Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Using Reilly’s Law – using the following information to determine what the distance is
Answer: - The Reilly’s law aims to find a point of indifference between two locations, so the
trading area of each can be determined. This point is assumed to be a function of the distance
between two locations pondered by their respective size (population often used for this purpose).
50.6
20.4
Mississauga Guelph
71 Kilometers
1+ 135,474 / 828,854
point of indifference should be halfway in between (35.5 km). However, since Mississauga has a
larger population (more weight), it is assumed to draw more customers. Under such
2. Is location theory useful? Yes. Location theory explains the basic, universal factors that
determine and influence the location of all kinds of economic activity. There are
economic geographic laws which determine the life of the economy, so are there special
entrepreneurship, knowledge exchange, and innovation. Location choices and its factors,
tools include:
Land and its attributes for instance the business size (retail or wholesale), the
The labor and management for instance the type of labour (skilled vs
The capital for instance finance and equipment, venture capital, machinery.
Market and price for instance cost of living, consumer demands, sales.
infrastructure.
Public policy, planning, and the state for instance the taxes to be paid to the
given business should be located. The business type influences the relative importance of these
factors.
3. Yes, it can be used for larger scales like regions and nations. Okun created the leaky
bucket analogy in Equality and Efficiency, the Big Tradeoff, which is becoming
renowned amongst economic experts: "The wealth has to be transported from the affluent
to the poor in a leaky bucket. Wealth pours into an area to spread throughout local
companies like water into a container in the leaky bucket analogy for regional industries.
Water leaking out symbolizes money leaving the economic growth to pay for imports.
The greater the water-tightness of the bucket, the greater the riches kept.
Since the government controls the economy of a region and the whole national large, transfer
of wealth through taxes from the comparatively wealthy to the relatively poor is a legitimate
government strategy. However, there is a loss of effectiveness in the distribution chain. Such
costs are ascribed to administration expenses associated with taxing and distributing, as well
as incentive effects. Since their welfare benefits are lowered when they earn more money, the
poor have less motivation to labor. Since higher marginal rates absorb a big portion of the
additional revenue, the wealthy have much less motivation to labor. The highly wealthy also
have a stronger motivation to invest on tax-deductible products and tax shelters in order to