You are on page 1of 4

Trends in Biosciences 10(9), Print : ISSN 0974-8431, 1749-1752, 2017

Standardization and Preparation of Protein Rich Multigrain Bar


P.M. CHILKAWAR*, D.M. SHERE, A.T. TAUR AND V. S. PAWAR
Department of Food Science & Technology, College of Food Technology,
Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, Maharashtra
*email : p.chilkawar@gmail.com

ABSTRACT (4.9 to 6.1 g/100g protein) which usually appears in grains


as a limiting amino acid. This high lysine concentration is
In present investigation multigrain based bar was prepared
using puffed amaranth as a main ingredient to enhance complemented with elevated levels of sulphur amino acid
protein content of the final product. Syrup mixture content (2 to 5%), which is higher than that measured in
concentration was standardized using different syrup the most important legumes (1.4% on average), such as
mixture concentration (65, 70, 75 & 80 0 Bx) as it is peas, beans & soybeans (Mburu et al., 2011).
important to bind the ingredients and give acceptable In India the grain amaranth is not eaten as a staple
texture to the bar. Bar with 750Bx concentration found food but it is used during the religious fasts as food (Cai
most acceptable in sensory evaluation. Further three and Corke, 2004). In view of above there is an argent need
protein rich multigrain bars (A-1, A-2, A-3) were prepared to standardize and prepare amaranth multigrain based bar
by addition of puffed amaranth at the rate of 0, 10, 20 and for all age group people to satisfy their hunger as well as
30 % instead of rice crisps. Obtained results indicated nutritional need.
that bar with 30% puffed amaranth (A-3) was most MATERIAL AND METHODS
acceptable in all sensory attributes hence selected as final
 Amaranth, wheat, rise crisps, soya chunks, almond,
protein rich multigrain bar.
ghee, skim milk powder, sugar were purchased from
local market, Parbhani.
Key words Amaranth, Multigrain, Bar, Sensory
evaluation  Standardization and Preparation of Protein Rich
Multigrain Bar Chocolate slabs, cocoa powder, liquid
glucose, carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), glycerol
Multigrain product is prepared by mixing two or more
monostearate (GMS) were purchased from local
grains together, to provides bundle of nutrients, which may
market, Nanded.
not be sufficiently available through single grain
consumption. The demand for healthy, nutritious and safe  Puffing of amaranth was carried out as described by
food is growing worldwide. Multigrain bar meet this trend John et al. (2014).
and is elaborated from the mass of grains of sweet and Standardization of the syrup mixture concentration for
pleasant taste, and is a source of nutrients (Izzo and Niness, the preparation of multigrain bar: The syrup mixture
2001). The consumption of different bars was increased 11 concentration containing sugar, water, ghee, chocolate,
% globally in 2007 and it represents a market of about US $ liquid glucose, skim milk powder, coco powder, CMC and
4 billon leading to an increase in the variety of bars and GMS was standardized for the preparation of multigrain
different ingrates in order to attract consumers (Sharma et bar. Sensory evaluation of multigrain bar, prepared with
al., 2014). Now indigenously made different types of bars varying concentration of syrup mixture (65, 70, 75 and 800Bx)
are becoming popular among Indian consumers. Multigrain was done to obtain a bar with highly acceptable texture.
bars are one of the ready-to-eat convenient products which Steps involved in preparation of multigrain bar: Multigrain
not only satisfy the hunger, but prove as a quality source bar was prepared using method given by Giri et al. (2012)
of nutrients and a convenient means of replacement of a with slight modification.
meal (Catherine and Johnston, 2012). The greatest challenge
in obtaining a good Bar is a combination of many Formulation of multigrain bars:
ingredients with good flavour, aroma, texture and decent Protein rich multigrain bars (A-1, A-2, A-3) were
appearance, while trying to achieve specific goals nutrients prepared by addition of puffed amaranth at the rate of 0, 10,
(Lima, 2004). 20 and 30 % instead of rice crisps. Other required ingredients
. Grain amaranth also called as “pseudocereal” were kept constant in all types of bars. Sensory evaluation
belongs to the sub-family Amaranthoideae, to the genus of all prepared multigrain bars was carried out, comparing
Amaranthus. The name Amaranth in Greek “amaranth” with control sample witch having 35 % rice crisps.
means “immortal”, “everlasting” or “non-wilting” (Silva et Sensory evaluation of bars:
al., 2009). Amaranth species are reported to have a unique
The bar samples were subjected to sensory
composition of protein, carbohydrates & lipids. The
evaluations by 10 semi trained panelists using 9-point
carbohydrate content of amaranth grain is reported to range
Hedonic scale (from Like extremely to dislike extremely) to
from 48% to about 62% (Garcia et al., 1987). The amaranth
determine the acceptability of product with respect to
grain is also high in minerals such as calcium, potassium,
colour, flavour, taste, texture and overall accept­ability
phosphorus, Iron (190.7, 326.8, 323.2, 13.9 mg/100g) as well
(Obatolu et al., 2006).
as dietary fiber (3.8 g/100g) (Mburu, 2012). Proteins have
high digestibility (approximately 90%) & are rich with lysine
1750 Trends in Biosciences 10 (9), 2017

Preparation of sugar syrup using Cleaned grains

Sugar: water (30 g: 50ml) by heating on slow flame (puffed amaranth)

Addition of liquid glucose, fat, chocolate slab

Weighing of ingredients according to


recipe
Addition of SMP and coco powder

Addition of GMS and CMC


Mixing of rice crisps and puffed
amaranth in prepared hot syrup
continuously heating on slow flame mixture

Concentrating syrup mixture to desired 0Bx


Addition of wheat flour and coarse

powder of soya chunk, almonds

MIXING

Continuous stirring

Immediately pour hot mixture into greased mould

Light pressing

Baking (120°C, 15 min)

Cooling to Ambient temprature

Packaging

Storage at room temrature


Fig. 1. Flow Chart for preparation of multigrain bar

RESULT AND DISCUSSION It is clear from table 2 that S3 treatment had highest
sensory score for all sensory attributes as compare to other
For preparation of multigrain bar the syrup mixture treatments. Overall acceptability of S1, S2, S3 and S4 was
was used as 65, 70, 75 and 800Bx concentration and product 6.28, 6.85, 8.35 and 7.72 respectively. S3 treatment with 75 %
was evaluated based on sensory evaluation. The most liked syrup mixture concentration was significant over all
product by the panel members was used as standardized remaining treatment (S1, S2 and S4) of various syrup mixture
product. The selected syrup mixture concentration was concentrations. Scores for texture characteristics greatly
finalized for preparation of multigrain bars in further studies. changes then other characteristics. Treatment S1 and S2
CHILKAWAR et al., Standardization and Preparation of Protein Rich Multigrain Bar 1751

Table 1. Recipe formulation for Protein rich multigrain bar

Recipe combination
Sr. No. Ingredients
Control A-1 A-2 A-3
1. Puffed amaranth --- 10 20 30
2. Rice crisp 35 25 15 5
3. Whole wheat flour 10 10 10 10
4. Soya chunk coarse powder 5 5 5 5
5. Almond coarse powder 5 5 5 5
6. Sugar 30 30 30 30
7. Chocolate slab 4 4 4 4
8. Ghee 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
9. Skim milk powder 5 5 5 5
10. Coco powder 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
11. Liquid glucose 1 1 1 1
12. Carboxy-methyl cellulose 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
13. Glycerol monostearate 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

had unacceptable stickiness and loss of texture whereas S4 aroma to the puffed grains. Therefore flavour and taste of
had increased hardness and hence they show less scores. the product was greatly enhanced by addition of puffed
Treatment S3 with 750Bx syrup mixture concentration scored amaranth grains in multigrain bar up to 30 % level of
highest by semi trained panel members and this was further incorporation.
used as standard syrup mixture concentration for Texture was progressively improved by addition of
preparation protein rich multigrain bar. puffed amaranth grains in the bar formulation. Texture was
The results of sensory score of protein rich multigrain improved from 7.35 (control) to 8.16 at 30 % level of puffed
bar presented in table 3. The sensory scores of colour clearly amaranth grains incorporation. Crispiness of the product
indicated that addition of puffed amaranth grain in bar was greatly enhanced and hence 30 % level of addition of
improved the colour significantly over control. The colour puffed amaranth grains was maintained in protein rich
of control bar was (7.02) was improved to (8.75) at addition multigrain bar.
of 30 % amaranth grain addition. This may be due to addition Overall acceptability of the protein rich multigrain bar
of pale yellow colored amaranth grains in formulation of was increased progressively with addition of puffed
the bar. amaranth grain in bar formulation. Overall acceptability
Flavour and taste were significantly improved by improved from 7.29 (control) to 8.50 at 30 % level of puffed
addition of puffed amaranth grains at 30 % level of amaranth incorporation. 30 % puffed amaranth was highly
incorporation. The increase in flavour and taste of the acceptable as compare to control as this bar had excellent
product may be due to development of acceptable flavour and taste with crunchy and porous texture of bar
pronounced pleasant puffed flavour and taste to amaranth by incorporation of puffed amaranth grains.
grains during puffing. This may also be ascribed to the The results are in agreement with the findings of
millard reaction takes place between sugar present in Sharanya and Chaturvedi (2014) in production of amaranth
aleurone layer which react with amino acids of grains and grain based snack bar.
results into development of a pleasant and highly desired

Table 2. Standardization of syrup mixture concentration for preparation of multigrain bar sample

Sr. Syrup mixture Colour and Flavour Taste Texture Overall acceptability
No. concentration appearance
1. S1 6.11 6.51 6.50 6.00 6.28
2. S2 6.49 6.80 7.32 6.79 6.85
3. S3 8.51 8.42 8.01 8.49 8.35
4. S4 7.70 7.80 7.60 7.80 7.72
SE 0.021 0.110 0.112 0.101 0.020
CD @5% 0.064 0.340 0.335 0.304 0.080
0
*S1, S2, S3 & S4: 65, 70, 75 & 80 Bx syrup mixture concentration respectively
1752 Trends in Biosciences 10 (9), 2017

Table 3. Sensory evaluation of Protein rich multigrain bars

Sr. No. Formulation Colour Flavour Taste Texture Overall acceptability


1. Control 7.02 7.25 7.55 7.35 7.29
2. A-1 7.52 7.60 7.81 7.72 7.66
3. A-2 8.10 7.79 7.99 7.89 7.94
4. A-3 8.75 8.25 8.84 8.16 8.50
SE 0.040 0.050 0.080 0.040 0.030
CD @5% 0.140 0.170 0.250 0.140 0.090

*A1, A2 & A3: Protein rich multigrain bar with 10, 20 & 30% puffed amaranth respectively

LITERATURE CITED products: preparation of formulation of fruits and brown bars.


State university of Campinas, Campinas-SP, Brazil, Ph.D. Thesis.
Cai, Y. Z. and H. Corke 2004. Amaranth. In: Wrigley, C.; Corke, H.
and Walker, C.E. eds. Encyclopedia of Grain Science (Vol-1). Mburu, M. W., N. K. Gikonyo, G. M. Kenji and A. M Mwasaru 2012.
U.K., Elsevier Academic Press. 1-10. Nutritional and functional properties of a complementary food
based on Kenyan Amaranth grain (Amaranthus cruentus). African
Catherine, M. T. and C. M. Johnston 2012. Ingestion of nutrition
j. of food, 12 (2):20-23
bars high in protein and carbohydrates does not impact 24 h
energy intake in healthy young adults. Appetite, 59(3): 778- Mburu, M. W., N. K. Gikonyo, G. M. Kenji and A. M. Mwasaru 2011.
781. Properties of complementary food based on Amaranth Grain
grown in Kenya. J. Agric. Food Tech., 1(19): 153-178
Garcia, L. A. M. A. Alfaro, and R. Bressani 1987. Digestibility and
nutritional-value of crude-oil from three amaranth species. J. of Obatolu, V. A., C. O. Omucti, A. A. Ebenerer 2006. Qualities of
American Oil Chemistry Society, 64: 371-375. extruded puffed snacks from maize/soybean mixture. J. Food
Process Engg., 29: 149-161.
Giri, N. A., A. T. Taur, R. B. Kshirsagar and G. B. Yadav 2012.
Studies on formulation and evaluation of fiber rich food bars. Sharanya D. and A. Chaturvedi 2014. Development and evaluation
Ind. J. Nutr. Dietet, 49: 243-247. of nutrient rich snack bars from grain amaranth. J. Res. Angrau,
42(2): 63-64.
Izzo M., Niness K. 2001. Formulating nutrition bars with insulin and
oligofructose. Cereal Food World, 46:102-105. Sharma C., A. Kaur, P. Aggarwal, B. Singh 2014. Cereal bars - a
healthful choice :A review. Carpathian J. of Food Sci.and
Lima, A. C. 2004. Study for the aggregation of heat to cashew
Techn., 6(2):29-35.

Received on 25-02-2017 Accepted on 02-03-2017

You might also like