Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3/4, 1995
Brief Report
1The authors wish to thank Adele LeMaire for her assistance with the data collection.
ZTo whom correspondence should be addressed at 343 Bethune College, York University,
4700 Keele Street, North York, Ontario, M3J 1P3, Canada.
277
0360-0025/95/0800-0277507.50/0© 1995PlenumPublishingCorporation
278 Dionne et al.
METHOD
Subjects
Measures
1. Body Dissatisfaction
(a) General Body Dissatisfaction: (GBD) was assessed by a modified
version of the Body Cathexis Scale (Secord & Jourard, 1953). An
overall GBD score was obtained by summing the respondents'
ratings of 10 parts of their bodies.
(b) Specific Body Dissatisfaction: (SBD) was assessed by the Body
Dissatisfaction subscale of the Eating Disorder Inventory (Garner
& Olmsted, 1984).
2. Neuroticism (N) was' measured by the 24-item N scale from The
Eysenck Personality Inventory, Form A (Eysenck and Eysenck,
1968).
3. Physical Activity Participation (Activity): Participants were
questioned about the frequency, and duration in minutes (1-30,
30-60, 60-90, and 90+) of their participation in physical activity
280 Dionne et al.
over the past four weeks. For each activity (e.g., bicycling,
swimming, aerobics) the frequency of the activity was multiplied
by its duration category (1, 2, 3, or 4). A total score was obtained
by summing across activities.
. Body Mass Index [weight(kg)/height2(m)] (BMI) was calculated.
Weight was measured using a Seca spring scale, and height with
a standard metal measuring tape with participants standing in
stocking feet.
. The Composite Feminist Ideology Scale (CFIS) is a compilation
and modification of three separate measures of feminist ideology
designed for the purpose of this study to assess degree of
concordance with the tenets of the women's movement (Dionne,
1992). The scale contains seven subscales (Inequality Recognition;
Domestic Issues; Job Equality, Reproductive Rights; Social
Gender Differences; Legal Issues; and Physical Attractiveness).
Subjects rated items on a four-point scale from strongly disagree
to strongly agree. For conceptual clarity in the analysis, the total
CFIS score was obtained by summing six of the seven sub-scales,
excluding Physical Attractiveness (PA), which was treated as a
separate variable.
Procedure
RESULTS
Descriptive Statistics
Means, standard deviations, and minima and maxima for all variables
used in the analyses are given in Table I. The statistics reported here are
similar to those obtained iia earlier validation studies, or where those are
not available, in recent studies using similar samples (Garner & Olmsted,
1984; Eysenck & Eysenck, 1968; Davis, Shapiro, Elliott, & Dionne, 1993;
and Ministry of Health & Welfare, 1988). A correlation matrix of all vari-
ables used in the analyses is presented in Table II.
Feminist Ideology and Body Dissatisfaction 281
Regression Analyses
U~ ~
t-¢3 ~ t~ ~ ~
:q
>1
Feminist Ideology and Body Dissatisfaction 283
• q o. o.
> ~- O0 I~ O~ ~_~
0
"8
O
001.¢~ t.xl ~ ~00
~.~ .o o . ~o ~ .~ o.~
I!1
o
"0
0
(D
~P
0
>.~
>
C/3 ~.v
284 Dionne et al.
the model, while the total feminism score does not. Unique variance ac-
counted for by this PA subscale is 2.5%.
Specific Body Dissatisfaction (SBD). Table IV shows the results of the
hierarchical regression analysis using SBD as the dependent variable, with
194 observations after removing records with missing data.
This model showed results similar to those using GBD as the depend-
ent variable (note that GBD and SBD are highly correlated), yet the full
model in this analysis accounted for somewhat greater variance (R 2 = 0.36).
BMI and neuroticism again proved to be highly significant predictors in
the hypothesized direction. Unlike the previous analysis, in this case age
was significantly and negatively related to specific body dissatisfaction. That
is, the younger a subject was, the more dissatisfied she was with her body.
As in the previous analysis, lower scores on the physical attractiveness CFIS
subscale were predictive of increased specific body dissatisfaction, while the
total score of the CFIS was not significantly related.
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Wooley, O., Wooley, S., & Dyrenforth, S. (1979). Obesity and women II: A neglected feminist
topic. Women's Studies International Quarterly, 2, 81-92.
Wooley, S., & Wooley, O. (1984). Should obesity be treated at all? In A. J. Stunkard & E.
Stellar (Eds.), Eating and its disorders. New York: Raven Press.
Xinaris, S., & Boland, E (1990). Disordered eating in relation to tobacco use, alcohol
consumption, self-control and sex-role ideology. International Journal of Eating Disorders,
9, 425-433.