Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PII: S0190-9622(17)32823-2
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.11.056
Reference: YMJD 12183
Please cite this article as: Zebda R, Paller AS, Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) Inhibitors, Journal of the
American Academy of Dermatology (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.11.056.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to
our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all
legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
PT
5 Chicago, Illinois USA
RI
6 Corresponding author:
7 Amy S. Paller, MD
SC
8 Department of Dermatology
12 Phone: 312-227-6060
M
13 Fax: 312-227-9402
D
14 Email: apaller@northwestern.edu
TE
18 Conflicts of Interest:
C
19 Amy S. Paller, MD, has received funds for serving as an investigator for Anacor and as
AC
27 References: 62
PT
28 Tables: 1
RI
29 Figures: 1
30 Attachments: none
SC
31 Keywords: Atopic dermatitis; phosphodiesterase, crisaborole, apremilast, adenylyl
U
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
3
33 Abstract
34 Historically, drugs available for treating atopic dermatitis (AD) have been limited to
35 topical corticosteroids (TCS) and topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI), with systemic
36 immunosuppressants and phototherapy reserved for severe AD. Despite their efficacy,
PT
37 with long term use, these agents have associated safety concerns and limitations. More
RI
38 targeted options with fewer systemic and cutaneous side effects are needed for treating
SC
40 cytokines via the degradation of cAMP. Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) activity is
41 increased in the inflammatory cells of patients with AD, leading to increased production
42
U
of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Targeting PDE4 reduces the production
AN
43 of these proinflammatory mediators in AD. Both topical and oral PDE4 inhibitors have a
45 for children >2yrs of age and adults in the treatment of AD. Crisaborole 2% ointment
D
46 shows early and sustained improvement in disease severity and pruritus/ other AD
TE
47 symptoms, with burning/stinging upon application as the only related adverse event.
48 Other PDE4 inhibitors are currently in trials with promising efficacy and safety.
EP
49
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
4
50 Capsule Summary
PT
54 and pruritus of mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis with a favorable safety profile
RI
55 • PDE4 inhibition is a non-steroidal alternative for treating atopic dermatitis.
56
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
5
57 Introduction
59 children and 7% of adults4. Its associated pruritus and comorbidities often lead to sleep
PT
61 quality of life.5-7 The mainstay of therapy for mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD) has
RI
62 long been emollients and topical corticosteroids. Topical corticosteroids (TCS) are
63 highly effective, but their use has been limited by concerns about side effects,
SC
64 particularly skin atrophy, striae and systemic absorption. Although adverse events are
65 infrequent, phobia about the use of steroids has limited patient adherence to physician-
66
U
prescribed regimens that include topical steroids.8 Topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs),
AN
67 tacrolimus ointment for moderate-to-severe AD and pimecrolimus cream for mild-to-
68 moderate AD, became available for children 2 years and older and adults in 2000
M
71 atrophogenic potential side effects of steroids and with minimal evidence of potential
72 absorption. However, burning or stinging with application can occur, especially when
EP
73 applied to more inflamed areas of skin. Furthermore, concerns about the theoretical
76 for the entire TCI class in 2006.11,12 To date, there has been no published evidence of
77 any malignancy signal with their use, but the black box warning persists.13-15
78
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
6
80 inflammatory cytokines
PT
83 AD has been described in adults with AD17-20 and the cord blood of children born to
RI
84 atopic parents.21 Intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels depend
85 on the relative rate of cAMP production and degradation. PDE4 degrades cAMP, a
SC
86 negative regulator of the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Fig. 1) such as
88
U
associated with increased histamine release from AD inflammatory cells and
AN
89 spontaneous IgE synthesis in cultured B lymphocytes from patients with AD.25,26 These
91
D
92 The first medicinal use of a PDE inhibitor was by Henry Hyde Salter, an asthmatic. He
TE
93 noted that his breathing eased when he drank two cups of strong coffee on an empty
95 caffeine, later found to be a weak non-selective PDE inhibitor.27,28 Weak PDE inhibitors
100 0.5% ointment in AD,33 these studies from the 1990’s were largely abandoned.
101
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
7
102 Ultimately, several isoforms of PDE were tested, and PDE4 was determined to be the
103 most specific target for decreasing secretion of proinflammatory cytokines in AD.34,22
104 Early PDE4 inhibitors, such as cilomilast, AWD 12-281, and KF66490, reduced
105 inflammation in mouse and guinea pig models, including suppression of both Th2 and
PT
106 Th1 cytokines.35,36 Schafer et al found that apremilast inhibited peripheral blood
RI
107 mononuclear cell cytokines and chemokines (CXCL9, CXCL10, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, IL-
108 12, and IL-23), TNF-α expression by stimulated natural killer cells and UVB-activated
SC
109 keratinocytes, and psoriasiform features in a mouse model.37 The PDE4 inhibitor E6005
110 has been shown to directly inhibit mechanisms leading to pruritus in addition through
111
U
reducing cytokine/chemokine production.38 In mouse models and cultured cells, E6005
AN
112 inhibited PAR2-associated itching through its effect on increasing cAMP,39,40 but also
113 through reducing expression of nerve growth factor41 and attenuation of capsaicin-
M
115
TE
117 During the past two decades, several oral and topical PDE4 inhibitors have been
EP
118 studied and approved for the treatment of a variety of inflammatory disorders, including
119 AD, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis,
C
121
122 Oral PDE4 inhibitors are minimally immunosuppressive, in contrast to other systemically
123 administered medications for inflammatory skin disease, but have a narrow therapeutic
124 window, with nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, dyspepsia, and diarrhea as common
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
8
125 adverse events at therapeutic doses.44 Apremilast is FDA-approved for psoriasis and
126 psoriatic arthritis, but early studies for AD have led to mixed results. In open-label
127 adult studies, apremilast is well tolerated with dose-dependent mild side effects
128 (headache, nausea, and soft stools/diarrhea).45,46 However, efficacy has been limited.
PT
129 In one 12 week, open-label, phase II study in 10 adults with AD and/or allergic contact
RI
130 dermatitis the primary endpoint (at least 2 point improvement in Investigator Global
131 Assessment [IGA]) was met in only 20% of subjects; only 10% achieved EASI-75 and
SC
132 an additional 10% also reached EASI-50.45 Response in patients with AD vs. allergic
133 contact dermatitis was not clarified. In a second study or adults with moderate-to-
134
U
severe AD, significant reduction in EASI-50 was observed after 3 months of 20 mg
AN
135 (n=6) and 30 mg (n=10) twice daily, but this too was an open-label trial without a
136 control group to consider the placebo effect. A phase II, multicenter, randomized,
M
137 double-blind, study was recently completed, with placebo vs. 30 vs. 40 mg twice daily
D
141 The small size of PDE4 (251 Da) enables consideration as a topical anti-inflammatory
142
143
144 adults and children 2 years of age and above; other topical agents are in development
145 (Table 1). The novel boron chemistry and small size of crisaborole contribute to its
146 ability to penetrate the epidermis and dermis to target skin inflammation.48 Crisaborole
147 is rapidly metabolized to an inactive form, thus limiting systemic exposure and off-target
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
9
148 side effects. Preclinical studies in animal models at doses as high as 7% demonstrated
151 and nonsensitive anatomic sites50 although 12% experienced local application–site
PT
152 reactions in a 6-week, vehicle-controlled study in adults with mild-moderate AD.51
RI
153 Limited systemic exposure was demonstrated in pK studies in adolescents52 and an 8-
154 day maximal-use systemic exposure (MUSE) study in children 2-17 years of age.53 A
SC
155 phase 2, randomized, controlled, dose-ranging study found greatest improvement in 2%
156 (vs. 0.5%) crisaborole and twice (vs. once) daily in adolescents.54 In two parallel
157
U
randomized, double-blinded, vehicle-controlled, phase 3 pivotal studies, twice daily
AN
158 application of crisaborole ointment (vs. vehicle) for 28 days had a favorable efficacy and
159 safety profile in patients 2 years and older with mild-to-moderate AD.55 In each study
M
160 crisaborole ointment 2% treatment met its primary endpoint of statistically greater
D
161 reduction in the Investigator Static Global Assessment (ISGA) by at least two points to
TE
162 reach ISGA clear (0) or almost clear (1) at day 29 compared to vehicle-treated
163 patients.55 Crisaborole treated patients achieved earlier success in ISGA score and
EP
164 improvement in pruritus than those treated with vehicle as early as day 8 of treatment
165 and sustained throughout the study. Each AD sign (erythema, exudation, excoriation,
C
166 induration/papulation, and lichenification) was significantly reduced when the results of
AC
167 the two parallel studies were pooled at day 29,55 crisaborole also led to significant
168 improvement over vehicle in both individual trials for erythema, exudation, excoriation
169 and lichenification (all p<0.05) and in one of the two trials for induration/population.55
170 Based on patient diaries, improved pruritus was seen earlier in crisaborole-treated
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
10
171 patients than in those treated with vehicle (1.37 vs. 1.70 days, p=0.001). With pruritus
172 measured on a 4-point scale (0-3), pruritus improvement occurred more often at each
173 time point with the crisaborole vs. vehicle (pooled data; days 8, 15, 22; p<0.001; day 29,
174 p=0.002).
PT
175 The use of crisaborole ointment twice daily for 28 days was associated with a favorable
RI
176 safety profile without evidence of skin atrophy or telangectasias during the 4 weeks of
177 testing. The major adverse effect was stinging/burning with application (4.4%),
SC
178 compared to historical rates of application site burning reported by tacrolimus (11%) and
179 pimecrolimus (10%);56 no head-to-head trials have been performed. Of the subjects who
180
U
experienced application site stinging/burning, 76% reported it on the first day of
AN
181 treatment and 77% reported resolution within 24 hours of onset. There were no reports
182 of serious adverse events. Gastrointestinal side effects were described in crisaborole
M
183 treated patients at low frequency (2.7%) and were not considered treatment related.55
D
185 safety study was conducted of 517 patients >2 years of age with mild-to-moderate AD
186 who completed the 28-day phase 3 pivotal study. Few treatment-emergent adverse
EP
187 events considered related to the topical crisaborole were noted, most of which were of
189 Most frequently reported treatment-related AES were application site pain
AC
190 (stinging/burning), worsening or flare of atopic dermatitis, and infection. GI side effects
191 (nausea, vomiting), which are a common side effect of apremilast (oral PDE4 inhibitor),
193
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
11
194 Other selective PDE4 inhibitors are currently in the pipeline (Table 1). Of these, the only
195 one with phase 2 trial reported outcomes in the US is OPA-15406. In an 8-week dose-
196 finding study of twice daily use, 20.9% of those on OPA-15406 1% (p=0.017) and 14.6%
197 of those on OPA-15406 0.3% (p=0.07) achieved the endpoint of IGA reduction >2 to
PT
198 clear or almost clear by 4 weeks vs. 2.7% of those on vehicle. Mean EASI scores in the
RI
199 OPA-15406 1% treatment group were decreased by 31.4% at week 1 and 39.0% by
200 week 2, and the mean visual analogue scale pruritus score improved from moderate-to-
SC
201 mild within 1 week. Improvement was sustained throughout the 8-week trial, but the
202 difference in improvement between the OPA-15406 and vehicle arms diminished by 8
203 weeks.58
U
AN
204 E6005 (parent of RVT-501) has completed phase 2 trials in Japan. In phase 1 trials in
205 adult healthy volunteers and patients with AD, application of E6005 ointment was well
M
206 tolerated and led to very low systemic exposure.59 In phase 2 dose-finding studies,
D
207 0.2% was found to give the most significant improvement in lesions60 and similarly was
TE
208 found to be more effective than lower dosing in children.61 An additional, double-blind,
210 reduction in EASI and SCORAD scores after 12 weeks.62 This compound has now
211 completed its first clinical trial in the US in adolescents and adults, comparing 28 days
C
212 of 0.2 vs 0.5% vs. vehicle ointment for mild-to-moderate AD; results are not yet
AC
213 available.
214
215 Conclusions:
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
12
216 There is a need for additional topical treatments for AD. PDE4 activity is increased in
217 inflammatory cells of patients with AD, leading to degradation of intracellular cAMP, with
219 promising targeted treatment option for children and adults with mild-to-moderate AD.
PT
220 Future studies will be needed explore the efficacy and safety of PDE4 compounds
RI
221 beyond crisasborole and in pediatric patients below the age of 2 years.
222
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
223 References
226 3. Eichenfield LF, Tom WL, Chamlin SL, et al. Guidelines of care for the
PT
227 management of atopic dermatitis: section 1. Diagnosis and assessment of atopic
RI
228 dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70:338-51.
229 4. Silverberg JI. Public health burden and epidemiology of atopic dermatitis.
SC
230 Dermatol Clin. 2017;35:283-9.
231 5. Ellis CN, Drake LA, Prendergast MM, et al. Cost of atopic dermatitis and eczema
232
U
in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:361-70.
AN
233 6. Blume-Peytavi U, Metz M. Atopic dermatitis in children: management of pruritus.
235 7. Brown MM, Chamlin SL, Smidt AC. Quality of life in pediatric dermatology.
D
237 8. Eichenfield LF, Tom WL, Berger TG, et al. Guidelines of care for the
240 9. Paller A, Eichenfield LF, Leung DY, et al. A 12-week study of tacrolimus ointment
C
241 for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in pediatric patients. J Am Acad Dermatol.
AC
243 10. Eichenfield LF, Lucky AW, Boguniewicz M, et al. Safety and efficacy of
244 pimecrolimus (ASM 981) cream 1% in the treatment of mild and moderate atopic
246 11. Carr WW. Topical calcineurin inhibitors for atopic dermatitis: review and
248 12. Siegfried EC, Jaworski JC, Hebert AA. Topical calcineurin inhibitors and
249 lymphoma risk: evidence update with implications for daily practice. Am J Clin
PT
250 Dermatol. 2013;14:163-78.
RI
251 13. Siegfried EC, Jaworski JC, Kaiser JD, Hebert AA. Systematic review of published
252 trials: long-term safety of topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors
SC
253 in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis. BMC pediatrics. 2016;16:75.
254 14. Sigurgeirsson B, Boznanski A, Todd G, et al. Safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus
255
U
in atopic dermatitis: a 5-year randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2015;135:597-606.
AN
256 15. Kang S, Lucky AW, Pariser D, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of tacrolimus
257 ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children. J Am Acad Dermatol.
M
259 16. Szentivanyia A. The beta adrenergic theory of the atopic abnormality in bronchial
TE
261 17. Grewe SR, Chan SC, Hanifin JM. Elevated leukocyte cyclic AMP-
EP
264 18. Parker CW, Kennedy S, Eisen AZ. Leukocyte and lymphocyte cyclic AMP
AC
267 lymphocytes from normal and atopic donors and the effects of PDE inhibition on
269 20. Chan SC, Reifsnyder D, Beavo JA, et al. Immunochemical characterization of the
272 21. Heskel NS, Chan SC, Thiel ML, et al. Elevated umbilical cord blood leukocyte
PT
273 cyclic adenosine monophosphate-phosphodiesterase activity in children with
RI
274 atopic parents. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1984;11:422-6.
275 22. Hanifin JM, Chan SC, Cheng JB, et al. Type 4 phosphodiesterase inhibitors have
SC
276 clinical and in vitro anti-inflammatory effects in atopic dermatitis. J Invest
278
U
23. Chan SC, Li SH, Hanifin JM. Increased interleukin-4 production by atopic
AN
279 mononuclear leukocytes correlates with increased cyclic adenosine
282 24. Chan SC, Kim JW, Henderson WR, et al. Altered prostaglandin E2 regulation of
TE
284 25. Butler JM, Chan SC, Stevens S, et al. Increased leukocyte histamine release
EP
287 26. Cooper KD, Kang K, Chan SC, et al. Phosphodiesterase inhibition by Ro 20-
AC
288 1724 reduces hyper-IgE synthesis by atopic dermatitis cells in vitro. J Invest
290 27. Salter H. On some points in the treatment and clinical history of asthma.
292 28. Persson CG. On the medical history of xanthines and other remedies for asthma:
PT
296 30. Shupack J, Stiller M, Meola T, et al. Papaverine hydrochloride in the treatment of
RI
297 atopic dermatitis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover clinical trial to
SC
299 31. Berth-Jones J, Graham-Brown RA. Failure of papaverine to reduce pruritus in
304 33. Kaplan RJ, Daman L, Rosenberg EW, et al. Topical use of caffeine with
D
306 62.
307 34. Crocker IC, Townley RG. Therapeutic potential of phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors
EP
310 inhibitors SB 207499 and AWD 12-281 on the inflammatory reaction in a model
AC
312 36. Harada D, Takada C, Nosaka Y, et al. Effect of orally administered KF66490, a
315 37. Schafer PH, Parton A, Gandhi AK, et al. Apremilast, a cAMP phosphodiesterase-
318 38. Ishii N, Shirato M, Wakita H, et al. Antipruritic effect of the topical
PT
319 phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor E6005 ameliorates skin lesions in a mouse atopic
RI
320 dermatitis model. J Phamracol Exp Ther. 2013;346:105-12.
SC
322 phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor: inhibition of responses to proteinase-activated
328 41. Ishii N, Wakita H, Shirato M. Effect of the phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor E6005
TE
329 on nerve growth factor elevation in irritated skin of NC/Nga mice. J Pharmacol
331 42. Wakita H, Ohkuro M, Ishii N, et al. A putative antipruritic mechanism of the
334 43. Teixeira MM, Gristwood RW, Cooper N, et al. Phosphodiesterase (PDE)4
336 1997;18:164-71.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
18
337 44. Gottlieb AB, Matheson RT, Menter A, et al. Efficacy, tolerability, and
340 45. Volf EM, Au SC, Dumont N, et al. A phase 2, open-label, investigator-initiated
PT
341 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of apremilast in subjects with
RI
342 recalcitrant allergic contact or atopic dermatitis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012;11:341-
343 6.
SC
344 46. Samrao A, Berry TM, Goreshi R, et al. A pilot study of an oral phosphodiesterase
346 2012;148:890-7.
U
AN
347 47. US National Library of Medicine: Clinicaltrials.gov. Efficacy and Safety Study of
349 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02087943?term=02087943&rank=1.
D
351 48. Jarnagin K, Chanda S, Coronado D, et al. Crisaborole topical ointment, 2%: a
EP
354 2016;15:390-6.
AC
356 results for crisaborole, a novel phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor for atopic dermatitis.
358 50. Zane LT, Hughes MH, Shakib S. Tolerability of crisaborole ointment for
361 51. Murrell DF, Gebauer K, Spelman L, et al. Crisaborole topical ointment, 2% in
PT
362 adults with atopic dermatitis: a phase 2a, vehicle-controlled, proof-of-concept
RI
363 study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2015;14:1108-12.
364 52. Tom WL, Van Syoc M, Chanda S, et al. Pharmacokinetic profile, safety, and
SC
365 tolerability of crisaborole topical ointment, 2% in adolescents with atopic
367
U
53. Zane LT, Kircik L, Call R, et al. Crisaborole topical ointment, 2% in patients ages
AN
368 2 to 17 years with atopic dermatitis: a phase 1b, open-label, maximal-use
370 54. Stein Gold LF, Spelman L, Spellman MC, et al. A phase 2, randomized,
D
371 controlled, dose-ranging study evaluating crisaborole topical ointment, 0.5% and
TE
373 2015;14:1394-9.
EP
374 55. Paller AS, Tom WL, Lebwohl MG, et al. Efficacy and safety of crisaborole
376 topical treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) in children and adults. J Am Acad
AC
378 56. Paller AS, Lebwohl M, Fleischer AB, et al. Tacrolimus ointment is more effective
379 than pimecrolimus cream with a similar safety profile in the treatment of atopic
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
20
381 2005;52:810-22.
382 57. Eichenfield LF, Call RS, Forsha DW, et al. Long-term safety of crisaborole
383 ointment 2% in children and adults with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis. J Am
PT
384 Acad Dermatol. 2017;77:641-9.e5.
RI
385 58. Hanifin JM, Ellis CN, Frieden IJ, et al. OPA-15406, a novel, topical, nonsteroidal,
SC
387 adolescent patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis (AD): A phase-II
389 2016;75:297-305.
U
AN
390 59. Ohba F, Matsuki S, Imayama S, et al. Efficacy of a novel phosphodiesterase
393 60. Ohba F, Nomoto M, Hojo S, et al. Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a
TE
397 inhibitor E6005 on Japanese children with atopic dermatitis: Results from a
C
399 62. Furue M, Kitahara Y, Akama H, et al. Safety and efficacy of topical E6005, a
402 2014;41:577-85.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
21
PT
407 cAMP – cyclic adenosine monophosphate
RI
408 Da – Dalton
SC
410 IFN-γ - Interferon gamma
414 IL – Interleukin
421 pK – Pharmacokinetics
AC
PT
RI
SC
U
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
23
430
PT
Study Study Primary Results
Study type Location Indication Age Duration References
Number Size Endpoints posted
AN2728 (crisaborole)
RI
No SAEs, 10
out of 23 https://clinicalt
SC
Phase I/II - Treatment-
subjects with rials.gov/ct2/s
Two, Open- related
NCT016 treatment how/NCT0165
Label, Single- USA AD 12-17y 23 28 Days AEs/SAEs,
52885 related AE. 2885
group pharmaco-
U
53 Limited
Studies kinetics.
systemic
AN
exposure.
https://clinicalt
Phase II - Improvement Greatest rials.gov/ct2/s
M
Multi-center, in Atopic improvement how/NCT0160
NCT016
Randomized, USA AD 12-17y 86 29 Days Dermatitis at day 8 and 2341
02341
Double-Blind, Severity Index 29 with 1%
D
Parallel-group (ADSI) score. concentration.
TE
% with ISGA
Primary
score clear or
endpoint and
almost clear at
Phase III - reduced
day 29; Time https://clinicalt
EP
Multicenter, pruritus
to ISGA rials.gov/ct2/s
NCT021 Randomized, Mild/Mod achieved with
USA >2y 764 28 Days treatment how/NCT0211
18792 Double-Blind, AD crisaborole
success; 8792
C
application site
signs at day how/NCT0211
pain reported
29. 8766
by 4.4% of
Phase III - % with ISGA
active vs. 1.2%
Multicenter, score clear or
NCT021 Mild/Mod placebo+I19.
Randomized, USA >2y 763 28 Days almost clear at
18766 AD No SAEs
Double-Blind, day 29; Time
reported.
Vehicle- to ISGA
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
24
Controlled treatment
(parallel success;
to NCT0211- Change from
55
8792) baseline in AD
signs at day
PT
29.
At day 28,
greater
RI
decrease in
Phase III - ADSI score in
Multi-Center, active-treated https://clinicalt
SC
Randomized, (68%) vs. rials.gov/ct2/s
NCT013 Double-Blind, Mild/Mod Improvement vehicle-treated how/NCT0130
Australia 18-75y 46 6 Weeks
01508 Vehicle- AD in ADSI score. (20%) lesion. 1508
U
Controlled, Local
Parallel- application site
AN
51
group reactions in
12% of
subjects. No
M
SAEs.
https://clinicalt
Phase I -
rials.gov/ct2/s
Single-center,
D
how/NCT0326
NCT032 Randomized, Healthy Skin irritation Open for
Japan 20-55y 32 4 Days 0595
60595 Vehicle- Men index enrollment
TE
controlled,
Parallel-group
EP
https://clinicalt
rials.gov/ct2/s
Phase II - how/NCT0323
C
25
https://clinicalt
Phase IV - Impact of rials.gov/ct2/s
Randomized, internet- how/NCT0325
NCT032 Mild/Mod Open for
Double-blind, USA 2-64y 40 12 Month reporting 0663
50663 AD enrollment
Parallel-group intervention on
PT
(Adherence) adherence.
RI
OPA-15405
Phase I -
SC
Multi-center,
Randomized, https://clinicalt
Blinded, rials.gov/ct2/s
U
NCT017 Vehicle-and- AEs/SAEs, how/NCT0170
USA AD 18-65y 92 4 Weeks None
02181 active drug levels. 2181
AN
Comparator-
controlled,
Sequential
M
Dose Cohort
Highest
Phase I -
AUC12h with https://clinicalt
Single-center,
D
OPA-15406 rials.gov/ct2/s
Randomized,
Pharmaco- 3%. No how/NCT0233
NCT023 Double-blind, Healthy
TE
Japan 20-40y 32 2 Weeks kinetic reported AEs 4787
34787 Parallel- Men
parameters. or SAEs.
group,
Placebo-
EP
controlled
Phase II -
Multi-center,
C
Randomized, https://clinicalt
Double-blind, rials.gov/ct2/s
AC
26
Phase II -
Multi-center, https://clinicalt
The number
Randomized, rials.gov/ct2/s
and
NCT030 Double-blind, how/NCT0301
Japan AD 2-14y 73 4 Weeks percentage of None
18691 Parallel- 8691
PT
subjects with
group,
AEs.
Vehicle-
controlled
RI
Improvement
in IGA, EASI,
pruritus with
SC
Phase II - OPA-15406
Multi-center, 1%. Negligible
Incidence and https://clinicalt
Randomized, blood levels.
severity of AEs rials.gov/ct2/s
U
NCT020 Double-blind, Mild/Mod Most common
USA 10-70y 94 8 Weeks and incidence how/NCT0206
68352 Vehicle- AD treatment-
AN
of success in 8352
controlled, related AEs:
IGA score.
Three-arm, worsening
Parallel-group AD/pruritus,
M
headache,
naso-
pharyngitis.
D
https://clinicalt
Plasma rials.gov/ct2/s
Phase II -
TE
NCT029 concentrations how/NCT0294
Multi-center, USA AD 2-18y 32 28 Days None
45657 drug and 5657
Open-label
metabolite.
EP
E6005/RVT-501
C
Phase I/II -
No skin
Two https://clinicalt
AC
irritation or
Randomized, rials.gov/ct2/s
Males with photosensiti-
Investigator- Pharmaco- how/NCT0117
NCT011 AD or zation. Plasma
blind, Japan 20-65y 76 Not Listed kinetic 9880
79880 Healthy concentrations
Parallel- parameters.
Men below the
group,
limit of
Vehicle-
quantification.
controlled
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
27
60
Studies
PT
RI
A Phase I/II -
Two https://clinicalt
SC
Randomized, rials.gov/ct2/s
Pharmaco-
Double-blind, how/study/NC
NCT020 Mild/Mod kinetic
Parallel- Japan 2-15y 62 Not listed None T02094235
94235 AD parameters
group,
U
and AEs.
Vehicle-
AN
controlled
Studies
Phase II -
Randomized,
M
https://clinicalt
Single-
Changes in rials.gov/ct2/s
NCT014 blinded, 4 wks, 8 wk
Japan AD 20-64y 78 pruritus and None how/NCT0146
61941 Parallel- extension
D
EASI score. 1941
group,
Vehicle-
TE
controlled
Phase II - https://clinicalt
Randomized, rials.gov/ct2/s
EP
NCT029 Double- Pharmaco- how/NCT0295
50922 blinded, USA, AD (<25% kinetics and 0922
12-70y 157 28 Days None
Parallel- Canada mild) safety
C
group, parameters.
Vehicle-
AC
controlled
DRM02
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
28
https://clinicalt
Phase II - Change in
rials.gov/ct2/s
Randomized, Physician
NCT019 how/NCT0199
Double-blind, Canada AD 18-70y 21 6 Weeks Lesion None
93420 3420
Vehicle Assessment
PT
Controlled (PLA).
GW842470X
RI
https://clinicalt
SC
Phase I - rials.gov/ct2/s
Single + repeat Safety and
NCT003 Randomized, how/NCT0035
Europe AD 18-67y 45 10 day expo- pharmaco- None
56642 Single-Blind, 6642
sure kinetics.
Dose-Rising
U
https://clinicalt
AN
Phase II - rials.gov/ct2/s
Randomized, Clinical how/NCT0035
NCT003
Double-blind, Europe Mod AD 18-65y 190 21 days efficacy (EASI None 4510
M
54510
Placebo- score).
controlled
D
Leo-29102
Phase I -
Multi-center, TE https://clinicalt
rials.gov/ct2/s
EP
Pharmaco-
Randomized, how/NCT0144
NCT014 7 days or 6 wks kinetics and
Double-blind, Germany AD 18-65y 58 None 7758
47758 (2 sets) safety
Parallel-
parameters.
C
group,
Prospective
AC
https://clinicalt
Phase I - rials.gov/ct2/s
NCT010 Randomized, how/NCT0100
Europe AD 18-55y 36 7 days AEs None
05823 Double-blind, 5823
Parallel-group
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
29
https://clinicalt
rials.gov/ct2/s
Phase I - how/NCT0095
Male adults
Double-blind, 8516
NCT009 with skin Phototoxic
Single-group, Europe 18-65y 32 5 days None
PT
58516 irritation on reaction
Vehicle-
exam.
controlled
RI
https://clinicalt
Phase I -
rials.gov/ct2/s
SC
Randomized,
how/NCT0089
NCT008 Double-blind, Healthy Safety and
Europe 18-55y 64 Not Listed None 1709
91709 Vehicle- Men tolerability.
controlled,
U
Parallel-group
AN
https://clinicalt
Phase I -
rials.gov/ct2/s
Randomized,
NCT014 how/NCT0142
Single- Europe Healthy 18-55y 102 Not Listed AEs None
M
23656 3656
blinded,
Parallel-group
D
Phase II -
Randomized,
TE
Double-
blinded,
Parallel- https://clinicalt
group, rials.gov/ct2/s
EP
NCT010 Canada, Mild/Mod Change in
Treatment 18-65y 183 4 Weeks None how/NCT0103
37881 Europe AD EASI score.
Efficacy 7881
of LEO
C
29102 vs.
Vehicle vs.
AC
Elidel®
Cream
Roflumilast
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
30
No significant
change (day
Phase II - 15) in
Multi-center, SCORAD,
https://clinicalt
Randomized, TEWL,
PT
Change in rials.gov/ct2/s
NCT018 Double-blind, pruritus. 5
Europe Mod AD 18-65y 40 15 Days Modified Local how/NCT0185
56764 Parallel- reported AEs -
SCORAD. 6764
group, application site
RI
Vehicle- pain, elevated
controlled LFTs, and
naso-
SC
pharyngitis.
U
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
31
432 Figure 1. PDE4 is increased in atopic dermatitis. PDE4 regulates the production of
433 inflammatory mediators via the degradation of cAMP. Inhibition of PDE4 leads to
434 increased intracellular cAMP, which activates protein kinase A (PKA). Activation of PKA
PT
435 inhibits NFAT and NFkB signaling pathways and downstream cytokine and chemokine
RI
436 release.
437
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
438
C
AC