CONCLUSION

As for the conclusion of this case study, we researchers jumped to

conclusion that the proposed shapes and designs of the Mortarless
Interlocking Hollow Blocks for non-load bearing are not essential for the
construction. Moreover, the cost of Mortarless Interlocking Hollow
Blocks are less expensive as compared to conventional CHB as it was
evidently shown during computation.
We researchers discovered that the strength of the Mortarless
Interlocking Hollow Blocks satisfied the ASTM and PTSS standards
based from the conducted compressive strength test per block. However,
the compressive strength testing was not included on the process. Thus,
additional testing suggested to be executed to conclude the material
quality is exemplary
With that being said, utilizing the MICHB for non-load bearing is not
highly recommended for structural purposes and it is not indeed
economical. To recapitulate, all of the stated problems and primary aims
were handled rationally and objectively.
We researchers obtained the data and conclusions through the help of
existing studies and with the assistance of further investigation. Indeed,
further study must be conducted in order to satisfy the construction
requirements and to fulfill the prerequisites for developing low-cost
residential structures in relation to the MICHB material.

So that ends our presentation. At this point, the floor is now open for
questions and recommendations. Thank you for listening, ma'am.