Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Responsibility refers to the duty or obligation to satisfactorily perform or complete a task (assigned by someone, or
created by one’s own promise or circumstances) that one must fulfill, and which has a consequent penalty for failure.
Accountability refers to the obligation of an individual or organization to account for its activities, accept
responsibility for them, and to disclose the results in a transparent manner.
Accountability vs. Responsibility
- The main difference between responsibility and accountability is that responsibility can be shared while
accountability cannot. Being accountable not only means being responsible for something but also ultimately being
answerable for your actions. Also, accountability is something you hold a person to only after a task is done or not
done.
- In ethics and governance, accountability is answerability, blameworthiness, liability, and expectation of account-
giving, while responsibility may refer to being in charge, being the owner of a task or event.
- Responsibility can be before and/or after a task. Accountability owes an explanation, while responsibility does not
necessarily owe an explanation.
E. Unfair communication
- Lying; Presenting misleading file notes; Concealing large debts: Obstruction of justice by shredding documents that
could be used for legal issues; Deliberately concealing large losses in projects; Reporting false stories;
Underreporting of profit; Provision of unsuitable financial advice to customers
G. Environmental degradation
1. Deterioration of environment through depletion of resources such as air, water, and soil
2. Destruction of ecosystems
3. Extinction of wildlife
H. Contractualization
- Replacing of regular workers with temporary workers who receive lower wages with no or less benefits; they do the
work of regular workers for a specified and limited period of time; they never become regular employees even if
they get rehired repeatedly under new contracts
Chapter 10: Models and Frameworks of Social Responsibility in the Practice of Sound Business
a. Economic responsibilities
- The first criterion of social responsibility is economic responsibility.
- The business institution’s responsibility is to produce goods and services that a society wants and to maximize
profit for its owners and shareholders but it should not be treated as the only social responsibility as it could
lead companies into trouble.
b. Legal responsibilities
- Defines what society deems as important with respect to appropriate corporate behavior and businesses are
expected to fulfill their economic goals within the legal framework.
c. Ethical responsibilities
- Includes behavior that is not necessarily codified into law and may not serve the organization’s direct
economic interests
- To be ethical, organization’s decision makers should act with equity, fairness, and impartiality, respect the
rights of individuals, and provide different treatments of individual only when differences between them are
relevant to the organization’s goals and tasks.
d. Discretionary responsibilities
- The highest criterion of social responsibility because it goes beyond societal expectations to contribute to the
community’s welfare
- Purely voluntary and guided by an organization’s desire to make social contributions not mandated by
economics, laws, or ethics
- Include generous philanthropic contributions that offer no payback to the organization and are not expected.
B. The Four-Way Test Framework
Herbert J. Taylor (18 April 1893 – 1 May 1978)
- A business executive, civic leader, and sponsor of Christian organizations who belonged to the United States of
America
- Set out to save the Club Aluminum Products distribution company from bankruptcy
- He wrote down the following twenty-four words which he believed was a simple, easily remembered guide to
right conduct – a sort of ethical yardstick – which all of those who are in the company could memorize and apply
to what they thought, said and did:
1. Is it the truth?
2. Is it fair to all concerned?
3. Will it build goodwill and better friendships?
4. Will it be beneficial to all concerned?
- He called the above The Four-Way Test of the things one thinks, says or does.
THE FOUR-WAY TEST is the exemplary Framework of Corporate Social Responsibility and has been used and
emphasized by several public service organizations in the US and other countries for many years. It is short and
simple but has broad application to all types of organizational activities. In a given situation, all of these guidelines
may not be entirely satisfactory but they do provide a set of useful criteria that are easily remembered.
C. Criteria for Decision Making
Most ethical dilemmas involve conflict between the needs of the part and of the whole the individual versus
the organization or the organization versus society as a whole. Managers faced with tough ethical choices often benefit
from a normative strategy to guide their decision making. Four of these approaches that are relevant to managers are
the following:
a. Utilitarian approach
- This is the ethical concept that moral behaviors produce the greatest good to the greatest number. Under this
approach, a decision maker is expected to consider the effect of each decision alternative on all parties and select
the one that optimizes the satisfaction of the greatest number of people.
b. Individualism approach
- This is the ethical concept that acts are moral if they promote the individual’s best long term interests which
ultimately leads to greater good.
c. Moral-rights approach
- This is the ethical concepts that moral decisions are those that best maintains the rights of those people affected
by them.
- Six moral rights that should be considered during decision making are:
1. The right of free consent.
2. The right to privacy.
3. The right of freedom of conscience.
4. The right of free speech.
5. The right of due process.
6. The right to life and safety.
d. Justice approach
- This is the ethical concept that moral decisions must be based on standards of equity, fairness, and impartiality.
Reference:
Jerusalem, V.L., Palencia, M.M., & Palencia, J.M. (2017). Business Ethics and Social Responsibility: Concepts, Principles, &
Practices of Ethical Standards. Manila, Philippines: Published and distributed by Fastbooks Educational Supply, Inc.