Professional Documents
Culture Documents
It was concluded that China’s claims were contrary to UNCLOS and exceeded the geographic
limits imposed by it since it failed to prevent fishermen from Chinese flagged vessels from
harvesting (a) endangered species on a significant scale and (b) in such a manner as to destroy
the coral reef ecosystem. Furthermore, the tribunal held that the ecosystem of the coral reef was
severely and permanently harmed by China's reclamation of land and construction of artificial
islands, facilities, and buildings in the Spratly Islands. With these, we can say that we did not only
win the case, but also exposed China of its indecent, unjust and illegal ways of propagating their
sovereign and economic gains.
However, despite the ruling, there is still the aftermath where conflict still exists. A dispute like this
will not be resolved only by education. We have to be realist as education with no expedient
measures—probably a more intelligent and aggressive move to counter China’s acts would be fultile.
It is a good to start to educate the filipino people. It is good that we start with our people. Hence, if
the government could only make use of their machinery to educate not only the Filipinos, but also
others, just like the presentation fo Justice Carpio, but more on a simple and more layman approach
then it would be easeir for us. Moreover, China rendering the arbitration ruling as illegal and void
and therefore without any binding effect per se is an explicit rejection of the decision and an
explicit disrespect to the treating binding them internationally. This means that even if we won the
case, we cannot just rely on it alone. I hope the government, especially those who are seated will
be more “Filipino” in committing to their public office. I also hope that the government will fulfill
their duties that might be outside of this topic but may still affect it (i.e. economic and even
personal ties), because personal is political; everything is political. —Mangudadatu, Rohanie M.