Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
Results of luminescence probe studies of solutions of the polyelectrolytes obtained upon dissolving Nafion are re-
p o r t e d . The p r i m a r y o b j e c t i v e of this work was to s t u d y the n a t u r e of the i n t e r a c t i o n s b e t w e e n t h e s e a n i o n i c
polyelectrolytes and their counterions. Both 1100 and 12"00 equivalent weight Nation were studie~l; solutions of these
Nations were prepared using a procedure developed in this laboratory. These luminescence probe studies have shown that
strong b i n d i n g to the Nation polyelectrolytes occurs when both hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions are possible.
Hence, Nation preferentially binds hydrophobic cations such as Ru(bpy)~2+ (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine), methylviologen, and
auramine O over simple inorganic cations such as H +, Na +, and Mg 2+. The implications of this u n u s u a l ion exchange selectiv-
ity to transport properties of Nation films and membranes are discussed.
751
752 J. Electrochem. Soc.: E L E C T R O C H E M I C A L S C I E N C E A N D T E C H N O L O G Y April 1984
1.S
1,4
1.3
C._ I/[.
1.2
1.1
8. t ~ E 05 , I
300. gO 4~(~, C0 500.00
band, because an analogous plot of the areas u n d e r its contact w i t h water. Therefore, a q u a n t u m yield
the emission bands gives an identical curve. W h e n increase would be expected.
g r e a t e r than stoichiometric amounts of P F S are added, The final luminescence p r o b e used was AO +. In
a leveling in emission i n t e n s i t y is o b s e r v e d (Fig. 3). nonviscous solvents, electronic excitation e n e r g y in
The leveling of the emission i n t e n s i t y at the stoi- AO + is dissipated as heat via rotation of its p h e n y l
chiometric equivalence point impiicates a role for rings (24). F o r this reason, AO + does not fluoresce in
electrostatic interactions in the o b s e r v e d increase in w a t e r (Fig. 5) or o t h e r nonviscous solvents (24).
emission intensity. However, if a hydrophilic, d i v a l e n t B i n d i n g of AO + to polyanions hinders p h e n y l r i n g
m e t a l ion (e.g., Mg 2+) is a d d e d to a R u ( b p y ) 3 2 + / P F S rotation, and fluorescence can be observed (24). F i g u r e
solution, a huge excess of the h y d r o p h i l i c ion is r e - 5 shows t h a t N a - P F S can induce fluorescence in AO +.
quired to r e t u r n I / I ~ b a c k to 1 (Fig. 4, the ratio As was the case w i t h Ru(bpy)82+, fluorescence in-
(mols Mg2+/mols R u ( b p y ) 3 a+) to m a k e I / I ~ 1 is ca. tensity is p r o p o r t i o n a l to [ - - S ( ) 3 - ] until a stoichio-
1000). If the increase in emission i n t e n s i t y (Fig. 3) m e t r i c a l l y e q u i v a l e n t q u a n t i t y of p o l y m e r is added.
resulted from p u r e l y electrostatic interactions, t h e F u r t h e r m o r e , h u g e excesses (ca. 1000-fold) of N a + a r e
a b i l i t y of Mg 2+ to replace Ru (bpy)32+ as the c o u n t e r - r e q u i r e d to r e t u r n the emission i n t e n s i t y to b a c k g r o u n d
ion of the p o l y e l e c t r o l y t e would not be so s e v e r e l y levels, indicating that AO + also binds via a concerted
retarded, t h a t is, one m i g h t expect the ratio (mols h y d r o p h o b i c / e l e c t r o s t a t i c interaction.
Mg2+/mols R u ( b p y ) a 2 + ) r e q u i r e d to m a k e I / I ~ ca. 1 Q u e n c h i n g s t u d i e s . - - I t is well k n o w n that quenching
to be close to unity. Given the h y d r o p h o b i c n a t u r e of reactions b e t w e e n an electronically excited cation and
Ru(bpy)82+, the results in Fig. 4 indicate that t h e r e a cationic quencher are accelerated in the presence of
is also a strong h y d r o p h o b i c interaction b e t w e e n this a po]yanion (19, 27, 29). This acceleration is due to
counterion a n d the PFS's. The b i n d i n g of Ru(bpy)32+ the concentration of the cations in the d o m a i n a r o u n d
to t h e P F S ' s is via a concerted h y d r o p h o b i c / e l e c t r o -
static interaction.
W h e n R u ( b p y ) ~ 2+ is used as a luminescence probe 5
of h y d r o p h i l i c polyions, w h e r e only electrostatic i n t e r - 1.0-
actions are extant, emission i n t e n s i t y does not change
w i t h the c o n c e n t r a t i o n of the polyion (27). This s u g -
gests t h a t the increase in emission i n t e n s i t y in Fig. 3
is caused b y the h y d r o p h o b i c p a r t of the interaction.
K u r i m u r a e~ al. s a w a s i m i l a r increase in emission
i n t e n s i t y w h e n P S S was a d d e d to a R u ( b p y ) s 2+ solu-
tion and also concluded t h a t this increase was due to
h y d r o p h o b i c interactions (21). A consideration of the
effect of w a t e r on the n o n r a d i a t i v e rate constant p r o -
vides a possible e x p l a n a t i o n for the observed increases
in Ru (bpy) 82+* emission intensity. As r e c e n t l y noted
b y Casper and M e y e r (28), w a t e r is p a r t i c u l a r l y ef-
fective at p r o m o t i n g n o n r a d i a t i v e decay in Ru(bpv)~ 2+*.
It seems likely, then, that a n y interaction which shields
Ru(bpy)82+* from w a t e r will increase its q u a n t u m
yield [the r a d i a t i v e rate constant is r e ] a t i v e l y i n s e n -
sitive to solvent (28)]. Since it is the i n c o m p a t i b i l i t y
of w a t e r and the h y d r o p h o b i c solute which p r o m o t e s
h y d r o p h o b i c b o n d i n g (15b), it is reasonable to as- hl
s u m e t h a t when b o u n d to PFS, R u ( b p y ) ~ 2+ minimizes
o.B
N
1.4
1.3
!/Io
1.2
i
I.I " 9 ~ -J
the polyion chains (i.e, the local concentrations of Table I. Apparent second-order.rate constants (M-1S -1) for
both emitter a n d quencher are higher than the b u l k quenching of Ru(bpy)~ +* emission by various quenchers. Effect
concentrations) (19, 27, 29). It was of interest to see of the PFS's on the rate constants
if acceleration of quenching reactions between cationic
quenchers and R u ( b p y ) ~ ~+* could be observed in the Quenchers
presence of the P F S s . F u r t h e r m o r e , given the strongly
hydrophobic n a t u r e of the PFS's (vide supra), it was Medium Cu~+ Fea~ MV2+9 HV~+b CO(acac) .e
of p a r t i c u l a r interest to see if a c o n t r i b u t i o n from
hydrophobie interactions (18) could be discerned in Water 7.7 x 10~a 2.1 x l0se 4.5 x 10~ 4.2 • 10s~ 1.1 x 109h
a n y acceleration observed. H-PFSI 2.4 • 109 2.2 x 10~ 1.5 x 10n 9.7 • 10~o 1.5 x 10~
Na-PFS1 3.9 x 10.8 4.5 x 10~t
Quenching rate constants were d e t e r m i n e d using the
emission i n t e n s i t y form of the S t e r n - V o l m e r equation
a Methylviologen.
(30). Typical S t e r n - V o l m e r plots are shown in Fig. 6. b Heptylviologen.
We have obtained a p p a r e n t quenching rate constants eacac = a c e t y l a c e t o n e .
from such plots for hydrophilic cation, hydrophobic Ref. (33).
e Ref. (19).
cation, and n e u t r a l quenchers in the presence of both f Ref. (16).
N'a-PFS a n d H - P F S ' s (Table I). Measured Ru(bpy)~~+* Ref. (54).
1~Ref. (12).
lifetimes of 640 _+ 10 ns ( N a - P F S ) and 590 _+ 10 ns i Solution was 2 • 10-~Min Ru(bpy)8~§and 0.05% in p o l y m e r .
( H - P F S ) were used for calculation of these rate con-
stants. They are called a p p a r e n t quenching rate con- Table II. H-PFS induced enhancement factors, c~ (.---- apparent
stants because they have been calculated assuming the rate constant in the presence of polymer divided by pure water
b u l k quencher concentrations. To obtain real q u e n c h - rate constant) for various quenchers*
ing rate constants, the values shown in Table I would
have to be normalized, as described by Meisel et al.
(19). Since it is the m a g n i t u d e of the rate constant Quencher Cu 2+ Fe ~ MV~+ HV=+ Co(acac) s
e n h a n c e m e n t which is of interest here, normalization
was not attempted. a 31 10 330 230 1.4
Table I shows that quenching rate constants are
enhanced for all of the cationic quenchers. The a m o u n t * S e e Table I.
of enhancern:ent can be described q u a n t i t a t i v e l y by
the e n h a n c e m e n t factor (~), which is the ratio of the As was indicated by the data obtained in the i n t e n s i t y
a p p a r e n t rate constant in the presence of the polymer studies, a concerted hydrophobic/electrostatic i n t e r -
to the rate constant observed in pure water. E n h a n c e - action is required to produce strong binding.
m e n t factors (Table II) for the hydrophobic cations
(methylviologen and heptylviologen) are seven to Conclusions
ten times larger t h a n the e n h a n c e m e n t factors for the This work has shown that strong b i n d i n g to the
hydrophilic cations. As in the previous set of experi- Nation polyelectrolytes occurs w h e n both electrostatic
ments, these data show that hydrophobie interactions and hydrophobic inter'actions are possible. This helps
can play a n i m p o r t a n t role in the b i n d i n g of counter- to e x p l a i n w h y a Nation film on an electrode surface
ions to the PFS's. Again, however, the importance of retains hydrophobic counterions (e.g., Ru(bpy)32+,
the electrostatic component of the interaction is d e m o n - MV 2+) (8) w h e n the film is immersed in a solution
strafed because q u e n c h i n g b y n e u t r a l Co (acac)~ is not containing high (e.g., 0.1M) salt concentrations and
changed appreciably b y the presence of the polyanion. none of the hydrophobic ion. Nation shows v e r y dif-
ferent selectivity t h a n the polyelectrolytes investigated
[Co(acac)3~ x IO-4M
b y A n s o n (31), which a p p a r e n t l y bind only via elec-
0 8 I0 12 trostatic interactions. We are c u r r e n t l y investigating
ion exchange selectivity in cationic analogs of Nation
to see if hydrophobically d r i v e n ion exchange is a
general phenomenon.
This work raises i m p o r t a n t points concerning t h e
transport properties of Nation. The p e r m e a b i l i t y of a
material to a solute species is proportional to the prod-
uct of the partition constant and the diffusion coeffi-
cient for that species in the material. I n most of the
electrochemical applications of Nation, high p e r m e a -
bility to" cations is desired. Because of the affinity of
the p o l y m e r for hydrophobic cations (i.e., high p a r t i -
tion constant), these ions could show higher p e r m e -
abilities t h a n s m a l l e r alkali metal ions, if the m e m b r a n e
-17
is in contact with a solution containing both types of
cations. Finally, these data corroborate results obtained
previously in this laboratory, which showed that rates
of ionic diffusion through Nation films can be affected
b y hydrophobic interactions (32).
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part b y the Office o f
Naval Research and the Robert A. Welch Foundation.
The authors would like to t h a n k M. A. J. Rodgers and
o.o F I 0
5
S. A t h e r t o n of the Center for Fast Kinetics Research,
U n i v e r s i t y of Texas at Austin, for assisting with the
[Cu2+] x 10"4M lifetime m e a s u r e m e n t s and for valuable discussions.
[MV2+3 x IO-4M
Manuscript submitted March 11, 1983; revised m a n u -
Fig. 6. Typical Stern-Volmer plots for quenching of PFS-bound script received Oct. 26, 1983. This was P a p e r 566 p r e -
Ru(bpy)~ ~+* by various quenchers. I-Ru(bpy)32+] = 2 X 10-5M, sented at the San Francisco, California, Meeting of the
[Na-PFS] = 0.05%. Society, May 8-13, 1983.
Vol. I31, No. 4 N A F I O N POLYELECTROLYTES 755
The O]~ce of Naval Research assisted in meeting the "Ion E x c h a n g e and Solvent Extraction," Vol. 2,
publication costs oi this article. J. A. M a r i n s k y and Y. Marcus, Editors, Marcel
Dekker, N e w Y o r k (1969).
REFERENCES 16. P. C. Lee and D. Meisel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 102,
1. A. E i s e n b e r g and H. L. Yeager, Editors, "Perfluori- 5477 (1980).
hated Ionomer Membranes," ACS Symposium 17. C. R. M a r t i n and H. Freiser, Anal. Chem., 53, 902
Series No. 180, ACS, Washington, DC (1982), and (1981).
references therein. 18. N. J. Turro and T. Okubo, J. Phys. Chem., 86, 1535
2. W. Grot, Chem.-Ing.-Tech., 50, 299 (1978). (1982).
3. W. Grot, G. E. Munn, and P. M. Walmsley, P a p e r 19. D. Meisel J. Rabani, D. Meyerstein, and M. S.
154 p r e s e n t e d at the Meeting of the E l e c t r o c h e m - Matheson, ibid., 82, 985 (1978).
ical Society, Houston, TX, M a y 7-11, 1972. 20. T. Okubo and N. J. Turro, J. Phys. Chem. Soc., 85,
4. R. S. Yeo, J. McBreen G. Kissel, F. Kulesa, and S. 4'034 (1981).
Srinivasan, J. Appl. Electrochem., 1O, 741 (1980). 21. Y. K u r i m u r a , H. Yokota, K. Shigehara, and E.
5. F. G. Will, This Journal, 126, 36 (1979). Tsuchida, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 55, 55 (1982).
6. R. S. Yeo and D.-T. Chin, ibid., 127, 549 (1980). 22. N. J. Turro, Y. Tanimoto, and G. Gabor, Photo-
7. A. B. LaConti, A. R. Yragala, and J. R. Boyack, in chem. Photobiol., 31, 527 (1980).
"Electrode M a t e r i a l s and Processes for E n e r g y 23. N. J. Turro and T. Okubo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 104,
Conversion and Storage," J. D. E. McIntyre, S. 2985 (1982).
Srinivasan, and F. G. Will, Editors, p. 354, The 24. G. Oster and Y. Nishijima Fortschr. Hochpolym.
E l e c t r o c h e m i c a l Society Softbound Proceedings Forsch., 3, 313 (1964).
Series, Princeton, NJ (1977). 25. K. K a l y a n a s u n d a r a m , Coord. Chem. Rev., 46, 159
8. C. R. Martin, I. Rubinstein, and A. J. Bard, J. Am. (1982).
Chem. Soc., 104, 4817 (1982), and references 26. L. B r a n d and J. R. Gohlke, Ann. Rev. Biochem., 41,
therein. 843 (1972).
9. G. A. Olah, G. K. S. P r a k a s h , and J. Sommer, Sci- 27. D. Meisel and M. S. Matheson, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
ence, 206, 13 (1979). 99, 6577 (1977).
10. H. L. Yeager and A. Steck, Anal. Chem., 51, 862 28. J. V. Casper and T. J. Meyer, ibid., 105, 5583 (1983).
(1979). 29. H. Morawetz, Acc. Chem. Res., 3, 354 (1970).
11. C. R. Martin, T. A. Rhoades, and J. A. Ferguson, 30. C. A. P a r k e r , "Photoluminescence of Solutions,"
ibid., 54, 1639 (1982). pp. 71-74, Elsevier P u b l i s h i n g Co., A m s t e r d a m
12. D. Meyerstein, J. Rabani, M. S. Matheson, and D. (1968).
Meisel, J. Phys. Chem., 82, 1879 (1978). 31. N. O y a m a and F. C. Anson, This Journal, 127, 247
13. R. H. Conrad, J. Heitz, and L. Brand, Biochem., 9, (1980).
1540 (1970). 32. C. R. M a r t i n and K. A. Dollard, J. Electroanal.
14. N. E. Schore and N. J. Turro, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97, Chem., 159, 127 (1983).
2488 (1975).
15. a. A r e v i e w of p o l y e l e c t r o l y t e / c o u n t e r i o n i n t e r a c - 33. D. Meisel, M. Matheson, and J. Robin, J. Am. Chem.
tions is given in G. S. Manning, Ann. Rev. Phys. Soc., 100, 117 (1978).
Chem., 23, 117 (1972); b. A b r i e f r e v i e w of h y - 34. M. A. J. Rodgers a n d J. C. Becker, J. Phys. Chem.,
drophobic interactions is g i v e n b y J. F i e t e l s o n in 84, 2762 (1980).
ABSTRACT
Ceramic electrolyte oxygen sensors consisting of stabilized zirconia with platinum electrodes were compared in
flowing gases in a laboratory apparatus. The oxygen partial pressures indicated by these sensors in reactive gases were
substantially different. Gases containing CO p r o d u c e d a greater difference than gases containing H2. The responses of these
sensors were attributed to their relative catalytic behavior.
C o m m e r c i a l l y a v a i l a b l e oxygen m e a s u r i n g devices of the oxides and sulfides of the elements involved (3,
include those based on ceramic electrolytes, p a r a m a g - 4). F l u c t u a t i o n s in o x y g e n and s u l f u r concentrations
netism, a n d electrometry. A n i m p o r t a n t use of o x y g e n t h a t result in combinations of low oxygen and high
sensors i's m e a s u r e m e n t of o x y g e n concentrations in sulfur might increase corrosion. A n o x y g e n m e a s u r i n g
the combustion e n v i r o n m e n t s of i n d u s t r i a l furnaces and s y s t e m (OMS) was needed, therefore, to s t u d y and
a u t o m o b i l e exhausts. In these applications, the sensors control corrosion b e h a v i o r in fluidized beds. S e v e r a l
m e a s u r e the o x y g e n concentration and, if coupled with m o v a b l e devices might s y s t e m a t i c a l l y r e v e a l o x y g e n
a u x i l i a r y i n s t r u m e n t a t i o n , control the a i r / f u e l ratio concentrations within the bed, t h e r e b y aiding i n t e r -
b e i n g burned. A p o t e n t i a l a p p l i c a t i o n for o x y g e n sen- p r e t a t i o n of corrosion results. Subsequently, s t a t i o n -
sors is in fluidized bed combustors (FBC's) b u r n i n g a r y devices at strategic locations could m o n i t o r and
coal. The n e e d for an o x y g e n sensor was d e m o n s t r a t e d control o x y g e n concentrations at levels consistent with
d u r i n g corrosion testing of candidate s t e a m - t u b e m a - efficient combustion and acceptable corrosion.
terials in a test bed. S e v e r e oxidation-sulfidation cor- C o m m e r c i a l l y a v a i l a b l e o x y g e n sensors were i n v e s t i -
rosion of t y p e 316 stainless steel occurred in one gated to d e t e r m i n e the t y p e most suitable for FBC use.
location of t h e bed, b u t the same alloy corroded little This investigation focused on the mode of operation,
at s i m i l a r t e m p e r a t u r e s in other locations (1, 2). This t e m p e r a t u r e capability, and m e a s u r i n g r a n g e of ce-
b e h a v i o r suggested t h a t t h e corrosiveness of the e n - r a m i c electrolyte, p a r a m a g n e t i c , and electrometric d e -
v i r o n m e n t v a r i e d significantly w i t h i n the bed. Corro- vices. P a r a m a g n e t i c devices use the p a r a m a g n e t i c
sion of stainless steels b y an oxidation-sulfidation p r o p e r t y of oxygen (most other gases are d i a m a g n e t i c )
m e c h a n i s m is g o v e r n e d b y the t h e r m o d y n a m i c s t a b i l i t y to p r o d u c e a flow of oxygen, a constituent of a gas
Key words: ceramics, electrolyte, cell, catalysis. m i x t u r e , o v e r a t h e r m i s t o r in .contact with the gas.