Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Agenda
• Stress
• Conflict
• Conflict Sources
Course Framework
Input Process Output
Job Satisfaction
Communication Group
Group
Effectiveness
Group Structure Leadership
Hindrance Job
Weak Negative Performance
Stressors
Hindrance Organizational
Strong Negative Commitment
Stressors
Challenge Job
Weak Positive Performance
Stressors
Challenge Organizational
Moderately Positive Commitment
Stressors
Hindrance Stressors
Stressful demands that are perceived as hindering progress
toward personal accomplishments or goal attainment.
– Work stressors
• Role conflict (conflicting expectations)
• Role ambiguity (lack of information about what needs to be
done, unpredictability regarding consequences)
• Role overload (too much to do)
• Daily hassles
– Nonwork stressors
• Negative life events
• Financial uncertainty
Sources of Stress at Various Points in the
Organization
Challenge Stressors
Stressful demands that are perceived as
opportunities for learning, growth, and achievement.
–Work stressors
• Not enough time
• Work exceeds capabilities (complexity)
• Work responsibility (number/scope/importance
of obligations)
–Non-work stressors
• Personal development
• Positive life events
How to Cope?
Managing Work-Related Stress
• Remove the stressor
• Minimize/remove stressors
• Withdraw from the stressor
• Vacation, rest breaks
• Change stress perceptions
• Positive self-concept, humor
• Control stress consequences
• Healthy lifestyle, fitness, wellness
• Receive social support
Managerial Implications
Help employees understand body’s reaction to stress as a
natural, healthy response
Help employees get support by providing opportunities to
connect with people who care about them
Provide a caring working environment so that employees can
turn to each other when stressed
Fostering a collaborative workplace with strong socialization
activities
Provide or educate employees about how to cope:
Job redesign
Social support
Work-life balance programs
Conflict Defined
The process in which one party
perceives that its interests are
being opposed or negatively
affected by another party
Is Conflict Good or Bad?
Is Conflict Good or Bad?:
Pre 1970s View
Historically, experts viewed Good
conflict as dysfunctional
Conflict outcomes
• Undermined relations
• Wasted human energy
• More job dissatisfaction, 0
turnover, stress
• Less productivity,
information sharing
Bad
Low Level of conflict High
Is Conflict Good or Bad?:
1970s-1990s View Optimal
conflict
1970s to 1990s – belief in an
Good
optimal level of conflict
Some conflict is good because:
Conflict outcomes
• Energizes debate
• Reexamine assumptions 0
• Improves responsiveness to
external environment
• Increases team cohesion
Bad
Low Level of conflict High
Is Conflict Good or Bad?:
Emerging View
• Constructive conflict (Process/Task conflict)
• Conflict is aimed at what and how work should be done
• Remaining respectful
• Produces benefits of conflict
Conflict outcomes
• Problem: difficult to
separate constructive from
0 Relationship
relationship conflict conflict
• Drive to defend activated
when ideas are critiqued
Bad
Low Level of conflict High
The Conflict Process
Conflict
Perceptions
Sources of Manifest Conflict
Conflict Conflict Outcomes
Conflict
Positive:
Emotions
Better Decisions
Responsive Org.
Team Cohesion
Conflict Negative:
Escalation Cycle Stress
Low Morale
Turnover
Hoard Information
Conflict Handling
Conflict Handling Contingencies
Avoiding
• Best when:
• relationship conflict is high
• conflict resolution cost is higher than benefits
• Problems: doesn’t resolve conflict, frustration
Accommodating
• Best when:
• other party has much more power
• issue is much less important to you than other party
• value/logic of your position is imperfect
• Problem: Increases other party’s expectations
Conflict Handling Contingencies
Collaborating
• Best when:
• Interests are not perfectly opposing
• Parties have trust/openness
• Issues are complex
• Problem: other party take advantage of information
Competing
• Best when:
• you have a deep conviction about your position
• quick resolution required
• other party would take advantage of cooperation
• Problems: relationship conflict, long-term relations
Conflict Handling Contingencies
Compromising
• Best when…
• Parties have equal power
• Quick solution is required
• Parties lack trust/openness
• Problem: Sub-optimal solution where mutual gains are
possible
Summary and Implications for Managers
• Don’t assume one conflict-handling strategy will always
be best!
• Use competition
• Use collaboration
• Use avoidance
• Use accommodation
• Use compromise
• Make sure you set aggressive negotiating goals
Summary