ANSWERS:

No. The part where he was paid by a company for an advertisement, he already violated the Article II
Section 3.5 wherein Architects should refrain from taking part in any paid advertisement.

ABC Architect and Design Studio should not accept the offer. If they really want to be featured in D + E
magazine, they should use their own resources and should not ask for sponsorship of one of their
suppliers. It is because the sponsor will only use this opportunity to advertise or promote their built
works. If they accept the offer, the fact that they ask for financial help and that financial help is fullfilled
by that supplier, we can also consider this as a paid advertisement which clearly violates Article II
Section 3.5 of Code of Ethical Conduct.

Yes, she clearly violated Article II Section 3.5 wherein she taked part in a paid advertisement which is
endorsing a home depot.

She can accept it but with the approval of the Client. That discount shall be only credited to the Client.
This is according to Article V Section 6.2

He violated Article II Section 3.6 whereas it is clearly stated that Architects should not deceive the public
with his credentials, professional competence or claiming to have other professional specialization
unless there are proofs to support that claim like academic qualification, track record or relevant
expertise etc.

REPEL-TOTAL ASURA

AMMENDS- CHANIGINGONE SECTION