Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wolfgang Nedobity
1 Introduction
The 18th century has been considered a „century of the body“1 due to the large number of works
dealing with various aspects of anthropology culminating in Kant's key publication on the topic.2
In addition there was a renewed interest in the male body which made up for the “lack of early
modern curiosity about the male body by comparison with the glut of interest in the elusive,
secretive female body, which was so intimately connected with paternity and patriarchy.”3
This is particularly obvious in the anthropological approach to aesthetics as pursued by scholars
such as Johann Joachim Winckelmann (1717-1768) and Friedrich Schiller (1759-1805).
There was also a liberal approach to hermaphroditism in the arts and in art history made possible
through a change of legal and medical views due to the Enlightenment.
In the Middle Ages it was a widespread superstition that the acquisition of a second sex to one's
original sex is an indicator of close relations with Satan, and is thus counter to the general order of
nature that has divided humankind into female and male creatures only. Society pursued any
aberrations with capital punishment until the middle of the 18th century as we learn from the
research of Michel Foucault: “Or again, right at the start of the seventeenth century, two
hermaphrodites were burnt alive and their ashes scattered in the wind simply because they lived
together and so, it was assumed, must have made use of their sexes with each other.”4
The Kantian and Enlightenment conception of reason fought superstition at all levels, which led to a
number of legal reforms and new medical treatments. In addition, there had been a shift towards
humanity and sympathy in the moral philosophy of the time, which resulted in a more tolerant
attitude with regard to deviants, as we learn from the following passage: “Academicians and
physicians needed to domesticate this sexual monster and draw it under the aegis of scientific study
in order to render it less of a threat to social order, or at least to refashion it as a tool in the making
of their own expert status.”5 This is particularly true of art historians. Thus it appears to be well
justified that Michael Hagner claims an “aesthetic turn of monstrosities” for the Age of
Enlightenment.6
The obsession with antic marble sculptures during the 18th century fostered the interest in ancient
Greek mythology and in arguments underlining the attractiveness of these artifacts.
In his „Thoughts about copying Greek works“7, Winckelmann gave ample room to hermaphrodites
as ideals of human beauty. Their line of beauty is a combination of male and female traits such as
1 Hoffmann, T. (2015). Körperpoetiken. Zur Funktion des Körpers in der Dichtungstheorie des 18. Jahrhunderts.
Paderborn: Fink, p.10.
2 Kant, I. (1800). Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht. 2nd ed. Königsberg: Friedrich Nicolovius.
3 McClive, C. (2009). Masculinity on Trial: Penises, Hermaphrodites and the Uncertain Male Body in Early Modern
France. History Workshop Journal 68, p.45.
4 Foucault, M. (2016). Abnormal. Lectures at the Collège de France 1974-1975. London & New York: Verso, pp.67-
68.
5 Thompson, C.E. (2016). Questions of Genre: Picturing the Hermaphrodite in Eighteenth-Century France and
England. Eighteenth-Century Studies 49(3), p.409.
6 Hagner, M. (1999). Enlightened Monsters. In Clark, W. et al. (eds.). The Sciences in Enlightened Europe. Chicago &
London: The University of Chicago Press, p.196.
7 Winckelmann, J.J. (1756). Gedanken über die Nachahmung der Griechischen Werke in der Malerey und
Bildhauerkunst. 2nd ed. Dresden & Leipzig: Waltherische Handlung.
8 Winckelmann, J.J. (1764). Geschichte der Kunst des Alterthums. Dresden: Waltherische Hof-Buchhandlung, p.368.
9 Winckelmann, J.J. (1972). History of Ancient Art. In Winckelmann, J.J. Writings on Art, ed. by David Irwin.
London: Phaidon, p.120.
10 MacLeod, C. (1998). Embodying Ambiguity. Androgyny and Aesthetics from Winckelmann to Keller. Detroit:
Wayne State University Press, pp.30-31.
11 Chapman, M. (2007). Architecture and Hermaphroditism: gender ambiguity and the forbidden antecedents of
architectural form. Conference Proceedings, Queer Space: Centers and Peripheries. Sidney: UTS, p.5. Retrieved
from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311652880
12 LeMens, M. (2019). Modernité Hermaphrodite. Art, histoire, culture. Paris: Éditions du félin, p.25.
13 Solomon-Godeau, A. (1997). Male Trouble: A Crisis in Representation. London: Thames & Hudson, p.202.
14 Winckelmann, J.J. (1764). Geschichte der Kunst des Alterthums. Dresden: Waltherische Hof-Buchhandlung, pp.160-
161.
15 Burke, E. (1767). A Philosophical Inquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful. 5 th ed.
London: J. Dodsley.
16 Kant, I. (1978). Critique of Judgement. Ed. by J. H. Meredith. Oxford: OUP.
17 Schiller, F. (1845). Upon the Sublime. In The Aesthetic Letters, Essays, and the Philosophical Letters of Schiller.
Translated, with an introduction by J. Weiss. Boston: Charles C. Little & James Brown, pp.239-264.
18 Schiller, F. (1845). Upon the Sublime. In The Aesthetic Letters, Essays, and the Philosophical Letters of Schiller.
Translated, with an introduction by J. Weiss. Boston: Charles C. Little & James Brown, p.247.
19 Dreger, A. (1998). Hermaphrodites and the Medical Invention of Sex. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,
p.35.
20 Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. 2nd ed. New York & London: Routledge.
21 Schiller, F. (1845). Upon the Necessary Limits in the Use of Beautiful Forms. In The Aesthetic Letters, Essays, and
the Philosophical Letters of Schiller. Translated, with an introduction by J. Weiss. Boston: Charles C. Little & James
Brown, pp.149-184.
22 Schiller, F. (1793). Über Anmut und Würde. An Carl von Dalberg in Erfurth. Leipzig: G.J. Göschen.
23 Schiller, F. (1780). Versuch über den Zusammenhang der thierischen Natur des Menschen mit seiner geistigen.
Stuttgart: Cotta.
24 Ibid.
25 Pope, A. (1734). An Essay on Man, and other Poems. London: John Sharp, Epistle 1, lines 173-175.
The Enlightenment can be characterized by a trend towards ambitious theorizing which led among
others to a philosophical morphology of issues concerning physiology and anatomy. Comparative
studies of the later field were exquisitely illustrated and published as anatomical atlases. The
German physician Albrecht von Haller (1708-1777) for instance, focused his interest on matters of
human embryological development, in particular the growth of the reproductive organs during the
formation of the foetus. There have also been first scientific attempts to investigate the phenomenon
of hermaphrodites such as the treatise by Jacob Giles (1686-1744).30 Right away from the preface,
Giles refers to the monstrous intrigues and natures of hermaphrodites; a common view that
gradually changed during the course of the century, finally leading to a situation, in which “there is
a ban on all sexual relations but no conviction for the fact of being a hermaphrodite or for the nature
of hermaphroditism.”31
Already in 1741 another treatise was published which questioned Giles's view: “What, but
Ignorance or Superstition, could persuade Men to imagine, that poor human Creatures (which were
only distorted in some particular Part, or had any thing unusual appearing about them, from some
morbid Cause affecting them, either in the Uterus, or after their Births) were Prodigies or Monsters
in Nature?”32 The author, James Parsons, was a fellow of the Royal Society in London, an
institution which attempted to clarify the question whether hermaphrodites do exist in real life at all:
“The question is taken up by the Royal Society on three occasions around 1740, and in 1750 the
case of Michel-Ann Drouart aroused considerable interest when she was exhibited as an example of
hermaphroditism to the medical profession.”33 Parsons assumes that the cause for the birth of a
hermaphrodite is a 'confusion of semina' at the time of conception, which renders a wide spectrum
of physiological variants.34
Elizabeth Reis investigated the divergence of sex development from the point of view of medical
26 Pugh, D. (2005). Schiller as Citizen of his Time. In Jane V. Curran & Christophe Fricker (eds:). Schiller's „On Grace
and Dignity“ in its cultural context. Essays and a new Translation. Rochester, N.Y.: Camden House, p.40.
27 Lessing, G.E. (1836). Laocoon; or the limits of poetry and painting. London: J. Ridgeway & Sons.
28 Home, H. (1762). Elements of criticism. 3vols. Edinburgh: Millar, Kincaid & Bell.
29 Schiller, F. (1992). On Grace and Dignity. Transl. by George Gregory. Hannover: Schiller Institute, p.388.
30 Giles, J. (1718). Tractus de Hermaphrodites; Or, A Treatise of Hermaphrodites. London: E.Curll.
31 Foucault, M. (2016). Abnormal. Lectures at the Collège de France 1974-1975. London & New York: Verso, p.68.
32 Parsons, J. (1741). A Mechanical and Critical Enquiry into the Nature of Hermaphrodites. London: J. Walthoe,
p.XVI f.
33 Friedli, L. 'Passing women' – A study of gender boundaries in the eighteenth century. In Rousseau, G.S. & Porter, R.
(eds) (1987). Sexual underworlds of the Enlightenment. Manchester: Manchester University Press, p.247.
34 Parsons, J. (1741). A Mechanical and Critical Enquiry into the Nature of Hermaphrodites. London: J. Walthoe, p.50.
Winckelmann was one of the first scholars who had the opportunity to see the excavations of
Pompei and Herculaneum on his visits from 1762 onwards. Among the artifacts on display there
was also a Roman fresco of Satyr and Hermaphrodite. Whitney Davis comments on it as follows:
“Whereas the satyr in his undiscriminating eroticism exemplifies unnatural lusts, supposedly the
Hermaphrodite attracts our undiscriminating aesthetic admiration, our recognition of all ideal
beauties.”36 As regards the sexual orientation of the hermaphrodite he claims: “Hermaphrodite as a
woman receives the love of men and loves as a woman – but as a man receives only male love. In
this sense the satyr's pursuit of Hermaphrodite is necessarily pederastic...”37 This fact explains also
the general attitude to be found in the eighteenth century when for instance an Angolan
hermaphrodite had been on display in London: “The juxtaposition of two kinds of deviance – same-
sex desire and racialized monstrous sexuality – served to refute hermaphroditism, yet also reminded
the viewer of the dangers that lurked in abnormal sex.”38
In the 18th century the term 'hermaphrodite' was frequently used as a derogatory code-word for
effeminate homosexuals, also referred to as 'macaronies', as the following quotation illustrates:
“But Macaronies are a sex
Which do philosophers perplex;
Tho' all the priests of VENUS' rites
Agree they are Hermaphrodites.”39
This poem was originally published in the Whitehall Evening Post under the title 'The Macaroniad;
or, the Priest Triumphant'.
One of the famous macaronies was Lord John Hervey (1696-1743), also nicknamed as 'Mr.
Fainlove', who became a frequent victim of satires full of insinuations such as the following: “But
though it would be barbarous to handle such a delicate Hermophrodite, such a pretty, little, Master -
Miss, in too rough a Manner; yet you must give me Leave, my Dear, to give you a little, gentle
Correction, for your own Good.”40 In this case one can assume that the term 'hermaphrodite' is also
an allusion to the bisexual orientation of the Lord. It is nevertheless a most appropriate label if one
presumes that Lord Hervey enjoyed what Mieli describes as the 'schizophrenic' feeling of an
underlying hermaphrodite being, because “...at a given moment in the life of a gay man, a satisfying
erotic relationship with a woman can contribute to launching the 'schizophrenic' trip. And the
'schizophrenic' experience, as we have seen, is (among other things) a transsexual perception, the
discovery of hermaphroditism.”41
Freud also refers to a psychosexual hermaphroditism of 'amphigenic inverts' which appears
35 Reis, E. (2007). Divergence or Disorder? The Politics of Naming Intersex. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
50(4), p.535.
36 Davis, W. (2001). Homoerotic Art Collection from 1750 to 1920. Art History 24(2), p.269.
37 Davis, W. (2001). ibid, p.277, note 77.
38 Thompson, C.E. (2016). Questions of Genre: Picturing the Hermaphrodite in Eighteenth-Century France and
England. Eighteenth-Century Studies 49(3), p.395.
39 Anonymous. (1773). The Vauxhall Affray; or the Macaronies Defeated: Being A Compilation of all the Letters,
Squibs, & c. On both Sides of that Dispute. London: J. Williams, p.59.
40 D'Anvers, C. (1731). A Proper Reply To a late Scurrilous Libel ; intitled, Sedition and Defamation display'd.
London: R. Francklin, p.6.
41 Mieli, M. (2018). Towards a Gay Communism. Elements of Homosexual Critique. London: Pluto Press, p.200.
Michel Foucault took great interest in the Grandjean case of 1765 which brought about a
controversy between the physician Champeaux and the lawyer Vermeil; the former considered all
stories about hermaphrodites as fables because he did not believe in a possible mix of sexes, while
the latter claimed the contrary.47 There is of course the fable of the nymph Salmacis who fused
bodily with the son of Aphrodite and Hermes as part of the ancient Greek mythology, but as a
matter of fact, the hermaphrodite has since then been the object of the male sexual imagination.
Sigmund Freud made the following observation in this respect: “The idea of a woman with a penis
returns in later life, in the dreams of adults: the dreamer, in a state of nocturnal sexual excitation,
will throw a woman down, strip her and prepare her for intercourse – and then, in place of the
female genitals, he beholds a well-developed penis and breaks off the dream and excitation. The
numerous hermaphrodites of classical antiquity faithfully reproduce this idea, universally held in
childhood...”48 This vision inspired some of the art of the 18th century as well; especially Ovid's
recounting of the myth49 rendered a great number of neoclassical representations.
These works of the fine arts usually show a young couple – Salmacis and Hermaphrodite – taking
the waters. The first one in this sequence seems to be an oil painting by the Venetian artist Giovanni
Antonio Pellegrini (1675-1741), produced in 1708. Further examples would be a painting of 1729
by Jean- Francois de Troy (1679-1752) and an undated work by Nicola Buonvicino (active in Rome
42 Freud, S. (2005). The Essentials of Psycho-Analysis. Selected, with an introduction and commentaries, by Anna
Freud. Translated from the German by James Strachey. London: Vintage Books, p.287. (German original first
published in 1905).
43 Tobin, R. (2000). Warm Brothers. Queer Theory and the Age of Goethe. Philadelphia: University of Pennsilvania
Press, p.179.
44 Derks, P. (1990). Die Schande der heiligen Päderastie. Homosexualität und Öffentlichkeit in der deutschen Literatur
1750-1850. Berlin: Verlag rosa Winkel , p.181.
45 Cowley, A.(1784). Platonick Love. In The Poetical Works of Abraham Cowley. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: The Apollo Press,
p.18.
46 Mieli, M. (2018). Towards a Gay Communism. Elements of Homosexual Critique. London: Pluto Press, p.209.
47 Champeaux, C. (1765). Réflexions sur les hermaphrodites relativement à Anne Grand-Jean, qualifiée telle dans un
mémoire de Maitre Vermeil, avocat au Parlement. Avignon: Jacquenod.
48 Freud, S. (2005). The Essentials of Psycho-Analysis. Selected, with an introduction and commentaries, by Anna
Freud. Translated from the German by James Strachey. London: Vintage Books, p.381. (German original first
published in 1908).
49 Robinson, M. (1999). Salmacis and Hermaphroditus: When two become one. Classical Quarterly 49(1), pp.212-223
50 Solomon-Godeau, A. (1997). Male Trouble: A Crisis in Representation. London: Thames & Hudson, pp.155-156.
51 cf. Arnaud, G. (1750). Dissertation on Hermaphrodites. London: A. Millar, plates 1-4.
52 Thompson, C.E. (2016). Questions of Genre: Picturing the Hermaphrodite in Eighteenth-Century France and
England. Eighteenth-Century Studies 49(3), p.406.