Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The thermal decomposition of the halides and basic halides of copper( 1 1 ) have been studied by a thermogravimetric
method. The hydrated chloride loses water and then halogen to give the copper(!) compound which then oxidises
to copper(1 1 ) oxide ; the bromide behaves similarly. The basic chlorides dehydroxylate, then lose halogen, while
the basic bromide loses halogen first and then water. The behaviour of the hydrated fluoride and the basic iodide
is complicated by the simultaneous loss of water and halogen as hydrogen fluoride or iodine. Activation energies for
some of the reactions have also been derived.
BASIChalides of the divalent metals have been widely the dissolution of copper(I1) carbonate in aqueous hydro-
studied, and there is great confusion in the early litera- fluoric acid; the mixture was set aside for 24 hr., and then
ture.l This confusion has been reduced in recent years the precipitate was filtered off and washed with water and
ethanol (Found : Cu, 46.4. Calc. for H,CuF,O : 46.2%).,
by the work of Feitknecht and his co-workers,2who have
Copper(11) chloride dihydrate was AnalaR grade material.
clarified the methods of preparation and crystal structures Copper(I1)bromide was reagent grade material. The only
of most of the known compounds. The first-row transi- hydrate known to exist is the tetrahydrate, which is reported
tion metals form two groups of compounds of general to dehydrate at 40°.5 Attempts to prepare this hydrate
formula M (OH)X and M2(OH),X, which have simple were unsuccessful. Material which was crystallised from
structures derived from hexagonal or cubic close-packed water dehydrated continuously up to 120".
hydroxy and halide ions, with the metal ions in octa- Copper (11) hydroxide fluoride was prepared by heating
hedral sites3 a suspension of copper(I1)fluoride dihydrate in water under
Basic salts are of interest because of the variable modes reflux for 24 hr. ; the precipitate was filtered off and washed
of decomposition which exist, vix., dehydroxylation with water, ethanol, and ether (Found: Cu, 63.9. Calc.
followed by loss of halogen or vice versa. Those of for HCuFO: Cu, 63-8y0).4
Copper(I1) hydroxide chloride was made hydrotheriiially
copper are of particular interest because of their form- from a 4 : 1 mixture of copper(I1) chloride dihydrate and
ation during corrosion of the metal. copper(I1) oxide by treatment for 3 days a t 250" in a sealed
glass tube. Excess of copper(I1) chloride was removed by
EXPERIMENTAL washing the crystals with methanol (Found: Cu, 54.9.
All compounds used in the present study were prepared by Calc. for HC~CLIO:Cu, 54.75%). Attempts to prepare the
known methods with slight modifications, with the exception analogous bromide were unsuccessful; all experiments
of copper(I1) chloride dihydrate and copper(I1) bromide. produced dicopper(11) trihydroxide bromide.
The identity of each preparation was confirmed by X-ray Botallackite [u-Cu,(OH),Cl] was prepared by passing
diffraction. Copper(I1)fluoride dihydrate was prepared by carbon dioxide-free air into an aqueous solution of hydro-
chloric acid ( 0 . 1 ~ )and sodium chloride ( 2 ~ containing
)
1 See J. W. Mellor, 'A Treatise on Inorganic Chemistry,'
pieces of copper foil. After ca. 48 hr. the pH rose to 5 and
Longmans Green, London, 1923, vol. 3, p. 178.
( a ) H. R. Oswald and W. Feitnecht, Helv. Chirn. A d a , 1961,
44, 847; ( b ) 1964, 47, 272. C. M. Wheeler and H . H. Haendler, J . -4rner. Chem. SOC.,
W. Feitknecht, ' Essays in Co-ordination Chemistry,' 1954, 76, 263.
ed. W. Schneider, G. Anderegg, and R. Gut, Birkhauser Verlag, N. S. Kurnakov and A. A. Sementschenko, 2. anorg. Chem.,
Basel, 1964, p. 84. 1895, 9, 337.
View Article Online
1418 J. Chem. SOC. (A), 1968
the basic salt was precipitated (Found: Cu, 59.2. Calc. for ments could be made unambiguously from differential
H,ClCu,O, : CU, 59.5574). 6 weight loss curves.
Paratacamite (y-Cu,(OH),Cl) was prepared by the Thermal Decomposition.-Copper (11) chloride dihydrate
hydrolysis of copper(I1) hydroxychloride with cold water normally lost two molecules of water in a single step to
(Found: Cu, 59.3. Calc. for H,ClCu,O,: Cu, 59.557'0).2b
form the anhydrous material, although in one run an
Atacamite [8-Cu,(OH),Cl] was a sample from Wallaroo,
South Australia, supplied by the British Museum (off B.M. inflection corresponding to the monohydrate was ob-
35720). Traces of goethite were removed before the served a t 115". Copper(I1) chloride lost halogen at a
material was used. fairly low temperature to form copper(1) chloride which
Dicopper (11) trihydroxide bromide was prepared hydro- then volatilised and oxidised. Copper(I1) bromide also
thermally from moist copper(11) bromide and copper(I1) decomposed to give the copper(1) compound which then
oxide. Excess of copper(I1) bromide was removed with oxidised at a higher temperature.
methanol (Found: Cu, 49-0. Calc. €or H,BrCu,O,: Cu, Copper(I1)fluoride dihydrate did not dehydrate simply
Published on 01 January 1968 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/J19680001417
oxide plus halide or hydroxide, e.g. CuO,CuCI, as equation was used. The exception, copper hydroxide
+
CuO CuCl,, since the chlorine in this intermediate chloride, required the use of a ' second-order ' equation
is lost in a single step rather than two stages as for to produce a linear relationship. The concept of ' reac-
copper(I1) chloride itself. tion order in solid-state reactions has little theoretical
Kinetic Studies.-The method of Dave and Chopras justification, since many reactions are diffusion or
Downloaded by University of Oklahoma on 23 March 2013
was used to treat the experimental thermogravinietric nucleation controlled, and the concept of ' order ' takes
no account of either of these; it is only used here to
TABLE 2 follow the original authors' terminology.
Heating Activation energy The activation energies in Table 2 are much larger
rate (kcal./mole) than those heats of reaction which could be calculated;
Reaction ("lmin.) Average
this could indicate that the rate-controlling step was
Dehydration of CuC1,,2H20 0-6
1-2
4.0
:f
13.1
} 13.4 not chemical reaction but some other process such as
diffusion or nucleation. However, dynamic methods
Dehalogenation of CuCl, * 0.6 such as thermogravimetric or differential thermal
1.2
4.0 36.9 analysis often give higher activation energies than iso-
Dehalogenation of CuBr, t 0.6 thermal studies and it is for this reason that doubts have
1.2 28.5 been cast on the derivation of such energies. A convinc-
4.0 28.0 ing explanation of these high values has been given by
Oxidation of CuBr $ 0.6
1.2
4.0
40.2
32.6
45.2
} 41.0
Ingraham,lo in terms of the formation of highly energetic
intermediates by the rapid flow of heat into the sample
Dehydroxylation of Cu(0H)CI 0.6 under dynamic heating conditions. The formation of
1.2 54.0 these intermediates raises the activation energy over
4-0 53.8 that required for the comparable isothermal reaction.
Dehydroxylation of Cu,(OH) ,C1 0.6
1.2
4.0
::::}
70.6
70.0
Which of these situations holds for the compounds in
the present study, viz. diffusion or nucleation control vs.
Dehalogenation of Cu,(OH),Br 0.6
1.2
4.0
43.1
50.2
49-2
} 47.5
the formation of energetic intermediates, can only be
decided by relatively lengthy isothermal studies.
Although relatively few direct comparison can be made,
Dehydroxylation of Cu,(OH),Br 0.6
1.2
4.0
:;::}
56.5
59.0 it would appear that the stability of the various halides
decreases in the order F > C1 > Br > I and that the
* Heats of reaction (kcal./mole): * 17.0, t 8-3, 2 12.4. activation energies follow the same order. Srivastava
and Secco found a similar order of stability in the
curves. This involves calculation of rate constants from cadmium hydroxide halides,ll but a reverse order for
the differential weight loss us. temperature curve, from the zinc compounds.12
which normal log k vs. 1/T plots give the activation
energies for the reaction. [7/1311 Rcceiued, October llth, 19671
Not all of the reactions studied were suitable for this 10 T. R. Ingraham, Proceedings 1st Toronto Symposium on
kinetic treatment, due either to volatilisation of material, Thermal Analysis 1965,' ed. H . G. Mca4die, Chemical Institute of
Canada, p. 81.
* N. G. Dave and S. K. Chopra, 2. p h y s . Chem. (Frankjztrt), 11 0. K. Srivastava and E. A. Secco, Canad. J . Chenz., 1967,
1966, 48, 17. 45, 1375.
0. Kubaschewski, E. LI. Evans, and C. B. Alcock, ' Metal- l a 0. K. Srivastava and E . A. Secco, Canad. J . Chent., 1967,
lurgical Thermochemistry,' Pergamon, Oxford, 4th edn., 1967. 45, 579, 585.