Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The surface electrodes used to record from the digastric muscles were 9 ram.
concave discs, which were attached to the skin by means of adhesive tape. Electrode
salt paste jelly was used to make intimate contact between the disc and the skin.
The interelectrode resistance, by this method of attachment, varied between 5,000
and 11,000 ohms.
Fig. 1.--An electromyogram made during a forward protrusive movement of the mandible.
Note the increased electrical activity of the external pterygoid muscles during the movement.
F i g . 2 . - - A n e l e c t r o m y o g r a m m a d e d u r i n g a l e f t l a t e r a l m o v e m e n t of t h e m a n d i b l e , A r r o w s
indicate the beginning of movement. N o t e t h e i n c r e a s e d e l e c t r i c a l a c t i v i t y ( m a x i m a l ) of t h e
right external pterygoid muscle during this movement.
Volume 7
Number 3
ELECTROMYOGRAM IN .~IANDIBULAR HINGE AXIS THEORY 363
The basic wave form recorded from all electrodes showed some irregularity
on the electromyograms, at times coincidental with mandibular movements. This
irregularity or artifact was due to movement of the needle and of the lead wire
from it in the case of the needle electrodes, and to nlovement of the lead wires in
the case of the surface electrodes.
The authors served as subjects for the recordings of these controlled hinge
openings of the mandible and the other jaw movements performed. The sub-
jects were comfortably seated upright in an armchair with the eyes closed. The
following jaw movements were executed: regular (uncontrolled) opening, hinge
opening, retrusion, protrusion, and right and left lateral movements. Right and
left lateral movements and the forward protrusion of the mandible were used so
that correct interpretation of maximal and minimal electrical activity, as recorded
on the electromyogram from the external pterygoid muscles, could be determined.
These movements were also used to make certain that the electrodes were properly
placed. Recordings were made with the mandible in rest position for comparison.
F i g . 3 . - - A n e l e c t r o m y o g r a m m a d e d u r i n g r i g h t l a t e r a l m o v e m e n t of t h e m a n d i b l e ( e l e c t r o d e
p o s i t i o n s w e r e t h e s a m e as f o r r e c o r d s in F i g . 2). A r r o w s i n d i c a t e t h e b e g i n n i n g of m o v e m e n t .
N o t e t h e m i n i m u m of e l e c t r i c a l a c t i v i t y of t h e r i g h t e x t e r n a l p t e r y g o i d m u s c l e d u r i n g this m o v e -
ment.
RESULTS
The nmximal electrical activity of the right external pterygoid muscle was ob-
served in a protrusion or left lateral movement of the mandible (Figs. 1,2). A
similarity of the rest pattern for the external pterygoid muscle and the digastric
muscle with different types of electrodes is evident on the electromyogram. No
significant change was noted on the recording of the basic wave form, frequency,
or amplitude from either area of the right external pterygoid muscle during a right
lateral movement of the mandible (Fig. 3).
364 \VOELFEL~ H I C K E Y ~ A N D R I N E A R J. Pros. Den.
May, 1957
' ~ J= ~ i I ~ ! )i ~
F i g . 4 . - - A n e l e c t r o m y o g r a m m a d e d u r i n g a n u n c o n t r o l l e d ( r e g u l a r ) o p e n i n g of t h e m a n d i b l e .
T h e a r r o w i n d i c a t e s a n a r t i f a c t w h i c h w a s p r o d u c e d b y m o v e m e n t of t h e n e e d l e e l e c t r o d e a t
t h e b e g i n n i n g of t h e o p e n i n g . N o t e t h e i n c r e a s e d e l e c t r i c a l a c t i v i t y r e c o r d e d f r o m t h e e x t e r n a l
pterygoid muscle from both intraoral and extraoral needle electrodes.
F i g . 5 . - - A n e l e c t r o m y o g r a m m a d e d u r i n g a n u n c o n t r o l l e d ( r e g u l a r ) o p e n i n g of t h e m a n d i b l e .
T h e a r r o w i n d i c a t e s a n a r t i f a c t w h i c h w a s p r o d u c e d b y m o v e m e n t of the nee:tie e l e c t r o d e as
t h e j a w w a s closecl. N o t e t h e i n c r e a s e d e l e c t r i c a l a c t i v i t y f r o m b o t h t h e r i g h t a n d left e x t e r n a l
p t e r y g o i d m u s c l e s d u r i n g th;s m o v e m e n t .
Volume 7 ELECTROMYOGR,AM I N MANDIBULAR HINGE AXIS THEO2.Y 365
Number 3
F i g . 6 , - - A n e l e c t r o m y o g r a m m a d e d u r i n g a h i n g e o r r e t r u d e d o p e n i n g of t h e m a n d i b l e .
T h i s r e c o r d w a s m a d e a t t h e s a m e s i t t i n g as t h a t f o r F i g . 4, a n d t h e e l e c t r o d e p o s i t i o n w a s un-
c h a n g e d . T h e first a r r o w i n d i c a t e s t h e b e g i n n i n g of r e t r u s i o n of t h e m a n d i b l e p r i o r to o p e n -
ing. TLhe s e c o n d a r r o w i n d i c a t e s t h e b e g i n n i n g of t h e h i n g e o p e n i n g m o v e m e n t . Note the
l a c k of i n c r e a s e of e l e c t r i c a l a c t i v i t y f r o m t h e e x t e r n a l p t e r y g o i d m u s c l e o v e r t h a t of its r e s t -
ing potential. C o m p a r e this with the increased electrical activity f r o m this muscle d u r i n g
the uncontrolled opening (Fig, 4).
F i g . 7 . - - A n e l e c t r o m y o g r a m m a d e d u r i n g a r e t r u d e d h i n g e o p e n i n g of t h e m a n d i b l e .
T h i s r e c o r d w a s m a d e a t t h e s a m e s i t t i n g as t h a t f o r F i g . 5, a n d t h e e l e c t r o d e p o s i t i o n s w e r e
unchanged. T h e a r r o w s i n d i c a t e t h e b e g i n n i n g of t h e h i n g e o p e n i n g m o v e m e n t . Compare
t h e l a c k of i n c r e a s e of e l e c t r i c a l a c t i v i t y of t h e e x t e r n a l p t e r y g o i d m u s c l e s s e e n in t h i s h i n g e
o p e n i n g w i t h t h e i n c r e a s e f r o m t h e s e s a m e m u s c l e s d u r i n g t h e r e g u l a r o p e n i n g s e e n in Fig. 5.
366 WOELFEL~ HICKEY, AND RINEAR J. Pros. Den.
May, 1957
L . _ 2 j :
Fig. 8.--An electromyogram made during an opening continued beyond the maximal hinge
opening. Arrows indicate the point of maximal hinge opening. Increasing electrical activity
f r o m t h e e x t e r n a l p t e r y g o i d m u s c l e s is s e e n b e y o n d t h i s p o i n t a s t h e t r a n s l a t i n g c o m p o n e n t is
introduced into the movement.
DISCUSSION
It has been shown that there is no protrusive movement of the mandible if the
external pterygoid muscles are missing or are not functioning. There are no other
muscles capable of performing this movement. ''~
The hinge axis theory is based on the assumption that the mandible rotates
around a definite axis during a retruded hinge opening. The amount of this open-
ing that can be made in a hinge fashion varies with the individual. If the condyle
should move forward in the glenoid fossa, during what is thought to be a hinge
movement, then there could be no single axis for this movement. If such forward
movement were to occur, it could only be the result of action of the external
pterygoid muscles, unless a posterior fulcrum below the level of the condyle was
encountered.
Volume 7
Number 3
ELECTROMYOGRAM IN MANDIBULAR HINGE AXIS THEORY 367
CONCLUSIONS