Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
Origins
Dimensions and calculation
New method (2010 HDI onwards)
Old method (HDI before 2010)
2019 Human Development Index (2020 report)
Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index (2020 report)
Past top countries
In each original HDI
Geographical coverage
Country/region specific HDI lists
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Development_Index 1/10
8/3/22, 12:52 AM Human Development Index - Wikipedia
Criticism
Sources of data error
See also
Indices
Other
Notes
References
External links
Origins
The origins of the HDI are found in the annual Human Development Reports produced by the Human Development
Report Office of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). These were devised and launched by Pakistani
economist Mahbub ul Haq in 1990, and had the explicit purpose "to shift the focus of development economics from
national income accounting to people-centered policies". Haq believed that a simple composite measure of human
development was needed to convince the public, academics, and politicians that they can and should evaluate
development not only by economic advances but also improvements in human well-being.
Published on 4 November 2010 (and updated on 10 June 2011), the 2010 Human Development Report calculated the
HDI combining three dimensions:[7][8]
In its 2010 Human Development Report, the UNDP began using a new method of calculating the HDI. The following
three indices are used:
LEI is equal to 1 when life expectancy at birth is 85 years, and 0 when life expectancy at birth is 20 years.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Development_Index 2/10
8/3/22, 12:52 AM Human Development Index - Wikipedia
Eighteen is equivalent to achieving a master's degree in most countries.
II is 1 when GNI per capita is $75,000 and 0 when GNI per capita is $100.
Finally, the HDI is the geometric mean of the previous three normalized indices:
MYS: Mean years of schooling (i.e. years that a person aged 25 or older has spent in formal education)
EYS: Expected years of schooling (i.e. total expected years of schooling for children under 18 years of age)
The HDI combined three dimensions last used in its 2009 report:
This methodology was used by the UNDP until their 2011 report.
where and are the lowest and highest values the variable can attain,
respectively.
GDP =
= increase.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Development_Index 3/10
8/3/22, 12:52 AM Human Development Index - Wikipedia
= steady.
= decrease.
United
17 (3) 0.926 0.12% 49 (2) 0.828 0.31%
States Romania
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Development_Index 4/10
8/3/22, 12:52 AM Human Development Index - Wikipedia
The Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index (IHDI) "can be interpreted as the level of human development
when inequality is accounted for. The relative difference between IHDI and HDI values is the loss due to inequality in
distribution of the HDI within the country."[16] The list comprises countries and territories with very high and high
human development:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Development_Index 5/10
8/3/22, 12:52 AM Human Development Index - Wikipedia
The year represents the time period from which the statistics for the index were derived. In parentheses is the year when
the report was published.
Geographical coverage
The HDI has extended its geographical coverage: David Hastings, of the United Nations Economic and Social
Commission for Asia and the Pacific, published a report geographically extending the HDI to 230+ economies, whereas
the UNDP HDI for 2009 enumerates 182 economies and coverage for the 2010 HDI dropped to 169 countries.[19][20]
African countries
Argentinean provinces
Australian states
Austrian states
Baltic Regions
Belgian provinces
Bolivian departments
Brazilian states
Canadian provinces and territories
Chilean regions
Chinese administrative divisions
Colombian departments
Danish regions
Dutch provinces
Ethiopian regions
European countries
French regions
German states
Greek regions
Indian states
Tamil Nadu districts
Indonesian provinces
Iranian provinces
Iraqi governorates
Italian regions
Japanese prefectures
Latin American countries
Malaysian states
Mexican states
New Zealand regions
Nigerian states
Pakistani administrative units
Philippine provinces
Palestinian regions
Polish voivodeships
Russian federal subjects
South African provinces
Spanish communities
Swedish regions
Swiss regions
UK countries and regions of England
U.S. states (American Human Development Report (AHDR))
Venezuelan states
Vietnamese regions
Criticism
The Human Development Index has been criticized on a number of grounds,
including alleged lack of consideration of technological development or
contributions to the human civilization, focusing exclusively on national
performance and ranking, lack of attention to development from a global
perspective, measurement error of the underlying statistics, and on the UNDP's
changes in formula which can lead to severe misclassification in the categorisation of
"low", "medium", "high" or "very high" human development countries.[21]
HDI vis-à-vis ecological footprint
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Development_Index 7/10
8/3/22, 12:52 AM Human Development Index - Wikipedia
Economists Hendrik Wolff, Howard Chong and Maximilian Auffhammer discuss the HDI from the perspective of data
error in the underlying health, education and income statistics used to construct the HDI. They identified three sources
of data error which are due to (i) data updating, (ii) formula revisions and (iii) thresholds to classify a country's
development status and conclude that 11%, 21% and 34% of all countries can be interpreted as currently misclassified in
the development bins due to the three sources of data error, respectively. The authors suggest that the United Nations
should discontinue the practice of classifying countries into development bins because: the cut-off values seem
arbitrary, can provide incentives for strategic behavior in reporting official statistics, and have the potential to misguide
politicians, investors, charity donors and the public who use the HDI at large.[21]
In 2010, the UNDP reacted to the criticism and updated the thresholds to classify nations as low, medium, and high
human development countries. In a comment to The Economist in early January 2011, the Human Development Report
Office responded[22] to a 6 January 2011 article in the magazine[23] which discusses the Wolff et al. paper. The Human
Development Report Office states that they undertook a systematic revision of the methods used for the calculation of
the HDI, and that the new methodology directly addresses the critique by Wolff et al. in that it generates a system for
continuously updating the human-development categories whenever formula or data revisions take place.
In 2013, Salvatore Monni and Alessandro Spaventa emphasized that in the debate of GDP versus HDI, it is often
forgotten that these are both external indicators that prioritize different benchmarks upon which the quantification of
societal welfare can be predicated. The larger question is whether it is possible to shift the focus of policy from a battle
between competing paradigms to a mechanism for eliciting information on well-being directly from the population.[24]
See also
Indices
Bhutan GNH Index Happy Planet Index (HPI)
Broad measures of economic progress Human Poverty Index
Corruption Perceptions Index Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index (IHDI)
Democracy Index Legatum Prosperity Index
Fragile States Index List of countries by Human Development Index
Gender Inequality Index Living planet index
Gender-related Development Index Multidimensional Poverty Index
Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) OECD Better Life Index (BLI)
Global Peace Index (GPI) Planetary pressures–adjusted Human Development
Green gross domestic product (Green GDP) Index (PHDI)
Green national product Rule of Law Index
Gross domestic product Social Progress Index
Gross National Well-being (GNW) Where-to-be-born Index
World Happiness Report
Other
Developing country List of countries by percentage of population living in
Economic development poverty
Ethics of care List of countries by share of income of the richest one
Happiness economics percent
Human Development and Capability Association Right to an adequate standard of living
Humanistic economics Subjective life satisfaction
International development Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Notes
a. Since 2013
b. Since 2012
References
1. A. Stanton, Elizabeth (February 2007). "The Human Development Index: A History" (https://web.archive.org/web/20
190228191918/https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1101&context=peri_workingpapers).
PERI Working Papers: 14–15. Archived from the original (https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?articl
e=1101&context=peri_workingpapers) on 28 February 2019. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Development_Index 8/10
8/3/22, 12:52 AM Human Development Index - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Development_Index 9/10
8/3/22, 12:52 AM Human Development Index - Wikipedia
20. Hastings, David A. (2011). "A "Classic" Human Development Index with 232 Countries" (http://www.humansecurityin
dex.org/?page_id=204). HumanSecurityIndex.org. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20110503210307/http://ww
w.humansecurityindex.org/?page_id=204) from the original on 3 May 2011. Retrieved 9 March 2011. Information
Note linked to data
21. Wolff, Hendrik; Chong, Howard; Auffhammer, Maximilian (2011). "Classification, Detection and Consequences of
Data Error: Evidence from the Human Development Index" (https://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/articles/338).
Economic Journal. 121 (553): 843–870. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02408.x (https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1468-02
97.2010.02408.x). hdl:1813/71597 (https://hdl.handle.net/1813%2F71597). S2CID 18069132 (https://api.semanticsc
holar.org/CorpusID:18069132).
22. "UNDP Human Development Report Office's comments" (https://web.archive.org/web/20110211083547/http://www.e
conomist.com/user/UNDP%2BHuman%2BDevelopment%2BReport%2BOffice/comments). The Economist. January
2011. Archived from the original (http://www.economist.com/user/UNDP%2BHuman%2BDevelopment%2BReport%
2BOffice/comments) on 11 February 2011. Retrieved 12 January 2011.
23. "The Economist (pages 60–61 in the issue of Jan 8, 2011)" (http://www.economist.com/node/17849159?story_id=17
849159). 6 January 2011. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20110113063006/http://www.economist.com/node/
17849159?story_id=17849159) from the original on 13 January 2011. Retrieved 12 January 2011.
24. Monni, Salvatore; Spaventa, Alessandro (2013). "Beyond Gdp and HDI: Shifting the focus from Paradigms to
Politics". Development. 56 (2): 227–231. doi:10.1057/dev.2013.30 (https://doi.org/10.1057%2Fdev.2013.30).
S2CID 84722678 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:84722678).
External links
Human Development Index (http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi)
Human Development Tools and Rankings (http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Development_Index 10/10