Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Types of transfers:
1. Bilateral transfers
2. Unilateral transfers
3. Complex transfers
BILATERAL TRANSFERS
UNILATERAL TRANSFERS
When a person dies, his legal identity including proprietary rights are extinguished.
His properties will be gratuitously transferred to his successors either by operation
of law or by virtue of a written will.
Succession is a donation of all the properties of the decedent caused by his death.
Hence, it is called donation mortis causa.
COMPLEX TRANSFERS
Complex transfers are transfers for less than full and adequate consideration.These
are sales made at prices which are significantly lower than the fair value of the
property sold
The adequacy of the price is influenced by the liquidity or the availability of willing
buyers of the concerned property. Hence, a discount of 20% to highly saleable goods
like gold would be construed as gift due to its relative liquidity while this may not be
the case in selling big real estates,
Transfers for adequate consideration are deemed pure exchanges and are subject to
income tax, not to transfer tax.
Transfers for less than full and adequate consideration are split into its components:
transfer element and exchange element. The transfer element is subject to transfer
tax while the realized gain on the exchange element is subject to income tax.
Illustration
Assume a property with a fair value of P50,000 and tax basis of P10,000 is sold for
merely P30,000.
Even without a deliberate intent to evade income tax, transfers have a natural
effect of decreasing future income tax collections of the government.
Illustration
Alison has P10,000,000 properties which earn 10% or P1,000,000 yearly income.
Desiring to make his 5 children become financially independent, he divided his entire
properties to them. Each child received P2,000,000 properties. Each child earns
roughly P200,000 on the donated properties.
Note that the split of the properties and the spread of the income to several taxpayers
will result in lesser tax collection to the government because of the progressive tax
imposed upon individuals. The same effect would result if Mr. Alison transfers his
property to his children through succession.
Exercising this special privilege to transfer property either inter vivos ormortis causa
is a benefit to the transferor. In accordance with the benefit received theory, the
transfer should be taxed.
The benefit received theory is the most dominant rationalization of transfer taxation.
In donor's taxation, the term resident citizen or alien includes domestic or resident
foreign corporation. Obviously, corporations are not subject to estate taxation.
SITUS OF TRANSFER
Likewise, properties are transferred inter-vivos in the place where they are
located at the date of donation. They are not transferred at the place where the
donor executed the deed of donation.
Examples:
1. A resident alien who has P10M properties in the Philippines and P40M properties
in Japan died in an airplane crash in Malaysia.
The P10M properties is deemed transferred mortis causa in the Philippines while the
P40M properties is also deemed transferred mortis causa in Japan.
2. While in Korea, a non-resident Filipino donated his car in Japan worth P5,000,000
to his American best friend.
The P5M car is deemed transferred inter-vivos in Japan.
Global donation means properties donated wherever situated across the globe.
Estate means properties of the decedent at the point of death. Global estate means
properties of the decedent wherever situated across the globe at the point of death.
Illustration 1
Mr. Mario, an American residing in the Philippines, donated a car in Mexico to a
friend and a motorbike in the Philippines to his brother in America.
Since the taxpayer is a resident, both the donation of a car abroad and the donation
of a motorbike in the Philippines are subject to transfer tax. Since the donor is living,
the transfers are donations inter-vivos subject to donor's tax.
Illustration 2
Juan, a non-resident Filipino citizen, died leaving a building in the United States and
an agricultural land in the Philippines for his heirs.
Since the taxpayer is a citizen, the transfer mortis causa of the building in the US and
the agricultural land in the Philippines is subject to Philippine estate tax.
Illustration 3
Mr. Kounoman, a Japanese citizen residing in Japan, donated a parcel of land in
Japan to a resident Filipino friend. He also donated his investment in the shares of
stocks of a Philippine corporation to his Japanese sister.
Since the donor is neither a Philippine resident nor a citizen, only the donation of
domestic shares of stock in the Philippines is subject to transfer tax. Also, since the
donor is living at the date of donation, the transfer is a donation inter-vivos subject to
donor's tax.
Illustration 4
Mr. Ti Wong, a Chinese citizen residing in Hong Kong, died leaving a building in
Hong Kong and a car in the Philippines.
The donor is neither a resident nor a citizen. Only the car in the Philippines is subject
to transfer tax. Since the transfer is effected by death, it is a donation mortis causa
subject to estate tax.
Illustration 1
Mr. Shino, a Japanese citizen, donated the following properties in thePhilippines:
1. Car
2. Cash in bank
3. Shares of stocks of a domestic corporation
Under Japanese laws, non-resident Filipinos are exempt on transfers of intangible
properties in Japan.
Since the reciprocity exemption applies, Mr. Shino is subject to donor's tax only on
the donation of the car. The donation of the intangible personal properties such as
cash and shares of stocks are exempt.
Illustration 2
leaving those properties in the Philippines. The Japanese government do not tax
Assuming the same data in the preceding problem, except that Mr. Shino died
intangible properties of non-resident Filipinos thereon to estate tax
Illustration 3
Mr. Park, a Korean citizen residing in the Philippines, died leaving P5M cash, P3M
interest in a business and a P10M condo unit in the Philippines. Under Korean laws,
Filipino non-residents therein are exempt from transfer taxation.
All of these will be subject to estate tax since reciprocity exemption applies only to
non-resident aliens to the exclusion of resident aliens.
If ownership over property is voluntarily transferred by the owner during his lifetime,
this is donation inter-vivos. If the owner retained ownership until the moment of his
death, death will transfer it his successors in interest. This transfer is donation mortis
causa.
Illustration
Don Juanico has a hotel and a commercial building as his only properties. He
promised to donate the hotel to son, Juan and the building to son, Juanito. He was
able to donate the hotel to Juan when the same was worth P40M. While finalizing the
deed of donation of the building for Juanito, Don Juanico met an
accident and died.
The hotel and the building has fair value of P45M and P50 at the date of death of
Don Juanico. A year after his death, the properties have fair values of P48M and
P52M, respectively.
The transfer of the hotel is a donation inter-vivos. The same shall be valued at P40M
and shall be subject to donor's tax. Since Don Juanico still owns the commercial
building upon his death, the same is a transfer mortis causa. The same shall be
valued at P50M and shall be subject to estate tax.
Note:
1. Donation inter-vivos are valued at the date of donation.
2. Donation mortis causa are valued at the date of death of the decedent.
Thought of death
The presence of express wordings in the deed of donation which indubitably manifest
that the donation is inspired by the decedent's thought of death will qualify a donation
as a donation mortis causa.
Illustration
On his death bed, Don Pedro made a written donation saying "Death is imminent
upon me. I would like to ensure that Pablo will have my sports car as his legacy. For
this, I am donating my car to him."
Though the donation is made during the lifetime of Don Pedro, the donation is
inspired by the thought of death. This is a transfer mortis causa subject to estate tax
upon Don Pedro's death.
The evaluation of the decedent's motive is done in particular when the decedent
made a donation just several months prior to his death and had a severe illness,
suffering from a critical injury, or of too advanced age.
Transfers in contemplation of death actually pass ownership over the property to the
transferee at the date of donation but the same is taxable to estate tax not to donor's
tax because it is a donation mortis causa.
Illustration
Rhad distributed a significant part of his properties worth P500M to his children. In
the deed of donation, he cited excessive income tax and his intent to save on income
tax as reasons of his donation.
Similarly, a donation that is made during the lifetime of the decedent with a stipulation
that ownership shall transfer upon his death, the same is a donation mortis causa.
Illustration
During his lifetime, Don Juan transferred a property to his favorite granddaughter,
Karen. Don Juan allowed Karen to obtain possession of the property but under
condition that ownership will not transfer until his death.
The transfer of property during the lifetime of the donor is not intended to take effect
in ownership immediately but at the point of death. The transfer is a donation mortis
causa subject to estate tax.
INCOMPLETE TRANSFERS
Incomplete transfers involve the transmission or delivery of properties from one
person to another, but ownership is not transferred at the point of delivery. The actual
transfer of ownership will take effect in the future upon the happening of certain
future events or satisfaction of certain conditions.
Initially incomplete transfers are not subject to transfer tax upon delivery of the
property. They are subject to transfer yax in the future when actual transfer occurs.
1. Conditional transfers
2. Revocable transfer
3. Transfers with reservation of title to property until death
Illustration 1
On June1, 2019, Don Lucio donated luxury car with value of 4M to his son Boy,
under a condition that Boy must be topnotcher in the Ocober 2019 CPA board
exam. To motivate Boy the car was delivered to him on June 1, 2019.
>the transfer shall not be subject to donors tax because of thecondition that
need be fulfilled.[despite the actual delivery]
> If Boy topped the board exam, condition was perfected and donors tax shall
be imposed on the date of completion
> if transferee failed to topped the board exam, there will be no donors tax,
> if transferor or donor waived the condition donation will nevertheless be
perfected at that time and will be taxable to donor's tax at its fair value at that time.
Assuming Don Lucio died before the exams, car would be transferred mortis-causa
as part of his estate and would be subject to estate tax at its fair value at the date
of death.
Illustration 2
On February 14, 2019, Mark transferred a phone to Goldemaire but subject to
revocation if Mark so pleases.
Although there is an actual physical transfer of property on February 14, 2019, the
same cannot be subject to donor's tax since there is no transfer of ownership at that
date.
> Assuming Mark waived his right to revoke, the donation shall be subject to
donor's tax at its fair value at the time of waiver.
> If Mark revoked the property, there is no donation to speak of.
> Assuming Mark died without revoking the phone, the same would be transferred
mortis-causa and would be included part of his estate subject to estate tax at its fair
value at the point of death.
Illustration 1
On June 1, 2017, Mr. D transferred his car worth P1,000,000 to E but for a minimal
consideration of P200,000 only. The transfer shall be revocable by D in 5 years.
Case 1: Waiver before death
On July 3, 2019, D intimated to E that he was waiving his right of revocation. The fair
value of the car was P800,000 on that date.
Since D was still living upon the perfection of the transfer, the transfer is a donation
inter-vivos. It shall be valued at: P800,000 less P200,000. Hence, P600,000 shall be
subject to donor's tax.
Case 2: Death without revocation Assume instead that Mr. D died on July 3, 2019
without waiving his right to revoke the transfer. The fair value of the property was P
900,000 at that time.
Illustration 2
Lordknight has a rare Egyptian artifact which has a fair value of P2,000,000. He gave
the artificact to Noventa for a consideration of P1,950,000 but revocable if Noventa
did not graduate as cum laude. Noventa subsequently graduated cum laude when
the artifact was worth P3,000,000.
The transfer was paid for an adequate consideration considering that the selling price
approximates the fair value at the date of delivery. The transfer is a bona fide sale
which will not be subject to transfer tax even if the fair value of the property
appreciated at the date of completion of the donation.
Illustration 3
Soren sold a gold bullion with a fair value of P2,500,000 to Leomilo at a price of
P1,800,000 but revocable within one year. The one-year period lapsed when the gold
bullion had a fair value of P1,700,000.
The transfer is insufficient thus subject to donor's tax upon expiration of the one- year
period since Soren is living. Since the fair value upon completion fell below
P1,800,000, there is no gratuity subject to donor's tax.
Assuming Soren died before the one-year period when the gold bullion was worth
P2,300,000. The donation mortis causa subject to estate tax shall be P500,000
(P2,300,000 P1,800,000).
Assuming the value fell below the P1,800,000 considerations upon Soren's death,
there is no gratuity subject to estate tax
NON-TAXABLE TRANSFERS
There are transfers of properties which are not actually donations and
hence, not subject to transfer taxes, such as:
1. Void transfers
2. Quasi-transfers
Void Transfers
Void transfers are those that are prohibited by law or those that do not conform to
legal requirements for their validity. Void transfers do not transfer ownership over
property and are therefore not subject to transfer
tax
Examples of void transfers:
1. Donation of properties not owned by the donor
2. Donation between spouses
3. Donations which do not manifest all essential requisites to validity such as
donations refused by the donee
4. Donations that do not conform to formal requirements such as oral donation of real
properties
Illustration 1
Tired of feeding Zeus' derby roosters, Raymund donated them to Andrix, his
bestfriend "tupada" master.
Since Raymund does not have ownership over the thing donated, the donation is
void. There is no valid donation to speak of; hence, no donor's tax is imposable.
Illustration 2
In an overnight drinking spree, Zeus orally donated his seven-hectare agricultural
land to Raymund.
Oral donation of real property is legally void because the law requires the execution
of a public instrument. There is no imposable donor's tax since there is no donation
to be taxed.
Quasi-transfers
There transmissions of property which will never involve transfer of ownership. For
the purpose of our discussion, let us refer to these transmissions as "quasi-
transfers." Quasi-transfers are not taxable.
Examples:
1. Transmission of the property by the usufructuary to the owner of the naked title
2. Transmission of the property by a trustee to the real owner
3. Transmission of the property from the first heir to a second heir in accordance with
the desire of a predecessor
Illustration 1
Mr. A died leaving a track of land to C but since C was a minor, A devised in his will
to give B a usufructuary right to use and enjoy the land for 10 years before turning it
over to C. After the lapse of 10 years, B transferred the land to C.
Usufractuary B does not own the land. He was granted only the right to use the same
but not ownership thereto. B's turnover of the land to C, the real owner (i.e. owner of
the naked title), shall not be subject to donor's tax since there is no transfer of
ownership.
Illustration 2
Mr. A died leaving a commercial building as inheritance to C. Since C was a minor, A
appointed his older brother B to be the fiduciary heir to the property to take care of
the same until C becomes 18 years old. When C turned 18 years old, B transferred
the property to C.
The transmission of the property from B, a mere trustee, to C, the real heir, shall not
be subject to donor's tax since there is no transmission of legal ownership over the
property.
If the usufruct in the Illustration 1 and the fiduciary relationship in the Illustration 2 are
pre-terminated by the death of the usufructuary or fiduciary heir, the transfer of the
property to the real owner is likewise not subject to estate tax for the same reason
that there is no transfer of ownership.