Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Methodology
Student Name
Institution
Date
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 2
Introduction
During 2011, when the LDB (Democracy governance legitimacy monitor) had been
published. The main claim behind establishing the monitor was known to be twofold. At first,
there had been wide-ranging discussions regarding the crisis of legitimacy of the democracy in
Dutch. Whereas in 2001 and 2005, political confidence figures entirely favored the Dutch terms
in a lowly manner, different legitimacy signals attractive attention too. Not only administrative
and political theory, although the wider public and the entire political domain, were not in
agreement with the issue. However, in extreme situations, the stance of the whole political
system had been on a rise capsize to being more fuss on nothing (Krevi, 2011).
Nevertheless, despite more evidence is centered on the debate that had expounded
because of the immense proliferation of the research, it was obscure as many people reported on
attitudes largely which implied that many citizens regarded it to democratic governance.
Following the feedback from the Ministry of interior and Kingdom relations, the guardian to
democratic constitutional state, and other principals beside the legitimacy monitor realized that
there was need for presenting an overview which would separate wheat and chaff so that forest
of tress could be seen again. During the present days Pollster Maurice (2013) signaled an alarm
regarding Dutch democracy whereby Dirk Jan (2013) responded that Dutch order nothing is
wrong. The main objective is answering the research presented which will incorporate a number
In this research the main hypothesis goes in line with the model that ads in line of
reasoning of what a suitable response would be dependent, including other matters which is
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 3
Europe, the nation or state, the relationship between insecurity which comes from globalization
and how effective institutional feedback would be dissimilar. It is further argued that persons
with an exclusive state identity, the whole state can be chosen so that its could be an effective
component, for people that tend to have exclusive EU identity or rather a dimensional EU level
hence being chosen to be effective (Rossem, M. van, 2010). The hypothesis has been shown
below:
H1: Do globalization present insecurity this will offer the desire for an effective policy response.
H2: Do respondent holds on to an exclusionary national identity, the entire state level will be
selected as being effective in dealing with threats that come from globalization
one, the EU level would thus be selected to be an effective pathway of dealing with globalization
threats.
Causal story
Dutch citizens who believe in jointly decision-making within the EU rather than in the national
guarantee for economic prosperity. This is because the rhetoric’s of the EU as an economic
project tends to be associated with a believe in freedom of competition. Thus, people who
believe in the EU’s jointly economic decision-making (independent variable 663=2) or believe in
stronger coordinated economic policy between Member States (independent variable 447=closer
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 4
to 1) also tend to believe more in freedom of competition as the best guarantee for economic
prosperity (dependent variable 545= closer to 1) (Loughlin, J., Hendriks, F., & Lidström, 2011).
A causal chain recommends how globalization impacts an individual diverge, based on the
manner a theory is considered. From this chain, we can regard the paper to be the only link, that
associate individual level impacts to individual level demands in a political context. Based on a
hypothesis presumes that agent opinions regarding policy which are consistent with other
distribution significant impacts policy was anticipated by various economic models. Talking in a
precise manner, employees and workers who are acting based on self-interest mostly center their
interest on distributional effects. The identified distributional impacting models tend to have
criticized on a number of occasions. First, it was argued that they typically overly in presuming
the capacity of persons in order to understand actual person of interest. Many people do not have
the confidence of factual data and the reason skills required for making adequate connections
amid own personal and economic scenarios. Theorists recommend that different factors could be
Research Design
which there will be dependent and independent variables. For the independent variable, there
will be the Dutch government, jointly within the EU and the other group is unidentified (variable
663. Options: 1=Dutch government, 2= Jointly within the EU, 3= Don’t know). The question
would be, “For each of the following areas, do you think that decisions should be made by the
Dutch Government, or made jointly within the European Union?” In addition, respondent
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 5
feedback will be categorized/grouped based on options (1,2,3,4,5 [whereby 1=very effective …,4
= not at all effective, and finally 5= don’t know]) as shown in the table below.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 6
In this case the two questions will be, “Certain measures aimed at combating the current
economic and financial crisis are currently being discussed within the European institutions.
Analysis
For every discussion there are two interlinked segments. We have evaluated the
bivariates amid the discernment dangers which emanates from globalization and have used it to
support the increasing EU fortifications and after that we have run the multivariate analysis to
the survey on whether the relationship could be directed based on character hence controlling the
identified elements. Permit us to analyze if the different thoughts and idea regarding the danger
coming from the globalization aspect in a different way affect the whole community. Entirely
speaking, the layered thoughts are presenting dangerous impacts. This believe in freedom of
prosperity. “In the following list, which are the three most important values for you personally?”
Thus, option 4 has been chosen relatively more often by Dutch citizens who think economic
This group has an even stronger believe in free competition as a guarantee for economic
prosperity. The control variable 1 is 531: hypothesis is that (531=positive feeling on Free trade)
independent variable 2 (above)= closer to 1. “Could you please tell me for each of the following,
whether the term brings to mind something very positive, fairly positive, fairly negative or very
negative.”
Moreover, the dependent variables will be 545 for which they will be grouped based
options 1,2,3,4, and 5 whereby (1=totally agree … 4=totally disagree, and 5 = Don’t know). But
the questions revolving on this will be, “To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of the
following statements?” and “Free competition is the best guarantee for economic prosperity?”
which is the variety in which Dutch citizens believe in free competition as best guarantee for
economic prosperity. If people choose the independent variable 1=’jointly with EU economic
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 9
policies between all the EU Member States” (closer to 1) it is more likely people choose the
dependent variable closer to option 1! Thus, believe stronger in free competition as guarantee for
economic prosperity (Waard, 2013). For research purposes an addition of two variables will be
employed to explain the bivariate relationship which would be the aggregate and at individual
level using the Eurobarometer 67.2. For each of these measures, could you tell me whether you
think it would be effective or ineffective in combating the crisis?” and “A stronger coordination
Interpretation
We have proposed notwithstanding how that this relationship may be impacted, for
example directed, by the sort of personality the respondent holds. Picturing at the results from
the software highlighted if the entire report was accurate and noted that the subject under-
reported her eating habits and other foods. Subsequently, she over-reported physical activity
occasions. The inaccurate statements showcased inaccurate outcomes within the dietary
software. The overall energy usage was estimated through evaluating the outcomes of dietary
change following the questionnaire and there was a great difference in the calories lost once she
had utilized the proper nutritional plan recommended (Loughlin, J., & Peters, 1997). According
to Naguib, Koura, Mahmound, and Wissa (2016), explain the determinants of precision would be
sweets, bread, desserts and snacks. Being in a position of maintaining decisions is challenging
for many people. After a period of monitoring, there was bod weight increase that would have
led to the patient not exercising and adhering to diet intake instructions.
towards globalization to aid the EU we have explained a number of models interdependence and
compensation models. They share conviction which would be for ones that feel destabilizing
impact of globalization, political needs will be presented to safeguard each. But they too diverge
based on the institution that will address every demand. Every model is known to be correct,
centered on every respondent’s identity. Many people that solely hold an exclusive identity has
been associated to the nation as its targeted to agency for the Dutch within the EU hence being
an alternative option.
Conclusion
aspect, although its closely linked to the research hence aiding European integration hence
research but they tend to have been moved in tandem. Realizing the attitude determinants
towards globalization integration of European has commenced with the utilitarian model of
understanding and has so far moved to incorporate different dimensions with respect to politics
and identity. But the two typical dimensions aid the EU integration and the understanding and
attitude towards globalization which are linked and have not been explored. In this paper, a
number of limits have been stated regarding the two issues. A relationship has been highlighted
between the attitudes following the aspect of globalization and also assisting the integration of
the EU.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 11
Reference
Derived from http: // krevi. Norris, P. (Ed.). (1999), Critical Citizens: Global Support for
Rossem, M. van (2010), Why is the citizen angry? On contemporary populism. Amsterdam: New
Loughlin, J., Hendriks, F., & Lidström, A. (Eds.). (2011), The Oxford Handbook of Local and
Waard, P. de (2013), The Netherlands has lost confidence in leaders: politicians and executives
Local Government Denmark (2009). The Danish Local Government System. Ontleend aan
http://www.kl.dk/
Pennings, P., & Keman, H. (Eds.). (2008). The Changing Landscape of Dutch Politics since the
Keating & J. Loughlin (Eds.), The Political Economy of Regionalism (pp. 41-62). London:
Routledge.
Loughlin, J., & Peters, B.G. (1997), State traditions, administrative reform and regionalization.
In M. Schaap, L., & Dool, L. van den (2013), Exploring light forms of municipal cooperation:
Sikkema, CY, Abraham, M., & Flight, S. (2007), Unwanted discussion: Undesirable behavior
Amsterdam: DSP group BV Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations (2012), State of the
Tiemeijer, WL (2008), What 93.7 percent of the Dutch should know about opinion polls.
Amsterdam: Aksant.
Walle, S. van de, & Bouckaert, G. (2003), Public Service Performance and Trust in Government:
913.
Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations (2010), State of the administration 2010. Breda:
Appendix
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 14
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 15
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 16
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 17
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 18
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 19
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 20
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 21