SA6021 ANALISIS SISTEM DAN PENGAMBILAN

KEPUTUSAN SDA

Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)

Analisis Keputusan Multi-kriteria (AKMK)
Magister Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Air – November 2020
Dr. Dhemi Harlan, S.T., M.T, M.Sc.
Dr. Ir. M. Cahyono
Faizal I. W. Rohmat, S.T., M.T., Ph.D
Review Teori MCDA
SA-6021 ANALISIS SISTEM DAN PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN SDA
Multicriteria Decision Analysis
[MCDA] are applied when
decisions are discrete, prior-
articulated alternatives (not
continuous).
For example, these may be
discrete solutions selected from
the (infinite) set of nondominated
solutions.
Main idea: how can we order or
rank alternatives within this set?
(I,P,R) or Indifference-Preference-
Incomparable Relations
Attempt partial preordering (or
ranking) of alternatives, or…
complete preordering
Weighted Average Method
SA-6021 ANALISIS SISTEM DAN PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN SDA
Criteria Alternatives
1. Flood protection 1. No action (do nothing)
2. Multiple use of floodway 2. Purchase of the Floodplain
3. Enhancement of property value 3. Park Greenway (North)
4. Aesthetic value 4. Park Greenway (South)
5. Relative neighborhood improvement 5. Basic Greenway
6. Number of family relocation 6. Concrete Channel
7. Project Cost 7. Bypass Conduit
8. Maintenance cost 8. Purchase and Redevelopment of
9. Ease of consctruction Floodplain (Combines 2 and 3)
10. Legal obstacles
Latihan Tugas
Lakukan ulang analisis MCDA dengan metode weighted average seperti yang telah
dilakukan sebelumnya.
Namun ganti bobot kriteria sesuai lingkungan kerja masing-masing mahasiswa.
PROM THÉE
SA-6021 ANALISIS SISTEM DAN PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN SDA
Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluation (Brans et al.,
1986)

PROMÉTHÉE is an outranking method, used to compare alternatives as a decision

aid.

Pairwise comparison of alternatives:

• differences in criteria values for each alternative mapped to preference function
• preference function values between 0 and 1—No. need for scaling for different
units.
Measure of intensity of preference of a over b
0 ≤ 𝑃 𝑎, 𝑏 ≤ 1

=0 𝑑 =𝑓 𝑎 −𝑓 𝑏 ≤0 no preference
≅0 𝑑 =𝑓 𝑎 −𝑓 𝑏 >0 weak preference
𝑃 𝑎, 𝑏
<1 𝑑 =𝑓 𝑎 −𝑓 𝑏 ≫0 strong preference
=1 𝑑 = 𝑓 𝑎 − 𝑓 𝑏 >>> 0 strict preference
7 teaching job offers 7 criteria
• 𝑎1 Univ 1 • 𝑓1 9-mo. Salary ($)
• 𝑎2 Univ 2 • 𝑓2 Ave. Teaching Load
• 𝑎3 Univ 3 • 𝑓3 Geographic Location
• 𝑎4 Univ 4 • 𝑓4 Summer Salary ($)
• 𝑎5 Univ 5 • 𝑓5 Research Support
• 𝑎6 Univ 6 • 𝑓6 Reputation
• 𝑎7 Univ 7
 Evaluation Table Parameters
Criteria min|max a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 Type q p s wi
9-mo. Salary ($) f1 max 24,000 23,000 26,000 27,500 22,000 III -- 2000 -- 0.167
Ave. Teaching Load f2 min 9 7.5 10.5 12 6 IV 2 4 -- 0.167
Geographic Location f3 max 2 3 5 2 4 II 2 -- -- 0.167
Summer Salary ($) f4 max 4,800 4,600 2,600 5,500 6,000 V 500 1000 -- 0.167
Research Support f5 max 4 4 3 1 5 VI -- -- 1.5 0.167
Reputation f6 max 3 2 4 5 1 I -- -- -- 0.167
Latihan Tugas
Lakukan ulang analisis MCDA dengan metode PROMETHEE seperti yang telah
dilakukan sebelumnya.
Namun ganti bobot kriteria sesuai lingkungan kerja masing-masing mahasiswa,
gambarkan preference graph yang baru, baik untuk PROMETHEE I maupun
PROMETHEE II.