System design should be based on user/customer requirements and the following basic Integrated Logistic Support requirements should be considered as part of Requirements Engineering: 1. Number of Maintenance levels 2. Maintenance Support personals capabilities 3. Maintenance Training limitations 4. Technical Manuals limitations 5. Field Reliability 6. Mean Time to Repair at each Maintenance level The first requirement, the number of maintenance levels, should be in place before detailed design starts as it is almost impossible to modify later during the detail design stage. Any fielded system should be supported by existing maintenance personal with known abilities and learning potential and addressed early on in the detailed design phases. In practice, during the establishment of the system, the top level configuration support requirement should drive the number of maintenance levels and, additionally, how and by whom the system will be supported and operated. Once these requirements are established, detailed design can start, it is difficult to influence the top system configuration once detailed design started.
2. Maintenance Planning & Supply Support
Maintenance requirements and supply resources needed to maintain a specific piece of equipment or an overall system. It’s developed from the maintenance and supply concept preliminary identification and is refined over the lifecycle of a piece of equipment or system. It contains information related to the system maintenance concept; the logistics support infrastructure, expected durations of support, reliability and maintainability rates; and support locations. It describes how: 1. Maintenance concept will be implemented, 2. Prescribes actions for each significant maintenance task that will be required for the system/ equipment during its life cycle, 3. Explains technical requirements (where and how maintenance will be performed), 4. Incorporates detailed support concepts and resource requirements, 5. Lists the significant consumable items, and 6. Lists for each repairable item the supply, maintenance, and recoverability requirements/sources. 7. Positions and delivers materiel to satisfy highly variable readiness and combat sustainment needs in a variety of unique and demanding environments. 8. Meets all materiel management and maintenance statutory requirements. 9. Improves readiness through performance-based sustainment strategies. 10. Establishes end-to-end processes focused on outcomes.
3. Packaging Handling Storage and Transportation
Packaging, handing, storage, and transportability (PHST) is one of many subsystems, which must be considered in a system engineering effort. In its simplest essence, PHST management provides a manager with the capability of having a useful system, assuring him that its elements can be delivered to the user. Efficient PHST has significant impact on system effectiveness, reliability, maintainability, and safety. PHST consumes a measurable percentage of overall cost and is, therefore, a significant element of life cycle investment. Optimizing the PHST system is one essential in optimising the parent system. The degree to which PHST suboptimising contributes to optimising the system is directly dependent upon the management emphasis received during all phases of the life cycle. Packaging, handling, and storage equipment in support of the system and its components for logistical and tactical movement as defined in the system requirements (material need, required operational capability, and operational requirement) shall be considered and plans on potential transportability problem items shall be formulated. A specific PHST concept shall be expanded to cover the following areas: a. Specific logistic operations and identification of each item of PHST equipment required to support system prime md critical items throughout the life cycles shall be formulated. b. The logistic flow analysis shall be used as the basis for determining what new items of PHST equipment require development. c. Determining specific PHST design requirements. The specific PHST design requirements and associated evaluations applicable to the PHST equipment shall be determined. d. Trade-off studies. In selecting pertinent PHST design concepts, the following trade off studies shall be made, as a minimum: i. Cost of ownership. Studies of cost of ownership shall include cost of transportation, PHST equipment, and costs of inventory in motion. ii. Large items which might be capable of shipment without crate. Relative costs of the alternate methods, relative times involved, alternative methods of protection, tentative methods for securing to the transit vehicle, and how they will be packaged and shipped to insure necessary concurrency at the reassembly point. iii. Items requiring development or use of special transport equipment
4. Life Cycle Cost
Life Cycle Cost (LCC) is an estimate of the total costs, direct and indirect, of an asset during its lifetime, including conceptual planning, development, procurement, production, operations, in service support and disposal. Main elements are: a. Definition of systems requirements. A system configuration baseline must be established and then changes to this baseline may be evaluated systematically and in a controlled manner b. Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS). A cost tree with the following characteristics: i. All system cost elements must be considered ii. Cost categories well identified and defined iii. Cost structure and categories coded (design, manufacturing, spares, maintenance, etc.) iv. CBS associated to the Work Breakdown Structure and with the management accounting procedures used in collecting costs v. Supplier costs to be separated from the other costs c. Cost Estimating. Expected cost to be accrued in the acquisition and/or utilization of the asset. Derived from: i. Known factors or rates ii. Estimating methodologies (analogous and/or parametric) iii. Expert opinion d. Cost Model. Combining the cost elements and cost categories to cost data as results of cost estimating e. Cost Profile. When costs are determined for each year in the life cycle and inflated to reflect real budgetary estimates, the cost profile over the time is shown f. Evaluation of alternatives. Appropriated profiles are compared, a break-even analysis is accomplished and the preferred approach is selected.