Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. GMP01
Notes:
Notes:
Notes:
1.4 Definitions
Notes:
Correct Choice
That's right! Remember, the Quick Quiz is not part of your final score. Use these questions to
check your knowledge before attempting the Final Assessment.
You did not select the correct response. Remember, the Quick Quiz is not part of your final score.
Use these questions to check your knowledge before attempting the Final Assessment.
Notes:
Notes:
Notes:
Notes:
Notes:
Notes:
1.14 Responsibilities
Notes:
Notes:
Notes:
Notes:
Notes:
A) There were a large number of QC samples awaiting analysis, some dated from
previous weeks.
C) The receiving area in the warehouse was crowded with goods, waiting to be
booked in.
That's right! All of these situations may indicate inadequate staffing levels. They may also
indicate a need to review procedures for efficiency!
The correct answer was 'D) all of the above'. All of these situations may indicate inadequate
staffing levels. They may also indicate a need to review procedures for efficiency!
Notes:
Notes:
The GMP guidelines recognize how critical people are to ensuring product
quality.
that they have the right qualifications and experience to do the job
To meet these requirements it's essential that what 'right' means has
been identified for every function and process.
competency matrices – identifying the skills and training required for each
role in the organization
training records to show when someone was trained and what they were
trained on
These records must be kept for everyone who works in a GMP area,
including:
contractors
cleaners
Untrained staff, filling in for someone who is away, will not understand
how much they can impact product quality
Example:
Because personnel are such a critical part of GMP, the GMP guidelines
specify that:
all staff must have the education, experience, and training to perform
their duties
It is critical that staff reduce the risk of introducing infections and bacteria
into the area where products are being made. This includes:
Notes:
has procedures for how and when to clean each piece of equipment that
can impact product quality
has procedures that clearly state who is responsible for the cleaning and
have cleaning records
Notes:
For example:
Example:
During an audit, the auditor discovered that this was only being done
during the annual shutdown period.
Why?
The machine had been installed very close to the wall. The maintenance
engineer could only access the back of the machine when it was moved
away from the wall. This could only be done during the annual shutdown,
when a mobile crane was available to lift the machine.
This means if a scale can weigh up to 1000g and the scale interval is to
0.1g, then the minimum of 20g may be weighed on that scale.
If the scale rounded to say 0.5g intervals, then the minimum permissible
weight should be 100g.
The above is only a 'rule of thumb' - all scales should be validated for their
intended purpose.
Notes:
Correct Choice
A) She should have repeated the measurements three times and calculated the
average to ensure the result was accurate.
C) She should have held 10 products to make the weight more appropriate for the
scale, dividing the weight difference by 10 to calculate the final weight of each
product.
The correct answer is B. She should have requested scales that had a range from 0-1 kg and
displayed x.x g.
1.38 Documentation
Correct Choice
Notes:
The contract acceptor must ensure that all products or materials delivered
are suitable for their intended purpose.
The contract acceptor must not pass to a third party any of the work
entrusted under the contract without the contract giver’s prior evaluation
and approval of the arrangements.
Notes:
be readily available
X A) Recorded
D) Recalled immediately
That's right! All product complaints must be recorded and investigated thoroughly.
The correct answer is A. All product complaints must be recorded and investigated thoroughly.
Notes:
Notes:
Lessons learned:
Notes:
Example 2:
Following a fire alarm in the factory, the clean room operators assembled at the
fire assembly point in the parking lot still wearing their clean room gowns, since
the fire regulations require that everyone evacuates the building immediately and
does not stop for any reason! The gowns were not changed when the operators
returned to work because the gowning procedure only required a daily gown
change and did not cover fire evacuation. This resulted in high levels of
microbial contamination, which took a lot of cleaning and monitoring before it was
cleared. This demonstrated a lack of awareness of the purpose of the gowning.
Lesson learned:
Awareness of the concepts of hygiene and gowning and the problems that bad
practices can cause, is as important as completing the “how to” training.
Notes:
Example 3:
On investigation it was found that this organism is normally found on the udders
of cows!
There have also been examples of organisms that are typically found on dogs,
cats and horses!
Lessons learned:
Notes:
Notes:
This case study involves a semi-automated process for protein capture, which
involved taking the harvest from a cell culture process that involved protein
expression. The harvest was a typical process involving centrifugation to remove
the culture medium, lysis of the cells and capture of the protein that had been
expressed, using a capture chromatography column. Following capture, the
The Sodium Hydroxide was accidentally eluted into the eluate tank with the
protein solution and the entire batch was lost because the Sodium Hydroxide
solution caused hydrolysis and destroyed the protein.
It didn’t just happen once, but it happened twice before the company took
effective action!
Notes:
The automated system should have prevented this error, BUT, the automated
process was overridden by the operator. The root cause was determined to be
the operator, who was counselled and re-trained. However the retraining of the
operator was not sufficient because the same problem occurred again, this time
involving a different operator.
After the second incident the company introduced a fix in the software to prevent
such an operator intervention without a second operator checking. Was this fix
sufficient? The risk still remains because two operators, both with a vested
Notes:
The main lesson learned was that while the primary root cause may have been
operator error, there was also a secondary root cause, which might also be
considered as the primary root cause and that is that the automation software
was not secure.
Operators may try to take short cuts to save time, but may not understand the
impact of their shortcuts. The automation was designed to prevent such an error
from occurring, but the flaw in the software design was that it could be overridden
by the operator. Even an override by two operators, is not completely secure.