PepsiCo Global Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Standard Cebu

4.1 Step 0: Preparatory Stage Deliverables Pendings

4.1.1 Management Support 1. CEB-IPM-TK01 signed by OM and QAM designates IPM Responsible
In order to ensure effectiveness, it is important that top management communicate their and IPM Deputy. 2.
commitment to the IPM program, as well as supporting the staff in their efforts to implement all Monthly IPM reviews during Operations Meeting
aspects of the program, and ensure regulatory compliance. 3. Corrective and Preventive Actions Program was revised to include
Resources such as time, personnel and capital shall be assigned not only for the start up, but for corrective actions from IPM related issues.
on-going activities, reviews and updates, as well as corrective and preventive actions.

4.1.2 Regulatory Compliance Recent regulations from FDA were issued in Administrative Order 2019- To Include in the IPM Program:
Facilities shall identify all relevant federal and local regulations related to IPM activities to ensure compliance. 0010, has been included in the IPM Program. Department of Health, Administrative
Order No. 2019-0010. Guidelines on the Regulation of Operators of Pest
Control, Certification of Pesticide, Handlers, and Accreditation of Their
Training Providers.

Department of Health, Food and Drug Administration Circular No. 2018-

008. Ban of Chlorpyrifos and Dichlovos for Use in Household/ Urban
Pesticide Products and Household/ Urban Pesticide Products Containing
Chlorpyrifos and Dichlorvos as Active Ingredient

Department of Health, Food and Drug Administration Circular No. 2017,

List of Banned Pesticides

Department of Health, Administrative Order No. 2014-0038. Rules and

Regulations Governing Household/ Urban Pesticides Licensing of
Establishments and Operators, Registration of their Products and for
Other Purpose

Department of Health, Department Circular No.2011-0101. The Rules

and Regulations Implementing Republic Act No 9711 – The Food and
Drug Administration Act of 2009.

Department of Health, Administrative Order No. 2004-153. Revised

Guidelines on Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing,
Packing, Repacking or Holding Food
.
Department of Health, Implementing Rules and
Regulations of Chapter XVI – Vermin Control of the Code on Sanitation
of the Philippines (P.D. 856), 1997

Fertilizer and Pesticide Authority, Rules and Regulations, No. 1 Series

1977. FPA Rules and Regulations Governing the Importation,
Manufacture, Formulation, Repacking & Distribution, Delivery, Sales,
Storage and Use of Pesticides.

4.1.3 IPM Responsible IPM Responsible identified and trained. Deputy assigned and trained.
Facility Management shall identify a responsible person for the IPM Program. The IPM
Responsible or a designee shall develop a thorough, effective IPM program that meets regulatory
requirements.

4.1.4 Training 1. Overall training already identified in the program. See Induction Training to visitors and contractors
The IPM program shall identify the required training for personnel involved in the program. These requirements Section 6.10 Training
shall be documented and updated upon program results review in the IPM plan. 2. IPM Awareness Training developed by the IPM Resp. already
conducted to all employee
3. Training Materials already
received: (Deployment Training Videos)
4.1.5. Pest Control Operator (PCO) Third-Party Contractor PCO: Chemsol. Technician was trained in PepsiCo Considering to change PCO Technician, needs to undergo Trainings for
Facilities shall identify an internal or external service provider, responsible for developing the IPM IPM e-learning courses and deployment Training Video. IPM
Program jointly with the facility IPM Responsible and for the execution of the IPM plan.
Pest Control Operators shall be appropriately licensed, certified and/or trained, as required by
relevant regulations, and have proved experience servicing food industry, manufacturing and/or
storage and distribution sites.

4.1.6. Contracted Services
When facilities identify an external service provider, a signed contract or any alternate service
agreement shall be documented detailing the scope of service, to ensure duties and
responsibilities are clearly established for proper execution of activities required by the program,
as well as regulatory compliance.
The contract was renewed due to time limitations. Adjustments to be PCO Liability Insurance still lacking
made from the verification visits of the IPM Lead are being documented;
subject for changes for the next issue of the contract.

4.1.7. Scientific Information The materials used as scientific support are mentioned or considered in
The IPM Responsible shall identify recognized sources for support on scientific information and the IPM Program.
new developments, to better understand emerging pest issues and how to address them
effectively.

4.1.8. Pesticides 1. PepsiCo list of Approved/Prohibited pesticides provided. 2.

Even though chemical treatments are the least preferred option, when the use of pesticides is the Pesticide approval process included in the IPM program.
only option to regain control derived of an infestation, pesticides shall be used ensuring 3. List of banned pesticides
compliance with all applicable regulations and fulfilling the requirements stated in the Pesticide issued by FDA was circulated to PCPPI plants during IPM Roll Out for
Use Guidance document. reference.
4.2. Step 1: Identification and Risk Assessment 1. Initial facility assessment conducted on April 28-29, 2019 with IPM
The goal of the first step of the IPM approach is to identify current or potential pest issues and/or lead support. After IPM training, IPM responsible is conducting quarterly
conditions promoting pest activity. follow up inspections. Pests of concern and program vulnerabilities were
All facilities shall identify specific pests of concern, assess their risks and include them in their identified. 2. Historical findings
specific site pest management program. <2015-2018> from AIBI audits were provided by the IPM Lead.
• Identification and risk assessment of current or potential pest issues or conditions promoting
pest activity shall be based on knowledge of pest biology and behavior, as well as pest 3. IPM
incidence in the specific location, experience and knowledge on food facilities, their products related findings are being handled by the revised CAPA Program and
and processes. filed with CAPA Report.
• Trained internal or external personnel shall conduct the facility assessment covering all areas
inside and outside of the facility, including neighboring activities that might have an impact,
at least annually.
• The assessment shall include every aspect of the operation that are or may be present
focusing especially on poor practices, structural deficiencies, current or historical pest activity
or infestations.
• The assessment shall include review of historical data from site monitoring program, selfinspections,
trends and pest sighting log info, corrective actions taken and their
effectiveness.
• Impact from other Prerequisite programs shall also be identified and communicated to
ensure development needs are addressed or built up to support the IPM program.

4.3. Step 2: Determine the Threshold limits Threshold limits was developed in accordance to the 12 months
Action thresholds shall be set by the IPM Responsible jointly with the PCO and shall reflect the monitoring data from Chemsol
site’s pest management objectives.
The threshold limits and their rationale shall be individually determined and documented for
each targeted pest, based on historical data and pest activity trends.
The Pest Management Program shall actively address and drive improvement in pest activity
on an annual basis as indicated by Key Performance indicators.
4.4. Step 3: Determine the IPM Program and Plan IPM Program and Plan was reviewed by IPM Lead during the second
Facilities shall have a documented Integrated Pest Management Program showing how they verification and comment were incorporated on the next revision.
manage effectively to avoid risk of contamination or adulteration of foods from pests, based on
the target pests identified in Step 1. (4.2)
The IPM Program shall demonstrate how facilities comply with requirements derived from this
Standard and its supporting documents, including a documented IPM Plan, monitoring and
control methods, schedules and procedures, a training program for all involved parties,
communication of pest related information to all employees, between others.
The IPM Plan shall be developed in order to manage pest issues or potential risks identified during
the Assessment step, with a proactive approach.
The IPM plan shall be updated on an annual basis or earlier, if required. The annual review shall
consider results from verification activities and be specific for each facility.
The IPM Plan shall include:
• Facility Information: type of foods produced or stored, managed ingredients that may be
vulnerable to pests, processes involved, etc.
• Facility Lay-out: Layout concerns, vulnerable areas, structural issues, upcoming or recent
changes in the structure, surrounding areas concerns, etc.
• Information of the Pests or potential pests identified in the Assessment step: known and
probable pests to affect the site.
• Control Tactics: Establish action plans to address all pest risks (identified on the Assessment
step). These actions may include but are not limited to: Cleaning frequency, Monitoring
devices and activities, Trap installation, Exclusion methods, Building condition improvement,
education, etc.
• Threshold limits for identified pests of concern.
• Training: Determine the training needs for frontline and non-frontline employees to ensure
plan effectiveness. Trainings shall be offered by a subject matter expert or a recognized
organization.
• Performance review: Periodic and annual review of the plan performance shall be
conducted as part the verification activities

4.5. Step 4: Establish Monitoring The monitoring program was included in the IPM program and
Based on the outcome of the Identification and Risk Assessment step, the Pest Management frequency of monitoring was adjusted accordingly.
Program shall include the placement of detectors and/or traps in key locations to identify and
follow up on on-going pest activity.
• The IPM Responsible jointly with the Pest Control Operator (PCO) shall define and
document the monitoring methods and frequencies for each targeted pest in the IPM plan.
• Monitoring devices shall be designed and located so as to prevent potential contamination
of materials, products or facilities.
• Monitoring devices shall be labelled and tracked on a location map. Any changes shall be
immediately updated in the map.
• Food materials shall not be used as an attractant for internal or external monitoring on a
routine basis. If they are used (i.e.: in case of infestation), the material shall not pose a risk
to the facility (i.e.: allergen, microbiological risk, other pests, etc.).
• Monitoring devices shall be in accordance with relevant regulations and used according
manufacturer’s labels or instructions.
• All monitoring activities and results shall be recorded
4.6. Step 5: Establish Corrective Actions %CAPA Completion overall is at 87% %
Corrective actions shall include the following elements to prevent pest activity and conditions Short Term Corrective Actions is at 97% %
that are conducive for pests: Long Term Corrective Action is at 77%
• determine and eliminate the root cause of an issue
• determine the disposition of product which may be impacted
• record the corrective actions that have been taken.
Corrections and corrective actions shall be taken when threshold limits are exceeded.
Root-cause analysis shall be conducted to ensure the cause(s) is (are) properly identified, the
situation is brought back under control, and recurrence is prevented.
Eradication measures shall be put in place immediately after evidence of infestation is reported.
Facilities shall use the most effective and lowest risk control methods, considering the risks to
the product, applicator, people, and environment. Chemical methods are the least preferred
option and their use shall be kept to a minimum.
Treatment with chemical, physical or biological agents shall be carried out without posing a
threat to the safety or suitability of food and ensure regulatory compliance. Pesticide use and
application shall be restricted to trained, licensed or certified (when required) operators and
shall be strictly controlled.
Records of eradication measures, actions taken and corrective actions shall be kept and assessed
for effectiveness.

4.7. Step 6: Establish Verification Procedures First verification in late Apr 2019 (CEB-IPM-TK07). Several gaps were
In addition to monitoring activities, facilities shall have verification procedures in place. The observed. The second verification will be documented by end of Sep
purpose of verification is to ensure the IPM program is effective and IPM activities are being 2019.
executed according to the IPM plan. There are two levels of verification.
The first level of verification evaluates if IPM activities are conducted according to the IPM Plan.
This includes but is not limited to:
• Review of records of PCO activities to ensure IPM plan execution as planned.
• Review of monitoring records to analyze findings, identify trends, if any, review any
changes, conducted on a quarterly basis, as a minimum.
• Review of corrective actions, if applicable.
The second level of verification evaluates if the IPM Program is effective. The criteria for success
are the lack or reduction of pest activity. This includes but is not limited to:
• Annual review of the program, along with trends from current and previous year, as a
minimum.
• Include data from self-inspection findings, internal and external audits, pest sighting logs,
and consumer complaints related to pest activity.
Results of verification activities shall be documented.

4.8. Step 7: Establish Documentation and Record Keeping Documents and Records were included in the IPM Program; as well as ,
IPM documents and records shall be controlled and reviewed to ensure effectiveness, adequate internal & external documents.
levels of protection, storage, retention times and disposal, and easily retrievable when required.
 Pepsi - Cola Products Philippines, Inc.
Cebu Plant

IPM CAPA SUMMARY

ROD # Area Area Responsible %CAPA Completion %ST %LT
5 Property Perimeter EHSM - EEP 84% 100% 67%
4 Outside Grounds EHSM - EEP 75% 100% 50%
4 Marketing Materials Storage Marketing 75% 50% 100%
4 Waste Collection Area EHSM - EEP 100% 100% 100%
3 Building Structure MM - MHC 75% 100% 50%
3 Maintenance Shop MM - MHC 75% 75% 75%
3 Washroom/Locker Room EHSM - EEP 100% 100% 100%
3 Fleet Area Fleet 100% 100% 100%
3 Spare Parts Storage MM - MHC 100% 100% 100%
3 Industrial Storage Room MM - MHC 100% 100% 100%
3 PD Yard LSM - MND 100% 100% 100%
3 Wastewater Treatment Plant EHSM - EEP 100% 100% 100%
3 Canteen EHSM - EEP 100% 100% 100%
2 Mezzanine MM - MHC 75% 100% 50%
2 Raw Materials Warehouse MCM - DS 80% 100% 60%
2 NR Warehouse LSM - MND 63% 100% 25%
2 RGB Full Goods Warehouse LSM - MND 82% 88% 75%
2 Bottle washer Area 1 PSM - MCC/CFA 80% 100% 60%
2 Bottle washer Area 2 PSM - QJS/KDV 100% 100% 100%
2 Bottle washer Area 3 PSM - KBL/TRF 75% 100% 50%
1 CSD Syrup Room QAM - EDM 74% 100% 47%
1 NCB Syrup Room QAM - EDM 100% 100% 100%
1 Filling Room Line 1 PSM - MCC/CFA 75% 100% 50%
1 Filling Room Line 2 PSM - QJS/KDV 92% 100% 83%
1 Filling Room Line 3 PSM - KBL/TRF 88% 100% 75%

25 Plant IPM CAPA % Completion: 87% 97% 77%