Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AMBEDKARCOLLEGEOFARTS,COMMERCEANDSCIENC
E,CHANDRAPUR
CERTIFICATE
Place:Chandrapur DR.RajeshDahegaokar
(Principal)
DR.AMBEDKARCOLLEGEOFARTS,COMMERCEANDSCIENC
E,CHANDRAPUR
CERTIFICATE
( Headofdepartment)
DR. AMBEDKAR COLLEGE OF ARTS, COMMERCE
ANDSCIENCE,CHANDRAPUR
CERTIFICATE
Place:Chandrapur DR.Bina.M.Moon
(Projectguide)
DECLARATION
ordiplomatoanyotheruniversity orinstitude.
Place:ChandrapurDate
://
Nameofstudents Signature
Mr.SANKET.VINAYAK.DHOKE(Groupleader )
Miss.ROSHNI.SURESH.BONDE
Mr.AKSHAY.MANOHAR.BORIKAR
Miss.MAHIMA.GANESH.CHAUDHARI
Miss.POOJA.SUBAL.DAS
Miss.SNEHA.RUPCHAND.DATARKAR
Miss.PALLAVI.RAMCHANDRA.DAWARE
Miss.MONALI.BHASKARRAO.DHOKE
Miss.KAJAL.ASHOK.DHOPTE
Miss.KALYANI.HEMANT.DODKE
Miss.ANUJA.SUNIL.DORLIKAR
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Wetakethisopportunitytoexpressourprofo
undgratitude to Dr. Rahesh.Dahegaokar
(Principal ) for givingus the permission to take
this project work at Dr Ambedkarcollege of
Arts, Commerce & Science college
Chandrapur. Wearethankfulto him
forthisvaluablesuggestions.
WegreatlyindebtedtoourguideDr.Bina.M.
Moonwho always encourages and guided us
for this project
work.Wetakethisopportunitytothankherforhisv
aluablesuggestions and constant
encouragement given to us fromtimetotime.
Duringthepreparationofthisprojectmanyp
ersonshavehelpedusimmensely.
Last but not the least our heartily thanks
to our parentsand those of our friends who
have, helped us so much
incompletionofthisproject.
ThankingYou!
Projectees
M.Com (Final Year)
2020-2021
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
GST stands for Goods and Service Tax. Vishwanath Pratap Singh who
was the 7th Prime Minister of India first initiated GST act in 1986. After that
in 2007, the prevailing government suggested to deploy GST Act and the
proposal has been presented in Lok Sabha in 2011 and again the same
proposal was presented in Lok Sabha in Dec 2014. GST Act was passed in
2015 and again Act was passed inthe Lok Sabha on 29th March 2017 After
the approval of Rajya Sabha GST act was launched from 1st July 2017 and it
was referred as 101 Amendment of Constitution. GST has become a
revolutionary change in indirect taxes after rossing 25 years of economic
amelioration.
Goods and Services Tax is an indirect tax which has replaced many indirect
taxes in India such as the excise duty, VAT, services tax etc. Goods and
Services Tax Law in India is abroad, multi-stage, destination-based tax that is
levied on every value addition. GST is a single indirect tax for the entire
country. Under the GST regime, the tax levied at every point of sale. In the case
of intra- state sales, Central GST and State CST are charged. All the sales
related to inter-state are chargeable to the Integrated GST Goods & Services
Tax is a comprehensive, multi- stage, destination-based tax that will be levied
on every value addition. Goods and Service Tax (GST) implemented in India to
bring in the ‘one nation one tax’ system, but its effect on various industries will
be slightly different. The first level of differentiation will come in depending on
whether the industry deals with manufacturing, distributing and retailing or is
providing a service. Goods and services are divided into five different tax slabs
for collection of tax, they are 0%, 5%, 12%, 18% and 28%.The introduction of
GST is an important step in the field of indirect tax reforms in India. By
amalgamating a large number of Central and State taxes into a single tax, GST
will mitigate the ill effects of cascading or double taxation in a major way
towards achievement of common national market.
The Goods and Services Tax (GST), the biggest reform in India’s indirect tax
structure since the economy began to be opened up 25 years ago, at last looks
set to become reality. The Constitution (122nd) Amendment Bill finally got the
nod of Rajya Sabha. Government successfully stitching together a political
consensus on the GST Bill, to pave the way for much awaited roll out of the
landmark tax reform that will create a common market of 1.25 billion people.
GST will be a game changing reform for Indian economy by developing a
common Indian market and reducing the cascading effect of tax on the cost of
goods and services. It will impact the Tax Structure, Tax Incidence, Tax
Computation, Tax Payment, Compliance, Credit Utilization and Reporting
leading to a complete overhaul of the current indirect tax system. Law, provide
for compensation100% to States for any loss of revenues arising on account of
GST, for a period which may extend to five years, based on the
recommendations of the GST Council Here, every tax payer will be issued a 15-
digit common identification number which will be called as “Goods & Service
Tax Identification Number” (GSTIN) a PAN based number.
GST is a consumption based tax levied on sale, manufacturing and consumption
of goods & services at a national level. Many taxes have been subsumed under
GST which are as under
Items not covered under (as in Proposed Draft) GST: Alcohol, tobacco,
petroleum product, electricity etc. are not covered under GST.
The retailers can file GST in two ways i.e.; regular and composite. In the case of
regular dealers, they have to file GST monthly returns (GSTR 3B, GSTR 1,2, 3)
+ Annual returns), whereas in the case of composite dealers, they file quarterly
returns (GSTR 4) + Annual returns. And also, regular dealers can make
interstate sales as well as local sales and higher sale of tax is applicable for
them. (5%, 12%, 18%, 28%). Itis applicable for large assesses having turnover
more than 1.5 crores. If the turnover is less than 1.5 crores, still normal scheme
can be chosen. While, the composite dealers cannot make interstate sales and
they can only sell within the state and their rates of tax are lower ie; 1% for
traders, 1% & 2% for manufactures and 5% for restaurants. It is applicable for
small assesses having turnover up to 1.5 crores in previous year.
The impact of GST on retail sector is going to be positive as it will bring down
total indirect taxes, increase supply chain efficiency and facilitate seamless
input tax credit. After the implementation of GST, state boundaries will be
irrelevant from taxation and documentation point of view. Vanishing state
boundaries will reduce the complexity for retailers and increase the distribution
reach as well as efficiency.
Retail is the process of selling consumer goods or services to customers through
multiple channels of distribution to earn profit. Retailers satisfy demand
identified through a supply chain. Retailing can be defined as the buying and
selling of goods and services. It can also be defined as the
GST has four different kind of taxes namely CGST,SGST, IGST and UGST.
CGST
stands for CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, the tax is levied based on
intrastate supply of goods and services. The share of GST tax is redirected to
the revenue department of central government. CGST replaces all the current
Central taxes like Central Excise Duty, Service Tax, Custom Duty, SAD, etc.
the share of this tax compensates all loss of current service tax and excise duty
of the central government. In case of local sales, Under GST 50% quantum tax
is transferred to SGST.
SGST
SGST stands for STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX , this tax is similar to
CGST ,as part of tax which is diverted to the state government has been credited
to revenue department of state government. In SGST ,tax are exacted by within
one state where transaction of goods and services take place. SGST compensate
the loss of other existing tax like sales tax and value added tax(VAT) which was
replaced all these taxes and has been a sole claimer of the revenue to the state
government. In case of local sales , 50% of quantum tax which was under GST
has been redirected to SGST tax.
IGST
IGST stands for INTEGRATED GOODS AND SERVICES TAX . This tax is
applicable when transactions take place on interstate or when two states
involved in purchases of goods and services. This tax is collected by central
government. One part of tax is transferred to central government and rest is
transferred to the state government.
UTGST /UGST
UTGST stands for Union Territory Goods and Services Tax. UTGST provide
the same benefits as SGST. The main purpose of UTGST bill is to levied tax on
every purchase of goods and services which take place within intrastate. This
tax is only applicable to union territories of India namely Andaman and Nicobar
Islands, Chandigarh, Daman, Diu, Dadra, Lakshadweep and Nagar Haveli.
1.1. STATEMENTOFTHEPROBLEM
Geography
Demography
Demography of the warora such as population and its growth, density, occupational
structure sex ratio etc.
Total area of Warora is 1,029 km/square, including 1,012.34 km/square rural area and
16.59 km/square urban area. According to 2011 census, Total Warora population is
125,008 people are living in this Taluka, of which 64,116 are male and 60,892 are female.
Expected Population of Warora Taluka in 2020/2021 is between 121,258 and 155,010.
Literate people are 91,662 out of 50,790 are male and 40,872 are female, There are about
179 villages in Warora block,
"Anandwan"
Anandwan was founded in 1948 and established in 1949 by Baba Amte with a hope of
giving marginalised people a dignified life through self-reliance and restoring a sense
of belonging which they had lost due to the ill treatment at the hands of society.The
project is run by the organisation Maharogi Seva Samiti. Two of its other projects are Lok
Biradari Prakalp and Somnath, a village for cured leprosy patients.
Anandwan today has two hospitals, a college, an orphanage, a school for the blind, a school
for the deaf and a technical wing. More than 5,000 people are dependent on it for their
livelihood. Vikas Amte, Baba Amte's elder son, is the chief functionary at Anandwan.
The story of Tata Steel is a century old and Sir Jamsetji Tata had idea of starting a steel
plant near Warora region. At the age of forty-three in 1882, Jamsetji read a report by a
German geologist, Ritter von Schwartz, that the best situated deposits of iron ore were in
Chandrapur district in the Central provinces, not far from Nagpur where he worked. They
area named was Lohara, after the iron ore deposits nearby. In the vicinity, Warora had
deposits of coal. Jamsetji is believed to have visited Lohara himself and obtained
specimens of Warora coal for testing. He took a consignment of coal with him and had it
tested in Germany. The coal was found unsuitable. The mining terms offered by the
government were too restrictive, and Jamsetji gave up the project. But the idea of giving
India a steel plant abided with him
GMR
GMR Warora Energy Limited is a 600 megawatt (MW) coal plant in Maharashtra, India.
The power station is close to Warora in Maharashtra. It was initially functioned by EMCO
Energy, an auxiliary of the GMR Group. The two 300 Megawatt units were commissioned
in 2013 itself.
GMR Warora Energy Limited is commissioned in March 2013. The approved capacity of
the thermal power plant is 600 Megawatt. The installed capacity of the thermal power plant
is also 600 Megawatt. The status of the Thermal Power Plant is Operational. The source of
coal for the generation of power is from South Eastern Coal Fields Limited (SECL) coal
mines, which is a part of Coal India Limited (CIL). The primary fuel used is Coal. The
GMR Warora Energy Limited is owned and operated by the GMR Group. The Boiler,
Turbine and Generator of the plant are manufactured by the Shanghai Electric Company,
China. Also the Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) contract was given to
Shanghai Electric Company, China. The beneficiary states of the thermal power plant
are Maharashtra and its neighbouring states.
The unit sizes of the thermal power plant are 600 Megawatt (300 Megawatt x 2
units). There are two units in operation and they are Unit 1 and Unit 2. The first unit
is commissioned in March 2013 with an installed capacity of 300 Megawatt.
Similarly the second unit is commissioned in September 2013 with also an installed
capacity of 300 Megawatt. GMR Warora Energy Limited is completely tied up
below long term Power Purchase Agreement for 200 Megawatt each with
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd, Dadar and Nagar Haveli
Power Distribution Corp Ltd, and Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution
Corporation. The Commercial Operation Date of first unit in the power station is
March 2013 and the Commercial Operation Date of second unit was in September 2013.
The plant got certifications like ISO 9001 and ISO 14001
SAI
Sai Wardha Power Plant is a coal-based thermal power plant located near Warora city
in Chandrapur district in the Indian state of Maharashtra. The power plant is operated by
the KSK Energy Ventures.
The coal for the plant is sourced from Western Coalfields Limited (WCL).
The Engineering, procurement and construction contract (EPCC) is given to Sichuan
Electric Design Company of People's Republic of China.
CHAPTER 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND HYPOTHESIS
Research :
Research is the process of gathering recording and analysing of critical and relevant facts
about any problem in any branch of human activity. It indicates critical and searching
study and scientific investigation of a problem a proposed course of action a hypothesis or
theory.
A research is an argument of conditions for collection and
analysis of data ina manner that aims to combine relevance to the research
purpose with the economy in
theprocedure.Inotherwords,researchdesignistheblueprintforthecollection,measur
ementandanalysis of data. This section describes the research methodology
adopted to achieve theobjectives of the study. The present study incorporates the
collection of both primary andsecondary data. The primary data were collected
through questionnaire specially designed forthis survey. And the secondary data
are collected from journals, books, records of previousstudy,articles,web
sitesetc…
RESEARCHDESIGN
DESCRIPTIVERESEARCH
SAMPLEDESIGN
CONVENIENCESAMPLING
POPULATION
Sample size is the number of items to be selected from the population toconstitute
the sample for the research. A sample should be actual representation of
thepopulation.InordertounderstandtheimpactofimplementationofGSTamongretailer
s.It is decidedtoselect 60 retailersin Nilambur taluk.
SOURCESOFDATA
Source of data means the origin from where we collect the data. Generally,the
source of data collection is two types (1) primary source of data (2)
secondarysource of data. Primary and secondary have been used in this study and
they werecollectedaccordingly.
PRIMARYDATA
Primary data are those data which are directly collected by the
researcher orthrough investigator or enumerator for his purpose in first
time. The primary data areoriginalin character.
Here,primarydataiscollectedfromtheretailers
inNilamburtalukbyusingquestionnaire.
SECONDARYDATA
The secondary data are those data, which have already been
collected andpublished or compiled for another purpose of the study. It
includes not only publishedrecords and reports but also unpublished
records. Secondary data require for the
studyhavebeengatheredfrominternet,newspaper, articles,magazines etc…
TOOLSFORANALYSIS
Under this study in order to analyse and interpret the collected
data thefollowingstatistical tools areused.
SIMPLEPERCENTAGEMETHOD
Simple percentage method refers to special kind of ratio
percentage that isused in making comparison between two or more series
of data percentage, I used todescribe relationship. Since percentage
reduce everything to common days and thereby allow meaningful
comparison to be made. Also it is to classify the opinion
ofrespondentsfordifferentfactors.
WEIGHTEDAVERAGEMETHOD
Meaninwhicheachitembeingaveragedismultipliedbyanumber(w
eight)based on the item’s relative importance. The result is summed and
the total is dividedby the sum of the weights. Weighted averages are used
extensively in descriptivestatisticalanalysis suchas index numbers.
Alsocalled weightedmean.
CHARTS,DIAGRAMSANDTABLES
CHI-SQUARETEST
1.1. HYPOTHESIS
H0:Thereisnosignificantrelationshipbetweentheeducationalstatusandt
Thereisasignificantrelationshipbetweentheeducationalstatusandtheaw
arenesslevelabout GST ofretailers.
H0:
Thereisnosignificantrelationshipbetweenthedifferentsectorsandtheimp
actofGST on turnover, costof production, and priceofgoods.
H1:
Thereisasignificantrelationshipbetweenthedifferentsectorsandtheimpa
ctof GST onturnover, cost ofproduction, and priceofgoods.
H0: GST has no significant impact on Small Retailers.
CHAPTER
Scope, objective and import of study
1.1. OBJECTIVEOFTHESTUDY
TounderstandtheimpactofimplementationofGSTamongretailer.
1.2. SCOPEOFTHESTUDY
Thestudyentitled“ImpactofimplementationofGSTamongretailerswith
specialreferencetoNilamburtaluk”wascarriedouttodefinedtheimpactofimpl
ementationofGSTamongretailersandtounderstandtheirknowledgeaboutGS
T,and also their opinion. It helps to identify impact of GST in retail sector
that is bothpositiveand negative.
So that it will ensure that GST have positive impact in the retail
sector.Because of GST will avoids the cascading effect as the tax is
calculated only on thevalue add at each stage of transfer of ownership.
GST is one indirect tax for the entirecountry.
CHAPTER 4
REVIEWOFLITERATURE
2.1. REVIEWOFLITERATURE
Reviews of related literature forms an integral part of any research study.
A carefulscanning of the illiterate studies on related studies will help for
clearing the background forpresentstudy.
PINKI,SUPRIYAKAMMAANDRICHAVERMA(JULY 2014)
AGOGOMAWULI(MAY2014)
NITINKUMAR(2014)
InhisresearchstudymentionedthattheGSTattheCentralandtheStatel
evelareexpectedtogivemorerelieftoindustry,trade,agricultureandconsumer
sthrougha more comprehensive and wider coverage of input tax set-off
and service tax set-off,subsuming of several taxes in the GST and phasing
out of GST. Responses of industryand also of trade have been indeed
encouraging. Thus GST offers us the best opinionto broaden our tax base
and we should not miss this opportunity to introduce it whenthe
circumstances are quite favourable and economy is enjoying steady
growth withonlymid inflation.
SARAVANANVENKADASALAM(2014)
Has analysed the post effect of the goods and service tax (GST)
on thenational growth on ASEAN states using Least Squares Dummy
Variable Model(LSDVM) in his research paper. He stated that seven
of ten ASEAN nations
arealreadyimplementingtheGST.Healsosuggestedthatthehouseholdfina
lconsumption expenditure and general government consumption
expenditure
arepositivelysignificantlyrelatedtothegrossdomesticproductasrequirean
dsupporttheeconomictheories. Buttheeffect ofthepost GSTdiffers in
countries.
Philippines and Thailand show significant negative relationship with
their nation’sdevelopment. Meanwhile, Singapore shows a significant
positive relationship. It
isundeniablethatthosecountrieswhomimplementingGSTalwaysencount
ergrows.Nevertheless,theextentoftheimpactvariesdependingonthegove
rnance,compliance cost and economic distortion. A positive impact of
GST depends on aneutral and rational design of the GST such a way it
I simple, transparent
andsignificantlyenhancesinvoluntarycompliance.It
mustbeactual,notpresumptive,pricesandcompliancecontrolwouldbeexe
rcised throughan auditingsystem.
HUANG(2013)
NEWZEALAND GOVERNMENT(2012)
TheauthorhastracedtheGSTandimportdutiesapplicableonthevari
ousimports into New Zealand. The paper discusses not only the goods
on which dutyis payable but also whether further GST is payable on
the same goods. The paperalso discusses the applicability of the taxes
on the goods ordered and
deliveredthroughinternet.Thepaperalsodiscussesvariousexemptionavail
ablelikepersonaleffectsto the import taxation.
DR.R.VASANTHAGOPAL(2011)
EHTISHAMAHMEDANDSATYA PODDAR(2009)
Studied“GoodsandServiceTaxReformsandIntergovernmentalCo
nsideration in India” and found that GST introduction will provide
simpler
andtransparenttaxsystemwithincreaseinoutputandproductivityofecono
myinIndia.Butthebenefits ofGST arecriticallydependent onrational
design ofGST.
CHAPTER-III
CONCEPTUALF RAMEWORK
GOODSANDSERVICETAX(GST)
Removingcascadingtax effect.
Higherthresholdforregistration.
Compositionschemeforsmallbusinesses.
OnlinesimplerprocedureunderGST.
Lessercompliances.
Definedtreatmentfore-commerce.
Increasedefficiencyinlogistics.
Regulatingtheunorganizedsector.
VALUE-ADDEDTAX(VAT)
RETAILING
Retailreferstotheactivityofreselling.Aretailerisanypersonororga
nisationisaresellerwhosellsgoodorservicesdirectlytoconsumersorend-
users.Some retailers may sell to business customers, and such sales are
termed non-retailactivity. In some jurisdiction or regions, legal
definitions of retail specify that at least80%of sales activitymustbe to
end-users.
TYPES;
Fast-
movingconsumergoodsareproductsthatsellquicklyatrelativelylowcost –
items such as milk, gum, fruit and vegetables, toilet papers, soda, beer
andover-the-counterdrugs likeaspirin.
The fast moving consumer goods industry covers the
households’
itemsthatyoubuywhenshoppinginthesupermarketorpharmacy.‘Fastmov
ing’impliesthat the items are quick to leave the shelves and also tend
to be high in volume butlow in cost items.
The products are ones that are essential items that we use day
in and dayout. This multi-million-dollar sector holds some of the most
famous brand namesthatwecomeacross everysingle day.
TEXTILES
Atypeofmaterialcomposedofnaturalorsyntheticfibres.Typesofte
xtilesinclude animal-based material such as wool or silk, plant-based
material such aslinen and cotton, and synthetic material such as
polyester and rayon. Textiles areoftenassociatedwith theproduction
ofclothing,
The textile industry is primarily concerned with the design,
productionand distribution of yarn, cloth and clothing. The raw
material may be natural, orsyntheticusingproductsof thechemical
industry.
HOTEL
MEDICALSHOP
JEWELLERY
Abranchofindustrythatproducesarticlesfrompreciousmetalsand
gemsandfromothermaterialssubjectedtoartistictreatment.Objectsofpers
onaladornment for women, tableware, and various souvenirs constitute
most of thearticles made by the jewellery industry. The industry’s
growth in the USSR hasbeen linked with the rising standard of living
of the working people and theincreasedexport ofjewelleryto other
countries.
DATAANALYSISAND INTERPRETATION
DATAANALYSISANDINTERPRETATION
Collecteddataareanalysedbyusingstatisticaltoolslikepercentage,Chi-
square,weightedaverage.
Table,diagrams,chartsandgraphsarealsousedtoanalysethedatatopresentth
eresultin attractiveways.
1. DISTRIBUTIONONTHEBASISOFAWARENESSLEVEL ABOUTGST:
TABLENO
CHARTNO.4.
AWARENESSLEVELABOUT GST
30
27
24
22
21 21
19
15
14
12 12 12
11
10
9 9 9
8 8
7
00
TAXRATESPAYMENTGSTCREDITCOMPOSITION GSTONLINE
MECHANISMSCHEME PROCEDURE
HIGHLYAWAREAWARENUETRALUNAWAREHIGHLYUNAWARE
TABLENO.4.2.2
ANALYSISONTHEBASIS OFAWARENESSLEVELABOUTGST
TERMS 5 4 3 2 1 SCO WEIGHTE %
RE D
AVERAG
E
Tax rate 1 1 3 0 0 249 4.15 8
0 0 6 3
5 8
Payment 3 4 9 22 0 195 3.25 6
mechanis 5 8 0 5
m
GSTcredit 0 6 7 42 0 174 2.90 5
0 2 8
Compositi 6 8 2 18 8 201 3.35 6
on 0 8 7 7
scheme
GSTonlin 4 5 5 20 8 186 3.10 6
e 5 6 7 2
procedure
(SOURCE:PRIMARYDATA)
INTERPRETATION:
Theabovetableshowsthatanalysisonthebasisofawarenesslevelabout
GSTof sample respondents. It says that 83% of the respondents are aware about
GST, and 67% ofthe respondents are aware about composition scheme. And
65% of the respondents are
awareaboutpaymentmechanism,and62%oftherespondentareawareaboutGSTonli
neprocedure.And the remaining 58% of the respondent are aware about GST
credit. Majority of therespondentsareaware about thevarious tax rates oftheGST
system.
CHI-SQUARETEST
H0:Thereisnosignificantrelationshipbetweentheeducationalstatusandtheawarene
sslevelaboutGST ofretailers.
H1:Thereisasignificantrelationshipbetweentheeducationalstatusandtheawareness
levelaboutGST ofretailers.
TABLENO.4.2.3
Particula Highly Awa Neutr Unawa Highly Tot
rs aware re al re unawar al
e
Below 2 6 18 17 7 50
SSLC
SSLC 5 23 36 17 5 86
Plustwo 8 23 26 12 4 73
Graduate 19 25 12 4 0 60
PG 16 13 2 0 0 31
Others 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 50 90 94 50 16 300
(SOURCE:PRIMARYDATA)
TABLENO.4.2.4
CHI-SQUARETABLE
OBSERVE EXPECTED(E (O-E)2 (O-E)2/E
D )
(O)
7 22 225 10.22727
8 12 16 1.333333
19 10 81 8.1
16 5 121 24.2
6 15 81 5.4
23 26 9 0.346154
23 22 1 0.045455
25 18 49 2.722222
13 9 16 1.777778
18 16 4 0.25
36 27 81 3
26 23 9 0.391304
14 29 225 7.758621
17 8 81 10.125
17 14 9 0.642857
16 27 121 4.481481
7 3 16 5.333333
9 14 25 1.785714
TOTAL 87.92053
X
Calculatedvalue=87.920
Degreeoffreedom=(r-1)(c-1)
Levelofsignificance=0.05Ta
blevalue=31.410
INTERPRETATION:
DATA)INTERPRETATIO
N:
CHARTNO.4.2
SOURCESOFGETTINGKNOWLEDGEABOUTGST
2. DISTRIBUTIONONTHEBASIS OFREGISTRATIONIN
COMPOSITIONSCHEME:
TABLENO.4.4
DISTRIBUTION ON THE BASIS OF REGISTRATION IN
COMPOSITIONSCHEME
PURTICULERS NO.OFRESPONDENT PERCENTA
S GE
Yes 50 83
No 10 17
Total 60 100
(SOURCE:PRIMARYDATA)
INTERPRETATION:
Theabovetableshowsthatdistributiononthebasisofregistrationincom
positionscheme.Itsaysthat83%oftherespondentsareregisteredincompositionsche
me,and the remaining 17% of the respondents are not registered in composition
scheme. Majorityoftherespondents areregistered in composition scheme.
CHARTNO.4.3
REGISTRATIONINCOMPOSITIONSCHEME
17%
Yes
No
83%
3. DISTRIBUTIONONTHEBASISOFSYSTEMBENEFIT:
TABLENO.4.5
DISTRIBUTIONONTHEBASISOFSYSTEMBENEFIT
SYSTEM NO.OFRESPONDENT PERCENTA
S GE
VAT 27 45
GST 33 55
Total 60 100
(SOURCE:PRIMARYDATA)
INTERPRETATION:
The above table shows that the distribution on the basis of system
benefit
ofsamplerespondents.Itsaysthat55%oftherespondentshavesaidthatGSTisbettertha
nVAT.Majorityof the respondents areacceptingGST system.
CHARTNO.4.4
ONTHEBASISOFSYSTEMBENEFIT
VATGST
45%
55%
4. DISTRIBUTIONONTHEBASISOFPROBLEMSRELATEDTOGST
PROCEDURES:
TABLENO.4.6
DISTRIBUTION ON THE BASIS OF PROBLEMS RELATED TO
GSTPROCEDURES
PURTICULERS NO.OFRESPONDENT PERCENTA
S GE
Yes 26 43
No 34 57
Total 60 100
(SOURCE:PRIMARYDATA)
INTERPRETATION:
The above table shows that the distribution on the basis of
problems related toGST procedure among sample respondents. It says that 57%
of the respondents have said thatthere are no problems related to GST
procedures, and remaining 43% of the respondents havesaid that there are
problems related to GST procedures. Majority of the respondents have
saidthatthereis no problem related to GST.
CHARTNO.4.5
PROBLEMSRELATEDTOGSTPROCEDURES
Yes43%
No
57%
5. DISTRIBUTIONONTHEBASIS OFEFFECT OFGST ONSOME
FACTORS:
TABLENO.4.7.1
DISTRIBUTIONONTHEBASISOFEFFECTOFGSTONSOME FACTORS
CHARTNO.4.6EFFECTOFGSTONSOMEFACTORS
25
20
15
10
0
GSThasincreasetheGSThasincreasetheGSThasdecrease theGSTisregulatingthecostofproductionpriceofgoodsturnoverunorganizedsector
StronglyagreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStronglydisagree
TABLENO.4.7.2
ANALYSISONTHEBASIS OFEFFECTOFGSTON SOMEFACTORS
STATEMEN 5 4 3 2 1 SCO WEIGHTE %
T RE D
AVERAG
E
GSThasincrea 85 7 57 1 1 225 3. 75
sethecost 2 0 75
ofproductio
n
GST 60 3 54 2 7 185 3. 62
hasincrea 6 8 08
sethe
priceof
goods
GSThas 20 3 45 4 10 155 2. 52
increasethet 6 4 58
urnover
GST 45 6 63 1 6 194 3. 65
isregulatin 4 6 23
gtheunorga
nized
sector
(SOURCE:PRIMARYDATA)
INTERPRETATION:
The above table shows that analysis on the basis of effect of GST
on
somefactors.Itsaysthat75%oftherespondentshavesaidthatGSThasincreasecostofp
roduction,and65%oftherespondentshavesaidthatGSTisregulatingtheunorganized
sector.And62%of the respondents have said that GST has increase the price of
goods, and 52% of therespondents have said that GST has decrease the turnover.
Majority of the respondents havesaidthat GST increasethe cost of production.
CHI-SQUARETEST
H0:ThereisnosignificantrelationshipbetweenthedifferentsectorsandtheimpactofG
STonturnover, cost of production, and priceofgoods.
H1:ThereisasignificantrelationshipbetweenthedifferentsectorsandtheimpactofGS
Tonturnover,cost of production, and priceofgoods.
TABLENO.4.7.3
CHI-SQUARETABLE
SECTO Strong Agree Neutr Disagr Strongl TOTA
RS ly al ee y L
agree disagre
e
FMCG 7 7 10 5 1 30
Textiles 7 7 9 6 1 30
Hotel 5 12 5 7 1 30
Medical 2 8 9 10 1 30
shop
Jewellery 7 11 7 5 0 30
Others 5 12 10 3 0 30
Total 33 57 50 36 4 180
(SOURCE:PRIMARYDATA)
TABLENO.4.7.4
CHI-SQUARETABLE
OBSERVED(O) EXPECTED( (O- (O-
E) E)2 E)2/E
7 6 1 0.16
7 10 9 0.9
10 8 4 0.5
6 7 1 0.14
7 6 1 0.16
7 10 9 0.9
9 8 1 0.125
7 7 0 0
5 6 1 0.16
12 10 4 0.4
5 8 9 1.125
10 13 9 0.69
8 10 4 0.4
9 8 1 0.125
11 7 16 2.28
7 6 1 0.16
11 10 1 0.1
7 8 1 0.125
5 7 4 0.57
5 6 1 0.16
12 10 4 0.4
13 15 4 0.26
TOTAL 9.84
Calculatedvalue=9.84
Degreeoffreedom=(r-1) (c-1)
Levelofsignificance=0.05Ta
blevalue =31.410
INTERPRETATION:
Here calculated value [9.84] is less than the table value 31.410. So
we
acceptnullhypothesisandrejectalternativehypothesis.Therefore,itfoundthatthereis
nosignificantrelationshipbetweenthedifferentsectorsandtheimpactofGSTonturno
ver,costofproduction,and priceofgoods
6. DISTRIBUTIONONTHEBASISOFTAXRATES:
TABLENO.4.8.1
DISTRIBUTIONON THE BASISOFTAXRATES
STATEMENTS Highly Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Highly TOT
satisfied dissatisfied AL
Variousratesunder 9 18 22 7 4 60
GST
system
0% 17 13 0 0 0 30
5% 20 17 13 4 0 54
12% 0 9 15 6 4 34
18% 0 0 7 19 10 36
28% 0 0 2 4 8 14
Goodscoveredund 5 8 19 15 13 60
erdifferent
rateoftax
GST 18 34 8 0 0 60
systemremovingt
hecascadingeffec
t
oftax
Total 70 100 86 54 38 348
(SOURCE:PRIMARYDATA)
CHARTNO.4.7
ONTHEBASIS OFTAXRATE
HighlysatisfiedSatisfiedNeutralDissatisfiedHighlydissatisfied
4 0 04 0
4 8
7 13 10 13
13 6
7
22 15
34
17 15 19
3 19
18 17 2
20 1 8 18
9 7
9 1 5
TABLENO.4.8.2
ANALYSISONTHE BASIS OFTAXRATES
STATEMEN 5 4 3 2 1 SCOR WEIGHTE %
TS E D
AVERAG
E
Variousratesun 45 7 6 14 4 201 3.35 6
derGST 2 6 7
system
0% 85 5 0 0 0 137 4.56 9
2 1
5% 100 6 3 8 0 215 3.98 8
8 9 0
12% 0 3 4 12 4 97 2.85 5
6 5 7
18% 0 0 2 38 10 69 1.91 3
1 8
28% 0 0 6 8 8 22 1.57 3
1
Goodscoveredu 25 3 5 30 13 157 2.61 5
nderdifferent 2 7 2
rateoftax
GST 90 1 2 0 0 250 4.16 8
3 4 3
systemremovi 6
ngthecascadin
geffect
oftax
(SOURCE:PRIMARYDATA)
INTERPRETATION:
The above table shows that analysis on the basis of tax rates. It
says that 91%of the respondents have said that they have satisfied about the 0%
tax rate, and 80% of therespondents have said that they have satisfied about 5%
tax rate. And 40% of the
respondentshavesaidthattheyhavesatisfiedaboutthe28%taxrate,and38%oftheresp
ondentshavesaidthat they have satisfied about the 18% tax rate. Majority of the
respondents are satisfied aboutthe0%taxrates
7. DISTRIBUTIONONTHEBASISOFBENEFITSFROM GST:
TABLENO.4.9
DISTRIBUTIONONTHEBASISOFBENEFITSFROM GST
SOURCES NO.OFRESPONDENT PERCENTA
S GE
Stategovt: 14 23
Centralgovt: 34 57
Consumers 6 10
Retailers 3 5
Not any 3 5
Total 60 100
(SOURCE:PRIMARYDATA)
INTERPRETATION:
The above table shows that distribution on the basis of benefits
from GST. Itsays that 57% of the respondent are says that central government is
get benefit from GST, and23% of the respondents are says that state government
is get benefit from GST. And 10% ofthe respondents says that consumers get
benefit from GST, and remaining 5% of respondentsare says that retailers get
benefit from GST. Majority of the respondents are said that centralgovernmentis
get morebenefit from GST.
CHARTNO.4.8
BENEFITFROMGST
Stategovt:Centralgovt:ConsumersRetailersNotany
5%
5%
23%
10%
57%
8. DISTRIBUTIONONTHEBASISOFLOSSFROMGST:
TABLENO.4.10
DISTRIBUTIONONTHEBASISOFLOSSFROMGST
SOURCES NO.OFRESPONDENT PERCENTA
S GE
Stategovt: 2 3
Centralgovt: 0 0
Consumers 8 13
Retailers 38 63
Not any 12 20
Total 60 100
(SOURCE:PRIMARYDATA)INTERPRETATION:
The above table shows that distribution on the basis of loss from
GST. It saysthat 63% of the respondents are says that retailers are the main
looser of GST, and 20% of
therespondentsaresaysnoonehasfaceanylossfromGST.And13%oftherespondents
aresaysthatconsumersarefacelossfrom
GST,and3%oftherespondentsaresaysthatstategovernment face loss from GST.
Majority of the respondents are saying that retailers are themain looserofGST.
CHARTNO.4.9
LOSSFROMGST
Stategovt:Centralgovt:ConsumersRetailersNotany
3%0%
20% 13%
64%
9. DISTRIBUTIONONTHE BASISOFOPINIONABUOT
IMPLIMENTINGGST:
TABLENO.4.11
DISTRIBUTIONONTHEBASISOFOPINIONABOUTIMPLIMENTINGGST
OPINION NO.OFRESPONDENT PERCENTA
S GE
Excellent 11 18
Good 14 24
Moderate 20 33
Bad 11 18
Verybad 4 7
Total 60 100
(SOURCE:PRIMARYDATA)
INTERPRETATION:
Theabovetableshowsthatdistributiononthebasisofopinionaboutimpl
ementing GST. It says that 33% of the respondents are says that their opinion is
neutral,and24%oftherespondentsaresaysthattheiropinionisgood.And18%oftheres
pondent aresays that their opinion is excellent and also bad, and 7% of the
respondent are says that theiropinionis verybad. Majorityof the
respondents’opinion is neutral.
CHARTNO.4.10
OPINIONABOUTIMPLIMENTINGGST
33
24
18 18
TABLENO.4.13.1
DISTRIBUTIONONTHEBASISOFOPINIONABOUTGSTSTRUCTURE
STATEME Strong Agr Neutra Disagr Strong TOTA
NT lyag ee l ee lydisa L
ree gree
GSTis easyto 9 15 20 12 4 60
understand
GSTis simple 5 13 24 14 4 60
tocalculate
GST is 7 16 21 10 6 60
simple&
transparents
ystemof
taxation
Removing 29 18 13 0 0 60
thecascadin
geffect of
taxwithintro
duction
ofGST
Total 50 62 78 36 1 240
4
(SOURCE:PRIMARYDATA)
CHARTNO.4.12
OPINIONABOUTGSTSTRUCTURE
TABLEN0.4.13.2
ANALYSISONTHEBASIS OFOPNIONABOUTGSTSTRUCTURE
STATEMENT 5 4 3 2 1 SCORE WEIGHTED %
AVERAGE
GSTis easyto 45 60 60 24 4 193 3.21 64
understand
GSTis simple 25 52 72 28 4 181 3.01 60
tocalculate
GST is 35 64 63 20 6 188 3.13 63
simple&
transparentsys
temof
taxation
Removing 145 72 39 0 0 256 4.26 85
thecascadingef
fect of
taxwithintrodu
ction ofGST
(SOURCE:PRIMARYDATA)
INTERPRETATION:
TheabovetableshowsthatanalysisonthebasisofopinionaboutGSTstru
cture. It says that 85% of the respondents agreed about removing the cascading
effect oftax with introduction of GST, and 70% of the respondents agreed about
GST is easy tounderstand. And 67% of the respondents agreed about GST is
simple and transparent systemof taxation, and 60% of the respondents agreed
about GST is simple to calculate. Majority
oftherespondentsagreedaboutremovingthecascadingeffectof taxwithintroduction
ofGST.
2. DISTRIBUTIONON THEBASISOFGSTINFAVOUROF
RETAILERS:
TABLENO.4.14
DISTRIBUTIONON THEBASISOFGST IN FAVOUROFRETAILERS
PURTICULERS NO.OFRESPONDENT PERCENTA
S GE
Yes 31 52
No 29 48
Total 60 100
(SOURCE:PRIMARYDATA)
INTERPRETATION:
The above table shows that distribution on the basis of GST in
favour ofretailers. It says that 52% of the respondents are says that GST is in
favour of retailers, and48%oftherespondentsare say
thatGSTisnotinfavourofretailers.Majority oftherespondentsaresayingthat GST is
in favourof retailers.
CHARTNO.4.13
GSTIN FAVOUROFRETAILERS
48%
52% Yes
No
CHAPTER-V
5.1. SUMMARY
GSTisoneindirecttaxfortheentirecountry.Insimplewords,GoodsandSer
viceTax is an indirect tax levied on the supply of goods and services. GST law
has replaced manyindirecttaxlaws that previouslyexisted inIndia.
Thisstudyhasbeenconductedtounderstandtheimpactofimplementationo
fGSTamong retailers in Nilambur taluk. This study is reveals that GST
implementation have bothpositiveand negativeimpact in retail sector.
This study is reveals that 83% of the sample respondents are highly
awareaboutGSTtaxrates.And63%oftherespondentsareawareaboutcompositionscheme.
Under this study it found that, one of the most important source of gettingknowledgeabout
GST ismass mediaand thesecond oneis onlinesources.
83%oftherespondentsareregisteredunderthecompositionscheme,and17%oftherespondents
arenotregistered under thecompositionscheme.
This study is found that 55% of the respondents have said that GST is betterthanVAT, and
45%of therespondents havesaid that VATis better.
57% of the respondents have said that there is no problem related to GSTprocedures, and 43%
of the respondents have said that there are problemsrelatedto GST procedures.
Most of the respondents [75%] are strongly agreed that GST ha increase thecost of production,
and 65% of respondents are agreed that GST is regulatingtheunorganized sector.
Amongthesamplerespondents91%ofthethemarehighlysatisfiedabout0%tax rates, and 80%of
the them aresatisfiedabout5%taxrates.
Thisstudyisrevealsthat57%ofthesamplerespondentshavesaidthatcentralgovernmentisgetmoreb
enefitfromGST,and23%ofthemaresaidthatstategovernmentis get benefit from GST.
63% of the sample respondents are said that retailers are the main looser fromGST.
Inmystudyitisfoundthat33%oftherespondents’opinionaboutimplementingGSTisneutral,
and24%of the respondents’ opinionis good.
Most of the respondents [75%] is strongly agreed that GST is helpful foroverall development of
nation, and 73% of them agreed that GST is decreasethecost of collection oftaxrevenues of
thegovernment.
This study is found that 85% of the respondents are strongly agreed aboutremoving the
cascading effect of tax with introduction of GST, and 70% ofthemareagreed about GST easyto
understand.
Among the sample respondents 52% of them are says that GST in favour ofretailers.
Amongthesamplerespondents70%ofthemaresaythatthereisnoincrementsinprofit level after GST
implementation.
Thestudyisrevealsthatmajorityofthesamplerespondentsinretailsectorareinbetweentheagegroup
25-35[35%].And28%oftheamplerespondentsareinbetween theagegroupof 45-55.
Among the sample respondents 83% of them are male. And 17% of them arefemale.
In my study is found that majority [32%] of the respondents are educated uptoSSLC. And 27%of
therespondentsarePLUSTWO.
This study mainly focused on the sectors FMCG, Textiles, Hotel, Medicalshop,Jewelleryetc…
.................................................................................which areequallyconsidered.
Among the respondents 73% of them are sole traders and 27% of them doingpartnership.
Itisunderstoodthatmostoftherespondent[33%]havemonthlysales6000090000.
5.1. SUGGESTIONS
Toconductawarenessclassesamongretailers.
GSTprocessmustbereducedsothatbusinesscanoperateefficientlyinthebestin
terest of the peopleandforeconomicgrowth.
Rateshouldberationalisedandreduced.Dailyusageitemssuchassoaps,creams,
electricalgoods,film ticketsshould notbetaxed at28%
Compositionschemeshouldalsobeprovidedtosmallscaleserviceproviders.
Petroleumproducts andelectricitytobebrought within thecontrol of GST .
5.2. CONCLUSION
This study is reveal that under the proposed GST regime, various
Indirect Taxeswould be subsumed and hence it is expected that it would result
in a simpler tax regime,especially for industries like FMCG, Textiles, Hotel,
Medical shop, Jewellery etc…. Apartfrom simplification of tax compliances, the
rate of tax will also have a significant impact
ontheallthespecifiedsectors.InFMCGsectortheVATrateisamounttoapproximately
22-
24%,undertheGSTregimetheratewouldbeintherangeof5%to28%.AndinTextileind
ustrytheVAT rate was 4-5%, under the GST regime the rate would be in the
range of 5% to 18%. Andin Hotel industry the VAT rate was 5-20%, under the
GST regime the rate would be in therange of 5% to 18%. And in Medical sector
the VAT rate was 4%, under the GST regime therate would be in the range of
5% to 12%. And in jewellery industry the VAT rate was 1%,under the GST
regime the rate would be 5%. Thereby resulting in significant impact for
thesesectors.i.e. theall thesesectors haveboth positiveand negativeimpact from
GST.
HenceIwouldliketoconcludebysayingthattheCentralgovernmenthav
egetmore benefit from GST implementation, and the retailers are the main
looser. That is the GSThaveboth positiveand negativeimpact
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Dr. Mohan Kumar, CA Yogesh Kumar (2017). “GST & its portable impact on
theFMCG industry in India”, International Journal of Research in Finance and
Marketing(IJRFM),Vol.7Issue4,April– 2017,pp.66-76
Saurabh Suman (2017). “Study on New GST Era and its Impact on Small
BusinessEntrepreneurs”,JournalofAccounting,Finance&MarketingTechnology,Vol.1,Is
sue,02.24-36p.
BOOKSREFERRED
ResearchmethodologybyDr. K.Venugopal
QuantitativetechniquesbyL.R.Potty
BasicnumericalskillsbyDr.SanthoshAreekuzhi