and chitosan.
Although DLS additive is not detected on the BAS sample by FTIR at used additive
concentration, when the added amount of DLS is higher than 4%, the precipitated BAS
becomes hydrophobic, i.e. the dodecylsulfate negative ion is adsorbed on the surface of BAS.
As described above, this anionic polymer strongly interact with the positively charged BAS.
So, the molecules of DLS are attached to the surface of the solid through electrostatic
interaction between the negative head of polymers and charged sites on the solid of BAS. At
the same time, the hydrophobic tales of polymer escape contact with the water molecules by
adsorbing passively at the surface of the solution. This is the reason why plate like particles
were formed in the air-water interface. This type of additive is not adequate to obtain regular
shape particles.
Cationic additives, such as DEA and chitosan, produced the BAS with fine spherical particles (<
0.5 μm) and lower grade of agglomeration as shown Figure 4.
(a)
(b)
Figure 4. Scanning electron micrographs of BAS obtained with additives (a) DEA and (b)
chitosan.
For comparison, the scanning micrograph of BAS obtained without additives is shown in the
Figure 5.
Generally, the precipitated BAS particles without additives are large agglomerates (>10 μm).
In the early stage of homogeneous precipitation, small particles of BAS are produced. Such
small particles are attracted between them with strong force, consequently this produces large
agglomerates. The presence of a cationic polymer, especially polyelectrolyte chitosan,
prevents formation of hard agglomerates or aggregates of BAS through electrosteric
mechanism. Owing to the fact that chitosan polymer has positive charge at the precipitation
pH of BAS, it is adequate to produce fine non-agglomerated particles of BAS.
On the other hand, neutral polymers, such as PVA and PEG, affect the agglomeration state of
the BAS in a lower grade than the ionic additives. This can be attributed to the weak
interaction force between the neutral polymers PVA and PEG with the positively charged
surface of BAS. In this case, the interaction of neutral additives with the surface takes place
through hydrogen bonds between the functional groups of the polymer and the hydroxylated
and protonated groups of the BAS surface [16]. According to the chemical compositions of
PVA and PEG, the first additive is expected to interact more strongly with the BAS surface than
the second one. PVA contains hydroxyl group, which can form hydrogen bonds with the
hydroxilated groups of the BAS surface, whereas PEG contains only ether group which is less
polar than hydroxyl. In Figure 6, the scanning electron micrographs of BAS obtained with
neutral additives can be seen. SEM micrograph of BAS obtained with PVA shows that this
additive exhibits higher effect on the agglomeration grade of the BAS particles, owing probably
to a steric effect.
(a)
(b)
Figure 6. Scanning electron micrographs of BAS obtained with additives (a) PVA and (b)
PEG.
Conclusions
Chitosan is the best dispersant for BAS obtained by homogeneous precipitation. All additives
used here could modify the agglomeration grade without modifying the composition and
crystalline grade of BAS. The chemical compositions of BAS slightly vary in the range of (1.9-
2.3)Al2O3 SO3 (8.4-11)H2O. The crystalline nature of all BAS was amorphous. The adsorption
of all additives used here on the surface of BAS solid was not observed by IR spectroscopy.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to express their gratitude to the Japanese government for supporting this
work through the 21st Century Center of Excellency (COE) Program of the Ministry of
Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.
We thank Juan José Guzman A., Director of the Centro de Investigaciones en Química
Inorgánica for his permission to publish the paper. Juan Balderas P. and Diana Mendoza are
acknowledged gratefully for the technical assistance and instrumental data interpretations.
References
1. J. B. Barnit, “Adsorbent Materials and Method of Producing the same”, U. S. Patent No. 1 868 869 (26 July 1932).
2. H. L. Fleming and K. P. Woodboy, “Selective Adsorption Process”, in Alumina Chemicals Science and Technology
Handbook (Ed. L. D. Hart), The American Ceramic Society Inc., Westerville Ohio, (1990) pp. 251-61.
3. H. L. Fleming and K. P. Woodboy, “Water-Treatment Products and Process”, in Alumina Chemicals Science and
Technology Handbook (Ed. L. D. Hart), The American Ceramic Society Inc., Westerville Ohio, (1990) pp. 263-72.
4. Kreyenberg Heiner, “Method and apparatus for treatment of water polluted with phosphates, heavy metals, sulfur,
oil, or polymer residues as well as suspended substances, especially for treatment of water from dewatering of
sludges from natural water treatment, with recycling of the treated water to natural water”, German Patent No.
3631472 (24 March 1988).
5. C. Mishra, “Industrial Alumina Chemicals, Oxides and Hydroxides of Aluminum”, Alcoa Laboratories, Alcoa Center,
PA, (1987) pp. 36-40.
6. R. Brace and E. Matijevic, ”Aluminum Hydrous Oxide Sols.I. Sphericles of Narrow Size Distribution.” J. Inorg. Nucl.
Chem., 35 (1973) 3691-3705.
7. L. Gordon, M. L. Salutsky and H. H. Willard, “Precipitation from Homogeneous Solution”, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
New York, N. Y., (1959).
8. B. C. Cornilsen and J.S. Reed, “Homogeneous Precipitation of Basic Aluminum Salts as Precursors for Alumina,”
Ceramic Bulletin, 58 [12] (1979) 1199.
9. M. D. Sacks, T-Y. Tseng and S. Y. Lee. “Thermal Decomposition of Spherical Hydrated Basic Aluminum Sulfate,”
Ceramic Bulletin, 63 [2] (1984) 301-310.
10. J. E. Blendell, H. K. Bowen and R. L. Coble, “High Purity Alumina by Controlled Precipitation from Aluminum
Sulfate Solutions,” Ceramic Bulletin, 63 [6] (1984) 797-801.
11. R. A. Nyquist and R. O. Kagel, “Infrared Spectra of Inorganic Compounds”, Academic Press, New York (1971).
12. K. Nakamoto, “Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds”, Wiley, New York, (1978).
13. C. J. Serna, J. L. White and S. L. Hem, “Anion-Aluminum Hydroxide Interactions,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 41 (1977)
1009-1013.
14. R. Brace and E. Matijevic, “Aluminum Hydrous Oxide Sols-I,” J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 35 (1973) 3691-3705.
15. M. D. Sacks, T-Y. Tseng and S. Y. Lee. “Thermal Decomposition of Spherical Hydrated Basic Aluminum Sulfate,”
Contact Details
E-mail: cesarcon@quijote.ugto.mx
This paper was also published in print form in “Advances in Technology of Materials and Materials Processing”, 8[1]
(2006) 35-40.