You are on page 1of 8

SHRINKAGE OF OIL WELLS CEMENT SLURRIES

S.K.LYOMOV K.R.BACKE P.SKALLE O.B.LILE H.JUSTNES


J.SVEEN

this article begins on the next page F


THE PETROLEUM SOCIETY PAPER 97-77 Shrinkage of Oil Well Cement Slurries S.K. Lyomov, K.R. Backe, P. Skalle, O.B. Life Norwegian University of
Science and Technology H. Justnes SINTEF Civil and Environmental Engineering J. Sveen SINTEF IKU Petroleum Research This paper is to be presented at the 48th Annual Technical Meeting of The Petroleum
Society in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, June 8 - 1 1, 1997. Discussion of this paper is invited and may be presented at the meeting if filed in writing with the technical program chairman prior to the conclusion of the meeting. This paper and any discussion filed will be considered for publication in CIM journals. Publication rights are reserved. This is a pre-print and is subject to correction. Abstract
Introduction Gas leakage into and through the cemented annulus in Cement, or more precisely, cement slurries, are used in oil and gas wells is a safety problem The conditions for oil and gas wells for cementing the steel casing to the gas migration develop when the hydrostatic pressure of the wellbore and thus sealing the rock formations from the hydrating cement slurry column slowly
declines and finally well. Gas leakage into and through the cemented annulus is falls below the pore pressure of a gas bearing formation. still a problem, in particular where shallow gas sands are This pressure decline is mainly caused by chemical penetrated and in deep gas wells, i.e. under high shrinkage of the cement. A low shrinkage will reduce the temperature and high pressure (HTHP) conditions. The
pressure decline and hence the risk of gas migration. leakage may manifest itself either as vertical A new and simple method for measurement of total communication between permeable gas reservoirs or chemical shrinkage at high temperatures has been migration all the way to the surface. Gas pressure in excess _ developed. It has proved to be reliable and sensitive for of
the cement hydrostatic slurry pressure is the driving monitoring the cement hydration process. The equipment force behind gas migration. was used to show that there is a marked difference in Reasons and mechanisms of gas migration are discussed 3 shrinkage behaviour for the tested slurries up to
180øC, by Levine et al.', Sabins et and Cheung and Beirute. probably due to a temperature effect on the cement Annular gas flow may be initiated when the hydrostatic hydration chemistry. The results confirmed the correlation pressure of the cement slurry declines and falls below the between total shrinkage and cement content. pore pressure of a gas bearing formation due to the
combined effect of shrinkage, fluid loss to the porous well bore and gel strength build up. Normally a slurry volume reduction would be compensated for by contraction and
r
セ THE PETROLEUM SOCIETY PAPER 97-77
I,,
j
I

Shrinkage of Oil Well


Cement Slurries

S.K Lyomov, KR. Backe, P. Skalle, O.B. Lite


Norwegian University of Science and Technology
H. Justnes
SINTEF Civil and Environmental Engineering
J. Sveen
SINTEF IKU Petroleum Research

This paper is to be presented at the 48th Annual Technical Meeting of The Petroleum Society in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, June 8 - 11,
1997. Discussion of this paper is invited and may be presented at the meeting if filed in writing with the technical program chairman prior
to the conclusion of the meeting. This paper and any discussion filed will be considered for pUblication in CIM journals. Publication rights
are reserved. This is a pre-print and is subject to correction.

Abstract Introduction
Gas leakage into and through the cemented annulus in Cement, or more precisely, cement slurries, are 、セウオ in
oil and gas wells is a safety problem. The conditions for oil and gas wells for cementing the steel casing to the
gas migration develop when the hydrostatic pressure ofthe wellbore and thus sealing the rock formations from the
hydrating cement slurry column slowly declines and finally well. Gas leakage into and through the cemented annulus is
falls below the pore pressure of a gas bearing fonnation. still a problem, in particular where shallow gas sands are
This pressure decline is mainly caused by chemical penetrated and in deep gas wells, Le. under high
shrinkage of the cement. A low shrinkage will reduce the temperature and high pressure (HTHP) conditions. The
pressure decline and hence the risk ofgas migration. leakage may manifest itself either as vertical
communication between permeable gas reservoirs or
A new and simple method for measurement of total
migration all the way to the surface. Gas pressure in excess
chemical shrinkage at high temperatures has been
of the cement hydrostatic slurry pressure is the driving
developed. It has proved to be reliable and sensitive for
force behind gas migration.
monitoring the cement hydration process. The equipment
was used to show that there is a marked difference in Reasons and mechanisms of gas migration are discussed
shrinkage behaviour for the tested slurries up to 180 DC, by Levine et al. l , Sabins et al.2 and Cheung and Beirute.3
probably due to a temperature effect on the cement Annular gas flow may be initiated when the hydrostatic
hydration chemistry. The results confirmed the correlation pressure of the cement slurry declines and falls below the
between total shrinkage and cement content. pore pressure of a gas bearing formation due to the
combined effect of shrinkage, fluid loss to the porous well
bore and gel strength build up. Normally a slurry volume
reduction would be compensated for by contraction and
downward movement of fluids from above, thus known, the shrinkage can be calculated on the basis of the
maintaining its hydrostatic head. However, during the continuously declining pressure during the test. The
setting process the cement slurry develops a gel structure calculation is corrected for gas temperature. Total
causing it to stick to the wall thus hindering compensation shrinkage was measured by submerging a permeable paper
of the shrinkage. The second requirement for gas migration cup containing around 50 ml of cement slurry in water
is that the cement must enable gas flow into the cement inside the measuring cell. All samples were weighed before
either by permeability, channels, microannuli or and after each test, and the volume of the hardened sample
microfractures before the slurry has reached a sufficient was found by applying the principle of Archimedes. The
strength. Thus, the gas migration phenomenon is thought applied pressure was in the range of 6-16 bars, and all
to be initiated during the transition state, from being fluid parameters (including cement temperature evolution) were
to becoming hard, Le. between initial and final set of the recorded by a data logger and stored in a personal
cement. computer.
A low shrinkage is preferable because the resulting The method works well and the results are repeatable,
hydrostatic pressure decline will be lower than for a slurry but the method have some drawbacks. It requires precision
with high shrinkage, i.e. pressure equilibrium between gas in the initial values as any inaccuracy will lead to
and slurry column is reached at a later point of time. systematic errors and at present the set-up cannot handle
downhole pressures. The temperature influence on the
The chemical shrinkage may be divided into two parts;
measurements is large: both when heating up the cell and
external shrinkage and total shrinkage. The external
when the set temperature is reached. When the cell is
shrinkage expresses the bulk volume change of the slurry
heated, the water inside will expand and increase the
leading to a possible microannulus between the cement and
pressure. The shrinkage calculations are therefore taken
the borehole wall. The total chemical shrinkage is the sum
from the point when the test temperature or pressure levels
of the external chemical shrinkage and the contraction
off and stabilises. This has the advantage that it simulates
pores of the slurry. The formation of contraction pores
field conditions; any shrinkage occurring before placement
contribute to the connectivity between pores in a set cement
of the cement in a well will not be taken into account.
and hence to its permeability.
However, some initial but minor shrinkage may not be
Chemical shrinkage of oil well cements have been observed. A stable set temperature is important for the
investigated by several authors. The most extensive tests same reason. At 180°C, a 1 °C temperature fluctuation
have been carried out by Chenevert and Shrestha,4 and by will lead to an apparent change of 0.3 percentage points in
Sabins and Sutton,S but other papers have been presented the cement shrinkage. This influence is reduced at lower
as well.6os Both totalsos and external chemical shrinkage4-6 temperatures.
were reported with a total shrinkage at 20 or 24 hours
varying from 0.6 to 6 vol.%, while most results were in the
range of 1.5-3 vol.%. Only Sabins and SuttonS have Results and Discussion
performed measurements of external shrinkage under
Temperature Influence
realistic downhole conditions. According to them, most
external shrinkage occurs when the slurry still is plastic. The tests were run at several temperatures ranging from
Their results showed an average shrinkage of 0.15 vol.% 25 to 180°C. A total of 20 slurries were tested. The
and they calculated the contraction pores to account for shrinkage curves for six of the tests are shown in Figures
97.5 to 99 % of the total shrinkage. Thus, from a gas 2-7 where the slurries are named TI5, T60, W90, Wl40
migration point of view, the formation of contraction pores and W180. The number represents the test temperature and
is by far the largest and most important part of the T stands for a very simple test slurry containing only water,
chemical shrinkage. cement and retarder. The W slurries contain all the
necessary additives for actual oilwell use. The W180 slurry
was run twice, both at the stated temperature and at
Experimental Method 160°C.
The method we have used exploits the pressure-volume It is immediately seen that there is a considerable
relationship of a gas. The principle is shown in Figure 1, difference in temperature evolution and shrinkage
indicating initial conditions in the left hand figure. At a behaviour between the six slurries in Figures 2-7, which of
later stage, shown in the right hand figure, the shrinkage course is influenced by the different additives they contain.
process, consuming water, leads to a lower gas pressure. However, for all slurries the temperature peaks coincides
When the initial temperature, pressure and volumes are with maximum shrinkage rates. And generally, the higher

, .- M セM ".............- --
I
I

the cement temperature is above the set temperature, the This correlation is self-evident and known,4.5 but has not
higher the shrinkage rate is. This correlation is to be before been linked to the gas migration problem: As long
expected as the temperature evolution reflects the rate of as the strength development of the cement slurry is
hydration and hence the shrinkage. Note the two satisfactory, more use of extender will reduce the shrinkage
temperature peaks of slurry W90 and W180 (with the and the risk of gas migration. And if the extender particles
exception of Figure 6), the first being at 5-10 hours and the are small enough, they will fill the space between the
secondary peak around 20-25 hours. Both peaks again cement particles, lowering the cement penneability and
coincides with the highest shrinkage rates, and the step- thus reducing the likelihood for gas intrusion even further.
wise hydration rate may be influenced by a number organic
admixtures in the slurries.
Conclusions
Some other slurries (not presented here) were tested at
90, 140 and 180 DC and they exhibited the same shrinkage A new and simple method for measuring total shrinkage
and temperature behaviour demonstrating that this is a of curing oil well cements at elevated temperatures has been
general trend. The behaviour is also continned by Lile et developed. It has proved to be reliable and sensitive for
。ャNセ using penneability, tensile strength, hydrostatic monitoring the cement hydration process. The recorded
pressure and temperature as indicators. Chenevert and shrinkage at 20 hours varied between 1.4 and 3.5 vol.%
Shrestha4 tested fresh water slurries at 93, 121 and 177 DC which is in agreement with published results.
and their medium temperature slurry showed the fastest
The results show that there is a marked contrast in
initial shrinkage.
shrinkage behaviour over the temperature range from
The difference in shrinkage and temperature evolution ambient and up to 180 DC, where the tested slurries at 90,
that we see in the results may also be due to a temperature 160 and 180 DC exhibited two temperature peaks and
effect on the cement hydration chemistry. It is well known S-shaped shrinkage curves. This difference is most likely a
that curing of cement already at 50-70 DC leads to an temperature effect on the cement hydration chemistry.
uneven distribution of hydration products with a densified
It was confInned that there is a close correlation between
calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) layer around the remaining
total chemical shrinkage and cement content. A low
unhydrated cement grains which eventually will slow down
shrinkage and a short transition period (Le. fast initial
the following hydration rate. It is possible that at even
shrinkage) should reduce the risk of gas migration.
higher curing temperatures that such a densified layer is
fonned initially and broken off after some further moderate
hydration (rate increasing with increasing temperature),
Acknowledgement
leading to a renewed acceleration period of the cement
hydration explaining the step-wise hydration rate shown as The authors would like to thank The Research Council of
the S-shaped shrinkage curves in Figures 4, 6 and 7. Norway, Norsk Hydro, Saga Petroleum and Statoil for
With respect to gas migration, an initial fast shrinkage supporting this work. We also thank Vincent HJ. Bosch for
reflecting the hydration rate (as with slurry W140) will carrying out some of the experiments.
limit the period in which gas can enter the cement and thus
reducing the likelihood of gas migration.
REFERENCES
1. LEVINE, D.C, TINSLEY, J.M. and SUTION, DL., Annular
Shrinkage versus Cement Content gas flow after cementing: A look at practical solutions; paper
10 9 SPE 8255 presented at the 1979 SPE Annual Fall Technical
Elvebakk used the method of Lile et al. to study the
Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, Sept. 23-26.
influence of additives on gas migration. He found that the
hazard of gas migration generally increased when the 2. SABINS, F.L., THOMAS, E.W., BEZNER, H.P. and TOLLE,
recipe was simplified. The same slurries were also tested G.C., Transition time of cement slurries between the fluid and
for shrinkage. The shrinkage curves of the six slurries set state; SPE Journal, 1982, Dec., Vol. 22, No.6, pp. 875-82.
A140 through F140 are presented in Figure 8. The
difference in shrinkage level was found to be correlated 3. CHEUNG, P.R. and BEIRUTE, R.M., Gas flow in cements;
with the cement content as shown in Figure 9 where the Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1985, June, Vol. 37, No.7,
straight line fitted to the data points is forced through zero, pp. 1041-48.
as zero cement content should yield no shrinkage.

3
4. CHENEVERT, M.E. and SHRESTHA, B.K., Chemical SPE 13176 presented at the 1984 SPE Annual Technical
shrinkage properties of oilfield cements; SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Sept. 16-19.
Engineering, 1991, March, Vol. 6, No.1, pp. 37-43.
8. STEWART, R.B. and SCHOUTEN, F.C., Gas invasion and
5. SABINS, FL. and SUTTON, D.L., Interrelationship between migration in cemented annuli: Causes and cures; SPE Drilling
critical cement properties and volume changes during cement Engineering, 1988, March, Vol. 3, No.1, pp. 77-82.
setting; SPE Drilling Engineering, 1991, June, Vol. 6, No.2,
9. LILE, O.B., ELVEBAKK, R., BACKE, K.R., SKALLE, P. and
pp.88-94.
LYOMOV, S., A new technique for measuring permeability
6. JUSTNES, R., VAN LOO, D., REYNIERS, B., SKALLE, P., and tensile strength of a curing oil well cement; Advances in
SVEEN, J. and SELLEVOLD, EJ., Chemical shrinkage of oil Cement Research, 1997, Vol. 9, No. 34.
well cement slurries; Advances in Cement Research, 1995,
10. ELVEBAKK, R., Influence of some additives in curing cement
Vol. 7, No. 26, pp. 85-90.
slurries; Report 8194, Department of Petroleum Engineering
7. PARCEVAUX, P.A. and SAULT, P.R., Cement shrinkage and and Applied Geophysics, Nonvegian University ofScience and
elasticity: A new approach for a good zonal isolation; paper Technology, 1994.

FIGURE 1: Principle of the shrinkage measurements.

"; ... -----..---- -' ..

You might also like