Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GUIDELINES
2020-21
In the Spring semester prior to NURS 686, the Associate Director for Graduate Programs will meet with
students on an individual basis to discuss possible topic ideas. Students should have explored clinical
problems in NURS 651 Quality Improvement for Nurse Practitioners and NURS 653 Evidence-Based Practice
for Nurse Practitioners. Students should be able to articulate one or more clinical problems in their clinical
specialty area (FNP or PMHNP) prior to meeting with the Associate Director. The Associate Director may
work with the student on project topic development so that they are prepared to start NURS 686 in
summer semester. After the student meetings, the SON Graduate Faculty will meet to assign chairs based
on the alignment faculty expertise with the focus of the student’s topic.
1
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
2
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
3
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
4
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
National organizations have resources that can also provide project ideas that could be implemented in a
local healthcare setting:
• Healthy People 2020: https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives
• Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ): https://www.ahrq.gov
• Centers for Disease Control (CDC): https://www.cdc.gov
• Institute for Healthcare Improvement: http://www.ihi.org
What does NOT qualify for a DNP project
Example: Determining the rate and severity of depression among adolescents in a school-based health clinic.
This is a research study. DNP projects must include a translation of evidence into practice with an
implementation and evaluation component.
Example: A qualitative study of patient’s perceptions of the quality of mental health care in an integrated
behavioral health clinic.
This is a research study. The DNP program does not provide the skills required for qualitative research designs.
Example: An integrated review of psychotherapy approaches for individuals with opioid used disorder.
Although all DNP projects involve a thorough review of the research literature, integrated or systematic
reviews alone do not provide opportunities for students to develop and integrate scholarship into their
practice. DNP projects must demonstrate implementation in the chosen area of practice.
Example: Conducting a workshop on novel therapies for patients with left ventricular assist devices.
Providing an in-service or training is not considered doctoral-level work, therefore educational interventions
alone are generally insufficient as DNP Projects. There is ample evidence in the literature that shows in-
services alone are not effective in bringing about a change in practice. DNP projects must demonstrate
implementation of a system level change or a change that affects population health outcomes.
Example: Use of simulation to increase critical thinking skills among BSN students.
DNP projects must provide a direct link to patient or system level outcomes. In general, a purely
educational topic does not qualify as DNP projects. The AACN and NONPF do not consider education as an
advanced practice specialty in nursing. DNP projects must demonstrate implementation of a healthcare
system level change or a change that affects population health outcomes.
Example: An assessment of unmet care needs of advanced cancer patients and their informal caregivers
All DNP students will conduct an organizational assessment as they develop their DNP project proposal and
a needs assessment may be a component of this. However, on its own a needs assessment is not an
appropriate topic for a DNP project. DNP projects must demonstrate implementation of a healthcare
system level change or a change that affects population health outcomes.
Example: Development of a policy and procedure for triaging stroke patients in an emergency department
Although development of a policy and procedure may be a component of a DNP project, the student must
implement and evaluate the effects of the new policy and procedure. A better project topic would be the
development, implementation and evaluation of an evidence-based clinical practice guideline since there
are national guidelines for the development and evaluation of CPGs (e.g., the AGREE II Tool).
Example: Increasing Registered Nurse retention using mentors in critical care services
This topic is not applicable to advanced practice nursing and is not relevant to FNP or PMHNP scope of practice.
5
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
In addition to completion of the required coursework and clinical practicum experiences, additional NMSU
Graduate School requirements for the DNP degree are as follows:
1. The comprehensive exam (written and oral components with passing marks)
2. Completion of the DNP project (with passing marks)
The NMSU School of Nursing has defined the comprehensive exam as:
1. 2 page executive summary of the project proposal (written component);
2. Proposal defense PowerPoint (or equivalent) file (written component);
3. Literature review in narrative format that identifies the rationale for conducting the project,
including choice of proposed intervention, program, or other solution to the clinical problem
identified (written component);
4. Oral defense of the proposal in front of the student’s DNP project committee (oral component).
Note: The student must submit a signed Site Confirmation Letter to their project chair prior to
defending their proposal (template posted in Canvas). If they cannot obtain approval from their chosen
site, they may have to change sites or project topics.
The NMSU School of Nursing has defined the DNP project as:
1. Institutional Review Board (IRB) application (cannot be submitted until after project proposal is
approved by committee);
2. Execution of the approved project as outlined in the DNP project proposal defense;
3. Final DNP project defense PowerPoint presentation file (or equivalent) or professional poster that
summarizes the project components, including outcomes and conclusions (format to be determined
by committee);
4. Oral defense of the project outcomes and conclusions;
5. A scholarly manuscript that summarizes the project components, including outcomes and
conclusions.
Specific requirements and guidelines for the comprehensive exam and DNP project are included in this
document. The DNP project committee will use a rubric to evaluate the DNP project oral proposal defense
(Appendix A) and final defense (Appendix B).
All templates, forms and other resources for the DNP project can be found in the SON Graduate Program
Information course under ‘Modules’. These documents will also be available in the Canvas course for NURS
686, NURS 687 and NURS 688.
6
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
7
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
1. Title of project
The title of your project should capture the purpose of your project and the setting and/or patient population.
Examples:
"Converging cultures: partnering in affirmative and inclusive healthcare for members of the lesbian, gay,
bisexual and transgender community"
“The development and integration of a downtime policy/procedure for electronic medical/medication
administration record in a rural mental health hospital”
“Implementation of a brief childhood trauma screening tool and trauma-informed care staff
development on adult inpatient psychiatric units”
“Integrating preventative dental health in a pediatric oncology center”
2. Problem Statement
Develop a problem statement that is specific to the proposed project site: Describe the broader context
for the problem. Is this a national problem? Is there a government edict to change? Is this a problem that
is caused by a change in population health or is it necessary to change some practice in order to achieve
the Triple Aim or to meet new JCAHO standards? Describe the specific problem at your proposed site or
practice arena and the scope of that problem. The problem statement in the executive summary is
generally 1-2 paragraphs and in the PowerPoint would be one slide with several bulleted points.
Hint: Statements and evidence must be supported with appropriate citations.
Hint: When describing the problem, start from a broad context and then narrow it down to a description
of the local context that will be addressed by the proposed project.
3. Project Goal and Objective(s)
Develop a statement that describes the overarching goal of the project. Develop 1-3 project objectives
that are specific and measurable.
Hint: Avoid research language such as “research questions”, “hypotheses”, and “study”.
For the DNP project, the goal may not be something that you can easily measure or achieve within the
timeframe of the project. However, based on the evidence, your program/protocol/intervention should
have a high likelihood of achieving this goal, if implemented correctly. Examples of DNP project goals:
• To decrease errors related to miscommunications among providers during 'hand offs'.
• To improve self-management of hypertension in African American women by tailoring the delivery of
nonpharmacological life style modifications.
• To decrease suicide attempts, suicidal ideation, self-harm, and other depressive symptoms among
through routine mental health screening of adolesncents in the emergency room setting.
The DNP project objective(s) is/are going to be much more concrete and should provide the reader with
a pretty clear idea of what you are going to do. If you are developing an evidenced-based protocol or
program, you could have a development objective. If you are implementing an evidenced-based protocol
or program, then you could have an implementation objective. Everyone should have an evaluation
objective, because you must evaluate how well your intervention worked.
8
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
For example:
• Develop, implement and evaluate the effectiveness of a referral tool that allows primary care
providers to quickly identify appropriate evidence-based self-management interventions that address
nonpharmacological life style modifications to reduce HTN.
• Evaluate the perceived usability and ease of use of a diabetes self-management referral tool among
providers in a primary care clinic setting.
• Increase the requisite knowledge of and capacity to effectively manage work place aggression among
nurses assigned to a medical surgical nursing unit at a military medical hospital.
• Develop and implement a cultural competence education program to increase registered nurses and
patient care technicians’ knowledge, awareness, and skills related to culturally competent care of
lesbian, gay, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) patients as measured by the Sexual Orientation
Counselor Competency Scale (SOCCS) survey.
If you are stuck, try writing out: The objective of my project is to...... (fill in the blank).
One rule of thumb is that you should have at least one measure for each objective. For development and
implementation objectives you could have one or more process measures (see page 13 for more info)
such as percent compliance with the new protocol.
Continue thinking of creative ways to evaluate the effects of your project - this all comes from your
organizational assessment. Remember, you don't have to prove that your intervention is effective - this
should already have been done in the research that you're citing as evidence. You are looking for
measures that will show you (and others) that your project worked in your setting with your healthcare
providers and your patients.
4. Background
The background section of the proposal should clearly and succinctly describe the practice problem or
need for change (this is an elaboration of your problem statement), as well as the rationale for the
chosen intervention/proposed system change/solution.
a. Literature Review
This component will consist of a 10 to 20-page narrative (submitted to your chair as a separate
document) and a bulleted list of key points for the DNP proposal defense PowerPoint. Your chair may
require a table of evidence (please use the NMSU SON Table of Evidence template).
Hint: Statements and evidence presented must be supported with appropriate citations.
For more information about developing the required 10 to 20-page written review of the literature
for the DNP project, please refer to page 13-14 of this document.
b. Organizational Assessment (including key stakeholders)
Use locally obtained data sources (i.e., data from organizational databases that the organization uses
for reporting, queries from the electronic health record, informal interviews with staff and/or
leaders, etc) to support the need for a change/intervention. These data should help you identify the
gap between where the organization is now and the desired state.
9
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
Stakeholder meetings/interviews with executives, professional groups, and/or others, to discuss the
project and gather stakeholder views, guidance, and feedback are required in most cases. An
organizational assessment may also include a review of institutional policies.
For patient-level data, the organizational assessment will provide you with the context of the local
practice organization (e.g., how many seen with this problem per year, how many patients in your
clinic present with this problem each month or, average HgA1C rate of diabetic patients over 65
years, etc).
You may have to conduct a SWOT analysis or needs assessment in order to fully characterize the
problem.
Students must submit a signed letter from the organization stating that they have permission to
conduct the project to their project chair. The oral proposal defense may not proceed without this
letter.
Note: Data sources used for the organizational assessment can be used as outcome measures for the
project.
c. Theoretical Framework
Provide a description of the theory or theoretical/conceptual framework and examples from the
literature where this theory has been used in similar health care projects. Explain why it is appropriate
for this project and how you will be using the theory or theoretical/conceptual framework.
A theory or theoretical/conceptual framework can used in the DNP project to guide the selection of your
intervention and its implementation. The theory might guide the evaluation plan, helping you identify
appropriate outcomes to be measured in the project. In general, the theory will not help you define the
clinical problem. The chosen theory or framework may apply to the entire project or just a component.
Change theories are useful for planning practice change. An intervention designed to promote a
health behavior change could be supported by the Health Belief Model, Erikson’s Modeling/Role-
Modeling or Orem’s Self Care Theory. Please discuss your choice of theory/framework with your DNP
project chair.
Examples of theoretical/conceptual frameworks that have been used in DNP projects:
• Health promotion model (Pender)
• Health belief model (US Public Health Service)
• Chronic care model (Wagner)
• Self care theory (Orem)
• Theory of planned behavior (Ajzen)
• Social cognitive theory (Bandura)
• Diffusion of innovations (Rogers)
• Modeling/role-modeling (Erikson)
• Internal Family Systems
• Change Theory of Nursing (Lewin)
• Lippitt’s Pases of Chage (an extension of Lewin’s theory)
• Normalization Process Theory (NPT)
10
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
5. Project Plan
a. Proposed Intervention or Change
Describe the proposed intervention/system change/other proposed solution in more depth (who,
what, when, how many times, and where). If the plan includes the implementation of an already-
developed, evidence-based program, protocol or guidelines, describe that here (with citations).
Explain how the intervention/system change/other proposed solution will address the
problem/purpose stated. Be sure this section is consistent with the purpose and proposed changes
described in the literature review.
If you plan to include education sessions, attach a curriculum outline (note – your project must
include more than a teaching intervention).
b. Population of Interest
Identify the population that you will be focusing on (e.g., African American women with
hypertension, type 2 diabetics in the community, etc). Identify characteristics of the population – use
national or research-based statistics and if, available, regional (state or county) data. If your project
focuses on a system change or health policy intervention, identify those that will be affected by your
proposed changes.
c. Implementation Plan
Describe the components of the project (note - there should be identifiable elements of your chosen
theory in the plan). In your EBP and QI courses, you learned about different models for organizing and
conducting these types of projects, which you are strongly encouraged to use. If you are using a model
for evidence-based practice projects or quality improvement initiatives, describe it (with citations).
Specific activities (as appropriate to the project):
• Implementation steps- if appropriate, you can develop a flowchart and include it as a figure.
• Any other details about project administration and management (e.g., team members/staffing
plan, who is responsible for what activities, how does the project interface with the organization,
how will you communicate information about the project to various stakeholders, etc)
• Information technology changes required to support and sustain the change
• Timeline from IRB application submission to completion of data analysis (Use GANTT or a simple
flowchart or table to present the timeline)
d. Evaluation Plan - How do you know your program was successful?
Note: IRB permission will be required if any data is collected about humans, including chart reviews,
interviews, surveys etc. The IRB application will be submitted after the student has passed the oral
DNP project proposal defense and other comprehensive exam requirements.
• Identify specific outcomes that can be tied to the project objective(s). Each objective should
have at least one outcome that can be measured. The outcome measures should be data that
you used to define the problem at the organization or measures that you would collect during
the project evaluation period. You may want to consider process and/or impact evaluation if
your intervention involves a system change. Include a comparison to national and/or
organizational benchmarks if appropriate.
11
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
• Identify how you obtain the information/data to measure your outcomes and determine if the
project objectives are met. A table can be helpful for displaying objectives, related outcome
measures and the information/data that will be collected.
• If you intend to use an instrument, scale or survey questionnaire to measure milestones,
attitudes, rates or other kinds of outcome measures, present evidence to justify its use in this
project and include a copy of the instrument when you submit your written literature review.
• Data analysis: Project outcomes are generally expressed as rates, percentages, a rise/drop or
other descriptions of change rather than as a statistically significant measure. However, if
appropriate, describe any statistical analyses that you plan to conduct. You may be trying to
meet a benchmark – in this case, you can compare your outcome to the benchmark (do not use
statistics).
6. DNP Essentials
Identify each DNP Essential that is represented in your project and describe how the project addresses
the requirement. Your project does not need to address all 8 ‘essentials’.
I. Integrate, synthesize, design and translate theory and research-based nursing and interdisciplinary
knowledge to develop and evolve Advanced Practice Nursing.
II. Develop and evaluate care delivery ensuring quality health care and patient safety within an
ethical framework.
III. Design, deliver, direct and disseminate evidence-based practices.
IV. Use information, systems/technology to select, use and evaluate programs of care, outcomes of
care and care systems.
V. Advocate for health care practice/system changes through policy development, implementation
and evaluation.
VI. Employ effective communication, collaboration, consultative, and leadership skills to promote
positive client and health organization outcomes.
VII. Integrate principles of clinical prevention, biostatistics, population health, and cultural
competence into their Advanced Practice Nursing role.
VIII. Implement the Advanced Practice Nursing role in accordance with national standards.
Please refer to this document for more details: The Essentials of Doctoral Education for Advanced Practice
Nursing (AACN, 2006)
7. References
Please use APA format for the DNP proposal defense PowerPoint. If you plan to submit your final
project manuscript to a journal that uses an alternative referencing format, please consult with your
chair if you would like to use this format for your written literature review.
12
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
Literature Review
This component will consist of a 10 to 20-page narrative (double-spaced and submitted to your chair as a
separate document). Your chair may require a table of evidence (please use the NMSU SON Table of
Evidence template).
The goal of the literature review is to provide a description of the context for your problem with evidence
obtained from the available research and other peer-reviewed literature. The description should include
the focus and scope of the project (i.e., clinical microsystem, health care network, professional group, etc.).
The literature review should start off by providing more information on the significance of the problem.
How many people are affected? How much is the problem costing? What types of patient care outcomes or
population health outcomes affected by the problem? (i.e., Why should we care about this problem?)
What is the relevance of this problem to advanced nursing practice? You may use published benchmarks to
compare current practice/outcomes and identify gaps. The literature review can then provide the rationale
for your chosen intervention and selected outcome measures in your evaluation plan.
The literature review for the DNP project will be focused on the use of primary research articles,
systematic/integrative reviews, meta-analyses, peer-reviewed guidelines (e.g., governmental reports, NCBI
clinical guidelines, white papers from professional organizations, etc), and other sources of data that have
been compiled and published. Please use current sources (e.g., in the past 5 years) unless citing a seminal
article on the topic or if no current source is available.
Remember: Your proposal defense PowerPoint will have a summary of your written literature review
presented with bulleted key points.
Tips for conducting the written literature review
• Findings from the literature should be synthesized, rather than presented in piece-meal fashion (e.g.,
Jones at al. said this, Garcia et al. said that).
• Findings from the literature should be interpreted, rather than simply presented, where appropriate.
• Include an evaluation of the evidence if it will affect the strength of your argument (e.g., identify study
weaknesses such as small sample size or use of non-validated outcome measures).
• Use subheadings to organize the different topics in your literature review. For example, an
implementation of a patient agreement for opioids in a primary care practice might cover the following
topics: the increase in opioid use in the nation, state and region; unintentional overdose and death due
to opioids; the role of primary care providers in prescribing opioids; challenges that primary care
providers encounter when prescribing opioids; national guidelines for monitoring requirements when
prescribing opioids; and effectiveness of these guidelines in preventing overdose and death.
Additional reference:
Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review (NIH/NCBI): Although this article was written for
researchers, it provides simple guidelines for conducting and writing a literature review.
13
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
Table of Evidence
A table of evidence can help you organize your review of the research literature. As noted above, some DNP
project chairs may require a table of evidence.
A table of evidence should only include primary sources of evidence (i.e., no reports or secondary sources).
In general, you would not include systematic reviews or a meta-analysis in your Table of Evidence (even
though these are excellent sources of evidence for your literature review), however you may want to
include some of the studies that were included in the review article.
The template to develop your Table of Evidence was presented in NURS 653 (a Word version of the
template is posted on the Graduate Student Canvas course and in NURS 686).
References
Please use APA format unless you plan to submit your final project manuscript to a journal that uses an
alternative reference format. In the latter case, please consult with your chair to obtain approval to use an
alternative reference format.
14
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
15
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
16
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
3789g, or for the National Center for Education Statistics under Federal statute 20 U.S.C. 12213-1,
which provide certain legal protections and requirements for confidentiality.
4. Research involving the collection or study of existing data, documents, records, pathological or
diagnostic specimens, if these sources are publicly available or if the information is recorded by the
investigator in such a manner that subjects cannot be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to
the subjects.
5. Research and demonstration projects which are conducted by or subject to the approval of
department or agency heads, and which are designed to study, evaluate, or otherwise examine: (a)
public benefit or service programs; (b) procedures for obtaining benefits or services under those
programs; (c) possible changes in or alternatives to those programs or procedures; or (d) possible
changes in methods or levels of payment for benefits or services under those programs.
6. Taste and food quality evaluation and consumer acceptance studies, if (a) wholesome foods without
additives are consumed or (b) a food is consumed that contains a food ingredient at or below the level
found to be safe, an agricultural chemical or environmental contaminant at or below the level found
safe by the Food and Drug Administration or approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or
the Food Safety and Inspection Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Expedited
Expedited review applies to those research projects that do not fit an exempt category but do not present
more than minimal risk to participants. These projects must meet one of the nine categories for expedited
review. Expedited review requires the same approval criteria as a full board study but because these studies
entail less risk they are reviewed by the IRB Chair or a Designated Reviewer, rather than the convened
committee. During this process, IRB reviewers exercise all of the authorities of the IRB except that they may
not disapprove the research. There are nine expedited review categories in the federal regulations (45 CFR
46.110). Many DNP projects fall under ‘Expedited’ Category 7.
1. Clinical studies of drugs and medical devices only when condition (a) or (b) is met. (a) Research on drugs
for which an investigational new drug application (21 CFR Part 312) is not required. (b) Research on
medical devices for which (i) an investigational device exemption application (21 CFR 812) is not
required; or (ii) the medical device is cleared/approved for marketing and the medical device is being
used in accordance with its cleared/approved labeling.
2. Collection of blood samples by finger stick, heel stick, ear stick, or venipuncture as follows: (a) from
healthy, non-pregnant adults who weigh at least 110 pounds. For these subjects, the amounts drawn
may not exceed 550 ml in an 8 week period and collection may not occur more frequently than 2 times
per week; or (b) from other adults and children, considering the age, weight, and health of the subjects,
the collection procedure, the amount of blood to be collected, and the frequency with which it will be
collected. For these subjects, the amount drawn may not exceed the lesser of 50 ml or 3 ml per kg in an
8 week period and collection may not occur more frequently than 2 times per week.
3. Prospective collection of biological specimens for research purposes by noninvasive means.
4. Collection of data through noninvasive procedures (not involving general anesthesia or sedation)
routinely employed in clinical practice, excluding procedures involving x-rays or microwaves. Where
medical devices are employed, they must be cleared/approved for marketing. (Studies intended to
17
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the medical device are not generally eligible for expedited
review, including studies of cleared medical devices for new indications.)
5. Research involving materials (data, documents, records, or specimens) that have been collected or will
be collected solely for non-research purposes (such as medical treatment or diagnosis).
6. Collection of data from voice, video, digital, or image recordings made for research purposes.
7. Research on individual or group characteristics or behavior (including, but not limited to, research on
perception, cognition, motivation, identity, language, communication, cultural beliefs or practices,
and social behavior) or research employing survey, interview, oral history, focus group, program
evaluation, human factors evaluation, or quality assurance methodologies.
Full Board Review
Studies that involve more than minimal risk require full board review at a convened meeting at which a
quorum of IRB members is present. For the research to be approved, it must receive the approval of a
majority of those members. Student investigators should consult with their faculty advisor and the IRB staff
if they are unsure which level of review is required for their research.
Completing the IRB Application
The IRB application consists of an online form that the student will complete with the assistance of the
project chair. Much of the information in the online form can be copied and pasted from the student’s
executive summary, proposal defense PowerPoint and/or literature review.
Keep in mind that the IRB staff and faculty reviewers are generally not clinicians, therefore you must define
acronyms and describe your project in terms that a non-clinical audience will understand. The IRB
application is also designed for research studies, therefore in some cases the student will have to use
research language (e.g., on a consent form).
The School of Nursing has created a series of videos to walk you through the process of submitting a DNP
project proposal to the IRB. These videos are posted on the SON Graduate Program Information Canvas
course under ‘Modules’.
Online IRB Application Website (Maestro): https://maestro.research.nmsu.edu/
18
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
APPENDIX A
DNP Project Proposal Defense – Evaluation Rubric
(fillable form is posted on SON Graduate Student Canvas Course)
19
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
School of Nursing
DNP Project Proposal Defense – Evaluation Rubric
20
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
Framework
(theoretical/conceptual/practice) is
described/evident and applicable.
Project Plan
The proposed intervention/solution
addresses the problem or need.
21
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
Evaluation Plan
Evaluation plan is clearly outlined.
22
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
DNP Essentials
DNP Essentials that are represented by the
project are identified.
23
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
Student has a signed letter from their organization giving them permission to conduct the project at their
facility or within their organization. q Yes q No
_____________________________________
Signature of Faculty
24
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
APPENDIX B
DNP Project Final Defense – Evaluation Rubric
(fillable form is posted on SON Graduate Student Canvas Course)
25
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
School of Nursing
DNP Project Final Defense – Evaluation Rubric
26
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
Recommendations/implications for
supporting organization and key
stakeholders are addressed.
Project Synthesis
Did the candidate meet the
goals/objectives of project? If not, was
appropriate rationale and explanation
provided?
27
New Mexico State University School of Nursing DNP Project Proposal Guidelines
Impact of Project
Impact of project on organization is
described.
_____________________________________
Signature of Faculty
28