Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4, 2018
Tatjana Jovanović*
Faculty of Administration,
University of Ljubljana,
Gosarjeva 5, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Fax: +38615805505
Email: tatjana.jovanovic@fu.uni-lj.si
*Corresponding author
Martina Dragija
Faculty of Economics and Business,
John Fitzgerald Kennedy 6, 10000, Croatia
Fax: +38512335633
Email: mdragija@efzg.hr
1 Introduction
higher education institutions have accounting systems for tracking finance according to
the accounting rules required by auditors, those systems do not enable interested
stakeholders the desired information. Instead, accounting systems do not transparently
present the different revenue sources on which universities rely, the true costs of core
functions such as teaching and research, the cross-subsidies of some functions by others,
administrative growth or shrinkage, and differences among disciplines. All of the
above-mentioned data prevents managers from making wise decisions (Capaldi and
Craig, 2011).
While universities are supposed to play a central role in the economic and social
development process, they have to be accountable to their stakeholders and clearly
communicate the spending of resources. As professors of accounting at two different
universities in two different countries, we were very motivated to research the field of
usefulness of accounting information in financial reports focusing mainly on the research
question “how useful and applicable are the financial reports at higher education
institutions for management and in which areas of decision-making can management use
this information?” Both questions were tested in Slovenian and Croatian higher education
institutions. The research methodology is based on a survey, returned by heads of
accounting departments and higher education institution management in Slovenia and
Croatia.
The paper is divided into six sections. After a brief introduction, the literature review
is presented, followed by financial reports systems in Slovenia and Croatia. In the
empirical part of the paper, the results of our two countries institutions are presented.
After the discussion part in Section 5, the conclusion is presented.
2 Literature review
The financial reports are considered as “a communication exercise between entities and
external users.” The objective of these is to provide information on the financial positions
and performance, cash flows, useful and necessary to users for taking decisions
(Ciuhureanu, 2016). The classical accounting system was almost exclusively
concentrated on financial transactions, events and conditions, focusing primarily on
preparation of financial reports for external users. For a long time, this was the primary
role of accounting, especially in public sector accounting. The financial reports’ role in
the management process of decision-making was of secondary meaning, considered
incidental and peripheral (Nagendrakumar, 2006; Manes-Rossi et al., 2016).
Higher education institutions carry out education through teaching and research
activities. The objectives of colleges and universities, especially public ones, differ from
those of commercial enterprises. Universities should provide educational services within
the existing levels of revenue available. Nevertheless, management should apply a wide
range of managerial techniques and methods. Financial management improvement in the
public sector is possible only if management skills and their capacity for usage of
accounting and non-accounting information are trained. Some of the most significant
financial risks and challenges that higher education institutions must address are lack of
understanding of financial operations by key stakeholders, lack of transparency in
financial reporting of operations, and lack of understanding of return on costs in
academic and administrative programs (KPMG, 2010).
Application of the accounting information at higher education institutions 455
Leaning on the ‘new public management’ concept, universities are not considered
only as social institutions. Consequently, certain logic and rules typical for managerial
culture in the private sector should be applied, like well-known principles of efficiency,
effectiveness, and accountability. The efficiency can manifest itself in productivity,
profitability, social significance, effectiveness, innovation activity, etc. While considering
the efficiency of higher education institutions, it is important to take into account the
social, cultural, scientific, educational aspect and not only the economic aspect of
efficiency (Bobyleva and Sidorova, 2015). Nevertheless, the policy of marketisation has
transformed the public universities managerial models in a business manner. The old
fashion academic rituals and practices have turned into modern techniques. Advocates of
marketisation believe that those changes will turn higher education into more flexible and
efficient institutions providing better value for money and ensure higher efficiency and
responsiveness to needs of society, the economy, students, etc. (Molesworth et al., 2010).
According to Christiaens and Rommel (2008) and Becker et al. (2014), the
accounting reforms were often the first phase of reforming governments, governmental
management, organisation and other parts of the public sector (Sordo et al., 2012). The
majority of reform measures for modernisation of management processes in higher
education institutions are oriented towards making financial reports more comprehensive
and accountable. Financial reports have to provide useful information for management,
while management decisions depend on accounting information. Accounting and
financial reports are of great importance for management and are indispensable in:
• allocation, financing, use, and recovery of funds
• control of implications of implemented decisions
• determining rights, obligations, responsibility, and incentives from development
activity and property management (Puican, 2015).
Recently, there have been a few studies (Jukan-Kokorivić and Babajić, 2016; İbicioğlu
et al., 2010; Hodžić, 2014; Mihăilă, 2014; Ciuhureanu, 2016) discussing the usage of
financial reports in management purpose in the private sector. The topic of management
accounting is poorly discussed in the public sector. There are only a few (Sordo et al.,
2012; Mamontova and Novak, 2015) isolated cases of papers dealing with higher
education institutions’ management accounting and the usefulness of financial reports in
managements’ decision-making processes. The financial reports analysis is the process of
converting data from financial reports into usable information for business quality
measurement by different analytical techniques (Zager and Zager, 2006). Sordo et al.
(2012) researching the topic of higher education institutions in Italy revealed that at the
present the cost accounting system and cost accounting techniques of universities do not
allow users to have all the information for rational decision-making. It turned out that the
current delegation process of economic responsibility is in line with the possible
implementation of different kinds of accounting systems. The introduction of marketing
principles in the academic environment caused the acquisition of competitive advantages
that influence availability of information provided by the accounting system and better
cost accounting techniques.
There were not any studies done about the usefulness of information from financial
reports for Slovenia and Croatia. Because of the poorly researched topic in scientific
literature, the paper reveals the theoretical and empirical points of view on the usefulness
456 T. Jovanović and M. Dragija
of information from the financial reports for managers in public universities, which is
also politically a very interesting topic.
of institution (public and private faculties) is regulated by the Accounting Act (Official
Gazette, 1999) but there are some differences as far as the operative part of the
accounting system is concerned. The public faculties as budgetary users apply a special
chart of accounts for the public sector (‘the single chart of accounts’), while the private
faculties use a chart of accounts for non-profit organisations in the private sector
according to Slovenian accounting standards. Consequently, the public faculties apply
accounting for budgetary users, which is cash principle oriented and additionally keep
books also on the accrual principle while the private faculties (non-profit organisations in
the private sector) book keep on the accrual principle or companies. Table 1 presents the
legal framework for financial reporting of higher education institutions in Slovenia, the
consistency of external financial statements, and the accounting basis.
The differences between the external financial reports of public and private HEIs are
specially concentrated on the scope of reporting and the structure of the reports. While
private HEIs report using just basic financial reports (balance sheet, statement on revenue
and expenses and notes to financial statements), public HEIs’ external reports include
several mandatory annexes. As mentioned before, public HEIs report on cash and accrual
basis, while private HEIs report only on accrual basis. Consequently, the external
financial reports of both groups of HEIs include information on costs of depreciation and
costs of other important categories, which are useful to get information about full costs.
Table 2 Normative framework of higher education institutions in Croatia and set of external
financial reports
into consideration the whole population instead of the sample due to population size in
both countries. Considering the complete number of public higher education institutions
in both countries, the sample of respondents included all public higher education
institutions in Croatia (104) and in Slovenia (50). Given the fact that the paper is part of
the project1, the survey was conducted among public universities and faculties. The
questionnaires were sent by e-mail in online form for Slovenia and by post for Croatia in
2016. In both countries, the survey research subjects were the heads of accounting in
public HEIs.
The purpose of the questionnaire was to analyse and evaluate accounting information
systems at public HEIs and it was divided into the following parts:
a General information about the higher education institution.
b Assessment of usefulness and quality of external financial reporting.
c The development of internal accounting and internal reporting.
Relying on the A and B questionnaire parts, our primary goal was to provide answers on
two main research questions:
1 How useful are the financial reports at higher education institutions for management?
2 In which areas of decision-making can management use this information?
To obtain the highest possible comprehensibility of the questions, a few pilot interviews
were carried out. The suggestions and comments of HEIs’ accounting experts asked to
help in the pilot phase have been an enormous contribution to the quality of the research.
The electronic survey form in Slovenia required additional technical tests to avoid
complications. The purpose and objectives of the research were explained at the
beginning of the questionnaire, ensuring respondents anonymity and confidentiality of
the information obtained.
The questionnaire was mostly structured from closed type of questions. The purpose
of the first analysed question was to evaluate the usefulness of the financial reporting
system considering the structure of the financial reporting forms and information
provided for decision-making and management of your institution. The offered questions
were:
a it is largely useful
b partly useful
c usefulness is small
d no usefulness
e I cannot assess.
The second question has been used to assess the purpose of the financial reports’ usage.
There were several possible purposes of usage offered, spreading from purely formal
(compliance with legal requirements, execution of financial plan) to management
oriented (like source of information for decision making processes, comparison with
other higher education institutions, informing broader public and for promotion of the
institution, etc.). The respondents were assessed on the Likert scale (from 1 – the least
important to 5 – the most important, 0 – no usage).
460 T. Jovanović and M. Dragija
In the third question, respondents were asked to evaluate the usage level of financial
reports’ information in decision-making. The possible usages were ranked on the Likert
scale (1 = not used at all, 2 = mainly not used, 3 = neither used nor not used, 4 = mainly
used, 5 = completely used). The answers offered spread from decisions for budget
allocation or individual program implementation, to calculation of the cost price,
planning, calculation, and control of costs, decision-making about employment, etc.
Figure 1 Usefulness of existing reporting system (see online version for colours)
Mann-Whitney test
N min max M SD Skewness Kurtosis
U Sig.
As an important source of information for SLO 23 1 5 3.74 1.096 –0.790 0.320
decision making processes and management 307.0 0.283
CRO 32 1 5 3.34 1.335 –0.336 –0.903
For compliance with legal requirements SLO 22 3 5 4.82 0.501 –2.911 8.432
regarding reporting 326.0 0.187
CRO 35 1 5 4.54 0.886 –2.425 6.751
To monitor the execution of financial plan SLO 22 2 5 4.14 0.889 –0.734 –0.179
289.0 0.099
CRO 35 1 5 3.63 1.140 –0.716 –0.097
For comparison with other higher education SLO 21 1 5 3.10 1.136 0.249 –0.667
institutions 305.0 0.547
CRO 32 1 5 2.88 0.907 0.259 0.992
reports for different purposes between countries
For informing broader public and for promotion SLO 21 1 5 2.76 1.179 0.915 –0.248
of the institution 300.0 0.392
CRO 33 1 5 2.94 1.144 –0.008 –0.552
For the purpose of external and internal audit SLO 23 2 5 4.17 1.029 –0.926 –0.377
and control 359.5 0.721
CRO 33 1 5 4.12 0.960 –1.156 1.763
Source: Authors’ calculations
Application of the accounting information at higher education institutions
Table 4
Mann-Whitney test
N min max M SD Skewness Kurtosis
U Sig.
For allocation of resource from the budget SLO 23 1 5 3.57 1.376 –0.722 –0.587
389.0 0.825
CRO 35 1 5 3.54 1.221 –0.465 –0.769
between countries
For the approval of the implementation of SLO 23 1 5 3.70 1.259 –0.711 –0.159
individual programs 387.0 0.797
CRO 35 1 5 3.69 0.963 –0.774 0.634
For determination of prices for provided services SLO 22 1 5 3.14 1.320 –0.410 –0.835
T. Jovanović and M. Dragija
297.0 0.183
CRO 34 1 5 2.74 1.109 0.139 –0.510
For asset procurement SLO 24 2 5 3.88 0.900 –0.128 –1.001
419. 0.987
CRO 35 1 5 3.80 1.079 –0.768 –0.007
For planning, calculation and control of costs SLO 24 3 5 4.29 0.624 –0.280 –0.485
373.0 0.428
CRO 35 1 5 4.00 1.029 –1.203 1.223
For decision making about employment SLO 24 1 5 3.33 1.049 –0.255 –0.312
300.5 0.057
CRO 35 1 5 2.69 1.231 –0.055 –1.330
For performance measurement SLO 24 1 5 3.17 1.090 –0.138 0.001
401.0 0.760
CRO 35 1 5 3.03 1.175 –0.289 –0.627
To monitor the effectiveness of the services SLO 24 1 5 3.29 0.999 –0.080 0.139
provided and fiscal responsibility 244.5 0.005
CRO 35 2 5 4.06 0.968 –0.738 –0.400
Source: Authors’ calculations
Descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney test for differences in usage level of
information from financial accounting and financial reporting for different decisions
Application of the accounting information at higher education institutions 463
As seen from Table 3, the Slovenian respondents more commonly use the financial
reports, than Croatian respondents, for decision-making processes and management, for
compliance with legal requirements regarding reporting, to monitor the execution of
financial plans, for comparison with other higher education institutions, and for the
purpose of external and internal audit and control. The Croatian respondents more
commonly than the Slovenian use financial reports for informing the broader public and
for the promotion of the institution. In both countries the highest average grade (Slovenia
4.82, Croatia 4.54) is given for compliance with legal requirements regarding reporting.
Such results were expected since higher education institutions are, generally, mainly
focused on reports that are prescribed by the normative framework. On the other hand,
the lowest average grade in both countries was given for the purpose of comparison with
other higher education institutions and for informing the broader public and for the
promotion of the institution. The Mann-Whitney test has showed that the differences in
usage purposes are not statistically significant (p > 0.05).
The third addressed question focused on specific management decisions which might
be supported by information from financial accounting and financial reports. The
descriptive statistics of respondents’ assessments about the level of usage of information
from accounting systems and financial reports are presented in Table 4. The highest
average grade in both countries was given to decisions for planning, calculation and
control of costs (Slovenia 4.29, Croatia 4.00). All other decisions were estimated with
much lower grade. Furthermore, it can be seen from Table 4 that there are differences in
grades between countries, what led us to decision to test the significance of differences.
The tests of normality were conducted before the analysis of differences in usage
between countries. Kolmogorov-Smirnov’s test revealed that the distribution of variables
is non-normal, therefore, the Mann-Whitney test was conducted in order to determine
whether the differences in usage of information from financial accounting and financial
reporting for different decisions between countries are statistically significant. The
average values presented in Table 4 suggest some differences between Slovenian and
Croatian respondents, but according to the Mann-Whitney test those differences are not
statistically significant. The differences in assessment between the Croatian respondents
and Slovenian respondents have turned out to be statistically significant (p < 0.01) when
estimating the usage level of financial accounting and financial reports for monitoring the
effectiveness of the services provided and fiscal responsibility.
5 Discussion
From the above presented research results, it can be concluded that existing reporting
systems of higher education institutions in Slovenia and Croatia are only partially useful
for management decision-making processes. When focusing on the areas of management
decision-making for which accounting information can be used, the highest average grade
in both countries was given to planning, calculation and control of costs, while the
financial reports are most commonly used for compliance with legal requirements
regarding reporting. Notwithstanding, the statistical analysis revealed that correspondents
from Slovenia graded all categories higher than the Croatian correspondents. The highest
average grades in Slovenia may arise from various reasons, such as accrual based
accounting for revenues and costs, more stable public sector accounting system, etc. In
464 T. Jovanović and M. Dragija
the paper, the authors have highlighted the main purposes of financial reports usage
according to the heads of accounting opinion and assessments. This assessment should be
used to create and implement the public policy for accounting in higher education sector,
which deserves much more systematic and thorough approach because of the specifics of
the service offered and long-term meaning for the society (economic, socio-political
aspect, etc.). This policy should focus on systematic framework for accounting at higher
education institutions, the methods and purposes of usage, targets and indicators for
monitoring the whole process and the results. The current status of accounting at higher
education institutions in both countries is not target oriented, while the main target of
accounting service is to offer the useful information for management and all other users
that might need such information (like policy makers). There is no consistent operational
framework, the financial reports usage is left to individuals, only few experts research
this topic, etc.
6 Conclusions
While the accounting reports should provide an applicable platform for institutional
leadership to conduct efficient management processes, our research has focused on
analysing the usefulness of those in management processes in two countries. It turned out
that in both countries the majority of respondents assessed the reports as partly useful,
while the compliance with legal requirements was listed as the most important purpose of
the external financial reports. Nevertheless, there were some differences in the evaluation
grade for that purpose between countries. As far as the usage of information from
financial accounting in decision-making processes is concerned, there were some major
differences. In Croatia, the highest average grade was given for monitoring the
effectiveness of the services provided and fiscal responsibility, while in Slovenia
planning, calculation, and control of costs were assessed as most important. It is possible
to assume that those differences result from the fact that the Croatian HEI reports are
based on modified accrual accounting principles, in which revenue is expressed on a cash
basis, while the expenses are expressed on an accrual basis. On the other hand, Slovenian
HEI reports are based on both principles, where accrual based external reporting is
intended for internal purposes, while cash flow based reporting is important for the
founder (usually the Ministry of Education, Science and Sport). Nevertheless, regardless
of the accounting principle used, the accounting function in the case of HEIs is
perceptibly underestimated, since it is mainly being used for administrative reporting
purposes. The accounting reports should be used as a powerful managerial tool,
especially for internal business analytics, long-term planning, and future projections.
References
Abbott, M. and Doucouliagos, C. (2003) ‘The efficiency of Australian universities: a data
envelopment analysis’, Economics of Education Review, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp.89–97.
Baruch, Y. and Holton, B.C. (2008) ‘Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational
research’, Human Relations, Vol. 61, No. 8, pp.1139–1160.
Becker, D., Jagalla, T. and Skaerbaek, P. (2014) ‘The translation of accrual accounting and
budgeting and the reconfiguration of public sector accountants’ identities’ Critical
Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 25, No. 45, pp.324–338.
Application of the accounting information at higher education institutions 465
Puican, L. (2015) ‘Utility of annual financial statements in the management process’, Annals of
Constantin Brancusi University of Targu-Jiu’, Economic Series, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp.164–169.
Ramadani, V. and Dana, L.P. (2013) ‘The state of entrepreneurship in the Balkans: evidence from
selected countries’, in Ramadani, V. and Schneider, R.C. (Eds.): Entrepreneurship in the
Balkans, Berlin and Heidelberg, pp.217–250, Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg.
Roje, G., Vašiček, V. and Hladika, M. (2012) ‘The perspectives of IPSASs introduction in Croatian
public sector’, Int. J. Public Sector Performance Management, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp.25–43.
Rossi, P, Wright, J.D. and Anderson, A.B. (1998) Handbook of Survey Research, Academic Press,
London.
Sanyal, B. and Martin, M. (2009) ‘Financing higher education: international perspectives’,
World 68, Vol. 110, No. 731, pp.23–24.
Sordo, C., Orelli, R.L. and Padovani, E. (2012) ‘Accounting practices in Italian higher education
system’, Economic Research, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp.825–845.
Vašiček, D. (2007) Državno Računovodstvo U Funkciji Odlučivanja Javnog Menadžmenta,
Unpublished PhD thesis, The Faculty of Economics in Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Zager, K. and Zager, L. (2006) ‘The role of financial information in decision–making process’,
Innovative Marketing, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp.35–40.
Note
1 This paper is a result of the Croatian Science Foundation’s funding of the project 8509
Accounting and financial reporting reform as a means for strengthening the development of
efficient public sector financial management in Croatia. Any opinions, findings, and
conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not
necessarily reflect the views of the Croatian Science Foundation.