Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN No:-2456-2165
F. Ethical consideration
Ethical approval was obtained from the ethical committee
of the General Hospital, Idanre, Ondo State. Informed consent
was obtained from the participant before administering the
questionnaires. Respondents were informed that participation
is voluntary and that all information provided will be made
confidential.
B. Knowledge of Cervical Cancer among Respondents sex and 64% opined that use of certain birth control pill. 94%
A majority (90%) of the female health workers have heard affirmed that abnormal vaginal bleeding, foul smelling
about cervical cancer before. On the causes of cervical cancer, discharge from the vagina and post coital bleeding were signs of
82% disagreed that excess alcohol intake is a cause, 90% cervical cancer while 81% indicated leg pain and back pain.
affirmed that human papillomavirus infection and multiple However, only 21% indicated that cervical cancer can be
sexual partners are causes, 86% agreed that early exposure to prevented by immunization.
C. Knowledge of Respondents On Pap Smear Screening cervical cancer. Half (51%) indicated that pap smear screening
In table 3, 90% of the respondents have heard about pap prevents cervical cancer. Furthermore, three-quarter of the
smear screening and almost al, (98%) affirmed that detection of respondents (75%) indicated that a positive pap smear result
cervical cancer through pap smear helps in treatment. 85% and means cervical cancer is about to start. 74% of the respondents
60% affirmed that pap smear screening helps in detecting knew that other screening test for cervical cancer is HPV
human papilloma virus infection and precancerous state of testing, 65% indicated Visual inspection with acetic acid, 94%
cervical cancer respectively while 43% erroneously indicated indicated colposcopy while 45% erroneously mentioned blood
that it helps in detecting sexually transmitted diseases. However, test.
all of the respondents disagreed that pap smear screening cures
50
50
45
40
30
22 21
20
14
10 8 7 8
3 2
seminar training in school TV/Radio Medical texts/journal other health workers
0
Fig. 1: Showing the source of information on cervical cancer and pap smear screening
From the bar chart above, 22% heard information on agreed, agreed, disagreed and strongly disagreed that their
cervical cancer through a seminar, 50% through class teachings culture forbids women from undergoing pap smear.
while in school, 3% through TV/Radio, 8% through medical Furthermore, majority affirmed that regular pap smear screening
textbooks while 7% through other health workers. On pap smear can prevent development of cervical cancer (80%) while others
screening, 14% first heard from a seminar, 45% while in school, (20%) disaffirmed. Almost all (99%) disaffirmed that cancer has
2% through TV/Radio, 8% through medical textbooks while no cure, hence no need for screening. Furthermore 97%
21% heard from other health workers. disaffirmed that there’s no time for screening while 24% either
strongly agreed or agreed that pap smear screening expose a
D. Perception of Pap Smear Screening Among Respondents woman to some STIs. However, 79% indicated that pap smear is
From the table 4, 9% agreed that they don’t need pap smear not too costly. 38% agreed that they are scared of being
screening because they are not promiscuous, 17% disagreed diagnosed of cancer through pap smear, 17% disagreed while
while 74% strongly disagreed. 1%, 4%, 35% and 60% strongly 45% strongly disagreed.
Statement SA A D SD Remarks
I don’t need pap smear because am not promiscuous 0(0.0%) 9(9%) 17(17%) 74(74%) Good
My culture forbids women undergoing such test 1(1%) 4(4%) 35(35%) 60(60%) Good
Regular pap smear screening can prevent
64(64%) 16(16%) 16(16%) 4(4%) Good
development of cervical cancer
Cancer has no cure therefore the screening is not
0(0.0%) 1(1%) 38(38%) 61(61%) Good
important
I don't have time to get a screening because it takes
1(1%) 2(2%) 49(49%) 48(48%) Good
much time
Cervical cancer screening can expose a woman to
11(11%) 13(13%) 29(29%) 47(47%) Good
some STIs
Pap smear screening is too costly 1(1%) 20(20%) 39(39%) 40(40%) Good
I am scared of being diagnosed of cancer through Pap
0(0.0%) 38(38%) 17(17%) 45(45%) Good
smear
Table 4: Perception of Pap Smear Screening Among Respondents
Frequency
Variables (N=100) Percent Remarks
Have you had Pap smear screening done yes 45 45.0 Poor
before? no 55 55.0
If yes, where? government hospital 33 73.3
N = 45 during a health outreach 12 27.7
If yes to the above, reason for having it for routine check up 34 75.6
done instructed by other
9 20.0
health workers
N = 45 forced to have it done 2 4.4
As a health worker will you recommend yes 94 94.0 Good
Pap smear screening to females? no 6 6.0
As a health worker, have you referred yes 32 32.0 Poor
someone for Pap smear screening before? no 68 68.0
Table 5: Acceptability and Practice of Pap Smear Screening Among Respondents
Fig. 2: Showing reasons for not having pap smear screening done among respondents
From the bar chart above 16(27%) said there is no time for F. Hypotheses Testing:
pap smear screening, 8(13%) each indicated that they were not a) Hypothesis One
at risk of cervical cancer and they were scared of the The relationship between the variables was tested using
embarrassment if cancer is detected. 4(7%) indicated that they Pearson Chi-square. The result revealed the chi-square
can’t afford the test, 7(12%) indicated that they were not aware value of 5.263, p = 0.022 (p < 0.05). This shows that
of the screening and 10(17%) were scared of pain while 7(12%) there is a significant relationship between knowledge of
had no reason. respondents on pap smear screening and acceptability of
pap smear screening. The hypothesis is therefore
rejected.
b) Hypothesis Two
The relationship between the variables was tested using Pearson Chi-square.
C. Perception of pap smear among respondents Conclusively, this study has shown most female health
It was shown that most of the respondents either agreed or workers in General Hospital, Idanre had good knowledge and
strongly agreed to the positive statements of pap smear such good perception of pap smear screening; however, the rate of
as pap smear screening can prevent the development of practice of pap smear screening is still low with reasons
cervical cancer while majority like wisely disagreed or being, fear of pain, lack of time, fear of embarrassment if
strongly disagreed to negative statements such as culture cancer is detected, and belief that they are not at risk of
forbids pap smear, cancer has no cure, so no need for cervical cancer.
REFERENCES
[1.] Omonua, K.I., Isah, A.D., & Agida, E.T. 2019, A Study
on the Awareness and Utilization of Pap Smear Among
Female Health Workers in a Tertiary Hospital in
Nigeria. J Cytol Histol 10: 531. doi:10.4172/2157-
7099.1000531
[2.] World Cancer Research Fund 2020,. Worldwide cancer
data, global cancer statistics for the most common
cancers. Retrieved from
https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/cancer-
trends/worldwide-cancer-data on 26/02/2021
[3.] International Agency for Research on Cancer(IARC)
2019, Nigeria Human Papillomavirus and
Related Cancers, Fact Sheet 2018, HPV information
centre, Barcelona, Spain
[4.] Amin, S.M., Abdullahi, K., Muhammad, M.,
Mohammed, L.I., Mahmoud, R.A., & Muhammad,
R.B., 2020, Perception of cervical cancer and its
cytological screening among medical students. Sahel
Med J 2020;23:41-6
[5.] Abiodun A.B, Oluwasola T.A, Durodola A.O, Ajani
M.A., Abiodun A.D & Adeomi AA 2017, Awareness
and perception of risk for cervical cancer among women
in Ogbomoso, Nigeria. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol 2017;
34:218-23.
[6.] Peirson, L., Fitzpatrick‑Lewis, D., Ciliska, D. &
Warren, R. 2013, Screening for cervical cancer: A
systematic review and meta‑analysis. Syst Rev 2013;
2:35.
[7.] Ifemelumma, C.C., Anikwe, C.C., Okorochuckwu,
B.C., Onu, F.A., Obuna, J.A., Ejikeme, B.N., & Ezeonu,
O.P., 2019, Cervical Cancer Screening: Assessment of
Perception and Utilization of Services among Health
Workers in Low Resource Setting. International
Journal of Reproductive Medicine Volume 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6505482