Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kumar Lopez
ICBT
Sri Lanka
COVID-19 RESPONSE
WORK
FROM
HOME
LEARNING OUTCOMES
ABOUT TEAMS AND GROUPS A MANAGER’S PERSPECTIVE
Consisting most of
the below
Any number of people who
Characteristics
interact with one another;
are psychologically aware • definable membership
of one another; and • group consciousness
perceive themselves to be • shared purpose
• interdependence
a group • interaction
defined by a group of psychological team
• act in unitary manner
A sense of belonging
INDIVIDUALS & GROUPS
Team Group
Mutual knowledge
Perception Focus on leader
understanding
Togetherness
Spirit Dynamic interaction persecution of
opponents
8
GROUP Vs TEAM
DISCUSSION
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
SENIOR OR MIDDLE
MANAGEMENT
MARKETING OR
FINANCE FUNCTION
FACTORY WORKERS
Time
determines
performance of
a team
GROUP VALUES & NORMS
The Hawthorne Experiment
Conducted at Western Electric Company USA Their Norms
Importance and Influence of group values and
• Not to be a ‘rate buster’
norms
14 men working in the Bank wiring room
• Not to be a ‘chiseller’
Despite financial scheme, small groups were • Not to be a ‘squealer’
formed • Not to be a ‘officious’
natural leadership emergence
decided on an output per day (6000 units per Source : Western Electric Company Hawthorne
Studies Collection, Baker Library, Harvard Business
day) School.
well below their capabilities
Group and Peer pressure stronger on
Individuals
Value
Provides order / Standard
Protection
We
Influence behavior
“we – they”
vs
Unsupporting
Informal “Shadow organization” They Source : Training Learning Consultancy Ltd, Bristol
GROUPTHINK & SYMPTOMS
• ILLUSION OF INVULNERABILITY
• RATIONALISATION
• INHERENT MORALITY OF THE GROUP
• NEGATIVE STEREOTYPING
• PRESSURE TO CONFORM AND REACH CONSENSUS
• SELF-CENSORSHIP
• ILLUSION OF UNANIMITY
• EMERGENCE OF MIND GUARD
THE IMPORTANCE OF TEAMWORK
Ideal Individual
Team
foundation Outcome
Identify what factors that made one team to win and the other to
fail? Identify visible and nonvisible components that make the
difference.
GROUP COHESIVENESS AND PERFORMANCE
High
High Stress Performance
Dysfunctional Funderachieving
TEAM COHESIVENESS
GROUP COHESIVENESS AND PERFORMANCE
Contributing
Factors
Organisational
• Management and leadership Group development
• Personnel policies and and maturity
procedures
• Success
• External threat
TEAM DEVELOPMENT
Tuckman Model AND MATURITY
1.
Forming
Working with
each other
4. 2.
Performing Storming
Working as Challenging
one each other
3.
5. Norming
Adjourning Learning
about each
other
FORMAL & INFORMAL GROUPS
Type of Team
Top-management A group composed of the CEO, the president,
team and the heads of the most important
departments
Type of Team
Self-managed work A group of employees who supervise their
team own activities and monitor the quality of the
goods and services they provide.
Performance only
Companionship and
through efforts of a
supporting mechanism
number of individuals
Collusion between
Sense of belonging
members (rotation)
26
CHARACTERISTICS OF AN EFFECTIVE TEAMS
DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE
DIFFERENT EXPERIENCE
DIVERSE THOUGHTS
MOVE OUT OF COMFORT ZONE
NEW THOUGHT PROCESSES
IS TECHNOLOGY AN ADVANTAGE FOR GROUPS
• From physical
operation to virtual
• Telecommuting
• Require new
communication skills
• Leadership skills
change
• GoldThorpe
– technology unfavorable
– Favorable when job
satisfaction is not a
priority
• Increase feeling of
Isolation
WORKING IN GROUPS AND TEAMS
Self Oriented
BELBIN’S TEAM-ROLES
Five C’s of Team Member Competencies
HR Dept Representation
Group peer of a possible
Senior Manager role-set in the
Trade Union work situation
Official
Consumer
Friend
Work colleagues
in other groups Group Leader
Accounts Dept
Admin Services
Group
Subordinate
Concepts of
Role incongruence
Source : Possible roles in work situation, Management and
Role expectations
Organizational Behaviour, 7/e , By Mullins Formal & Informal expectation
34
ROLE EXPECTATION
ROLE EXPECTATIONS & CONFLICT
ROLE CONFLICT
Role perception
Role incompatibility Role motivation
Role ambiguity Role capacity
Role overload
Role under-load
ROLE SANCTION
ROLE STRESS
Saturation
Independence
“One-Size-Fits-All” does not work
ANALYSING INDIVIDUALS
Source : Possible roles in work situation, Management and Organizational Behaviour, 7/e , By Mullins
ANALYSING INDIVIDUALS
P
K N
J
L
G
H
Source : Possible roles in work situation, Management and Organizational Behaviour, 7/e , By Mullins
ANALYSING INDIVIDUALS
Positive reaction
Attempt to solve
Seeking Answers
Negative reactions
Sample Sheet
Social Loafing or
Ringelmann Effect
RISKY –SHIFT PHENOMENON
WHY ?
As an individual the
person may not take the
same risk as in group
BRAINSTORMING
• Collective thoughts – Better ideas
• Define problem or solution finding
• Involve everyone
• encourage
• be open
• do not criticise
• collect all ideas
• then evaluate
• reverse Brain Storming
T-Group
Advantages and Disadvantages of Teams