Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Joel Yann
Professor Lemerond
ENG 182
18 April 2022
For hundreds of years men were expected to show no feeling. This expectation is now
known as toxic masculinity. The lack of emotion causes mental unease and in serious cases
Slaughterhouse Five and Chuck Palahniuk’s Fight Club, as the protagonists in both novels are
heavily challenged due to the suppression of their emotions. Both Slaughterhouse Five and Fight
Club use hyperbolic irony to examine how apathy and masculinity impact men and their ability
Billy Pilgrim is not well. After countless traumatic experiences in the war he comes home
to a society that does not care. He cannot show the sheer amount of grief and pain he has stored
up inside mainly due to the fact that there is no one who wants to listen. He is expected to be a
strong, fearless veteran, a true man among boys. However, that is not the reality of war.
Truthfully Billy is deeply scarred and needs serious help, the lack of which leads to his
hallucinations of time traveling and the infamous tralfamadorians. Every time he tries to tell
someone about these crazy experiences he has, getting abducted or how he knows a plane will
crash, he is dismissed as insane. Billy Pilgrim is repeatedly discouraged from sharing his
feelings, something that gradually builds, leading him to stop feeling emotion altogether and
dismissing everything that occurs in his life with his tag line, “so it goes.” This emotionless
Yann 2
behavior exhibited towards all the things our society considers meaningful is shared with the
Fight Club’s nameless protagonist, sufficiently dubbed the narrator, needs help. The first
two instances in which we are introduced to him sharply contrast, the first scene he has a gun in
his mouth and the second he is speaking with a therapist. There is no one thing that led him to
these positions, rather a melting pot of hundreds of little things that all culminated into him
slowly going crazy. Issues like the immorality of his job or his insomnia or how pointless all the
couches in his apartment are weigh him down more and more with each passing day. He goes to
his therapist only to be dismissed and told that if he wants to see real pain he should go to a
cancer support group. The harmful nature of telling someone how you are feeling and being
rejected because someone else is worse off is a key reason why men hate sharing their emotions.
The feeling of being second best or not as important haunts men, and in this scenario it shows
how damaged the narrator is, because he actually finds comfort in the company of the support
group. The irony is found in the mockery of Bob. He is a body builder who adds comedic relief
through the dark humor of him having boobs and no testicles. The fact that the narrator is happy
here shows how despicable his case is. His happiness is short-lived however, as when Marla
arrives the narrator begins to spiral again. This free fall leads to the creation of fight club, the
ultimate blend of toxic masculinity and apathy, a place where all your anger and frustration can
Masculinity, specifically the toxic type, is the idea that men should be strong,
independent, and carry the burden of life without showing any pain or hardship. This is
demonstrated to great lengths in both novels, especially Fight Club. Not only does the narrator
exude the traits of toxic masculinity, but others key characters as well including Tyler and all the
Yann 3
members of project mayhem. The willingness to not only join a fight club, but also start a
terrorist group partially because it helps release tension and hatred at the world is incredibly
unhealthy and a great hyperbole for how men’s emotions are dealt with in our society today. The
satirical nature is that this whole ordeal only started due to a lack of therapy. Rather than finding
a healthy outlet for his depression and mental hardships the narrator bounces from cancer support
groups, to fight club, before finally landing at project mayhem. The idea that men are supposed
to suppress their feelings is dangerous and Palahniuk shows this through hyperbole and project
mayhem.
While apathy is addressed heavily through the narrator’s character arc, Slaughterhouse
Five uses it much more effectively. Through Billy Pilgrim’s journey we see a man so lost in his
own mind that he believes that everything he ever did, is doing, and will do have no meaning.
Therefore he just sits back and watches as an eternity of events flood by. Perhaps they are
predetermined and he is powerless to stop them, but he will never know because he never tries.
This apathetic approach to life is unhealthy and depressing, and the deterministic approach that
Billy Pilgrim takes to life is a hyperbolic example of feeling helpless in situations where effort
It is evident that both Palahniuk and Vonnegut heavily lean on Bakhtin’s theories of
satire as many of them are visible in their stories. The one that appears most through both novels
is moral-psychological experimentation. Both Billy Pilgrim and the narrator embody the abstract
ideals that the authors are attempting to communicate. Apathy and masculinity are present in
both characters, with apathy being seen more in Billy and masculinity for the narrator. Both
characters are insane, and their conditions are explored through the use of satire. By adding
humor to their characters they become infinitely more relatable to the audience than they would
Yann 4
as stoic psychopaths. By making them relatable to the audience Vonnegut and Palahniuk are able
to show real world issues, in this instance apathy and toxic masculinity, in ways that readers will
understand. The audience has to resonate with the protagonist for any message to be impactful
and the use of satire in an absurd, carnivalesque space allows this wonderfully.
In both Slaughterhouse Five and Fight Club the authors use satire and hyperbolic irony to
send a very realistic message to their audience. The idea is to teach that the idea of masculinity
and apathy being something inherently helpless is very wrong. We have autonomy over our own
actions. Nothing is predetermined and just because society expects men to look or act or feel a
certain way does not mean that it is required. By studying the narrator and Billy Pilgrim it is very
clear that neither of them are healthy people. A major reason behind this is their inability to share
how they really feel, to really let out their emotions and feelings in a healthy and beneficial way.
Vonnegut and Palahniuk expertly address very taboo topics and provide great satirical
commentary on issues that apply to everyday life in our ever changing world. They tell everyone
Works Cited