Professional Documents
Culture Documents
v.
Buffalo, NY 14202
Buffalo, NY 14202
Defendants.
YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to answer the Complaint in this action, and to
serve a copy of your Answer, or, if the Complaint is not served with a Summons, to serve a Notice
of Appearance on the plaintiff's attorney(s) within 20 days after the service of this Summons,
exclusive of the day of service, or within30 days after completion of service where service is made
in any other manner than by personal delivery within the State. In case of your failure to appear
or answer, judgment may be taken against you by default for the relief demanded in the Complaint.
This is a copy of a pleading filed electronically pursuant to New York State court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5-b(d)(3)(i))
which, at the time of its printout from the court system's electronic website, had not yet been reviewed and
approved by the County Clerk. Because court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5[d]) authorize the County Clerk to reject
filings for various reasons, readers should be aware that documents bearing this legend may not have been
accepted for filing by the County Clerk. 1 of 9
CAUTION: THIS DOCUMENT HAS NOT YET BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COUNTY CLERK. (See below.) INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/30/2022
Erie County is designated as the place of trial on the basis of Plaintiff's residence.
Buffalo, NY 14214
(716) 300-0000
This is a copy of a pleading filed electronically pursuant to New York State court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5-b(d)(3)(i))
which, at the time of its printout from the court system's electronic website, had not yet been reviewed and
approved by the County Clerk. Because court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5[d]) authorize the County Clerk to reject
filings for various reasons, readers should be aware that documents bearing this legend may not have been
accepted for filing by the County Clerk. 2 of 9
CAUTION: THIS DOCUMENT HAS NOT YET BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COUNTY CLERK. (See below.) INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/30/2022
Plaintiff, COMPLAINT
v.
Index No.:
BUFFALO PUBLIC SCHOOLS and
DR. KRINER CASH, FORMER SUPERINTENDENT
OF BUFFALO PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Defendants.
PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF S.J., AN INFANT, above named, by and through
her attorneys, JOHN ELMORE PC, for her complaint against the Defendants, BUFFALO
1. At all times hereinafter mentioned, the plaintiff was and continues to remain a
resident of the State of New York, County of Erie, residing at 564 Dodge Street, Apt. 805, Buffalo,
2. At all relevant times, Plaintiff AURIELLE AUSTIN, was the parent and natural
This is a copy of a pleading filed electronically pursuant to New York State court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5-b(d)(3)(i))
which, at the time of its printout from the court system's electronic website, had not yet been reviewed and
approved by the County Clerk. Because court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5[d]) authorize the County Clerk to reject
filings for various reasons, readers should be aware that documents bearing this legend may not have been
accepted for filing by the County Clerk. 3 of 9
CAUTION: THIS DOCUMENT HAS NOT YET BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COUNTY CLERK. (See below.) INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/30/2022
4. Upon information and belief, at all relevant times, Defendant, BUFFALO PUBLIC
SCHOOLS was and still is a public education corporation/municipality duly formed and existing
pursuant and subject to the laws of New York State with offices located at 712 City Hall, 65
Niagara Square, Buffalo, New York, County of Erie, New York 14202.
5. Upon information and belief, at all relevant times, Defendant, DR. KRINER
superintendent of Buffalo Public schools on or about February 9, 2022 and in the immediate years
preceding.
lawfully on the grounds of the defendant's property, BUFFALO PUBLIC SCHOOLS, located at
PUBLIC SCHOOLS, was responsible for the control, supervision, management and operation of
neglected their duty to provide a safe and secure environment, in that their agents, servants and/or
This is a copy of a pleading filed electronically pursuant to New York State court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5-b(d)(3)(i))
which, at the time of its printout from the court system's electronic website, had not yet been reviewed and
approved by the County Clerk. Because court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5[d]) authorize the County Clerk to reject
filings for various reasons, readers should be aware that documents bearing this legend may not have been
accepted for filing by the County Clerk. 4 of 9
CAUTION: THIS DOCUMENT HAS NOT YET BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COUNTY CLERK. (See below.) INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/30/2022
employees were negligent in failing to supervise students; in hiring and training of faculty, staff
and administration; failing to secure the school grounds; failing to suspend, properly discipline
and counsel students who have committed violent acts; ignoring threatening behavior from
students; ignoring credible complaints made by parents, school teachers and representatives from
Teachers'
the Buffalo Federation; allowing bullying, fighting and violent behavior from students
disciplined, safe and organized school climate; and negligently allowing a culture of violence to
develop within the schools. This negligence resulted in needless suffering, and significant multiple
10. Upon information and belief, Defendants, BUFFALO PUBLIC SCHOOLS and
knew or should have known of violence which was to occur against Infant-Plaintiff, S.J. through
multiple warnings and signs for concern that there was potential for violence.
11. That upon information and belief, on December 9, 2021, the President of the
Buffalo Teachers Federation Philip Rumore sent a memorandum to the defendants, BUFFALO
PUBLIC SCHOOLS, advising that since September 2021, there had been 40 incidents of violence
at the school, and that there was a critical need for more security and community officers at the
school. There was also a request for more support teachers, counselors, psychologists, intervention
This is a copy of a pleading filed electronically pursuant to New York State court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5-b(d)(3)(i))
which, at the time of its printout from the court system's electronic website, had not yet been reviewed and
approved by the County Clerk. Because court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5[d]) authorize the County Clerk to reject
filings for various reasons, readers should be aware that documents bearing this legend may not have been
accepted for filing by the County Clerk. 5 of 9
CAUTION: THIS DOCUMENT HAS NOT YET BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COUNTY CLERK. (See below.) INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/30/2022
12. Defendants failed to implement any safety recommendations to prevent the incident
of February 9, 2022.
13. Defendants failed to implement any of the safety recommendations of Mr. Rumore
Teachers'
and the Buffalo federation.
14. That upon information and belief, Defendants, BUFFALO PUBLIC SCHOOLS
were aware of potential for violence involving the specific students who attacked Infant-Plaintiff
S.J., and Infant-Plaintiff's cousin, a fellow McKinley High School student whose identity was
SCHOOLS'
known to BUFFALO PUBLIC staff and/or administrators.
15. The defendants continued their pattern of inadequately addressing the potential for
17. That upon information and belief, Defendants, BUFFALO PUBLIC SCHOOLS
were aware of the potential for violence and threats made specifically against Infant-Plaintiff's
cousin, in that the school's acting principal, Karen Kibler, as well as vice principal, Solomon
18. Defendants, BUFFALO PUBLIC SCHOOLS and DR. KRINER CASH, FORMER
This is a copy of a pleading filed electronically pursuant to New York State court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5-b(d)(3)(i))
which, at the time of its printout from the court system's electronic website, had not yet been reviewed and
approved by the County Clerk. Because court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5[d]) authorize the County Clerk to reject
filings for various reasons, readers should be aware that documents bearing this legend may not have been
accepted for filing by the County Clerk. 6 of 9
CAUTION: THIS DOCUMENT HAS NOT YET BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COUNTY CLERK. (See below.) INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/30/2022
19. This meeting occurred around 3:19 PM on February 9, 2022. All students were
allowed to return to their classes, and were dismissed from school without any security measures
20. That upon information and belief, Defendants, BUFFALO PUBLIC SCHOOLS
failed to notify the parents of the students who were attacked that there was a potential for violence,
even after having knowledge through the Defendant's meeting with students.
21. That upon information and belief, Defendants, BUFFALO PUBLIC SCHOOLS
failed to notify law enforcement of the potential for violence after having notice through their
22. That upon information and belief, Defendants, BUFFALO PUBLIC SCHOOLS
failed to provide a safety plan, or safe transportation home from school after having notice through
23. That upon information and belief, Defendants, BUFFALO PUBLIC SCHOOLS
failed to prevent the individuals who attacked Infant-Plaintiff, S.J., from possessing a weapon (a
This is a copy of a pleading filed electronically pursuant to New York State court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5-b(d)(3)(i))
which, at the time of its printout from the court system's electronic website, had not yet been reviewed and
approved by the County Clerk. Because court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5[d]) authorize the County Clerk to reject
filings for various reasons, readers should be aware that documents bearing this legend may not have been
accepted for filing by the County Clerk. 7 of 9
CAUTION: THIS DOCUMENT HAS NOT YET BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COUNTY CLERK. (See below.) INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/30/2022
24. That upon information and belief, Defendants, BUFFALO PUBLIC SCHOOLS
failed to provide the Infant-Plaintiff, S.J., and other students with a safe environment.
25. That upon information and belief, Defendants, BUFFALO PUBLIC SCHOOLS
failed to prevent the individuals who attacked Infant-Plaintiff S.J., from using said weapon (knife)
defendants'
26. That as a result of the negligence, Infant-Plaintiff suffered significant
damages/injuries including multiple stab wounds which required surgical intervention to prevent
defendants'
27. That as a result of the negligence, Plaintiff has suffered past damages
including medical expenses along with pain and suffering. In addition, Plaintiff will be making a
claim for future medical expenses, future lost wages, and future pain and suffering.
28. Upon information and belief, Defendants, BUFFALO PUBLIC SCHOOLS and
a duty to provide for the safety and protection of students while they attend school.
29. Defendants, BUFFALO PUBLIC SCHOOLS and DR. KRINER CASH, FORMER
uphold the responsibilities associated with this duty and these failures directly led to the serious
This is a copy of a pleading filed electronically pursuant to New York State court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5-b(d)(3)(i))
which, at the time of its printout from the court system's electronic website, had not yet been reviewed and
approved by the County Clerk. Because court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5[d]) authorize the County Clerk to reject
filings for various reasons, readers should be aware that documents bearing this legend may not have been
accepted for filing by the County Clerk. 8 of 9
CAUTION: THIS DOCUMENT HAS NOT YET BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COUNTY CLERK. (See below.) INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/30/2022
AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF S.J., AN INFANT, demands judgment against the Defendants,
BUFFALO PUBLIC SCHOOLS, in the amount of money exceeding the monetary jurisdiction of
all lower courts and punitive or exemplary damages in a sum of money exceeding the monetary
jurisdiction of all lower courts together with interest and the costs and disbursements of this action.
Buffalo, NY 14214
(716) 300-0000
This is a copy of a pleading filed electronically pursuant to New York State court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5-b(d)(3)(i))
which, at the time of its printout from the court system's electronic website, had not yet been reviewed and
approved by the County Clerk. Because court rules (22 NYCRR §202.5[d]) authorize the County Clerk to reject
filings for various reasons, readers should be aware that documents bearing this legend may not have been
accepted for filing by the County Clerk. 9 of 9