Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CLJURIS3
CRIMINAL LAW BOOK 2
MODULE 2
Submitted by:
Submitted to:
Date Given:
Deadline/Date of Submission:
INSTURCTIONS:
1. Please rename the module file to your last name, subject, and module number.
(ex. Lumiqued-BOOK2-2)
2. You can send your finished module to my email. (spadeconstantino17@gmail.com)
3. Edit this document and insert your answers.
4. Follow the format of this document all through-out the module.
1. Doctrine of Absorption
The doctrine of absorption of common crimes (also called Hernandez doctrine) is a rule
that enunciates that the ingredients of a crime form part and parcel thereof and hence,
are absorbed by the same and cannot be punished either separately therefrom or by the
application of Article 48 of the Revised Penal Code.
can misappropriate the act to designate the actors of conflicts as terrorists, and thereby
close much-needed space for peace building .
Facts: On May 23, 2017, President Rodrigo Duterte issued Proclamation No. 216,
declaring Martial Law in the whole island of Mindanao and the suspension of the
privilege of the writ of habeas corpus therein. On May 25, the president submitted a
written report to Congress on the factual basis of the Martial Law declaration (as
required by the Constitution). The main basis of the declaration was the attack of the
Maute terrorist group in Marawi City. According to the report, the Maute group is an
affiliate of ISIS which is aiming to establish an Islamic caliphate in Marawi City (and
might spread its control in all the other parts of Mindanao). It also cited the ongoing
rebellion and lawless violence that has plagued Mindanao for decades.
i. To prevent the promulgation or execution of any law or the holding of any popular
election;
ii. To prevent the National Government, or any provincial or municipal government, or any
public officer thereof from freely exercising its or his functions, or prevent the execution
of any administrative order;
iii. To inflict any act of hate or revenge upon the person or property of any public officer or
employee;
iv. To commit, for any political or social end, any act of hate or revenge against private
persons or any social class; and
v. To despoil, for any political or social end, any person, municipality or province, or the
National Government of all its property or any party thereof.
1. Elements
i. Offenders rise publicly and tumultuously;
ii. Offenders rmploy force, intimidation, or by other means outside of legal
method;
iii. Purpose is attain any of the following objects:
a) to prevent the promulgation or execution of any law or the holding of
any popular election;
b) to prevent the National Government, or any provincial or municipal
government, or any public officer thereof from freely exercising its or
his functions, or prevent the execution of any administrative order;
c) to inflict any act of hate or revenge upon the person or property of an
public officer or employee;
d) to commit, for any political or social end, any act of hate or revenge
against private persons or any social class; and
e) to despoil, for any political or social end, any person, municipality or
province, or the National Government of all its property or any part
thereof.
traffic infractions. After a trial in New York state court, the jury convicted Cabrera on all
counts. The appellate division affirmed the convictions. The Court of Appeals of New
York granted Cabrera's petition for review. Cabrera argued that the evidence adduced at
trial was insufficient as a matter of law to sustain his convictions for criminally negligent
homicide and third-degree assault; and, in the alternative, that he was entitled to a new
trial because the trial judge's instructions were erroneous.
Issue: Was Cabrera guilty of negligent homicide and third-degree assault when he failed
to negotiate the curve while driving, causing the car to crash and leaving the other
passengers injured and dead?
Issue: whether or not the theatrical performance of Tolentino were acts of inciting to
sedition.
Issue: Whether the accused is liable of seditious libel under Art. 142 of the RPC against
the Government of the Philippines?
H. ART. 143. ACTS TENDING TO PREVENT THE MEETING OF THE ASSEMBLY AND SIMILAR BODIES
The penalty of prisión correccional or a fine ranging from Forty thousand pesos (₱40,000) to
Four hundred thousand pesos (₱400,000), or both, shall be imposed upon any person who, by
force or fraud, prevents the meeting of Congress or of any of its committees or subcommittees,
1. Elements
i. There be a projected or actual meeting of either the Congress, Constitutional
Commission or any of the provincial board or city or municipal council;
ii. The offender, who may be any person, prevents such meeting by force or fraud.
1. Elements
i. There is an actual meeting of either of the House of the Legislature, or of any
provincial board or city or municipal council or board; and
ii. The offender does any of the following acts
a) He disturbs any of such meetings
b) He behaves while in the presence of any such bodies in such a manner
as to interrupt its proceedings or to impair the respect due it.
The penalty of prision correccional in its minimum and medium periods and a fine not exceeding
1,000 pesos shall be imposed upon the founders, directors, and presidents of associations
totally or partially organized for the purpose of committing any of the crimes punishable under
this Code or for some purpose contrary to public morals. Mere members of said associations
shall suffer the penalty of arresto mayor. (Reinstated by E.O. No. 187).
penalty of prisión correccional in its minimum period and a fine not exceeding One hundred
thousand pesos (₱100,000) shall be imposed. (Art. 148, Revised Penal Code, as amended by RA
10951)
iii. That at the time of the assault, the person in authority or his agent
(a) is engaged in the actual performance of official duties, or
(b) is assaulted by reason of the past performance of official duties;
iv. That the offender knows that the one he is assaulting is a person in authority or
his agent in the exercise of his duties; and
v. That there is no public uprising (Guelos v. People, G.R. No. 177000, June 19,
2017).
1. Elements
articles shall resist or seriously disobey any person in authority, or the agents of such person,
while engaged in the performance of official duties.
When the disobedience to an agent of a person in authority is not of a serious nature, the
penalty of arresto menor or a fine ranging from Two thousand pesos (₱2,000) to Twenty
thousand pesos (₱20,000) shall be imposed upon the offender (Art. 151, Revised Penal Code, as
amended by RA 10951).
TUMULTUOUS - caused by more than 3 persons who are armed or provided with means
of violence.
iii. Any person who, while wandering about at night or while engaged in any other
nocturnal amusements, shall disturb the public peace; or
iv. Any person who, while intoxicated or otherwise, shall cause any disturbance or
scandal in public places: Provided that the circumstances of the case shall not
make the provisions of article 153 applicable. (Art. 155, Revised Penal Code, as
amended by RA 10951)
2. Define ‘charivari’
Charivari includes a medley of discordant voices, a mock serenade of discordant noises
made on kettles, tins, horns, etc. designed to annoy or insult.
1. Elements
i. There is a person confined in a jail or penal establishment;
ii. The offender removes therefrom such person, or helps the escape of such
person.
violence or intimidation, or through connivance with other convicts or employees of the penal
institution, the penalty shall be prision correccional in its maximum period. (Revised Penal Code)
1. Elements
i. Offender is a convict by final judgment.
ii. He is serving his sentence which consists in deprivation of liberty (destierro
included)
iii. He evades the service of his sentence by escaping during the term of his
sentence (Tanega vs. Masakayan, GR L-27191, Feb. 28, 1967)
Convicts who, under the circumstances mentioned in the preceding paragraph, shall give
themselves up to the authorities within the above mentioned period of 48 hours, shall be
entitled to the deduction provided in Article 98. (Revised Penal Code)
1. Elements
i. Offender is a convict by final judgment who is confined in a penal institution.
ii. There is disorder, resulting from -
a. conflagration,
b. earthquake,
c. explosion, or
d. similar catastrophe, or
e. mutiny in which he has not participated
iii. He evades the service of his sentence by leaving the penal institution where he
is confined, on the occasion of such disorder or during the mutiny.
iv. He fails to give himself up to the authorities within 48 hours following the
issuance of a proclamation by the chief executive announcing the passing away
of such calamity.
“Art. 98. Special time allowance for loyalty. – A deduction of one fifth of the period of
his sentence shall be granted to any prisoner who, having evaded his preventive
imprisonment or the service of his sentence under the circumstances mentioned in
Article 158 of this Code, gives himself up to the authorities within 48 hours following the
issuance of a proclamation announcing the passing away of the calamity or catastrophe
referred to in said article. A deduction of two-fifths of the period of his sentence shall be
granted in case said prisoner chose to stay in the place of his confinement
notwithstanding the existence of a calamity or catastrophe enumerated in Article 158 of
this Code.
Y. ART. 160. COMMISSION OF ANOTHER CRIME DURING SERVICE OF PENALTY IMPOSED FOR
ANOTHER PREVIOUS OFFENSE
Besides the provisions of Rule 5 of Article 62, any person who shall commit a felony after having
been convicted by final judgment, before beginning to serve such sentence, or while serving the
same, shall be punished by the maximum period of the penalty prescribed by law for the new
felony.
Any convict of the class referred to in this article, who is not a habitual criminal, shall be
pardoned at the age of seventy years if he shall have already served out his original sentence, or
when he shall complete it after reaching the said age, unless by reason of his conduct or other
circumstances he shall not be worthy of such clemency. (Revised Penal Code)
2. Elements
i. Offender is convicted by final judgment of one offense
ii. He commits another felony before beginning to serve such sentence or while
serving the same.
Whereas in quasi-recidivism:
1.The convictions are not for crimes embraced in the same Title of the Revised Penal
Code, provided that it is a felony that was committed by the offender before serving
sentence by final judgment for another crime or while serving sentence for another
crime; and
2.This circumstance is a special aggravating circumstance, which cannot be offset by
any mitigating circumstance