Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Test - 2
Time:3hrs MM:250
Sec-A
• Spinoza
• It is the view that the mental and the physical are two aspects of, or perspectives of the same
substance.
• Substance – attributes : cogitation and extension
• Theory of parallelism
• Neutral monism
• Hume's separation between Matters of Fact and Relations of Ideas is often referred to as "Hume's
fork."
• According to him, relations of ideas can be proved with certainty, however, they don't really
mean anything about the world. Since they don't mean anything about the world, relations of
ideas cannot be used to prove matters of fact. Because of this, matters of fact have no certainty
and therefore cannot be used to prove anything.
• Hume's fork makes it pointless to try to prove the existence of God as a matter of fact.
• Kant’s response : analytic and synthetic distinction ; possibility of SAJ
• With this theory Berkeley attempts to explain self and other self, God and structure of the
universe
• See booklet
• Berkeley explains that we learn about our own minds by means of inward reflection, and that the
existence of God's mind is evinced by the mechanisms of nature that we observe around us.
However, we can't perceive minds like we do other objects. Later Berkeley introduces the term
'notion' and suggests that while we can't gain perceptual knowledge of minds we can at least
possess notional knowledge of their existence.
• Berkeley suggested that we do not just have notions of ourselves but also of other minds,
including God, and of relations between things. We arrive at our notions of ourselves by “inward
feeling or reflection,” at our notions of other minds by reasoning, and at our notions by,
presumably, intuition.
• Berkeley’s doctrine of notions raises some problems. If we can have notions of spirits, why can’t
we have notions of matter? Can notions exist apart from being perceived? If they can, why can’t
ideas?
Q.2
a) “Transcendentalism maintains a golden mean between exaggerated scepticism and
excessive claims of knowledge.” Critically examine the statement. 20
• Kant’s philosophy comes in the backdrop of debate between rationalism and empiricism
• critic of rationalism : overemphasised on reason, ends in dogmatism, makes castles in the air,
while of philosophy is based on ideas, lacking newness in the knowledge
• critic empiricism : ends in scepticism and dogmatism , lacking certainty in knowledge
• kantian solution : synthesis in 2 ways :
- SAJ
- Formation of knowledge
2022/23
b) Descartes builds a God centered system which was followed by Leibnitz and Berkeley. 15
• Descartes : Substance ; Idea of an all perfect being - cogito; veracity of God : external world
• Leibnitz : God : highest monad; teleological explanation; PEH : explains relation between
windowless monads
• Berkeley : refutation of materialism and establishment of theism ; esse est percipi
c) Critically examine the justification for the distinction between primary and secondary
qualities as given by Locke. 15
Q.3
a) In philosophy there has been major issue of reconciling problem of Being and
Becoming. How does different philosophers respond to this issue ? 20
• Explain reason and 3 ideas ; performs regulatory functions ; unifies and regulates understanding
itself
• Transcendental illusions
• functions
• Hume
• Hegel
c) What do you mean Hegel’s Dialectical Method and how does it improves upon
mathematical method ? 15
2022/23
• Define DM
• Principle of negation and contradiction
• Critic of Geometrical /mathematical method
• Absolute idealism ; concrete reality
• Characteristics of DM
Q.4
a) Are Kantian Space & Time subjective or objective ? Critically examine their significance
also. 20
• Define S & T
• They are subjective forms of sensibility but since they are in same way for all they are truly
objective ; synthesis of Newtonian and Leibnitz conception
• Their role in knowledge
• Metaphysical and transcendental exposition
Sec-B
b) How does Samkhya school justifies the word Samkhya in their philosophy ?
• Define Inference
• Classification
- Keval anvaya
- Keval vyatireki
- Anvaya vyatireki
• Briefly other classification
• Critic
e) Asiddha Hetvabhasa
Q.6
a) Discuss fully Pratyaksha as a pramana in Nyaya school. 20
• Define , conditions, process : mana acting as a mediator between self and senses
• Stages
• Types
• Jyestha Pramana
• Comparative study with Kant
b) Why Samkhya believes that various arguments could not prove the existence in God ? 15
c) Purusvisesa 15
Q.7
a) “Anumana is a cognition which presupposes another cognition”. Critically examine the
statement. 20
• Purusa : Nityamukta
• Ignorance – Phenomenal ego / Sopadhika Purusa – trapped in bondage , subject to 3 different
types of pain
• Liberation : Naistraiyagunya ; discriminative knowledge
2022/23
• Critic
Q.8
a) How do you differentiate between Klista and aklista vrittis ? Why Yoga stands for
cessation of vrittis ? 20
• Define Vrittis
• Klista : activities of bondage soul ; chittavrittis
• Aklista : vrittis of Jivanmukta
• Bondage : vicious cycle of klesa – chittavrittis – action and reaction – klesas
• Yoga is a spiritual effort for the perfection of soul, ultimate aim is the kaivalya through
discriminative knowledge
• Chittavrittisnirodha : samadhi
b) Panchavayavas 15
• Define anumana
• Swartha and Parartha Anumana
• 5 logical statements : Prtijna, hetu , udharan , upanaya and nigmana
• Application of vyapti and paramarsha
c) How do Samkhya and Nyaya school differ in terms of their theory of creation ? 15