PROJECT TOPICS FOR FORENSIC SCIENCE FOR END SEMESTER

S. Regd. Name of the Topic

No No.
.

1 17LLB00 Forensic Medicine.

3

2 17LLB00 Forensic Toxicology.

4

3 17LLB00 Legal provisions under Cyber Crime.

5

4 17LLB00 Cyber Forensic Analysis-Discovery of evidence.

7

5 17LLB00 Crime Scene Investigation

8

6 17LLB01 Cyber child pornography with reference to case laws

0

7 17LLB01 Crime Scene management.

2

8 17LLB01
6
Tampering computer source code-case analyses

9 17LLB01 Admissibility of DNA evidence in Criminal cases

8

10 17LLB01 Admissibility of DNA evidence in determining paternity and maternity with

9
Reference to case laws.

11 17LLB02 Types of forensic evidence with reference to DNA and relevant case laws.
 0

12 17LLB02 Role and responsibilities in Crime Scene Investigations

3

13 17LLB02 Crime Scene and evidence recording, few case laws.

5

14 17LLB02 Forensic Evidence Recovery from persons

6

15 17LLB02 Death Investigation -Importance of Forensic Evidence

7

16 17LLB02 Forensic examination of Firearms and ballistic materials legal issues

8

17 17LLB02 Types of Fingerprint evidence at Crime Scene

8

18 17LLB02 Forged Handwriting-Handwriting Analysis its legal implications.

9

19 17LLB03 Recovery and preservation of documents – ESDA examination

0

20 17LLB03 Sources of DNA and its legal relevancy

2

21 17LLB03 Constitutionality of DNA – A critical analysis of case laws

3

22 17LLB03 Types of Forensic evidence with reference to criminal cases

6

23 17LLB03 Nature of Forensic evidence and future trends.

8

24 17LLB04 DNA fingerprinting admissibility in criminal cases.

 0

25 17LLB04 Admissibility of DNA in rape cases.

1

26 17LLB04 Admissibility of Forensic evidence with reference to Dowry death cases,

2

27 17LLB04 Post mortem using forensic Toxicology legal issues.

3

28 17LLB04 Principles on which Toxicology Evidence is based.

4

29 17LLB04 Chemical analysis report with reference to Dowry Suicide cases.

6

30 17LLB04 Murder by poisoning importance of forensic evidence

8

31 17LLB05 Offences under Information Technology Act 2000 cases study.

0

32 17LLB05 Cyber Terrorism- case study

1

33 17LLB05 Cyber pornography -Cases on publishing obscene material.

2

34 17LLB05 Critically analyse cases on identity theft and computer fraud.

3

35 17LLB05 Use of cyber forensic for collection and analysis of electronic evidence.
4

36 17LLB05 Critically analyse Kamalanatha V State of Tamil Nadu AIR 2005 SC 2132, and
5 Kamati Devi Poshi Ram.2001(2)CTC 625.

37 17LLB05 Explain critically State of Gujarat v Krishanbhai (2014)5 SCC108 and Krishna
 6 Kumar Malik Vs State of Haryana(2011)7 SCC 130

38 17LLB05 Analyse Selvi v State of Karnataka(2010) SCC263.and Vansha Lakama Gangad v

7 State of Maharashtra ..MANU/MH/0319/2010.

39 17LLB05 Importance of forensic science - Constitutional Imperatives and other legal aspects
8 of Narcoanalysis test

40 17LLB06 Analyse Polygraph Test and its implications on human body .Explain few cases.
0

41 2016034 Explain Dinesh Dalmia v State with reference to procedural safeguards under
criminal procedure and expert opinion under evidence act.

42 2016042 Analyse constitutionality and legal implications involved in Ramachandra Reddy

and others v State of Maharashtra. Lie-detection test in forensic technology to
detect crime.

43 2016051 State of Bombay v Kathikalu AIR 1961.Crlj vol 2 ,2007. Constitutional and Human
rights perspective.

44 2016065 Abdul Rahman Kanji v State of West Bengal Cal L T 2015(1) HC 318,and
B.AUmesh V State of Karnataka. (2011) 3 SCC 85.

45 2016078 Patangi Balarama Ganesh v State of Andhra Pradesh(2009)14 SCC607.Santosh

Kumar Singh v State (through CBI) (2010 ) 9 SCC 747.With reference to DNA
TEST.

46 2016122 Siddhartha Vashit v State AIR 2010 SC 2352.Admissibility in criminal cases .

State of M.P. v Paltan Mallah.AIR 2005 SC 733.

47 2016123 Sukhwant Singh v State of Punjab.(1995)3 SCC367.Ajay Singh v State of

Bihar.2000.SCC Vol 9 .730 Admissibility of Ballistic evidence.

48 2016068 Ghurey Lal v State of U.P (2008)10SCC450.Validity of forensic evidence

 BilalAhamed Kaloo vState of A.P.(1997) 7 SCC431.

49 17LLB06 Opinion of ballistic expert ; Critically analyse Rajkumar v State of

1 Hariyana.MANU/PH/ 0916/1996.Sukhwant Singh v State of Punjab
(1995)3SCC367

50 17LLB06 Principles on which fingerprint evidence is based. Analyse the method /mechanism
3 for collection of fingerprints for criminal investigation.

51 17LLB06 Criminal cases in which toxicology evidence is used/ referred for recording
5 convection or acquittal.

52 17LLB06 Cyber Forensics cases on Hacking- Abhinav Gupta v State of Haryana 2008
6
Crlj 4536.Nirav Navinbhai Shah v State of Gujarat.(2006)26 GLH 711.

53 17LLB06 Dr. Katari Sunil Kumar v Dr .B. Hemanalini (2013)1 ALD (Cri)251 cases on
8
Obscene electronic transmitted .Kamlesh Vaswani v Union of India (2016)7 SCC
592.

54 17LLB07 Shreya Singhal v Union of India 2013 vol 12 SCC73,Syed Asif Uddin v St of
0 A.P2005 Crlj 4314.

55 17LLB07 Medico-Legal aspects of Forensic Medicine. Analyse few cases

1

56 17LLB07 Roles and Responsibilities in Crime scene Investigations.

5

57 17LLB07 Development of Forensic Science in India.

6

58 17LLB07 Principles of Exhibit Handling, Explain few cases.

7

59 17LLB07 Forensic Evidence Recovery From Persons. Analyse few cases

8
60 17LLB08 Relevant provisions including substantial and procedural laws in India dealing
2
Forensic Science.

61 17LLB08 State of Maharashtra Sukhdeo Singh.1992 SC/0416/MANU. State of U.P V Sheo

3 Sanehi (2004)12 SCC347.

62 17LLB08 State v Nalini (1999)5SCC253.State v Vinod Kumar Yadav 2015Del .HC

4

63 17LLB08 Surendra Koli v State of UP 2011,vol 4 SCC 80. Tipparam Prabhakar v State of AP
6 (2009)3 SCC534.

64 17LLB08 Vijai Kumar Arora v State.(2010)2 .SCC353.State v Mohd .Afzal 2003 DLT SCC1
9

65 17LLB09 Sunil Kumar v State 1997 Crlj 3380. State of Karnataka v M.V.Mahash (2003)
1
Vol3 SCC353.State of Maharashtra v Amit 2003 CrLJ 600.

66 17LLB09 Sidhartha Vashisht v State AIR2010SC2352.State of Gujarat v Kishanbai

2 (2014)5SCC108.

67 17LLB09 State of H.P v Lekh Raj (2000)1SCC247. Sanmughan v State of

3 Kerala(2012)2SCC788.

68 17LLB09 Sivakumar v State (2006)1SCC714. State v M Krishna Mohan (2007) 14 SCC

4
667.

69 17LLB09 Sachin v State(NCT of Delhi(2007) CrLJ 3947. Shaun State of Haryana 2009 CrLJ
7 2035.

70 17LLB09 Renu gogar v State of H.P 2010 SCC online HP 101.Ramakant Rai v Madan
8 rai(2003)12SCC395.

71 17LLB10 Ram Singh v State of Rajasthan (2012)12SCC339. Puran Singh v State of

2 Uttaranchal(2008)3SCC795.

72 17LLB10 -O.M.Baby v State of Kerala (2012)SCC362, Nirmaljit Kaur v State of Punjab

 3 (2006)SCC363. Munna Kumar Upadyaya v State of A.P (2012)6SCC174.

73 17LLB10 Karpal v State 2009 SCC online Del1775. Kamelesh Vaswani v Union of India
4
(2016)7SCC592.

74 17LLB10 Anita v State of State of Haryana (2010)3 RCR (Cri) 113(DB) Anil v State of
7 Maharashtra (2014)4 SCC 69.

75 17LLB11 Babu v State of Kerala. (2010)9SCC189.Ajai Singh v State of Bihar, (2000)9

1 SCC730.

76 17LLB11 A Yadav v State of Karnataka(2008)15SCC322.Maya Chanchal v State (2011)

3
185 DLT 209 Analyse Fingerprint Evidence a link in the chain of circumstances,

77 17LLB11 Kamalanatha v State of Tamil Nadu.AIR 2005SC 2132.Jarnail Singh v State

4
of Punjab (2009)9SCC719. Analyse DNA Technology in Forensic Science.

78 17LLB11 Suk want Singh v State of Punjab (1995)3SCC367.Admissibility of ballistic

5 evidence. State v Navin Ahuja MANU/DE/5590/2012.

79 17LLB11 Scientific establishment of Fingerprint Evidence. Ramasubhramanian v State of

6 Kerala. (2007)12SCC 801.B.A Umesh v State of Karnataka (2011)2SCC85

80 17LLB11 Analyse Medical Evidence with reference to toxicology. Jyotiba Laxman Patel v
9 State of Karnataka 2001 Kar 2175.Manik Mukherjee v State of Bihar 2000

CrLJ3661.

81 17LLB12 State of Karnataka by the Police Inspector v R,Raju 2007 CrLJ920.

0
Ponnusamy v State of Tamil Nadu (2008) 5 SCC587.

82 17LLB12 Atir Khan v U .T, of Chandigarh (2017) Computer Fraud. State v Md.Afzal
1 (2003)DLT 385Cyber Crime ,Tempering with Computer source Code.

83 17LLB12 Analyse Evidentiary reliability ; Opinion Evidence .Evidence of fact .Basics of

3
Admissibity of forensic science. Kannankeril v Terminix. International .Inc.
 128
F3d802,809(Cri1997).a````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
``````````

84 17LLB12 Pantangi Balarama Venkata Ganesh v State of A.P 2009 vol 14 SCC607.Thomas
4 Mitchell Overton v State of Florida, http//www.floridasupremecourt
.org/decision/2007/DNA maching.Sharda v Dharmpal 2003 (2) CTC 760.

85 17LLB12 Forensic Evidence leads to acquittal ; State of M.P Ghudan (2003)12SCC 485.State
5 of Punjab v Rajender Singh (2009)15 SCC612.Jogender Singh State of Haryana
(2014)SCC335

86. 17LLB126 Ballistic Evidence-Admissibility in criminal cases.

87. 17LLB128 Classification of fingerprints availability in crime scene.

88.2016006 Principles of Toxicology-Examination and collection of evidence at crime scene

89. 2016114 Computer based forgery with reference to case analysis of cyber fraud.

90. 17LLB105 Forensic Psychology.

91. 17LLB106 Forensic law and evidence Recovery.

92. 17LLB112 Forensic Pathology.